scholarly journals Administrative and legal regulation of state registration of legal entities in Ukraine

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (29) ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
M.I. Logvinenko
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 209-230
Author(s):  
A. V. Gabov

The subject of research. The issue of reliability (unreliability) of information (data) included in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities has increased after the amendments made to the Russian Civil Code in 2013 and to the Russian legislation on state registration of legal entities in 2015. The legislation, introducing the principle of public reliability of information included in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities does not clearly define what is meant by such reliability. Accordingly, the question arises about what is meant by “unreliability” of information. Although legal norms contain the concept of “error”; the legislation does not contain a single legal regime of “error”. This is expressed in the presence of several independent cases described in the legislation, including, among other things, an independent procedure for correcting an error. It is also not clear how the presence of an “error” correlates with the requirements for the reliability of the data of the Unified State Register of Legal Entities. The author shows the evolution of the concepts of “error” and “technical error” in the legislation on state registration of legal entities, as well as ways to eliminate it for the first time in the Russian doctrine.The purpose of the article is to: (a) analyze the current regulation and qualify various cases of “errors” in the information included in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities; (b) specify the objectives of regulation in each identified case of “errors”; (c) identify the main contradictions in the regulation; (d) form a new model of the reliability of the information included in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities and specific legal decisions based on the goals of the legislator to “whitewash” the Russian economy, strengthen the principle of good faith, and ensure the certainty of legal norms. The scientific hypothesis is that the “error” in the information included in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities, whatever its cause, is a special case of unreliability of information. Accordingly, all cases of “error” should be settled within the framework of the general model of reliability of information included in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities. The current regulation does not provide real public reliability of the information; in fact, such public reliability today is nothing more than an illusion. Approaches to determining the reliability (unreliability) of information included in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities do not provide such reliability.Description of research methods and methodology. The research is based on a systematic and teleological interpretation of normative material (legal norms, explanations of a normative nature, judicial legal positions). Information about the main scientific results. Conclusions. The conducted research fully confirmed the correctness of the proposed scientific hypothesis. Systematic proposals for changing existing approaches to regulation and specific legal solutions are formulated. Conclusions. It is noted that the current regulation regarding the criteria for the reliability/unreliability of information (data) of the Unified State Register of Legal Entities is confusing and creates uncertainty in the legal regulation. The necessity of changing the norms of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation and other federal laws, the abolition of the most odious explanations of a regulatory nature, the foundations of a new regulatory model and proposals for reforming the existing regulatory framework are formulated.


Author(s):  
Iryna I. Banasevych ◽  
Ruslana M. Heints ◽  
Mariia V. Lohvinova ◽  
Oksana S. Oliinyk

Theoretical and applied research of the features of the legal status of the subjects of civil law remains debatable today. Doctrinal and legislative analysis of this subject points to unresolved issues in this area. In particular, the provision on defining the state as a party to civil law remains controversial. There is no consensus on the definition of individuals and legal entities as subjects of civil law among scholars. Furthermore, the legal regulation of certain types of entities is somewhat unsystematic and chaotic. This is largely due to the insufficient development of theoretical issues related to the subjects of civil law. The above issues determine the relevance of the study of the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law. The purpose of the study is to investigate the features of the legal status of subjects of civil law based on doctrinal and legislative analysis. The study is based on a systematic approach, which lies in studying a complex system of relationships between subjects of civil law. Furthermore, the study is based on the laws and principles of dialectics, which contribute to the study of the legal status of the subjects of civil law. Systemic and structural-functional analysis was used to comprehensively describe the legal status of subjects of civil law. The historical method contributed to the study of the evolution of research on the subjects of civil law. The formal legal method helped identify the special features of the provisions of regulations concerning the subjects of civil law. With the help of the comparative legal method, the study analysed the provisions of the Civil Code of Ukraine in terms of regulation of subjects of civil law and such regulation was compared with other countries. The study defined the concepts and types of subjects of civil law and considered the features of the legal status of individuals, legal entities, as well as the state as a special participant of civil law. Special attention was paid to the historical analysis of the development of approaches to the definition of subjects of law, starting with Roman law


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
I. G. Zhabinsky ◽  

The article raises the question of differentiating the legal regulation of legal relations arising from a pledge, depending on the object of the pledge. Of course, the pledge as a way of securing the fulfillment of obligations is characterized by common features and general approaches to regulation, regardless of the object, at the same time, the features of individual objects require the specification of the relevant rules. The ongoing debate in science regarding the ratio of objects of civil rights, as well as the lack of unity on the issue of the ratio of individual objects, gives rise to a discussion regarding certain types of collateral, classified depending on the object. The author pays special attention to the pledge of property rights and proposes an approach on the relationship between certain types of property rights, in particular, rights of obligation, rights of participants in legal entities and exclusive rights to the results of intellectual activity.


Author(s):  
O.M. Stratiuk

The article deals with scientific views on the retrospective of legal regulation of historical and cultural institutions as non-entrepreneurial legal entities, as well as their role. The origin, concept, meaning and general features, inherent to this kind of legal entities are investigated. An analysis of the modern mechanism of legal regulation of historical and cultural institutions in Ukraine is being analyzed.  


2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 1367-1379
Author(s):  
Vladimir Šebek

Public concern about the environmental impact of economic activities has significantly increased around the globe in recent years. Within the scope of unlawful acts, environmental delicts are among the most serious ones in terms of environmental impact, the consequences of which directly affect the quality and development of agriculture as the main branch of economic activity. The issue of environmental protection and liability can be approached from different perspectives, and the focus of the present research will be on the analysis of environmental delicts committed by legal entities, taking into consideration the importance and role of these entities in agriculture. In addition to general assumptions on legal regulation of the liability of legal entities, the authors also presented the results of research on legal entities reported, charged, and convicted for environmental delicts in the Republic of Serbia in the period from 2010 to 2017, with a special emphasis on the analysis of results obtained in the abovementioned research areas for the territory of AP Vojvodina.


2019 ◽  
pp. 47-50
Author(s):  
O. O. Bernaziuk

The article is devoted to the study of foreign experience of improving national legislation in the field of regulation of the organization of electronic state registers. The author analyzed scientific conceptual approaches to defining the concept of state registration, on the basis of which a number of characteristic features of state registration were distinguished. Based on the scientific and legal analysis, it is concluded that the objects of state registration may include, in particular: information about natural and legal persons, things (movable and immovable), property and other rights (property rights, leases, easements, etc.), documents (regulations, court decisions, statutes, etc.), legal facts (birth, death, acquisition or loss of citizenship, formation, reorganization, liquidation of a legal entity, public association, commencement or termination of a pre-trial investigation, enforcement On proceedings, etc.). The author analyzes foreign experience of countries such as Georgia, Germany, Sweden in the field of legal relations arising in the sphere of state registration and organization of electronic state registers. Based on the analysis, it is concluded that one of the significant shortcomings of national legislation in the field of legal relations arising in the field of state registration is the lack of a single legislative approach to the formation of the list of information about the object of state registration. In order to improve the legal regulation of state registers, including in the light of foreign experience in this field, the author has developed the following proposals, in particular, to introduce a unified approach to: defining the concept of “state registry” (as an information and telecommunication system), “state registration” (as a type of state activity); the procedure of keeping state registers, if their holder is one body; Introduce the legal principle of determining the amount of information about a state registration object, in particular: extending the information contained in public registers and minimizing information in non-public registers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document