scholarly journals Fishing for Solutions: Nomenclature of Cell-Cultivated Fish Products

Author(s):  
Marlana Malerich ◽  
Christopher Bryant

Abstract In recent decades, marine resources have faced extreme environmental pressures due to growing global fish consumption. Both commercial fishing and aquaculture harm the environment, threaten public health, and entail morally dubious practices. While consumers have increasingly become aware of the implications of the global fishing industry, most still want to eat seafood. Recent advancements in food technology have resulted in the successful production of cell-cultivated fish. Grown from real fish cells, cell-cultivated seafood avoids many of the issues associated with conventional fish production. Although cell-cultivated seafood will soon be available to consumers, there is not yet consensus on a ‘common or usual name’, a requirement of the US Food and Drug Administration for novel foods. We present a public discourse analysis, and the results of two online US-based surveys (n=2,452 and n=1,839) analyzing consumer acceptance and understanding of key terms used to describe cultured fish. Adult participants were tested for knowledge and acceptability of multiple descriptive terms: Bio-crafted, Bio-Cultivated, Cell-based, Cultivated, Cultured, Molecular, and the coined term ‘Novari’. The Control was a description of the product coupled with realistic packaging a consumer may expect to find once the product is available for purchase. The discourse analysis indicated that there is no current consensus on terminology used to describe cell-cultivated meat, and that some of the most commonly-used terms currently tend to be used in a negative context. Our Phase I survey revealed that names such as ‘cell-based’ and ‘bio-crafted’ were more likely to be understood, but relatively unappealing, while names such as ‘cultivated’ and ‘Novari’ were more appealing, but less likely to be understood. Our Phase II survey further revealed that the term ‘cell-cultivated’ combined promising elements of these terms, and was subsequently more appealing than ‘cell-based’ and better-understood than both ‘cultivated’ and ‘cell-based’. That said, none of the names tested outperformed the control group in consumer ability to identify the product accurately

2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
ANAT HERBST

AbstractThis study applies critical discourse analysis to the public discourse in Israel regarding the battle of single mothers against extensive welfare cuts. Using the protest of July 2003 as a case study, the article points to parallels between Israel's neo-liberal welfare discourse and that in the US, but also reveals a competing discourse in Israel that incorporated several basic cultural motifs: motherhood, militarism, Zionism and nationalism. While the latter discourse stresses the importance of motherhood and its contribution to society, the former presents single mothers as dependents living off the country's welfare resources. The discourse analysis shows that despite the seeming legitimacy of motherhood in Israel, especially of the Zionist mother who gives birth to soldiers, the negative imagery applied by the neo-liberal ideology to single mothers who receive allowances succeeded in eroding this legitimacy.


Author(s):  
Louçã Francisco ◽  
Ash Michael

Chapter 5 traces how free market ideology displaced the apparent consensus on economic regulation that emerged from the Depression, the New Deal, and the Second World War. Viewed as cranks within economics through the 1960s, Milton Friedman and his supporters built an apparatus of ideas, publications, students, think tanks, and rich supporters, establishing outposts in Latin America and the UK. When developed economies faltered in the 1970s, Friedman’s neoliberal doctrine was ready. With citizens, consumers, and workers feeling worked over by monopolies, inflation, unemployment, and taxes, these strange bedfellows elected Reagan in the US and Thatcher in the UK and rolled to power in academia and in public discourse with a doctrine of privatization, liberalization, and deregulation. Friedman, Eugene Fama, and James Buchanan whose radical free market views triumphed at the end of the 1970s are profiled. A technical appendix, “Skeptics and Critics vs. True Believers” explores the economic debates.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 77-103
Author(s):  
Simone Mwangi

AbstractEconomic and political crisis situations are interpreted differently in different societies and cultures. What is perceived as a major threat in one society can be experienced as an everyday occurrence in other societies. This shows that crises are not issues that exist independently of people, but that they are to a large extent the result of social interpretations. An example of how a community interprets events as a surmountable challenge, rather than a crisis, is Argentina’s public discourse on the 2014 default. Instead of a discourse that concentrates on economic, political and social problems, the event provoked a political discourse on national identity. The present paper uses the methods of descriptive discourse analysis to study this solution-driven way of handling crisis events. The investigation focuses on the cultural knowledge and discourse traditions used in Argentina to interpret the country’s situation in the summer of 2014. The study analyzes how these cultural and linguistic resources contribute to coping with the situation of default while strengthening national identity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 672-690
Author(s):  
Kyle Rapp

AbstractWhat is the role of rhetoric and argumentation in international relations? Some argue that it is little more than ‘cheap talk’, while others say that it may play a role in persuasion or coordination. However, why states deploy certain arguments, and why these arguments succeed or fail, is less well understood. I argue that, in international negotiations, certain types of legal frames are particularly useful for creating winning arguments. When a state bases its arguments on constitutive legal claims, opponents are more likely to become trapped by the law: unable to develop sustainable rebuttals or advance their preferred policy. To evaluate this theory, I apply qualitative discourse analysis to the US arguments on the crime of aggression at the Kampala Review Conference of the International Criminal Court – where the US advanced numerous arguments intended to reshape the crime to align with US interests. The analysis supports the theoretical propositions – arguments framed on codified legal grounds had greater success, while arguments framed on more political grounds were less sustainable, failing to achieve the desired outcomes. These findings further develop our understanding of the use of international law in rhetoric, argumentation, and negotiation.


To legitimize US invasion of Iraq, Bush fabricated fake intelligence reports, and depended solely on propaganda; he manipulated language in a well-calculated manner; most particularly, the metaphors chosen and devised for his speeches were such that convinced the US citizens about the legitimacy of the invasion, elicited financial support of the European allies and moral support of the majority of the world community. This research work used discourse analysis to study the metaphors that were used by George Bush in the speeches he made on 8 different occasions, and the theoretical framework used in it is the combination of critical discourse analysis CDA with postcolonial theory concept of orientalism.It utilized both qualitative and quantitative data collection tools.It found that most of the task was accomplished through the linguistic manipulation in the shape of metaphor used to dehumanize the enemy, which first made the US citizens feel as victims to the jealousy of rogue Muslim states for intending to completely annihilate them; then, it made appeal to their sense of justice, sense of security, and right to self-defense. By grouping the world citizens into Us and Them groups, the innocent, peace-loving and the war-mongers, the angels and the devils, and then by placing themselves and the rest of the world among the first group and placing the powerfulMuslims states among the second group, the US exploited the feelings and thoughts of all. Despite the UN and the rest of the world having come to know the sheer lies of the US now, the US still has managed to flog a dead horse and blind-fold majority of the world through this linguistic manipulation in the form of using dehumanizing metaphors


2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilibeth A. Calonge ◽  
Ismael N. Talili

The art of public speaking has been one of the commonly feared tasks for some people because they are not prepared and equipped with knowledge in rhetoric. The study was conducted to analyze the State of the Nation Address (SONA) delivered by the three presidents of the Philippines. Speech videos and speech manuscripts were analyzed using validated rubrics. A survey was also conducted to gather information on students’ perception on the study of rhetoric. Frequency, standard deviation, and weighted mean were used to analyze the rhetorical devices and canons of rhetoric employed in the speeches. It was found out that metaphor is a common rhetorical device used by the Presidents. The results show that the canons of rhetoric: invention, arrangement, style, memory and delivery were utilized in the speeches. Majority of the students of Rhetoric and Public Discourse, self-reported (or agreed) that the rhetorical discourse analysis of the SONA is beneficial to them as Rhetoric and Public Discourse students. The study concludes that the Presidents used the rhetorical elements and techniques to convince and influence the audience. It is recommended that the presidents (or their speech writers) should consider optimum use of the rhetorical elements and techniques to evoke the desired response from the audience.


2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (5) ◽  
pp. 423-429 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sudhir A. Shah ◽  
Madhav. G. Paranjpe ◽  
Philip I. Atkins ◽  
Eias A. Zahalka

The lack of a clear guidance on the adequate number of animals used for positive controls in the short-term (26-weeks) transgenic mouse carcinogenicity studies has resulted in the use of high number of animals. In our earlier Tg.rasH2 studies, 25 mice/sex were used in the urethane-positive control dose groups that were sacrificed by 18 weeks. Based on a robust response, several of our protocols for Tg.rasH2 studies with 15 mice/sex and terminal sacrifice at 17 ± 1 weeks were submitted and accepted by the Carcinogenicity Assessment Committee of the US Food and Drug Administration since we demonstrated close to 100% response for the development of lung and splenic tumors (target organs) in 500 mice/sex. These 500 mice/sex included 17 groups of 25 mice/sex and 5 groups of 15 mice/sex.  The objective of this investigation was to determine whether the number of animals can be further reduced along with the shortened duration of exposure to urethane. Accordingly, 10 Tg.rasH2 mice/sex/group were administered a total of 3 intraperitoneal (IP) injections of urethane (1000 mg/kg per day) on study days 1, 3, and 5, and the presence of tumors in the lungs and spleen was evaluated after 8, 10, 12, 14, or 16 weeks. Our results demonstrate that 100% of the mice at 8 weeks had developed lung tumors, whereas close to 100% of the mice at 14 weeks had developed splenic tumors. Based on the development of lung tumors alone in 100% of the mice, we recommend that 10 mice/sex are sufficient and that these mice can also be sacrificed as early as 10 ± 1 weeks following the administration of urethane.


2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (10) ◽  
pp. 952-956 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago Henrique de Souza ◽  
Marcelo Barciela Brandão ◽  
Thiago Martins Santos ◽  
Ricardo Mendes Pereira ◽  
Roberto José Negrão Nogueira

ObjectiveWe investigated whether ultrasound guidance was advantageous over the anatomical landmark technique when performed by inexperienced paediatricians.DesignRandomised controlled trial.SettingA paediatric intensive care unit of a teaching hospital.Patients80 children (aged 28 days to <14 years).InterventionsInternal jugular vein cannulation with ultrasound guidance in real time or the anatomical landmark technique.Main outcome measuresSuccess rate, success rate on the first attempt, success rate within three attempts, puncture time, number of attempts required for success and occurrence of complications.ResultsWe found a higher success rate in the ultrasound guidance than in the control group (95% vs 61%, respectively; p<0.001; relative risk (RR)=0.64, 95% CI (CI) 0.50 to 0.83). Success on the first attempt was seen in 95% and 34% of venous punctures in the US guidance and control groups, respectively (p<0.001; RR=0.35, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.54). Fewer than three attempts were required to achieve success in 95% of patients in the US guidance group but only 44% in the control group (p<0.001; RR=0.46, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.66). Haematomas, inadvertent arterial punctures, the number of attempts and the puncture time were all significantly lower in the ultrasound guidance than in the control group (p<0.015 for all).ConclusionsCritically ill children may benefit from the ultrasound guidance for internal jugular cannulation, even when the procedure is performed by operators with limited experience.Trial registration numberRBR-4t35tk.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Lawler ◽  
Jessica Lee

Background: Substance abuse is a major health crisis in the US, with an estimated 20 million people suffering from substance use disorders (SUD). In addition to rising rates of SUD, Kentucky is located in the northern region of the stroke belt and has one of the highest rates of stroke hospitalizations in the US. Substance use may cause stroke by various mechanisms, including vasoconstriction, endothelial dysfunction, drug-induced vasculopathies, advanced rates of atherosclerosis, and infective endocarditis. We sought to examine the relationship between SUD and stroke outcomes. Methods: This is a single center, retrospective chart review of adults age >18 years with a diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke, and SUD based on either urine drug testing or medical record history, admitted between 12/6/2015 and 5/10/2019. We collected length of stay (LOS), admission/discharge NIHSS, discharge modified Rankin Scores, ICH scores, and discharge status and compared them to controls of ischemic stroke without SUD. Results: A total of 197 cases were identified [M=147 (74.6%)]. The most common illicit substances identified by testing were stimulants (42.6%, n=84), opioids (32.5%, n=64), and benzodiazepines (28.4%, n=56). Nearly all subjects had multiple substances present on screening. 13.8% (n=27) and 5.6% (n=11) received thrombolysis with either IV alteplase or mechanical thrombectomy, respectively. Compared to a control group of 176 ischemic stroke patients that did not test positive for illicit substances, cases (n= 139, ischemic stroke + SUD) were younger (mean=54.94+/-12.01 vs 66.15 +/- 14.38 yrs , p=0.0137), had a longer LOS (n=139, mean=8.44+/-10.84 vs 5.06 +/- 5.74, p=0.0006), higher admission NIHSS (mean=9.87+/-9.08, p=0.00012), and higher discharge NIHSS (mean=6.51+/-7.13 vs 4.19 +/- 5.73 , p=0.000512). Conclusion: Patients with SUD and stroke had longer LOS and worse discharge NIHSS compared to ischemic stroke patients without SUD. This could be due to the different mechanisms that cause strokes in substance users or could be a reflection of the effects of specific substances present at the time of admission. Future directions will include evaluating a hemorrhagic control population and examining a subpopulation of infective endocarditis.


2021 ◽  
pp. 123-156
Author(s):  
Jussi M. Hanhimäki

The rapid spread of Covid-19 transformed lives all across the world, causing restrictions on individual liberties and cross-border movements. Transatlantic travel came to a virtual halt in the spring of 2020. The coronavirus caused a severe and rapid economic contraction. Its politicization exacerbated existing divides within societies and polities. Yet, in some ways the most surprising effect of the pandemic may turn out to be the limited impact it had on the structural bonds between America and Europe. Talk about NATO’s demise took a back seat and the momentum for increased transatlantic cooperation in science and innovation picked up. In November 2020, Donald Trump’s defeat in the US presidential elections—perhaps the most closely observed political event of all time—signaled a possible return to less divisive public discourse. Even when infected by a virus, Pax Transatlantica endured.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document