scholarly journals Influence of hydrological factors on bacterial community structure in a tropical monsoonal estuary in India

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Parvathi Ammini ◽  
Michela R Catena ◽  
Jasna Vijayan ◽  
Nikhil Phadke ◽  
Nikhita Gogate
Keyword(s):  
Community Structure ◽  
Bacterial Community ◽  
Bacterial Communities ◽  
Bacterial Community Structure ◽  
Salinity Gradient ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Temporal Variations ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Variation ◽  
Physico Chemical ◽  
The Impact

Abstract In the present study, we analysed variations in bacterial community structure along a salinity gradient in a tropical monsoonal estuary (Cochin estuary, CE), on the southwest coast of India, using Illumina next-generation sequencing (NGS). Water samples were collected from eight different locations thrice a year, to assess the variability in the bacterial community structure and to determine the physico-chemical factors influencing the bacterial diversity. Proteobacteria was the most dominant phyla in the estuary followed by Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Firmicutes. Statistical analysis indicated significant variations in bacterial communities between freshwater, mesohaline and euryhaline regions, as well as between the monsoon (wet) and non-monsoon (dry) periods. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis demonstrated that the bacterial communities cluster according to different salinity regimes of the estuary. Canonical Correspondence analysis (CCA) showed a clear spatial and temporal variation in the distribution of bacterial communities in the CE. Abundance of Betaproteobacteria was high in the freshwater regions, while Gammaproteobacteria, Alphaproteobacteria and Epsilonproteobactera were more abundant in mesohaline and euryhaline regions of the estuary. Correlagram based on Pearson correlation analysis demonstrated the impact of different physico-chemical variables on the distribution of dominant phyla, class and genera. Spatial and temporal variations in bacterial community structure could be due to regional variations in environmental conditions imparted by allochthonous inputs, monsoonal rainfall, and tidal influence.

scholarly journals Effects of Plastic Debris on the Biofilm Bacterial Communities in Lake Water

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 1465
Author(s):  
Chao Shen ◽  
Liuyan Huang ◽  
Guangwu Xie ◽  
Yulai Wang ◽  
Zongkai Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Structure ◽  
Bacterial Community ◽  
Bacterial Communities ◽  
Bacterial Community Structure ◽  
Diversity Index ◽  
Plastic Substrate ◽  
Simpson Index ◽  
Plastic Debris ◽  
Plastic Substrates ◽  
Wiener Diversity Index

Increasing discharge of plastic debris into aquatic ecosystems and the worsening ecological risks have received growing attention. Once released, plastic debris could serve as a new substrate for microbes in waters. The complex relationship between plastics and biofilms has aroused great interest. To confirm the hypothesis that the presence of plastic in water affects the composition of biofilm in natural state, in situ biofilm culture experiments were conducted in a lake for 40 days. The diversity of biofilm attached on natural (cobble stones (CS) and wood) and plastic substrates (Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)) were compared, and the community structure and composition were also analyzed. Results from high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA showed that the diversity and species richness of biofilm bacterial communities on natural substrate (observed species of 1353~1945, Simpson index of 0.977~0.989 and Shannon–Wiener diversity index of 7.42~8.60) were much higher than those on plastic substrates (observed species of 900~1146, Simpson index of 0.914~0.975 and Shannon–Wiener diversity index of 5.47~6.99). The NMDS analyses were used to confirm the taxonomic significance between different samples, and Anosim (p = 0.001, R = 0.892) and Adonis (p = 0.001, R = 808, F = 11.19) demonstrated that this classification was statistically rigorous. Different dominant bacterial communities were found on plastic and natural substrates. Alphaproteobacterial, Betaproteobacteria and Synechococcophycideae dominated on the plastic substrate, while Gammaproteobacteria, Phycisphaerae and Planctomycetia played the main role on the natural substrates. The bacterial community structure of the two substrates also showed significant difference which is consistent with previous studies using other polymer types. Our results shed light on the fact that plastic debris can serve as a new habitat for biofilm colonization, unlike natural substrates, pathogens and plastic-degrading microorganisms selectively attached to plastic substrates, which affected the bacterial community structure and composition in aquatic environment. This study provided a new insight into understanding the potential impacts of plastics serving as a new habitat for microbial communities in freshwater environments. Future research should focus on the potential impacts of plastic-attached biofilms in various aquatic environments and the whole life cycle of plastics (i.e., from plastic fragments to microplastics) and also microbial flock characteristics using microbial plastics in the natural environment should also be addressed.

Tu1716 Evaluation of the Impact of Different Commercially Available DNA Extraction Kits and Laboratories for Assessing Bacterial Community Structure in Fecal Samples - Implications for IBD Research

2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (5) ◽  
pp. S-829
Author(s):  
Nicholas A. Kennedy ◽  
Alan Walker ◽  
UK IBD Microbiota Consortia ◽  
UK IBD Genetics Consortia ◽  
Susan H. Berry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Structure ◽  
Bacterial Community ◽  
Dna Extraction ◽  
Bacterial Community Structure ◽  
Fecal Samples ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Significant Differences in the Gut Bacterial Communities of Hooded Crane (Grus monacha) in Different Seasons at a Stopover Site on the Flyway

Animals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 701 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fengling Zhang ◽  
Xingjia Xiang ◽  
Yuanqiu Dong ◽  
Shaofei Yan ◽  
Yunwei Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Structure ◽  
Bacterial Community ◽  
Community Composition ◽  
Bacterial Communities ◽  
Bacterial Community Structure ◽  
Bacterial Community Composition ◽  
Stopover Site ◽  
Intestinal Bacterial Community ◽  
Hooded Crane ◽  
Grus Monacha

Intestinal bacterial communities form an integral component of the organism. Many factors influence gut bacterial community composition and diversity, including diet, environment and seasonality. During seasonal migration, birds use many habitats and food resources, which may influence their intestinal bacterial community structure. Hooded crane (Grus monacha) is a migrant waterbird that traverses long distances and occupies varied habitats. In this study, we investigated the diversity and differences in intestinal bacterial communities of hooded cranes over the migratory seasons. Fecal samples from hooded cranes were collected at a stopover site in two seasons (spring and fall) in Lindian, China, and at a wintering ground in Shengjin Lake, China. We analyzed bacterial communities from the fecal samples using high throughput sequencing (Illumina Mi-seq). Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Tenericutes, Cyanobacteria, and Actinobacteria were the dominant phyla across all samples. The intestinal bacterial alpha-diversity of hooded cranes in winter was significantly higher than in fall and spring. The bacterial community composition significantly differed across the three seasons (ANOSIM, P = 0.001), suggesting that seasonal fluctuations may regulate the gut bacterial community composition of migratory birds. This study provides baseline information on the seasonal dynamics of intestinal bacterial community structure in migratory hooded cranes.

Bacterial communities of the rhizosphere and endorhiza associated with field-grown cucumber plants inoculated with a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium or its genetically modified derivative

1997 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 344-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. F. Mahaffee ◽  
J. W. Kloepper
Keyword(s):  
Community Structure ◽  
Bacterial Community ◽  
Bacterial Communities ◽  
Genetically Modified ◽  
Acid Methyl Ester ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Natural Ecosystems ◽  
Genus Level ◽  
Plant Growth Promoting ◽  
The Impact

The future use of genetically modified microorganisms in the environment will be dependent on the ability to assess potential or theoretical risks associated with their introduction into natural ecosystems. To assess potential risks, several ecological parameters must be examined, including the impact of the introduced genetically modified organism on the microbial communities associated with the environment into which the introduction will occur. A 2-year field study was established to examine whether the indigenous bacterial communities of the rhizosphere and endorhiza (internal root tissues) were affected differently by the introduction of an unaltered wild type and its genetically modified derivative. Treatments consisted of the wild-type strain Pseudomonas fluorescens 89B-27 and a bioluminescent derivative GEM-8 (89B-27::Tn4431). Cucumber root or seed samples were taken 0, 7, 14, 21, 35, and 70 days after planting (DAP) in 1994 and 0, 7, 14, 28, 42, and 70 DAP in 1995. Samples were processed to examine the bacterial communities of both the rhizosphere and endorhiza. Over 7200 bacterial colonies were isolated from the rhizosphere and endorhiza and identified using the Sherlock System (Microbial ID, Inc.) for fatty acid methyl ester analysis. Community structure at the genus level was assessed using genera richness and Hill's diversity numbers, N1 and N2. The aerobic–heterotrophic bacterial community structure at the genus level did not significantly vary between treatments but did differ temporally. The data indicate that the introduction of the genetically modified derivative of 89B-27 did not pose a greater environmental risk than its unaltered wild type with respect to aerobic–heterotrophic bacterial community structure.Key words: diversity, ecology, PGPR, Pseudomonas, root colonizaton, GEM.

scholarly journals Comparative analysis of the composition of bacterial communities from two constructed wetlands for municipal and swine wastewater treatment

2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paula Arroyo ◽  
Gemma Ansola ◽  
Ivan Blanco ◽  
Patricia Molleda ◽  
Estanislao de Luis Calabuig ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Community Structure ◽  
Bacterial Community ◽  
Bacterial Communities ◽  
Bacterial Community Structure ◽  
Typha Latifolia ◽  
Treatment System ◽  
Swine Wastewater ◽  
Wastewater Treatment System ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Systems

This work provides information about bacterial community structure in natural wastewater treatment systems treating different types of wastewater. The diversity and composition of bacterial communities associated with the rhizosphere of Typha latifolia and Salix atrocinerea were studied and compared among two different natural wastewater treatment systems, using the direct sequencing of the 16S ribosomal RNA codifying genes. Phylogenetic affiliations of the bacteria detected allowed us to define the main groups present in these particular ecosystems. Moreover, bacterial community structure was studied through two diversity indices. Ten identified and five non-identified phyla were found in the samples; the phylum Proteobacteria was the predominant group in the four ecosystems. The results showed a bacterial community dominated by beta-proteobacteria and a lower diversity value in the swine wastewater treatment system. The municipal wastewater treatment system presented a high diverse community in both macrophytes (Typha latifolia and Salix atrocinerea), with gamma-proteobacteria and alpha-proteobacteria, respectively, as the most abundant groups.

Effects of Long-Term Elevated CO2 on Rhizosphere and Bulk Soil Bacterial Community Structure in Pinus sylvestriformis Seedlings Fields

2011 ◽  
Vol 343-344 ◽  
pp. 351-356
Author(s):  
Xia Jia ◽  
Chun Juan Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Community Structure ◽  
Bacterial Community ◽  
Bacterial Communities ◽  
Bacterial Community Structure ◽  
Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Pinus Sylvestriformis ◽  
Soil Bacterial Community Structure ◽  
Gradient Gel Electrophoresis ◽  
Polymerase Chain

The effect of long-term elevated CO2(as open top chambers) on rhizosphere and bulk bacterial community structure in Pinus sylvestriformis seedlings field was investigated in July, August, and September. The bacterial communities were processed by Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) analysis of bacterial 16S rDNA fragments amplified by PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) from DNA extracted directly from soil. DGGE profiles from rhizosphere samples showed large changes in rhizosphere bacterial community under elevated CO2compared to ambient except for that in September. For bulk samples, bacterial community structure changed when exposed to elevated CO2in three months. With the exception of bulk samples in August, a similitude of bacterial communities structures existed between different elevated CO2concentrations by analyzing UPGMA dendrogram based on Jaccard’s coefficient.

scholarly journals The impact of host rock geochemistry on bacterial community structure in oligotrophic cave environments

2007 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hazel Barton ◽  
Nicholas Taylor ◽  
Michael Kreate ◽  
Austin Springer ◽  
Stuart Oehrle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Community Structure ◽  
Bacterial Community ◽  
Host Rock ◽  
Bacterial Community Structure ◽  
The Impact

scholarly journals Tree phyllosphere bacterial communities: exploring the magnitude of intra- and inter-individual variation among host species

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e2367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle Laforest-Lapointe ◽  
Christian Messier ◽  
Steven W. Kembel
Keyword(s):  
Community Structure ◽  
Bacterial Community ◽  
Individual Variation ◽  
Host Species ◽  
Bacterial Communities ◽  
Bacterial Community Structure ◽  
Temperate Forest ◽  
Abies Balsamea ◽  
Tree Canopy ◽  
Individual Tree

BackgroundThe diversity and composition of the microbial community of tree leaves (the phyllosphere) varies among trees and host species and along spatial, temporal, and environmental gradients. Phyllosphere community variation within the canopy of an individual tree exists but the importance of this variation relative to among-tree and among-species variation is poorly understood. Sampling techniques employed for phyllosphere studies include picking leaves from one canopy location to mixing randomly selected leaves from throughout the canopy. In this context, our goal was to characterize the relative importance of intra-individual variation in phyllosphere communities across multiple species, and compare this variation to inter-individual and interspecific variation of phyllosphere epiphytic bacterial communities in a natural temperate forest in Quebec, Canada.MethodsWe targeted five dominant temperate forest tree species including angiosperms and gymnosperms:Acer saccharum,Acer rubrum,Betula papyrifera,Abies balsameaandPicea glauca. For one randomly selected tree of each species, we sampled microbial communities at six distinct canopy locations: bottom-canopy (1–2 m height), the four cardinal points of mid-canopy (2–4 m height), and the top-canopy (4–6 m height). We also collected bottom-canopy leaves from five additional trees from each species.ResultsBased on an analysis of bacterial community structure measured via Illumina sequencing of the bacterial 16S gene, we demonstrate that 65% of the intra-individual variation in leaf bacterial community structure could be attributed to the effect of inter-individual and inter-specific differences while the effect of canopy location was not significant. In comparison, host species identity explains 47% of inter-individual and inter-specific variation in leaf bacterial community structure followed by individual identity (32%) and canopy location (6%).DiscussionOur results suggest that individual samples from consistent positions within the tree canopy from multiple individuals per species can be used to accurately quantify variation in phyllosphere bacterial community structure. However, the considerable amount of intra-individual variation within a tree canopy ask for a better understanding of how changes in leaf characteristics and local abiotic conditions drive spatial variation in the phyllosphere microbiome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document