Normal Tension Primary Ppen-Angle Glaucoma with Progressive Synechial Angle Closure in Senior Chinese
Abstract Background: This study is to address a unique subtype of combined-mechanism glaucoma (CMG), normal tension glaucoma (NTG) with progressive synechial angle closure in the Chinese senior population, whose clinical course and treatment targets are quite different from classic primary angle-closure glaucoma (PACG). Methods: In this retrospective study, 12 patients with NTG plus primary angle closure suspect or primary angle closure were included in the CMG group, and 12 classic PACG patients with matched extent of glaucomatous optic neuropathy (GON) were included in the control (PACG) group. Clinical features and detailed histories of disease development were investigated and compared between these two groups.Results: There were 6 females and 6 males in CMG group, 3 males and 9 females in PACG group. No statistical significances were found in age (63.42 ± 5.90 vs. 59.42 ± 7.47 years), preoperative intraocular pressure (20.75 ± 5.06 vs. 21.25 ± 4.47 mmHg), anterior chamber depth (ACD) (1.98 ± 0.28 vs. 1.94 ± 0.21mm), mean deviation of visual field (24.37 ± 6.54 vs. 22.01 ± 0.85 dB), average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (48.00 ± 14.00 vs. 57.25 ± 14.10 μm), cup-to-disc (C/D) ratio (0.89 ± 0.07 vs. 0.87 ± 0.07) and axial length (22.69 ± 0.76 vs. 22.47 ± 0.69 mm) between the two groups (P > 0.05). The extent of synechial angle closure in PACG group was more extensive than that in CMG group, as evaluated by the number of “clock hours” (3.96 ± 1.14 vs. 9.38 ± 1.99, P < 0.05), although the severity of GON was comparable.Conclusion: If NTG develops with synechial angle closure, it might be misdiagnosed as PACG. We need to recognize and scrutinize this specific subtype of CMG, which is very common in the Chinese senior population, but widely neglected. In contrast to classic PACG, treatment targets in NTG with progressive synechial angle closure is primarily in consistent with those in NTG.