Measuring the Impact of Advertisement on Children Diet Choice in the Pediatric Population.

Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the test–retest reliability of the paired selection method for measuring the impact of food advertising on the consumption preferences of children. Methods: In this study, 52 children aged 4 to 6 years participated in watching an advertisement style video showing four foodstuffs with low nutritional value. Two pollsters were introduced at two instances showing pairs of pictures of the advertised foodstuffs right next to similar products, so that children could express their preferences. The test–retest reliability was measured through the concordance and interclass co-relation between both answers. Results: Kappa concordance indices of 0.71 (0.46–0.97), 0.88 (0.62–1.15), and 0.90 (0.64–1.16) were obtained for the three foodstuff pairs. The interclass correlation coefficient for the sum of manifested preferred scores was 0.72 (p = 0.0000). Conclusions: The paired selection method has been demonstrated to be efficient with good or very good reliability, making it useful for measuring the impact of food advertising on this age group. Keywords: food advertising; food habits; childhood obesity; television advertising; assessment.

Download Full-text

Test-retest reliability of the human functional connectome over consecutive days: identifying highly reliable portions and assessing the impact of methodological choices

Network Neuroscience ◽

10.1162/netn_a_00148 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 4 (3) ◽

pp. 925-945

Author(s):

Leonardo Tozzi ◽

Scott L. Fleming ◽

Zachary D. Taylor ◽

Cooper D. Raterink ◽

Leanne M. Williams

Keyword(s):

Human Brain ◽

Functional Neuroimaging ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Good Reliability ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Methodological Choices ◽

Functional Connectome ◽

Global Signal ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

The Impact

Countless studies have advanced our understanding of the human brain and its organization by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to derive network representations of human brain function. However, we do not know to what extent these “functional connectomes” are reliable over time. In a large public sample of healthy participants ( N = 833) scanned on two consecutive days, we assessed the test-retest reliability of fMRI functional connectivity and the consequences on reliability of three common sources of variation in analysis workflows: atlas choice, global signal regression, and thresholding. By adopting the intraclass correlation coefficient as a metric, we demonstrate that only a small portion of the functional connectome is characterized by good (6–8%) to excellent (0.08–0.14%) reliability. Connectivity between prefrontal, parietal, and temporal areas is especially reliable, but also average connectivity within known networks has good reliability. In general, while unreliable edges are weak, reliable edges are not necessarily strong. Methodologically, reliability of edges varies between atlases, global signal regression decreases reliability for networks and most edges (but increases it for some), and thresholding based on connection strength reduces reliability. Focusing on the reliable portion of the connectome could help quantify brain trait-like features and investigate individual differences using functional neuroimaging.

Download Full-text

Test–Retest Reliability of Soccer Dribbling Tests in Children

Journal of Motor Learning and Development ◽

10.1123/jmld.2021-0003 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-7

Author(s):

Michael J. Duncan ◽

Darren Richardson ◽

Rhys Morris ◽

Emma Eyre ◽

Neil D. Clarke

Keyword(s):

Coefficient Of Variation ◽

Pediatric Population ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Correlation Coefficients ◽

Systematic Bias ◽

Limits Of Agreement ◽

Good Reliability ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽

Test Retest Reliability

The present study examined the test–retest reliability of the Ghent University dribbling test and short dribble test in a pediatric population. Fifty-four boys aged 9–14 years (mean ± SD = 11 ± 2 years) undertook the Ghent University and dribbling tests on two occasions separated by 2 weeks. Intraclass correlation coefficients, coefficient of variation, and 95% limits of agreement were conducted for each test. Intraclass correlation coefficients and coefficient of variation indicated good to excellent reliability, and relatively small variability for both dribbling tests. The 95% limits of agreement indicated relatively little bias Ghent University dribbling test for both running alone and running with the ball components, and the Bangsbo and Mohr short dribble test. The results of the present study suggest both dribbling tests examined in the present study demonstrate good reliability and low levels of systematic bias.

Download Full-text

A new visual feedback-based system for the assessment of pinch force, endurance, accuracy and precision. A test-retest reliability study

Hand Therapy ◽

10.1177/17589983211002550 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 175899832110025

Author(s):

Alberto Dottor ◽

Eleonora Camerone ◽

Mirko Job ◽

Diletta Barbiani ◽

Elisa Frisaldi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Visual Feedback ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Precision Grip ◽

Voluntary Contraction ◽

Good Reliability ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Relative Reliability ◽

Time Accuracy ◽

In The Beginning ◽

Test Retest Reliability

Introduction Given that pinch is a precision grip involved in sustained submaximal activities, a Sustained Contraction (SC) task could be associated to Maximal Voluntary Contraction (MVC). To better evaluate the thumb-index system, the test-retest reliability of pinch MVC and SC, measured by a visual feedback-based pinch gauge was assessed. Methods 26 healthy participants performed MVC and SC in two separate sessions. SC required to maintain 40%MVC as long as possible and it was evaluated in terms of time, accuracy (Mean Distance between force trace and target force, MD), precision (Coefficient of Variability of force trace, CV). MD and CV analyses were conducted dividing the SC task into three equivalent time stages (beginning, middle, exhaustion). Relative Reliability (RR) was measured by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, and Absolute Reliability (AR) was measured by Standard Error of Measurement and by Bland-Altman plot. Results MVC and Time showed high RR and AR in both hands. RR of MD and CV in right hand was excellent in the beginning and middle stages, and fair in the exhaustion one, showing decreasing reliability as fatigue increases. In the left hand RR of MD and CV was generally lower. MD showed excellent reliability in the beginning stage and good reliability in the other stages. CV showed fair relative reliability at both beginning and middle stages, excellent in the last one. Conversely, it was observed high AR of MD and CV in all stages in both hands. Conclusions All indices are reliable to assess motor control of thumb-index pinch in both hands.

Download Full-text

Test–Retest Reliability of the Twin Cities Walking Survey

Journal of Physical Activity and Health ◽

10.1123/jpah.6.1.119 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 6 (1) ◽

pp. 119-131 ◽

Cited By ~ 20

Author(s):

Ann Forsyth ◽

J. Michael Oakes ◽

Kathryn H. Schmitz

Keyword(s):

Physical Activity ◽

International Physical Activity Questionnaire ◽

Total Activity ◽

Twin Cities ◽

Kappa Statistics ◽

Good Reliability ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Social Features ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Activity Questionnaire

Background:The Twin Cities Walking Study measured the associations of built environment versus socioeconomic and psychosocial variables with total physical activity and walking for 716 adults.Methods:This article reports on the test–retest reliability of the survey portion of the study. To test the reliability of the study measures, 158 respondents completed measures twice within 1 to 4 weeks. Agreement between participants’ responses was measured using Pearson r and Spearman rho, and kappa statistics.Results:Demographic questions are highly reliable (R > .8). Questions about environmental and social features are typically less reliable (rho range = 0.42– 0.91). Reliability of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (last 7 days version) was low (rho = 0.15 for total activity).Conclusions:Much of the survey has acceptable-to-good reliability. The low test–retest reliability points to potential limitations of using a single administration of the IPAQ to characterize habitual physical activity. Implications for sound inference are accordingly complicated.

Download Full-text

The Reliability, Validity and Normative Scores of the Bene-Anthony Family Relations Test for Use With Arab Children

Frontiers in Psychology ◽

10.3389/fpsyg.2021.548493 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

Author(s):

Abdrabo Soliman ◽

Abdel-Salam G. Abdel-Salam ◽

Mervat Ahmed

Keyword(s):

Family Relations ◽

Clinical Status ◽

Psychological Disorder ◽

Normative Values ◽

Future Research ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Arab Children ◽

Starting Point ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

The Impact

Background: The Bene-Anthony Family Relations Test (BAFRT) is one of the most widely used measures of family dynamics seen from a child’s perspective. However, the most common issue surrounding this test is the lack of accurate normative scores for use with non-white ethnic groups. The purpose of this study was to examine the BAFRT’s reliability and validity for use with Arab children, as well as to provide normative data for this group. Methods: The BAFRT was translated into Arabic and back-translated to ensure accuracy. The test was administered to a cohort of 394 Arab children, consisting of both cognitively normal children (n = 269) and children diagnosed with a psychological disorder (n = 125), all aged 5–8 years old. Test-retest reliability was assessed using a sub-set of children and validity was tested against clinical status as well as CBCL and SDQ measures. Normative measures were calculated after examining the impact of influencing variables such as age and gender. Results: Statistical analyses showed that in our cohort of Arab children the BAFRT has good test-retest reliability, correlates well with measures of emotional and behavioral adjustment, and discriminates accurately between clinical and non-clinical children. Age, gender, and clinical status all significantly impacted upon BAFRT scores and therefore normative values are presented from our cohort when considering these variables. Conclusion: The normative scores we present will provide researchers and clinicians an appropriate reference point for the comparison of scores from Arab children and a starting point for future research into this area.

Download Full-text

State-of-the-art assessment allows for improved vestibular evoked myogenic potential test-retest reliability

Audiology Research ◽

10.4081/audiores.2018.212 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 8 (2) ◽

Author(s):

Lydia Behtani ◽

Maxime Maheu ◽

Audrey Delcenserie ◽

Mujda Nooristani ◽

François Champoux

Keyword(s):

State Of The Art ◽

Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials ◽

Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Vestibular Assessment ◽

Myogenic Responses ◽

Neurologically Normal ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

The Impact ◽

Potential Test

The goal of the present study was to evaluate the test-retest reliability values of myogenic responses using the latest guidelines for vestibular assessment. Twenty-two otologically and neurologically normal adults were assessed twice, on two different days. The analyses were carried out using interclass correlations. The results showed that the latest recommendations for vestibular assessment lead to test-retest reliability values that are as high, or greater, than those reported in previous studies. The results suggest that state-of-the-art testing, using the latest recommendations as well as electromyography control, improves reliability values of myogenic responses, more specifically for the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. The impact of small differences in experimental procedures on the reliability values of myogenic responses is also addressed.

Download Full-text

Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS): Inter-rater and test-retest reliability and validity in a Spanish population

European Psychiatry ◽

10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.10.004 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

pp. 44-48 ◽

Cited By ~ 24

Author(s):

Miguel Roca ◽

Rocio Martin-Santos ◽

Jerónimo Saiz ◽

Jordi Obiols ◽

Maria J. Serrano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Major Depression ◽

Reliability And Validity ◽

Kappa Statistic ◽

Diagnostic Interview ◽

Spanish Version ◽

Spanish Population ◽

Good Reliability ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Kappa Value ◽

Test Retest Reliability

AbstractObjectiveTo test the reliability and validity of the DIGS in Spanish population.MethodsInter-rater and test-retest reliability of the Spanish version of DIGS was tested in 95 inpatients and outpatients. The resultant diagnoses were compared with diagnoses obtained by the LEAD (Longitudinal Expert All Data) procedure as “gold standard”. The kappa statistic was used to measure concordance between blind inter-raters and between the diagnoses obtained by LEAD procedure and through the DIGS.ResultsOverall kappa coefficient for inter-rater reliability was 0.956. The kappa value for individual diagnosis varied from major depression = 0.877 to schizophrenia = 1. Test-retest reliability was 0.926. Kappa for all individual target diagnoses ranged from 0.776 (major depression) to 1. Kappa between LEAD procedure and DIGS ranged from 0.704 (major depression) to 0.825 (bipolar I disorder).ConclusionMost of the DSM-IV major psychiatric disorders can be assessed with acceptable to excellent reliability with the Spanish version of the DIGS interview. The Spanish version of DIGS showed an acceptable to excellent concurrent validity. Giving the good reliability and validity of Spanish version of DIGS it should be considered to identify psychiatric phenotypes for genetics studies.

Download Full-text

Reliability of the Polar Vantage M Sports Watch when Measuring Heart Rate at Different Treadmill Exercise Intensities

Sports ◽

10.3390/sports8090117 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 8 (9) ◽

pp. 117

Author(s):

Mike Climstein ◽

Jessica L. Alder ◽

Alyce M. Brooker ◽

Elissa J. Cartwright ◽

Kevin Kemp-Smith ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Heart Rate ◽

Treadmill Exercise ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Good Test ◽

Good Reliability ◽

Measurement Variability ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Activity Monitors ◽

Test Retest Reliability ◽

Standard Error Of Measurement

Background: Usage of wrist-worn activity monitors has rapidly increased in recent years, and these devices are being used by both fitness enthusiasts and in clinical populations. We, therefore, assessed the test–retest reliability of the Polar Vantage M (PVM) watch when measuring heart rate (HR) during various treadmill exercise intensities. Methods: HR was measured every 30 s (simultaneous electrocardiography (ECG) and PVM). Test–retest reliability was determined using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest real difference (SRD) were used to determine measurement variability. Results: A total of 29 participants completed the trials. ICC values for PVM during stages 1, 2 and 5 demonstrated good to excellent test–retest reliability (0.78, 0.78 and 0.92; 95% CI (0.54–0.90, 0.54–0.9, 0.79–0.97)). For PVM during stages 0 (rest), 3 and 4, the ICC values indicated poor to good reliability (0.42, 0.68 and 0.58; 95% CI (−0.27–0.73, 0.32–0.85, 0.14–0.80)). Conclusion: This study identified that the test–retest reliability of the PVM was comparable at low and high exercise intensities; however, it revealed a poor to good test–retest reliability at moderate intensities. The PVM should not be used in a clinical setting where monitoring of an accurate HR is crucial to the patients’ safety.

Download Full-text

Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test and its two abbreviated versions in persons with mild to moderate spinocerebellar ataxia: A pilot study

Neurorehabilitation ◽

10.3233/nre-203154 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 47 (4) ◽

pp. 479-486

Author(s):

Yuki Kondo ◽

Kyota Bando ◽

Yosuke Ariake ◽

Wakana Katsuta ◽

Kyoko Todoroki ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Spinocerebellar Ataxia ◽

Intraclass Correlation ◽

Correlation Coefficients ◽

Minimal Detectable Change ◽

Detectable Change ◽

Retest Reliability ◽

Evaluation Systems ◽

Intraclass Correlation Coefficients ◽

Interclass Correlation ◽

Test Retest Reliability

BACKGROUND: The reliability of the evaluation of the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) and its two abbreviated versions are confirmed for balance characteristics and reliability. However, they are not utilized in cases of spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA). OBJECTIVE: We aimed to examine the test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change (MDC) of the BESTest and its abbreviated versions in persons with mild to moderate spinocerebellar ataxia. METHODS: The BESTest was performed in 20 persons with SCA at baseline and one month later. The scores of the abbreviated version of the BESTest were determined from the BESTest scores. The interclass correlation coefficient (1,1) was used as a measure of relative reliability. Furthermore, we calculated the MDC in the BESTest and its abbreviated versions. RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients (1,1) and MDC at 95% confidence intervals were 0.92, 8.7(8.1%), 0.91, 4.1(14.5%), and 0.81, 5.2(21.6%) for the Balance, Mini-Balance, and Brief-Balance Evaluation Systems Tests, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The BESTest and its abbreviated versions had high test-retest reliability. The MDC values of the BESTest could enable clinicians and researchers to interpret changes in the balance of patients with SCA more precisely.

Download Full-text