scholarly journals Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on breast surgery and breast reconstruction in a Japanese university hospital setting.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dai Shibata ◽  
Takahiko Kawate ◽  
Takako Komiya ◽  
Itaru Nakamura ◽  
Takashi Ishikawa ◽  
...  

Abstract The new coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is spreading worldwide. In Japan, the number of people infected has been increasing since March 2020. The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on hospitals, although Tokyo, Japan did not experience a collapse of the medical system. Patients were triaged and prioritized due to surgical limitations during the pandemic period. The purpose of this study was to determine how patients with breast cancer or breast reconstruction were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic at a university hospital in Tokyo. In this retrospective chart review we investigated how patients were treated, including surgical postponements during three periods: April to July 2020, August to November 2019 (after the Allergan recall), and April to July 2019. More than half of breast surgeries and breast reconstructions had to be postponed during the COVID-19 pandemic, and the number of candidates for surgery was also lower compared to the pre-pandemic periods. Triage of patients with breast cancer did not result in any adverse oncological outcomes for these patients. COVID-19 has had a major impact on breast cancer surgery and breast reconstruction, and there was substantial postponement of surgery. Due to triage and prioritization, no patients experienced disease progression in the short-term period, demonstrating that our strategy was appropriate.

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6504-6504
Author(s):  
T. P. Hofer ◽  
S. T. Hawley ◽  
S. J. Katz

6504 Background: Variation in receipt of local therapy for breast cancer has motivated research addressing whether treatment differences are attributable to surgeons. We assessed the amount of variation in receipt of mastectomy and breast reconstruction attributable to surgeons and evaluated patient and surgeon factors associated with treatment variability. Methods: Women with non-metastatic breast cancer aged 20–79 diagnosed from June 2005-February 2007 in Detroit and Los Angeles were surveyed after surgical treatment (response rate 72%, N = 2,260). Attending surgeons were surveyed (response rate 76.1%, N = 318). Patient and surgeon data were merged to SEER data (1764 patients and 295 surgeons). Two dependent variables were receipt of mastectomy and reconstruction. Patient variables were age, ethnicity, marital status, tumor size, behavior, and grade. Surgeon factors included age, gender, years in practice, percent of total practice devoted to breast cancer, hospital setting, and 3 scales measuring patient management processes. We used separate random effects models for each dependent variable to determine the amount of treatment variation attributable to surgeons and the amount of within-surgeon variability explained by patient and surgeon factors. Results: The number of patients per surgeon ranged from 1 to 35 (mean 5.5). One-third of women received mastectomy, 30% of whom received reconstruction. The amount of variation in mastectomy attributable to individual surgeons was moderate (8%, median odds ratio 1.7). Patient factors explained half this variation, while surgeon factors explained very little (<1%). The amount of variation in reconstruction attributable to individual surgeons was large (18%, median odds ratio 2.3), with patient level factors explaining one third of this variation. One surgeon level factor (propensity to refer to a plastic surgeon prior to surgery) explained an additional third of the variance. Conclusions: These results suggest that individual surgeons and their attributes contribute only modestly to the variation in primary surgery for breast cancer. By contrast, individual surgeons play a much larger role in explaining the wide variation in receipt of breast reconstruction- primarily through preoperative referral to plastic surgeons. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nalini Vadivelu ◽  
Maggie Schreck ◽  
Javier Lopez ◽  
Gopal Kodumudi ◽  
Deepak Narayan

Breast cancer is a potentially deadly disease affecting one in eight women. With the trend toward minimally invasive therapies for breast cancer, such as breast conserving therapies, sentinel node biopsies, and early treatments of radiation and chemotherapy, life expectancy after breast cancer has increased. However, pain after breast cancer surgery is a major problem and women undergoing mastectomy and breast reconstruction experience postoperative pain syndromes in approximately one-half of all cases. Patients post mastectomy and breast reconstruction can suffer from acute nociceptive pain and chronic neuropathic pain syndromes. Several preventative measures to control acute post operative pain and chronic pain states such as post mastectomy pain and phantom pain have been tried. This review focuses on the recent research done to control acute and chronic pain in patients receiving minimally invasive therapies for breast cancer, such as breast conserving therapies of mastectomies and breast reconstruction, sentinel node biopsies, and early treatments of radiation and chemotherapy.


In Vivo ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (3 suppl) ◽  
pp. 1667-1673 ◽  
Author(s):  
PIERO FREGATTI ◽  
MARCO GIPPONI ◽  
MARIA GIACCHINO ◽  
MARCO SPARAVIGNA ◽  
FEDERICA MURELLI ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Azzeddine Kermad ◽  
Jacques Speltz ◽  
Guy Danziger ◽  
Thilo Mertke ◽  
Robert Bals ◽  
...  

Abstract Purpose In this retrospective study, we compared inhaled sedation with isoflurane to intravenous propofol in invasively ventilated COVID-19 patients with ARDS (Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome). Methods Charts of all 20 patients with COVID-19 ARDS admitted to the ICU of a German University Hospital during the first wave of the pandemic between 22/03/2020 and 21/04/2020 were reviewed. Among screened 333 days, isoflurane was used in 97 days, while in 187 days, propofol was used for 12 h or more. The effect and dose of these two sedatives were compared. Mixed sedation days were excluded. Results Patients’ age (median [interquartile range]) was 64 (60–68) years. They were invasively ventilated for 36 [21–50] days. End-tidal isoflurane concentrations were high (0.96 ± 0.41 Vol %); multiple linear regression yielded the ratio (isoflurane infusion rate)/(minute ventilation) as the single best predictor. Infusion rates were decreased under ECMO (3.5 ± 1.4 versus 7.1 ± 3.2 ml∙h−1; p < 0.001). In five patients, the maximum recommended dose of propofol of 4 mg∙hour−1∙kg−1ABW was exceeded on several days. On isoflurane compared to propofol days, neuro-muscular blocking agents (NMBAs) were used less frequently (11% versus 21%; p < 0.05), as were co-sedatives (7% versus 31%, p < 0.001); daily opioid doses were lower (720 [720–960] versus 1080 [720–1620] mg morphine equivalents, p < 0.001); and RASS scores indicated deeper levels of sedation (− 4.0 [− 4.0 to − 3.0] versus − 3.0 [− 3.6 to − 2.5]; p < 0.01). Conclusion Isoflurane provided sufficient sedation with less NMBAs, less polypharmacy and lower opioid doses compared to propofol. High doses of both drugs were needed in severely ill COVID-19 patients.


Breast Care ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 385-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabian Riedel ◽  
André Hennigs ◽  
Sarah Hug ◽  
Benedikt Schaefgen ◽  
Christof Sohn ◽  
...  

Aim: To describe and discuss the evidence for oncological safety of different procedures in oncological breast surgery, i.e. breast-conserving treatment versus mastectomy. Methods: Literature review and discussion. Results: Oncological safety in breast cancer surgery has many dimensions. Breast-conserving treatment has been established as the standard surgical procedure for primary breast cancer and fits to the preferences of most breast cancer patients concerning oncological safety and aesthetic outcome. Conclusions: Breast-conserving treatment is safe. Nonetheless, the preferences of the individual patients in their consideration of breast conservation versus mastectomy should be integrated into routine treatment decisions.


2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 226-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Romanowicz ◽  
Bruce Sutor ◽  
Christopher Sola

Introduction: Depressive syndromes are common following cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and many patients do not respond to pharmacotherapy. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a safe and effective treatment for mood disorders arising with many comorbid medical conditions. In this paper, we describe the successful treatment of post-CVA depression with ECT.Methods: Retrospective chart review of 24 patients hospitalised for depression on an in-patient Medical Psychiatry unit between 2000 and 2010. Medical, neurologic and psychiatric histories, physical examination findings, results of laboratory, imaging and neurophysiologic investigations and treatment response with medications and ECT were recorded.Results: Twenty patients (83%) showed a positive response to treatment with ECT. None had worsening of depression after the ECT or experienced exacerbation of post-stroke neurological deficits. Three patients suffered from minor complications of ECT (prolonged confusion or short-term memory problems).Conclusions: This review supports the use of ECT after a stroke with appropriate clinical observation. The treatment was well tolerated and the majority obtained clinical benefit.


Author(s):  
Oren Ziv ◽  
Aviad Sapir ◽  
Eugene Leibowitz ◽  
Sofia Kordeluk ◽  
Daniel KAPLAN ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives: To determine the immediate post-operative course and outcome of pediatric patients with complicated acute mastoiditis (CAM) following surgical treatment. Study Design: A retrospective chart review of children diagnosed with CAM who underwent mastoid surgery during 2012-2019. Setting: Tertiary care university hospital. Participants: the study includes 33 patients, divided into two groups: 17 patients with subperiosteal abscess (SPA) alone - single complication group (SCG) and 16 patients with SPA and additional intracranial or intratemporal complications -multiple complications group (MCG). Main Outcome Measures: post-operative fever course and pattern (POF). Results :33 patients belong to the SCG 17(51%) and 16(49%) belonged to the MCG, respectively. 6/17(35.3%) SCG patients experienced POF vs. 12/16(75%) in the MCG (P=0.012). At post-operative day 2 (POD2), 10/13(77%) febrile patients belonged to MCG and 3/13(23%) to SCG (P=0.013). POF was recorded until POD6 in both groups. Seven patients, all from MCG with POF, underwent second imaging with no new findings. Conclusion: Following a cortical mastoidectomy for CAM, POF is not unusual in the first 6 days and seem to be benign condition. POF is more common, higher, and persistent for a longer duration in MCG compared with SCG. At POD 6, fever is expected to normalize in both groups, so if fever persists further evaluation should be considered.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tan Jia Liang

Breast reconstruction surgery means using autologous tissue grafts and breast prosthesis to rebuild chest wall deformities and the absence of breast caused by post mastectomy, which are possibly due to burns, trauma, infections, congenital dysplasia and sex reassignment surgery etc., with the prevalence of unilateral breast reconstruction. After attempting to carry out breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi, many surgeons constantly improved, designed, and modified multiple forms of operation programs and thus promote increasing improvement in repair and reconstruction of the breast after breast reduction surgery and mastectomy for breast cancer [1] Currently, breast reconstruction after breast cancer surgery is just in the early stage while it has occupied an important position in developed countries,therefore, the knowledge of breast reconstruction needs to be enhanced and publicized in our country. Some data show the quality of life in patients following breast reconstruction surgery is significantly higher than that in patients undergoing lumpectomy plus radiotherapy or simple mastectomy. More and more patients pursue breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. Breast reconstruction is roughly divided into lost chest wall skin repair, hemispherical breast reconstruction, anterior axillary fold repair, plastic surgery for subclavian depression, nipple and areola reconstruction and asymmetrical breast repair. In the reconstruction of breasts, it is necessary to endeavor to make the rebuilt breast symmetrical to the healthy side so that future adjustment will be simple and easily feasible.


The Breast ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.A. Droeser ◽  
D.M. Frey ◽  
D. Oertli ◽  
D. Kopelman ◽  
M.J. Baas-Vrancken Peeters ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. s507-s507
Author(s):  
G.L. Almeida ◽  
R.M.C. Sena ◽  
V.L.P. Alves ◽  
C. Cardoso-Filho ◽  
E.R. Turato

IntroductionBreast cancer is a type that more affects female population in the world. Surgical indication, present in most cases, is a mutilating procedure and mentally traumatic for majority of women subjected. Thus, immediate breast reconstruction, which is the choice to rebuild the breast during the mastectomy surgery, is an alternative to reduce discomforts associated with loss of the breast, in addition to being associated potentially with improved emotional and psychosocial quality of life.ObjectiveTo discuss, from psychological viewpoint, the emotional expectations about surgical results of a planned mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction, reported by women with breast cancer treated in a university hospital in Campinas, state of São Paulo.MethodQualitative design, particularized in the clinical-qualitative method, adequate to health assistant settings, using the semi-directed interview with open-ended questions in-depth, fully transcribed and after submitted to content clinical-qualitative analysis. Intentional sample closed by criterion of information theoretical saturation with 12 sequential participants.ResultsAmongst the emergent categories from free-floating readings, we have chosen the following to presentation:.–The desire of healing above expectations of the aesthetic aspects;–The perception of the surgical approach predominantly with aesthetic effects;–The desire of a contra-lateral healthy breast withdrawal, too.ConclusionsFace the proposal of mastectomy with immediate reconstruction, days before the surgery, women reported to be well emotionally organized for the procedure, although in different ways. This occurs probably due to emotional meanings built by many experiences from their psychological histories, as well as from values provided by the socio-cultural environments.Disclosure of interestThe authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document