scholarly journals Reliability, validity and cut-off score of the Chinese version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale Self-Report form in patients with panic disorder

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xitong Liu ◽  
Tingting Xu ◽  
Dandan Chen ◽  
Chen Yang ◽  
Pei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Panic Disorder ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Chinese Version ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Severity Scale

Abstract Background Panic disorder (PD) is often undiagnosed, misdiagnosed, or untreated in non-psychiatric clinical settings. Therefore, a cost-effective, accurate and easy-to-administer instrument for PD assessment is still needed. For that reason, the self-report version of the Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS-SR) has been developed and suggested to be a reliable and useful tool in clinical and research settings. The current study aims to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the PDSS-SR and determine the cut-off score of the PDSS-SR. Methods A total of 133 patients with PD in Shanghai were assessed by the PDSS-SR, PDSS and Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA). Moreover, 117 patients with non-PD anxiety and 51 healthy subjects also completed the PDSS-SR to construct a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with the scores of PD patients. Results The internal consistency (Cronbach’s α) of the PDSS-SR was 0.72-0.80, and the interrater correlation coefficient was 0.78. The results of principal component analysis and varimax rotation indicated that the PDSS-SR had a two-factor structure, with all seven items having salient loadings. The cut-off score was 4, which was associated with high sensitivity (96.03%) and specificity (61.31%). Conclusions The findings demonstrate that these items and the total score of the PDSS-SR have acceptable reliability and validity in patients with PD and that the PDSS-SR can be used by general doctors for clinical screening in China.

scholarly journals Reliability, validity and cut-off score of the Chinese version of the panic disorder severity scale self-report form in patients with panic disorder

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xitong Liu ◽  
Tingting Xu ◽  
Dandan Chen ◽  
Chen Yang ◽  
Pei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Panic Disorder ◽  
Chinese Version ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Severity Scale

scholarly journals Reliability and Validity of the Thai Version of the Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ratana Saipanish ◽  
Thanita Hiranyatheb ◽  
Manote Lotrakul
Keyword(s):  
Rating Scale ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Internal Consistency Reliability ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Symptom Checklist ◽  
Global Assessment Of Functioning ◽  
Severity Scale ◽  
Obsessive Compulsive ◽  
Compulsive Disorder ◽  
Patient Health

This study aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Thai version of the FOCI (FOCI-T), which is a brief self-report questionnaire to assess the symptoms and severity of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Forty-seven OCD patients completed the FOCI-T, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), and the Pictorial Thai Quality of Life (PTQL). They were then interviewed to determine the OCD symptom severity by the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale-Second Edition (YBOCS-II) and depressive symptoms by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), together with the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scales (CGI-S). The result showed that the FOCI-T had satisfactory internal consistency reliability on both the Symptom Checklist (KR-20 = 0.86) and the Severity Scale (α=0.92). Regarding validity analyses, the FOCI-T Severity Scale had stronger correlations with the YBOCS-II and CGI-S than the FOCI-T Symptom Checklist. This implied the independence between the FOCI-T Symptom Checklist and the Severity Scale and good concurrent validity of the FOCI-T Severity Scale. Our results suggested that the FOCI-T was found to be a reliable and valid self-report measure to assess obsessive-compulsive symptoms and severity.

Panic Disorder Severity Scale-Self-Report--2-item Version

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Forsell ◽  
Martin Kraepelien ◽  
Kerstin Blom ◽  
Nils Isacsson ◽  
Susanna Jernelöv ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Panic Disorder ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Severity Scale

scholarly journals Psychometric properties of the HIV/AIDS Knowledge Scale for Spanish adolescents (HIV-KS) / Propiedades psicométricas de la Escala de Conocimientos sobre VIH/SIDA para adolescentes (VIH-KS)

2009 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
José P. Espada ◽  
Tania B. Huedo-Medina ◽  
Mireia Orgilés ◽  
Roberto Secades ◽  
Rafael Ballester ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Discriminant Validity ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Principal Component ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Internal Reliability ◽  
Gender And Age ◽  
Aids Knowledge ◽  
Knowledge Scale ◽  
Hiv Aids

El objetivo de este trabajo consistió en desarrollar y analizar las propiedades psicométricas de una escala multidimensional para evaluar los conocimientos relacionados con el VIH/SIDA en adolescentes (Escala de conocimientos sobre VIH/SIDA, HIV-KS). Tras un estudio piloto se administró un cuestionario de 48 ítems a una muestra de 14 centros escolares de 5 provincias españolas. Se puso a prueba la estructura teórica del cuestionario mediante un análisis de componentes principales al que se le aplicó un análisis confirmatorio. Se analizó la validez convergente y discriminante y la fiabilidad de la escala y, finalmente, se procedió a comprobar su invarianza factorial en función del género y la edad con una muestra de 1216 participantes. La versión final de HIV-KS estuvo compuesta por 10 ítems distribuidos en 3 factores principales. Los factores incluidos fueron (1) Transmisión oral del VIH, (2) Efectos del VIH, y (3) Otras vías de transmisión del VIH. La escala HIV-KS muestra invarianza en función del género y la edad y buena consistencia interna. HIV-KS es una escala capaz de evaluar de forma rápida y eficaz el grado de conocimientos sobre VIH/SIDA en población adolescente.  Absctract This paper aims to describe the development process, the factor structure, the reliability and validity of a multidimensional scale to measure HIV/AIDS-related knowledge for adolescents (HIV/AIDS Knowledge Scale, HIV-KS). After a pilot study of the items, a questionnaire of 28 items was administered to a sample from 14 different schools in 5 counties in Spain. Firstly, Principal-component analysis was used: first, to test a theory-driven structure and second, to develop an empirically derived factor structure for HIV-KS, which was tested with a confirmatory factor analysis. Secondly, reliability and convergent and discriminant validity were examined and finally, the factorial invariance was analyzed according to gender and age with a sample of 1,216 Spanish adolescents.The final version of the HIV-KS consists of 10 items distributed across three major factors. The factors included are: (1) HIV oral transmission, (2) HIV effects, and (3) other HIV transmission methods. The HIV-KS is invariant across gender and age and shows good validity and internal reliability. HIV-KS is a capable and parsimonious self-report scale for assessing main aspects of HIV/AIDS-related knowledge for adolescents.

Weiss Functional Impairment Rating Scale Self-Report--Chinese Version

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-Ju Lin ◽  
Kuan-Wu Lo ◽  
Li-Kuang Yang ◽  
Susan Shur-Fen Gau
Keyword(s):  
Functional Impairment ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Chinese Version ◽  
Self Report

Reliability of the self-report version of the panic disorder severity scale

2002 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia R. Houck ◽  
David A. Spiegel ◽  
M. Katherine Shear ◽  
Paola Rucci
Keyword(s):  
Panic Disorder ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Severity Scale

Faces scales in paediatric pain assessment

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Bliss
Keyword(s):  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Critical Evaluation ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
The Self ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Pain Scales ◽  
Pain Rating Scale

The landmark paper discussed in this chapter is a systematic review assessing the commonly used faces pain scales employed to aid children in the self-report of their pain intensity. The review provides a critical evaluation of the Faces Pain Scale, the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R), the Oucher pain scale, and the Wong–Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale (WBFPRS). The reviewers found that the psychometric properties of the FPS-R supported its superiority for use in research. Although they found that children, and many staff, expressed a preference for the WBFPRS, the reviewers had major concerns about this scale confounding pain intensity with affect. They also noted the paucity of research in younger children, and concluded that future research should not focus on developing more pain scales for paediatric use but on examining the appropriate application of existing scales in a wider range of clinical settings.

scholarly journals Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Japanese version of the Hoarding Rating Scale-Self-Report (HRS-SR-J)

2017 ◽  
Vol Volume 13 ◽  
pp. 1235-1243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aki Tsuchiyagaito ◽  
Satoshi Horiuchi ◽  
Toko Igarashi ◽  
Yoshiya Kawanori ◽  
Yoshiyuki Hirano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Factor Structure ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Japanese Version ◽  
Self Report ◽  
Structure Reliability
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document