scholarly journals Relation Between Malnutrition and the Presence of Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in Hospitalized Cancer Patients

Author(s):  
Francisco Jose Sanchez Torralvo ◽  
Victoria Contreras Bolívar ◽  
María Ruiz Vico ◽  
José Abuín Fernández ◽  
Inmaculada Gonzalez Almendros ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundAnxiety and depression are a common issue in patients with cancer, yet understudied among hospitalized patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of anxiety and depression symptomatology in cancer inpatients and its relationship with malnutrition. MethodsCross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients. A nutritional assessment was done using GLIM criteria to diagnose malnutrition. Data regarding anxiety and depression symptomatology was obtained with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).ResultsA total of 282 inpatients were assessed. GLIM criteria found 20% (66) of well-nourished and 80% (216) with malnutrition. HADS presented an average score of 8.3±4.4 with respect to anxiety and an average score of 7.7 ± 4.6 with respect to depression. 54 % showed a possible presence of anxiety and 45.3% showed a possible presence of depression.In malnourished patients, HADS score tended to be higher with respect to anxiety (8.5±4.3 in malnourished vs 7.1 ± 4.6 in well-nourished; p=0.06) and was significantly higher with respect to depression (8.2 ± 4.6 in malnourished vs 5.3 ± 4.0 in well-nourished; p<0.001).After controlling for potential confounders, malnourished patients were 1.98 times more likely to present anxious symptomatology (95% CI 1.01-3.98; p=0.049) and 6.29 times more likely to present depressive symptomatology (95% CI 1.73-20.47; p=0.005).ConclusionsThe presence of anxiety and depression symptomatology in oncological inpatients is high. There is an association between malnutrition and presenting anxious and depressive symptomatology in hospitalized cancer patients.

Author(s):  
Francisco José Sánchez-Torralvo ◽  
Victoria Contreras-Bolívar ◽  
María Ruiz-Vico ◽  
José Abuín-Fernández ◽  
Inmaculada González-Almendros ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Anxiety and depression are a common issue in patients with cancer, yet understudied among hospitalized patients. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of anxiety and depression symptomatology in cancer inpatients and its relationship with malnutrition. Methods Cross-sectional study in hospitalized cancer patients. A nutritional assessment was done using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria to diagnose malnutrition. Data regarding anxiety and depression symptomatology was obtained with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Results A total of 282 inpatients were assessed. GLIM criteria found 20% (66) of well-nourished and 80% (216) with malnutrition. HADS presented an average score of 8.3 ± 4.4 with respect to anxiety and an average score of 7.7 ± 4.6 with respect to depression. Up to 54% of the patients showed a possible presence of anxiety, and 45.3% of them showed a possible presence of depression. In malnourished patients, HADS score was non-significantly higher with respect to anxiety (8.5 ± 4.3 in malnourished vs 7.1 ± 4.6 in well-nourished; p = 0.06) and was significantly higher with respect to depression (8.2 ± 4.6 in malnourished vs 5.3 ± 4.0 in well-nourished; p < 0.001). After controlling for potential confounders, malnourished patients were 1.98 times more likely to present anxious symptomatology (95% CI 1.01–3.98; p = 0.049) and 6.29 times more likely to present depressive symptomatology (95% CI 1.73–20.47; p = 0.005). Conclusions The presence of anxiety and depression symptomatology in oncological inpatients is high. There is an association between malnutrition and presenting anxious and depressive symptomatology in hospitalized cancer patients.


1991 ◽  
Vol 158 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stirling Moorey ◽  
Steven Greer ◽  
Maggie Watson ◽  
Christine Gorman ◽  
Linda Rowden ◽  
...  

An exploratory factor analysis of the HAD was carried out in 568 cancer patients. Two distinct, but correlated, factors emerged which corresponded to the questionnaire's anxiety and depression subscales. The factor structure proved stable when subsamples of the total sample were investigated. The internal consistency of the two subscales was also high. These results provide support for the use of the separate subscales of the HAD in studies of emotional disturbance in cancer patients.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anish Khalil ◽  
Muhammad Faheem ◽  
Ammad Fahim ◽  
Haran Innocent ◽  
Zainab Mansoor ◽  
...  

Background. The biomedical care for cancer has not been complemented by psychosocial progressions in cancer care.Objectives. To find the prevalence of anxiety and depression amongst cancer patients in a hospital setting.Design and Setting. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the tertiary care hospitals Shifa International Hospital Islamabad and Nuclear Medicine, Oncology, and Radiotherapy Institute [NORI].Patients and Methods. 300 patients were interviewed from both the outpatient and inpatient department using The Aga Khan University Anxiety and Depression Scale (AKUADS).Main Outcome Measures. Using a score of 20 and above on the AKUADS, 146 (48.7%) patients were suffering from anxiety and depression.Results. When cross tabulation was done between different factors and the cancer patients with anxiety and depression, the following factors were found out to be significant with associatedpvalue < 0.05: education of the patient, presence of cancer in the family, the severity of pain, and the patient’s awareness of his anxiety and depression. Out of 143 (47.7%) uneducated patients, 85 (59.4%) were depressed, hence making it the highest educational category suffering from depression and anxiety.Conclusion. The prevalence of anxiety and depression amongst cancer patients was high showing that importance should be given to screening and counseling cancer patients for anxiety and depression, to help them cope with cancer as a disease and its impact on their mental wellbeing.Limitations. The frequency of female patients in our research was higher than those of male patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (8) ◽  
pp. 3921-3926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Antonietta Annunziata ◽  
Barbara Muzzatti ◽  
Ettore Bidoli ◽  
Cristiana Flaiban ◽  
Francesca Bomben ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e0210111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Turon ◽  
Mariko Carey ◽  
Allison Boyes ◽  
Bree Hobden ◽  
Sophie Dilworth ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 908-912 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Singer ◽  
S Kuhnt ◽  
H Götze ◽  
J Hauss ◽  
A Hinz ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1335-1345 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. OSBORNE ◽  
G. R. ELSWORTH ◽  
D. W. KISSANE ◽  
S. A. BURKE ◽  
J. L. HOPPER

Background. Assessment of adjustment of patients in cancer treatment trials is becoming more common and increasingly regarded as a useful outcome measure. The widely used Mental Adjustment to Cancer (MAC) Scale was designed to measure Fighting Spirit (FS), Anxious Preoccupation (AP), Helpless–hopelessness (HH) and Fatalism.Methods. Questionnaire responses from 632 breast cancer patients were randomly divided into two groups, one for exploratory analyses and possible scale refinement, and the other for validation purposes.Results. Estimates of reliability (Cronbach's α) were satisfactory for two scales, FS (α = 0·85) and HH (α = 0·81), but lower for AP (α = 0·65) and Fatalism (α = 0·64). Exploratory factor analysis suggested that the MAC Scale might be measuring six independent constructs including two related to Fighting Spirit (Positive Orientation to the Illness, Minimizing the Illness), two related to Fatalism (Fatalism-revised, Loss of Control), a construct we have named Angst, and an unchanged HH construct. Scales developed to measure these constructs were satisfactorily replicated in confirmatory analyses but some reliabilities were lower than desirable. The general structure of the MAC Scale remained little changed despite the division of two scales and the suggested removal of six items. The refined scales correlated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale and the Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire, indicating good concurrent validity.Conclusions. While reasonable reliability of the original scales persists through analyses of the MAC Scale, the original factor structure could not be reproduced. Six refined constructs with strong construct validity were identified within the overall domain of mental adjustment to cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document