Genetic Improvement in Grain Yield of Commercial Maize Hybrids Grown in Ontario from 1959 to 1988

Crop Science ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1365-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Tollenaar
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Genetic Improvement ◽  
Maize Hybrids

scholarly journals Changes in Nitrogen Use Traits Associated with Genetic Improvement for Grain Yield of Maize Hybrids Released in Different Decades

Crop Science ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
pp. 1256-1268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason W. Haegele ◽  
Kevin A. Cook ◽  
Devin M. Nichols ◽  
Frederick E. Below
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Genetic Improvement ◽  
Nitrogen Use ◽  
Maize Hybrids

Genetic Improvement of Root Growth and Its Relationship with Grain Yield of Wheat Cultivars in the Middle-Lower Yangtze River

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 613
Author(s):  
Zhong-Wei TIAN ◽  
Yong-Hui FAN ◽  
Mei YIN ◽  
Fang-Rui WANG ◽  
Jian CAI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Root Growth ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Yangtze River ◽  
Genetic Improvement ◽  
Wheat Cultivars ◽  
Lower Yangtze

Contribution of CIMMYT Wheat Germplasm to Genetic Improvement of Grain Yield in Spring Wheat of Sichuan, Yunnan, Gansu, and Xinjiang Pro-vinces

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (10) ◽  
pp. 1752-1762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong ZHANG ◽  
Shi-Zhao LI ◽  
Zhen-Lu WU ◽  
Wen-Xiong YANG ◽  
Ya-Xiong YU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Spring Wheat ◽  
Genetic Improvement ◽  
Wheat Germplasm

Growth and grain yield of eight maize hybrids are aligned with water transport, stomatal conductance, and photosynthesis in a semi‐arid irrigated system

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sean M. Gleason ◽  
Lauren Nalezny ◽  
Cameron Hunter ◽  
Robert Bensen ◽  
Satya Chintamanani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stomatal Conductance ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Water Transport ◽  
Maize Hybrids ◽  
Semi Arid

Physiological Bases of Across-Environment and Environment-Specific Responses for Grain Yield in Maize Hybrids Obtained from a Full Diallel Mating Design

Crop Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 180-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eugenia M. Munaro ◽  
Abelardo J. de la Vega ◽  
Karina E. D'Andrea ◽  
Carlos D. Messina ◽  
Maria E. Otegui
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Maize Hybrids ◽  
Mating Design ◽  
Diallel Mating Design ◽  
Diallel Mating

Stability Analysis of Agronomic Traits for Maize (Zea Mays L.) Genotypes Based on Ammi Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-350
Author(s):  
Meijin Ye ◽  
Zhaoyang Chen ◽  
Bingbing Liu ◽  
Haiwang Yue
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Agronomic Traits ◽  
Interaction Model ◽  
Genotype By Environment Interaction ◽  
Kernel Weight ◽  
Environment Interaction ◽  
Maize Hybrids ◽  
Genotype By Environment ◽  
Ammi Model ◽  
The Ideal

Stability and adaptability of promising maize hybrids in terms of three agronomic traits (grain yield, ear weight and 100-kernel weight) in multi-environments trials were evaluated. The analysis of AMMI model indicated that the all three agronomic traits showed highly significant differences (p < 0.01) on genotype, environment and genotype by environment interaction. Results showed that genotypes Hengyu321 (G9), Yufeng303 (G10) and Huanong138 (G3) were of higher stability on grain yield, ear weight and 100-kernel weight, respectively. Genotypes Hengyu1587 (G8) and Hengyu321 (G9) showed good performance in terms of grain yield, whereas Longping208 (G2) and Weike966 (G12) showed broad adaptability for ear weight. It was also found that the genotypes with better adaptability in terms of 100-kernel weight were Zhengdan958 (G5) and Weike966 (G12). The genotype and environment interaction model based on AMMI analysis indicated that Hengyu1587 and Hengyu321 were the ideal genotypes, due to extensive adaptability and high grain yield under both testing sites. Bangladesh J. Bot. 50(2): 343-350, 2021 (June)

scholarly journals Trait association for improved grain yield of extra-early maturing maize hybrids evaluated in the forest and transitional zones of Ghana

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 1127-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.B. Adu ◽  
◽  
R. Akromah ◽  
M.S. Abdulai ◽  
K. Obeng-Antwi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Maize Hybrids ◽  
Trait Association ◽  
Early Maturing

Effect of in-season application methods of fertilizer nitrogen on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in maize

2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. L. Ma ◽  
M. Li ◽  
L. M. Dwyer ◽  
G. Stewart
Keyword(s):  
Grain Yield ◽  
Nitrogen Use Efficiency ◽  
Dry Matter ◽  
Foliar Spray ◽  
Soil N ◽  
Nitrogen Use ◽  
N Application ◽  
Maize Hybrids ◽  
Use Efficiency ◽  
Application Methods

Little information is available comparing agronomic performance and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) for N application methods such as foliar spray, soil application, and ear injection in maize (Zea mays L.). The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of various N application methods on total stover dry matter, grain yield, and NUE of maize hybrids using a 15N-labeling approach. A field experiment was conducted on a Dalhousie clay loam in Ottawa and a Guelph loam in Guelph for 2 yr (1999 and 2000). Three N application methods were tested on two maize hybrids, Pioneer 3893 and Pioneer 38P06 Bt. At planting, 60 kg N ha-1 as ammonium nitrate was applied to all treatments. In addition, 6.5 kg N ha-1 and 13.5 kg N ha-1 as 15N-labeled urea were applied to either foliage (Treatment I) or soil (Treatment II) at V6 and V12 stages, respectively. In Treatment III, 20 kg N ha-1 as 15N-labeled urea was injected into space between ear and husks at silking. The results showed that compared with soil N application neither foliar spray nor injection through ear affected grain yield or stover dry matter. The NUE values ranged from 12 to 76% for N fertilizer applied at V6 a nd V12 stages, or at silking for all treatments. There was no interaction of hybrid × N application methods on any variables measured with the only exception that for soil N application, grain NUE in Pioneer 38P06 Bt was significant higher than in Pioneer 3893. The difference in total N and NUE of grain and stover between soil N application and foliar N spray was inconsistent. However, NUE was substantially higher for N injection through the ear than for foliar or soil application without differential responses between the two hybrids. Nitrogen injection through the ear at silking might have altered N redistribution within the plant and improved NUE. Hence, it can potentially enhance grain protein content. Foliar N spray is not advocated for maize production in Ontario. Key words: Maize, Zea mays, nitrogen application methods, nitrogen-15, yield, nitrogen use efficiency

scholarly journals AGRONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS AND GRAIN YIELD OF SORGHUM AND MAIZE HYBRIDS GROWN WITH DIFFERENT SOWING TIMES1

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 780-790
Author(s):  
PAULO VINICIUS DEMENECK VIEIRA ◽  
PAULO SÉRGIO LOURENÇO DE FREITAS ◽  
ANDRÉ LUIZ BISCAIA RIBEIRO DA SILVA ◽  
ANA CLAUDIA SOSSAI SOUZA ◽  
JULIANA MARQUES VORONIAK
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Design ◽  
Grain Yield ◽  
Leaf Area Index ◽  
Maize Crop ◽  
Area Index ◽  
Maize Hybrids ◽  
Agronomic Characteristics ◽  
West Region ◽  
Spikelets Per Panicle ◽  
Grown Plant

ABSTRACT Sorghum is a commonly grown plant in the Central-West region of Brazil as a second crop; however, it is grown almost exclusively as a second crop after maize in the state of Paraná (South region). The growth of sorghum crops is an option for areas or times in which the growth of maize crops can be risky. Thus, the objective of this work was to evaluate the agronomic characteristics of eight sorghum hybrids (ADV-123, ADV-114, 1G100, 50A10, 1G244, 50A40, 50A50, and 1G282) grown in three sowing times in two agricultural years: 2014 (February 20, March 02, and March 03) and 2015 (February 09, February 19, and March 01), and four maize hybrids in 2014 (DKB-330-Pro, P-3431-HX, Formula-TL, and AG-9010-Pro) and five maize hybrids in 2015 (DKB-330-Pro, P-3431-HX, Formula-TL, DKB-275-Pro, and DKB-290-Pro), in the same sowing times used for sorghum. A randomized complete block experimental design with a split-plot factorial arrangement was used, with the sowing times in the plots and the hybrids in the sub-plots. The variables evaluated were: number of days from sowing to flowering, leaf area index, 1,000-grain weight, grain yield, number of spikelets per panicle, for the sorghum crop; and number of rows per ear and number of grains per row, for the maize crop. The comparison between the two crops showed that the sorghum maintained higher production stability in the different sowing times.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document