FDI in India and Its Impact on Land Acquisition & Involuntary Displacement - A Case Study on POSCO Project at Paradeep in Odisha

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binod Mishra
Keyword(s):  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Involuntary Displacement

scholarly journals KONFLIK PEMBEBASAN LAHAN PEMBANGUNAN BENDUNGAN JATIGEDE DI DESA WADO

SOSIETAS ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muthi Amalia ◽  
Elly Malihah
Keyword(s):  
Social System ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Dam Construction ◽  
Case Study Method ◽  
Know How ◽  
The People ◽  
Causative Factors ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Impact

The research talks about the conflict of the land acquisition of Jatigede dam construction at Wado, Sumedang. This research has a purpose to know how the process of a land acquisition is, the causative factors of a land acquisition, the impacts of a land acquisition and the conflict resolution for the land acquisition of Jatigede dam construction in Wado. This research usedqualitative approach and case study method. The data collected with observation technique, deep interview and documentation study. The research informant consists of the land acquisition committee, the institution in Wado,the society figure and the people who got the impact. The result of this research shows that the process of a land acquisition make horizontal conflict and vertical conflict come up which caused by the individual differences and had a impact on social system and society economic. Active participation and teamwork is the most effective effort in solving the conflict of the land acquisition of Jatigede dam construction.

scholarly journals Kesesuaian Dokumen Perencanaan Pengadaan Tanah Bendungan Karian dengan UU Pengadaan Tanah di Kabupaten Lebak

Widya Bhumi ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-57
Author(s):  
Febri Yudhanto ◽  
Priyo Katon Prasetyo ◽  
Sudibyanung Sudibyanung
Keyword(s):  
Land Acquisition ◽  
General Description ◽  
Land Value ◽  
Government Regulations ◽  
The Public ◽  
Location Determination ◽  
Development Plans ◽  
Acquisition Planning ◽  
Spatial Plan

Land Acquisition  Law Article 15 Paragraph (1) of Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition  for  Development in  the  Public  Interest  regulates  the  Land  Acquisition  Planning Document (DPPT) which at least contains the purpose and objectives of the development plan, conformity with the the spatial plan and National and Regional Development Plans, land layout, land area needed, general description of land status, estimated time of land acquisition, estimated time of construction, estimated land value and budgeting plan. DPPT documents became the basic of Land  Acquisition for location determination and anvancing process. Karian Land Aqcuisition is taken as an case study in this research. Karian Dam whose land acquisition began in 2007, until 2020 land acquisition has not yet been completed. Government regulations Number 37 Year 2010 regulating about dams will also be used as material for evaluations. DPPT Karian Dam was compiled in 2016. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the 2016 Karian Dam (DPPT) with 73 Criteria for Land Acquisition and  Government Regulations. This research uses a qualitative research method with a descriptive approach. The results of this study 14 criteria are suitable and 59 criteria are not suitable. With dominant points that are not appropriate, namely: (a) General Description of Land Status, (b) Estimated Time of Land Acquisition, (c) Estimated Time of Development Implementation; (d) Estimated Land Value, (e) Budgeting Plan.Keywords: Land Acquisition, Conformity, Dams, Evaluations. Intisari: Pasal 15 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum mengatur tentang Dokumen Perencanaan Pengadaan Tanah (DPPT) yang paling sedikit memuat maksud dan tujuan rencana pembangunan, kesesuaian dengan RTRW dan Rencana Pembangunan Nasional dan Daerah, letak tanah, luas tanah yang dibutuhkan, gambaran umum status tanah, perkiraan waktu pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah, perkiraan jangka waktu pelaksanaan pembangunan, perkiraan nilai tanah dan rencana penganggaran. DPPT tersebut yang akan menjadi dasar bagi pelaksanaan Penetapan Lokasi dan proses lanjutan pengadaan tanah. Sebagai studi kasus maka diambil pelaksanaan pengadaan tanah Bendungan Karian. Bendungan Karian yang pengadaan tanahnya dimulai dari tahun 2007, sampai dengan tahun 2020 belum dapat diselesaikan pengadaan tanahnya. PP Nomor 37 Tahun 2010 mengatur tentang Bendungan akan digunakan sebagai bahan untuk melakukan evaluasi. DPPT Bendungan Karian disusun pada tahun 2016. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah mengevaluasi Kesesuaian DPPT Bendungan Karian Tahun 2016 dengan 73 Kriteria Peraturan Perundang- Undangan Pengadaan Tanah dan PP tentang Bendungan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan pendekatan dekriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini 14 kriteria sesuai dan 59 kriteria tidak sesuai. Dengan poin dominan yang tidak sesuai yaitu: (a) Gambaran Umum Status Tanah, (b) Perkiraan Waktu Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Tanah, (c) Perkiraan Waktu Pelaksanaan Pembangunan; (d) Perkiraan Nilai Tanah, (e) Rencana Penganggaran.Kata Kunci: Pengadaan Tanah, Kesesuaian, Bendungan, Evaluasi.

Evaluating the impact of the land acquisition phase on property owners in megaprojects

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-173
Author(s):  
Vince Mangioni
Keyword(s):  
Public Perception ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Acquisition Phase ◽  
Adverse Impact ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Property Owners ◽  
Road Projects ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of the land acquisition phase and site assembly of land for large scale infrastructure road projects and its impact on property owners. A review of one of the largest roadwork projects currently underway in Sydney Australia demonstrates the adverse impact that has resulted in property owners challenging the approach used by government to acquire land for this project. Similar case studies are used to set out the key measures that should apply internationally in mitigating challenges from property owners in the land acquisition phase. It further shows that while adequate statutory provisions are important, it is the practices of acquiring authorities that ultimately determine the success and expedition of this initial important phase of these projects. Design/methodology/approach In measuring the factors that impact the acquisition of land by negotiation in contrast to acquisition by compulsory taking, a case study methodology is used. In this approach, the author reviews two completed projects and the factors that contributed to their success. These are contrasted with the primary case study currently underway in Sydney, the WestConnex project in which a number of adverse factors have emerged that have impacted this project. The review of these cases examined provides options for reforms that should be adopted both in the WestConnex case and across projects internationally. Findings It is demonstrated that the impact of the land acquisition phase on property owners with limited ability to rehouse within the same or surrounding locations, results in increases to challenges. This factor has prompted increases in the number of cases that have proceeded to court and potentially impacts the public perception and site assembly phase of large scale road projects. The inability for impacted property owners to relocate themselves has resulted in a breakdown in the ability for acquiring authorities to achieve acquisition by agreement. This is evidenced by significant increases in the number of properties that have been acquired by compulsion since 2016. It is found that the operational provisions of the land acquisition processes were obsolete in NSW, particularly those leading up to acquisition that was originally designed to assist owners. The paper finds that the most important phase of a megaproject is the planning and consultation phase, which includes most importantly the way in which impacted owners are informed, assisted and compensated. It is concluded that the processes engaged in by acquiring authorities rather than the statutory provisions available, will determine the success of the land acquisition phase and perceptions of the project. Originality/value The primary contribution of this paper is defining the changing landscape that has led to the adverse impact on property owners in the site assembly process for large scale projects. It identifies the reforms that will enhance opportunity for owners to relocate and rehouse which will expedite the acquisition phase of megaprojects and restore acquisition by agreement rather than by compulsion. This in turn will contribute to improve public perception of large scale projects in urbanised locations.

Penyelesaian Tanah Sisa pada Pengadaan Tanah Pembangunan Jalan Tol di Kabupaten Karanganyar

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 85-105
Author(s):  
Fredi Elroi Sudiarka ◽  
Haryo Budhiawan ◽  
Priyo Katon Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Research ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
Director General ◽  
Case Study Method ◽  
Land Area ◽  
Qualitative Research Method ◽  
Descriptive Approach ◽  
The Right

Abstract: Article 35 of Law Number 2 of 2012 states that if there is residual land, the rightful party can request compensation in full for the leftover land that can no longer be used in accordance with the original designation and use. However, in its implementation, the implementing committee of the land acquisition still had difficulty especially for determining the criteria of the leftover land that could be compensated. Based on that issue, this study intend to (1) determining the characteristics of the leftover land that can be compensated; (2) knowing who has the right to determine the leftover land that can be compensated; (3) knowing the process of settling leftover land in land acquisition. The method used in this study is a qualitative research method with a descriptive approach to the case study method. The results of the study show that compensation that can be directly compensated for leftover land is land that has an area of less than 100m². For those who are more than 100m², the land acquisition implementation committee considers the shape of the remaining land, the leftover land area and access roads. The right to determine the leftover land is the land acquisition committee. Settlement of the leftover land carried out in Karanganyar Regency is based on a Circular from the Director General of Land Procurement.Keywords: Land Acquisition, Leftover Land, CompensationIntisari: Pasal 35 Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 menyebutkan bahwa apabila terdapat tanah sisa, pihak yang berhak dapat meminta ganti kerugian secara utuh terhadap tanah sisa yang sudah tidak dapat digunakan sesuai dengan peruntukan dan penggunaannya semula. Namun dalam pelaksanaannya panitia pelaksana pengadaan tanah masih kesulitan untuk menentukan kriteria tanah sisa yang dapat diberikan ganti kerugian. Berdasarkan hal tersebut penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengetahui karakteristik tanah sisa yang dapat diberikan ganti kerugian; (2) mengetahui siapa yang berhak menentukan tanah sisa dapat diberikan ganti kerugian; (3) mengetahui proses penyelesaian tanah sisa pada pengadaan tanah. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode penelitian kualitatif pendekatan deskriptif dengan metode studi kasus. Hasil dari penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ganti kerugian yang dapat langsung diberikan ganti kerugian adalah tanah sisa yang memiliki luas kurang dari 100m². Untuk yang lebih dari 100m², panitia pelaksana pengadaan tanah mempertimbangkan mengenai bentuk tanah sisa, luas tanah sisa dan akses jalan. Yang berhak menentukan tanah sisa adalah panitia pengadaan tanah. Penyelesaian tanah sisa yang dilakukan di Kabupaten Karanganyar berdasarkan Surat Edaran dari Direktur Jenderal Pengadaan Tanah.Kata Kunci: Pengadaan Tanah, Tanah Sisa, Ganti Kerugian

Problematika Konsinyasi Pengadaan Tanah Pembangunan Jalan Tol Krian Legundi Bunder di Kabupaten Gresik

Tunas Agraria ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 141-171
Author(s):  
Shelvi Manurung ◽  
Rofiq Laksmana ◽  
Priyo Katon Prasetyo
Keyword(s):  
Research Method ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
District Court ◽  
Case Study Method ◽  
Local District ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Cash Compensation ◽  
Qualitative Descriptive ◽  
To Receive

Abstract: On the Land acquisition process, the therm consignment is known.If no consensus is reached in the deliberations, then the rightful party may file an objection to the local district court for 14 working days after the consultation period. If the party entitled to refuse and not to file a clearance, by law shall be deemed to receive the form and/or amount of the indemnity. The compensation money is deposited to the local district court (consignment). Based on the above objectives, the objectives of this research are to (1) identify the consignment causation factor and the consignment reason that is not taken in the local court; (2) to find out the form of settlement of cash compensation money not taken by the party entitled.The research method used is qualitative descriptive research with case study method. This research is intended to describe the factors and causes of consignment that are not taken by the parties and the settlement of money settlement money compensation is not taken by the party entitled.The results of the research showed why the consigment is not taken from the local cout are: (1) Land owner rejects the form and / or amount of compensation, (2) The object of land procurement is still disputed its ownership and (3) The entitled party is not known.Keywords: consignment, compensation, objection, land aquisitionIntisari: Dalam proses pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum dikenal istilah konsinya-si.Apabila dalam musyawarah kesepakatan tentang ganti kerugian tidak tercapai kesepakatan, maka pihak yang berhak dapat mengajukan keberatan ke pengadilan negeri setempat selama 14 hari kerja setelah musyawarah. Apabila tidak mengajukan keberatan, makauang ganti kerugian tersebut dititipkan ke pengadilan negeri setempat (konsinyasi). Berdasarkan hal tersebut maka tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk (1) mengetahui faktor penyebab konsinyasi dan alasan konsinyasi yang tidak di ambil; (2) untuk mengetahui bentuk penyelesaian konsinyasi yang tidak diambil oleh pihak yang berhak. Metode penelitian adalah penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dengan metode studi kasus. Penelitian ini mendeskripsikan faktor penyebab dan alasan konsinyasi yang tidak di ambil oleh pihak yang berhak serta upaya penyelesaian penitipan uang ganti kerugiannya.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor penyebab konsinyasi tidak diambil ada-lah: (1) penerima ganti rugi menolak bentuk dan/atau besarnya ganti kerugian, (2) bidang tanahnyamasih dipersengketakan kepemilikannya dan (3) pihak yang berhak tidak diketahui keberadaannya.Kata Kunci: konsinyasi, uang ganti kerugian, keberatan, pengadaan tanah

The Right to Property and Compulsory Land Acquisition in Ghana: A Human Rights Perspective

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-125
Author(s):  
Michael Gyan Nyarko
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
International Law ◽  
Land Acquisition ◽  
International Human Rights Law ◽  
Human Rights Law ◽  
Global Level ◽  
Constitutional Protection ◽  
The Right ◽  
Human Rights Based Approach

Using a human rights-based approach and Ghana as a case study, this article examines the scope and content of the right to property in relation to compulsory land acquisition under international law. It argues that while the exact frontiers of the right to property remain quite uncharted at the global level the vacuum has been filled by the regional human rights systems and soft law. In the context of Ghana, the Constitutional protection of the right to property and quite elaborate rules to be followed during compulsory acquisition have not translated into revision of the compulsory acquisition laws, which remain largely incoherent and inconsistent with the requirements of the Constitution and international human rights law.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document