scholarly journals First-Line Methadone For Cancer Pain. Titration Time Analysis

Author(s):  
Mammana Guillermo ◽  
Bertolino Mariela ◽  
Bruera Eduardo ◽  
Orellana Fernando ◽  
Vega Fanny ◽  
...  

Abstract Background. Methadone is a low-cost, strong opioid that is increasingly used as a first-line treatment for pain in palliative care (PC). Its long and unpredictable half-life and slow elimination phase can make titration challenging. Evidence for titration modalities is scarce.Objective. To describe the titration phase of the treatment with low dose first-line methadone and the use of methadone for breakthrough pain.Methods. Prospective study with strong opioid-naïve patients with moderate to severe cancer pain followed at a tertiary PC unit in Argentina. Starting methadone dose was 2.5-5 mg/day every 8, 12, or 24 hours. Titration allowed daily dose increases from Day 1, and prescription of oral methadone 2.5 mg every 2 hours with a maximum of 3 rescue doses/day for breakthrough pain. Pain control, methadone stabilization dose, and adverse effects, among other variables, were daily assessed over the first 7 days (T0 –T7).Results. 62 patients were included. Initial median (IQR) methadone dose was 5(2.5) mg/day. Pain intensity decreased from a median (IQR) of 8(2.3) at T0 to 4(2.3) at T1 and remained ≤4 until T7 (all p<0.0001 compared to T0). Similar results were obtained through the categorical and tolerability scales for pain. Fifty patients (81%) reached pain control, 66% in the first 48 hours. Methadone daily dose at T2 and T7 were higher than that at T0: 7.5(3) and 6.7(5.5) versus 5(2.5); respectively (all p<0.05). The opioid escalation index at T7 was 1.7%. The median (IQR) number of rescues, stabilization dose and time for stabilization were 0 (1), 5(4.5) mg and 3(2) days, respectively. Two patients were discontinued due to delirium. All the other side effects were mild.Conclusions. First-line, low-dose methadone using rescue methadone resulted in a pronounced and rapid decrease in pain, with minimal need for titration and for breakthrough doses, and no evidence of accumulation or sedation by the end of the week.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 193-193
Author(s):  
Su-Jin Koh ◽  
Bhumsuk Keam ◽  
Jeong Ju Seo

193 Background: Caner pain is prevalent, burdensome, and undertreated. Barriers to good cancer pain control exist within patients on lack of knowledge or poor attitudes towards pain and opioid analgesics. The objective of this study was to test the effects of an education program on reducing barriers to pain management in oncology. Methods: Participants completed baseline assessments and were randomly allocated to receive an education program or not in addition to standard care. Education materials for the pain management program included the ‘Guideline on cancer pain management for patients’. The average education time took basically 30 minutes, and CRNs implemented the education program using a booklet for an individual patient. Outcome measures at one week included the Barriers Questionnaire (BQ), Brief Pain Inventory. Adherence of analgesia and daily activity score were assessed. Results: 176 participants were recruited from 5 sites over 3 months. Mean average pain and worst pain score (NRS) improved significantly in patients receiving education program 1.40 and 1.61. The addiction subscale of the BQ score was improved by 1.95 (pre: 3.39, post: 1.44, p < 0.001) for participants receiving pain education. In terms of administration of short-acting analgesics due to breakthrough pain, inpatients showed no large difference before/after education in the use of short-acting analgesics but outpatients exhibited an increase from 25.5% before education to 73.5% after education and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusions: A cancer pain education was effective in reducing patient's barriers to pain management, improving pain score and daily activity score of cancer patients, especially using short-acting analgesics for breakthrough pain control in outpatients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Ali Haider ◽  
Yu Qian ◽  
Zhanni Lu ◽  
Syed M. Naqvi ◽  
Amy Zhuang ◽  
...  

9 Background: Increasing total opioid dose is the standard approach for managing uncontrolled cancer pain. Other than simply increasing the opioid dose, palliative care interventions are multidimensional and may improve pain control in the absence of opioid dose increase. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of patients referred to our inpatient palliative care (IPC) team who achieved clinically improved pain (CIP) without opioid dose increase. Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients referred to our IPC team. Eligibility criteria included: 1) taking opioid medication; 2) having ≥ 2 consecutive visits with the IPC team; 3) Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) pain score ≥ 4 at consultation. We assessed patient demographics and clinical variables, including cancer type, opioid prescription data (type, route, oral morphine equivalent daily dose [MEDD]), presence of opioid rotation, psychological consultation, changes in adjuvant medications (e.g., corticosteroids, benzodiazepines, and neuroleptics), and achievement of CIP. Results: Of the 300 patients enrolled, CIP was achieved in 196 (65%) patients. Of CIP patients, 85 (43%) achieved CIP without an increase in MEDD. CIP without MEDD increase was associated with more adjuvant medication changes (P = 0.003), less opioid rotation (P = 0.005), and lower symptom distress scale of ESAS (P = 0.04). Conclusions: Nearly half of patients achieved CIP without MEDD increase, suggesting that multidimensional palliative care intervention is effective in improving pain control in many opioid-tolerant patients without the need to increase the opioid dose.


2007 ◽  
Vol 135 (7-8) ◽  
pp. 453-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Snezana Bosnjak ◽  
Ivana Bozovic-Spasojevic ◽  
Nedeljka Boskov ◽  
Sofija Vjetrov ◽  
Ljubisa Sumarac ◽  
...  

Introduction The analgesic efficacy of slow release tramadol in the titration phase of treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain has been demonstrated in clinical trials. Objective The aim of the study was to evaluate this treatment strategy in routine daily practice. Method This was a prospective, non-randomized, open, multicentric, phase IV two-week study. Each patient received 100 mg slow release tramadol orally, twice a day. Patients were allowed to take 20 drops (50 mg) of tramadol as needed for breakthrough pain. The pain intensity and tramadol tolerability were recorded every day for the previous 24 hours, in the first week and at the end of the study. Pain relief and the impact of pain on sleep were evaluated on the 8th and 15th day. Results The study included 46 patients with metastatic malignant disease. The total of 46 patients completed the first week of treatment, and 33 patients completed the whole study. At the end of study, the intensity of pain was significantly reduced from 6.75 to 3.03 on numerical scale (NS 0-10) (p<0.001). At the end of study, 60.6% of patients graded the severity of pain as maximally mild on a verbal scale. The pain relief significantly improved from 25.75 to 71.81 on a numerical scale (NS 0-100) (p<0.001). The impact of pain on sleep was significantly reduced from 51.51% to 10.61% on a numerical scale (NS 0-100) (p<0.001). There were no differences in the drowsiness/confusion, nausea, vomiting, dizziness, loss of appetite and constipation, from the beginning to the end of treatment. Conclusion Tramadol slow release was effective in the titration phase of treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain with good tolerability.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caroline A. MacCallum ◽  
Lauren Eadie ◽  
Alasdair M. Barr ◽  
Michael Boivin ◽  
Shaohua Lu

Background: Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is estimated to affect 20% of the adult population. Current United States and Canadian Chronic non-cancer pain guidelines recommend careful reassessment of the risk-benefit ratio for doses greater than 90 mg morphine equivalent dose (MED), due to low evidence for improved pain efficacy at higher morphine equivalent dose and a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. There are a number of human studies demonstrating cannabis opioid synergy. This preliminary evidence suggests a potential role of cannabis as an adjunctive therapy with or without opioids to optimize pain control.Methods: In 2017, the Canadian Opioid Guidelines Clinical Tool was created to encourage judicious opioid prescribing for CNCP patients and to reevaluate those who have been chronically using high MED. Mirroring this approach, we draw on our clinical experiences and available evidence to create a clinical tool to serve as a foundational clinical guideline for the initiation of medical cannabis in the management of CNCP patients using chronic opioid therapy.Findings: Following principles of harm reduction and risk minimization, we suggest cannabis be introduced in appropriately selected CNCP patients, using a stepwise approach, with the intent of pain management optimization. We use a structured approach to focus on low dose cannabis (namely, THC) initiation, slow titration, dose optimization and frequent monitoring.Conclusion: When low dose THC is introduced as an adjunctive therapy, we observe better pain control clinically with lower doses of opioids, improved pain related outcomes and reduced opioid related harm.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Bruera ◽  
J. Lynn Palmer ◽  
Snezana Bosnjak ◽  
Maria Antonieta Rico ◽  
Jairo Moyano ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare the effectiveness and side effects of methadone and morphine as first-line treatment with opioids for cancer pain. Patients and Methods Patients in international palliative care clinics with pain requiring initiation of strong opioids were randomly assigned to receive methadone (7.5 mg orally every 12 hours and 5 mg every 4 hours as needed) or morphine (15 mg sustained release every 12 hours and 5 mg every 4 hours as needed). The study duration was 4 weeks. Results A total of 103 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (49 in the methadone group and 54 in the morphine group). The groups had similar baseline scores for pain, sedation, nausea, confusion, and constipation. Patients receiving methadone had more opioid-related drop-outs (11 of 49; 22%) than those receiving morphine (three of 54; 6%; P = .019). The opioid escalation index at days 14 and 28 was similar between the two groups. More than three fourths of patients in each group reported a 20% or more reduction in pain intensity by day 8. The proportion of patients with a 20% or more improvement in pain at 4 weeks in the methadone group was 0.49 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.64) and was similar in the morphine group (0.56; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.70). The rates of patient-reported global benefit were nearly identical to the pain response rates and did not differ between the treatment groups. Conclusion Methadone did not produce superior analgesic efficiency or overall tolerability at 4 weeks compared with morphine as a first-line strong opioid for the treatment of cancer pain.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10107-10107
Author(s):  
Zu-Yan Fan ◽  
Jin-Xiang Lin ◽  
Xing Li ◽  
Xiang-Wei Chen ◽  
Xiu-Yan Huang

10107 Background: Most patients suffer from cancer pain, especially breakthrough pain. The overall incidence of breakthrough pain is estimated to be 65%. Self-management makes patients actively participating in the use of drugs, transforming their roles and adjusting their moods in order to better cure their own diseases. Therefore, the aim of the study is to discuss the effect of reducing cancer pain patients' breakthrough pain through self-management based on pain control diary. Methods: From October, 2015 to October, 2016, a total of 200 patients treated with opioids for cancer pain were randomly divided into groups. Patients in the control group were given general management including the Standard "the three steps analgesic ladder treatment for cancer pain", the traditional form of health education and psychological care; While the intervention group in addition to conventional cancer pain management, self-management based on pain control diary was applied. Through repeated intensive training, patients learned how to do self-assessment, to master the feature of their own pain, problem-solving skills and formal report to their oncologists in charge. Results: After six weeks of intervention , 10% patients in the intervention group had suffer breakthrough pain compared with 54% patients in the control group (P < 0.05). The whole processing management model is a whole process, specialization and humanization Care model for patients with advanced cancer pain management, can effectively improve patient medication compliance, reduce the cancer breakthrough pain's incidence, improve the patients,s life quality with cancer pain. The medication compliance of the intervention group was significantly higher than that of the control group(X2= 46.606, P<0.001), and in intervention group the incidence of breakthrough pain was significantly lower than that of the control group (X2= 44.148, P<0.001) Conclusions: The self management based on pain control diary is a whole process, specialization and humanization Care model for patients with advanced cancer pain management, can effectively improve patient medication compliance, reduce the cancer breakthrough pain's incidence, improve the patients's life quality with cancer pain.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fereidoun Azizi ◽  
Hengameh Abdi ◽  
Atieh Amouzegar

Abstract Background Long-term antithyroid drug therapy has become one of the options for treatment of Graves’ hyperthyroidism. The aim of this study was to compare thyroid status in those who discontinued methimazole (MMI) treatment after 12.8 years with those who continued MMI as long as 24 years. Methods Fifty nine patients with Graves’ disease on long-term MMI for 14.2 ± 2.9 years were recruited; 32 patients (54%) decided to discontinue MMI and 27 (46%) preferred additional years of MMI treatment. All patients were followed for a mean of 6 additional years. Results Of 27 patients who continued MMI up to 24 years, suppressed serum thyrotropin (TSH) was not observed in any patient after the seventh year of treatment. Serum free thyroxine, triiodothyronine, TSH and TSH receptor antibody concentrations remained normal up to the length of the study. Mean daily dose of MMI to maintain TSH in the reference range decreased gradually and reached to 2.8 ± 1.7 mg by 24 years of MMI treatment. No adverse reaction related to MMI occured during additional years of therapy. In 32 patients who discontinued MMI, hyperthyroidism relapsed in 6 patients (19%), one left follow-up and 25 (78%) remained euthyroid during the study. Conclusions Long-term low dose MMI treatment may be a lifelong effective and safe therapeutic modality in patients with Graves’ hyperthyroidism for prevention of relapse, if studies from other centers confirm findings of this research. Trial registration IRCT201009224794N1, 2010-10-25. Retrospectively registered. https://www.irct.ir/trial/5143.


Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 755
Author(s):  
Zsolt Gaál ◽  
Zsuzsanna Szűcs ◽  
Irén Kántor ◽  
Andrea Luczay ◽  
Péter Tóth-Heyn ◽  
...  

Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) has about a dozen known causal genes to date, the most common ones being HNF1A, HNF4A, HNF1B and GCK. The phenotype of this clinically and genetically heterogeneous form of diabetes depends on the gene in which the patient has the mutation. We have tested 450 Hungarian index patients with suspected MODY diagnosis with Sanger sequencing and next-generation sequencing and found a roughly 30% positivity rate. More than 70% of disease-causing mutations were found in the GCK gene, about 20% in the HNF1A gene and less than 10% in other MODY-causing genes. We found 8 pathogenic and 9 likely pathogenic mutations in the HNF1A gene in a total of 48 patients and family members. In the case of HNF1A-MODY, the recommended first-line treatment is low dose sulfonylurea but according to our data, the majority of our patients had been on unnecessary insulin therapy at the time of requesting their genetic testing. Our data highlights the importance of genetic testing in the diagnosis of MODY and the establishment of the MODY subtype in order to choose the most appropriate treatment.


1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 204-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Ripamonti ◽  
Eduardo Bruera

Background Pain, dyspnea, and anorexia are common symptoms experienced by patients with cancer and often are poorly managed. Methods The incidence and causes of these symptoms are described, as well as factors that exacerbate or ameliorate their impact. Results Pharmacologic management of cancer pain is based on the use of a sequential “ladder” that incorporates nonopioid, opioid, and adjuvant drugs, depending on the severity of the pain. This approach usually is effective. Other symptoms of advanced disease may be more difficult to control. Conclusions Adherence to an adequate pain-control strategy will significantly enhance palliation of pain in patients with cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document