scholarly journals The Long-Lasting Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid in COVID-19 Patients

Author(s):  
Shan Li ◽  
Chaojie Wu ◽  
Mingshun Zhang ◽  
Lianzheng Zhou ◽  
Jie Xiang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although recurring cases of COVID-19 have been sporadically reported, the long-persistence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is still arguable. We aimed to provide the evidences of recovered COVID-19 patients with long-lasting positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA tests in a Chinese hospital. Case presentations: We reported 4 discharged patients with COVID-19 patients relapsed during the period of self-quarantine, leading to an extended disease course. All of four patients were historically healthy without known underlying diseases (diabetes, hypertension, cancer, i.e.) which may influence the disease course. Conclusion: The persistent course of SARS-COV-2 nucleic acid test positive in these 4 cases was prolonged, which provided some ideas for the long-term existence of SARS-COV-2 RNA in convalescent patients.

2020 ◽  
Vol 221 (12) ◽  
pp. 1940-1947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanfeng Pan ◽  
Xue Yu ◽  
Xinwei Du ◽  
Qingqing Li ◽  
Xianyang Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background We retrospectively analyzed 26 persistently asymptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) carriers. Methods Epidemiological and clinical characteristics from the 26 asymptomatic patients with positive results for SARS-CoV-2 ribonucleic acid testing were obtained. Results Twenty-two patients (84.6%) correlated with clustering occurrence. The median period from contact to diagnosis and the last positive nucleic acid test was 19 (8–24 days) and 21.5 days (10–36 days), respectively. The median period from diagnosis to negative nucleic acid test was significantly different between patients with normal or atypical chest computed tomography (CT) findings (n = 16, 61.5%; 7.5 days [2–20 days]) and patients with typical ground-glass or patchy opacities on CT (n = 10, 38.5%; 12.5 days [8–22 days]; P < .01). Seven patients (70.0%) with initial positive nucleic acid test results had a negative result simultaneously with improved CT findings. Obvious improvement in CT findings was observed in 3 patients (30.0%) despite positive nucleic acid test results. Conclusions In asymptomatic patients, changes in biochemical and inflammatory variables are small and changes on chest CT can occur. It is worth noting that the long existence of SARS-CoV-2 in some asymptomatic patients and false-negative results need to be considered in SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaojian Zhu ◽  
Jue Wang ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Yutong Tang ◽  
Shu Zhou ◽  
...  

Abstract The Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has evolved into a global pandemic in the early 2020. Management strategy outside hospitals of the suspected cases, close contacts and discharged patients might be as important as treatment in hospital. We analyzed information from 1232 cases at 14 hotels (requisitioned as quarantine zones) in Qiaokou district, Wuhan during Feb 8th to Mar 4th 2020. Abide by the unquarantine and hospitalization standard, 603 (48.94%) cases were released from quarantine zones; 540 (43.83%) cases were sent to hospital for further medical care. 89 (7.22%) cases remained on quarantine up to the end of the analysis. The reasons for cases sent to the hospital for treatment were either positive for COVID-19 nucleic acid test, progression in pulmonary CT scan, or aggravation of symptoms. 11/59 patients switched from negative to positive for nucleic acid test during stayed in quarantine zones after being discharged from the hospitals. In total, hospitalization and positive rate for COVID-19 nucleic acid test both decreased over time. The quarantine measures were important and played a pivotal role in identification of cardinal number, cutting off the transmission, reducing the scope of prevention and rehabilitation therapy. This protocol adopted in Wuhan provided countries worldwide with valuable experience.


2020 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junli Liu ◽  
Rui Lian ◽  
Guochao Zhang ◽  
Baojun Hou ◽  
Chuming Wang ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junxue Wang ◽  
Xiaofeng Hang ◽  
Bo Wei ◽  
Dingchen Li ◽  
Fangyan Chen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Recently, patients with COVID-19 who showed persistently positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test results despite resolved clinical symptoms have attracted a lot of attention. We report the case of a patient with mild symptoms of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), who achieved clinical recovery but showed persistently positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid test results until Day 92 after disease onset.Case presentation: The patient is a 50-year-old man with mild symptoms of coronavirus disease (COVID-19). He was quarantined for 105 days. Of these, inpatient quarantine lasted for 75 days. When the nucleic acid test results were negative for 3 consecutive days, the patient was discharged at Day 75 after disease onset. During this period, multiple samples were collected from the patient’s body surface, the surrounding environment, and physical surfaces, but none of these tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. These samples included those from anal swabs, hands, inner surface of mask, cell phone, bed rails, floor around the bed, and toilet bowl surface. However, nucleic acid retest results on Day 80 and Day 92 after disease onset were positive for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids. The patient continued with quarantine and observation at home. After the test results on Days 101 and 105 after disease onset were negative, quarantine was terminated at last.Conclusion: Per our knowledge, this is the longest known time that a patient has tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acids. No symptoms were observed during follow-up. During hospitalization, the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid positivity was not observed in samples from the body surface and surrounding environment, and no verified transmission event occurred during the quarantine at home. After undergoing clinical recovery a minority of patients with COVID-19 have shown long-term positive results for the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid. This has provided new understanding and research directions for coronavirus infection. Long-term follow-up and quarantine measures have been employed for such patients. Further studies are required to analyze potential infectivity in such patients and determine whether more effective antiviral drugs or regimens to enable these patients to completely clear viral infection should be researched.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Xuan Zhu ◽  
Xinxin Zhu ◽  
Min Wang ◽  
Fang Yang ◽  
Zhibing Sun ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) long-term nucleic acid positive patients (hereinafter referred to as CLTAPs). METHODS: Patients were recruited from the Xiaogan Central Hospital between 16 January 2020 and 28 March 2020. Among the 562 cases of patients with laboratory-identified COVID-19 infection by real-time polymerase chain reaction (qtPCR), 19 cases of COVID-19 patients with more than 41 days from the first to the last time of nucleic acid test were selected as the study group, and 76 cases of age- and gender-matched COVID-19 patients were selected as the control group (hereinafter referred to as C-CLTAPs). Demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, laboratory examination and computed tomography (CT) imaging characteristics were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: On admission, among the 562 cases of patients with COVID-19, there were 398 cases of ordinary COVID-19 patients, 99 cases of severe COVID-19 patients and 99 cases of critical COVID-19 patients. CLTAPs had milder clinical symptoms and longer viral shedding time in comparison to C-CLTAPs. Compared to C-CLTAPs, CLTAPs had a lower infection index at admission. CLTAPs used less oxygen therapy and a higher proportion of hydroxychloroquine treatment in comparison to C-CLTAPs. In comparison to C-CLTAPs, CLTAPs showed slower pulmonary CT progression and faster pulmonary CT absorption. CONCLUSION: In this study, out of the 562 cases, we found 19 CLTAPs. The clinical differences between CLTAPs and C-CLTAPs were compared and analyzed. We hope that these finding can provide a theoretical basis for the treatment of CLTAPs.


Transfusion ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 395-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lunan Wang ◽  
Le Chang ◽  
Yunzheng Xie ◽  
Chengyin Huang ◽  
Lei Xu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document