Managerial Ownership, Executive Remuneration and Firm Performance: Evidence from Two-Tier Board Model

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leszek Bohdanowicz
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Executive Remuneration

Managerial ownership and firm performance: Evidence from China's privatizations

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 396-413 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donghui Li ◽  
Fariborz Moshirian ◽  
Pascal Nguyen ◽  
Li-Wen Tan
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Managerial Ownership

scholarly journals Managerial Ownership, Board of Directors, Equity-based Compensation and Firm Performance: A Comparative Study between France and the United States

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 78-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehdi Bouras ◽  
Mohamed Imen Gallali
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Corporate Performance ◽  
The Other ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Managerial Entrenchment ◽  
Non Linear ◽  
The One

Abstract The aim of this comparative study between the French and American markets, characterized by a different ownership structure is to examine the relationship between managerial ownership, the board of directors, the equity-based compensation and corporate performance. Regardless of the selected sample, we found on the one hand, a non-linear relationship between managerial ownership and firm performance and on the other hand, in the case of managerial entrenchment board of directors is a substitute for managerial ownership to solve the agency problem. In addition, stock-based compensation is non-linear function with managerial ownership, contrary to previous studies that assume a monotonous or non-significant relationship. The hypothesis of endogeneity is valid only in the American case. This result leads us to believe that the U.S. CEO has a preference to hold a large percentage of shares of firms that generate a good performance to neutralize capital market monitoring. Our study is exclusive in terms of the effect of managerial ownership on corporate performance in terms of comparison between two markets, characterized by a difference in ownership structure. We determine the impact of equity compensation on the one hand, the managerial ownership where all the studies assume either a monotone or neutral relationship between these two variables and on the other hand, the effect of board in the alignment or managerial entrenchment cases.

scholarly journals The Impact of Financial Structure Towards Performance of Non-Financial Companies Listed on Amman Stock Exchange

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-83
Author(s):  
Laith Fouad Alshouha ◽  
◽  
Wan Nur Syahida Wan Ismail ◽  
Mohd Zulkifli Mokhtar ◽  
Nik Mohd Norfadzilah Nik Mohd Rashid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Financial Structure ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Amman Stock Exchange ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the relationship between financial structure towards the financial performance of companies listed on Amman stock exchange (ASE) as one of the emerging economies. This paper adopted a panel data set of 88 non-financial companies listed on the ASE over a period of 10 years from 2009 to 2018. According to empirical results that there is significant evidence to support the fact that debt repaying ability (DRAB), managerial ownership (MANOW), and foreign ownership (FOROW) are positively related to firm performance. Otherwise, the findings revealed no evidence to support the impact of the financial structure ability (FSA) towards firm performance. Moreover, the findings support the fact that firm size (SIZ) has a positive impact on firm performance of companies listed on the ASE. On the other hand, (AGE) has a negative impact on firm performance, while (GROWTH) has no impact on firm performance. The current study encourages managers to maintain a good percentage of debt repaying ability and owners to grant shares as managers’ incentives, and also to attract foreign investors. Future studies, should try applying the current study on the financial sector.

scholarly journals Effect of Working Capital Management on Firm Performance: The Role of Ownership Structure

2019 ◽  
Vol IV (I) ◽  
pp. 75-83
Author(s):  
Shams ur Rahman ◽  
Khurshed Iqbal ◽  
Aamir Nadeem
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
Fixed Effect Model ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Capital Management ◽  
Working Capital ◽  
Working Capital Management ◽  
Inventory Turnover

Current study investigates the effect of working capital management on firm performance with the moderating role of ownership structure. A random sample of 77 firms for the period 2011-2015 was selected. By using fixed effect model the study demonstrated statistically significant negative relationship of leverage, average collection period and quick ratio on firm performance, while current ratio, account payable and inventory turnover found with positive significant effect on Firm Performance. Further, the effect of working capital on firm performance was positively affected by Institutional ownership and negatively affected by Managerial ownership. Thus, the results suggest that the owner/manager needs to manage their limited resources efficiently for the improvement of profitability. It is also advised that investor and shareholder pay attention to the level of institutional and managerial ownership at the time of investment..

Investigating the associations between executive compensation and firm performance

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 245-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nader Elsayed ◽  
Hany Elbardan
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Executive Compensation ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Performance Pay ◽  
Simultaneous Equation ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Executive Remuneration ◽  
Study Results ◽  
And Performance

PurposeWhile there have been extensive empirical investigations of pay-performance sensitivity, the perspective of performance-pay has received less attention to date. While executive compensation is sensitive to firm performance, firm performance is also likely to be affected by executive compensation. Adopting multiple theoretical perspectives, the purpose of this paper is to examine whether executive compensation has a greater influence on firm performance or whether the latter has a greater influence on compensation.Design/methodology/approachUsing data from a five-year period (2010-2014) for Financial Times and Stock Exchange 350 companies, the authors employ a set of simultaneous equation modelling to jointly investigate, after accounting for endogeneity problem, the mutual association of executive compensation and firm performance by employing four control variables (board size, non-executive directors, leverage and boardroom ownership).FindingsThe authors find strong evidence for the greater influence of executive compensation on firm performance than the pay-performance framework. This finding supports the tournament theory compared with the agency perspective.Research limitations/implicationsInevitably, there are limitations in a wide-ranging study of this nature that could be addressed in future research. As any empirical study utilising company data, there may be concerns to the effect of survivorship bias and the manner in which companies have reorganised, if there is any, themselves during the period under examination. There are also issues as to missing data, some measures relating to both executive compensation and corporate governance are not provided by the BoardEx database.Practical implicationsThe study results provide evidence that using the tournament perspective by remuneration committees as a guide for determining executive compensation helps in achieving better performance. This helps in developing appropriate mechanisms for setting executive remuneration.Originality/valueThis paper combines an empirical investigation of the frameworks of pay-performance and performance-pay and develops a system of six simultaneous equations to examine the associations between executive compensation and firm performance.

scholarly journals WOMEN AT THE LEVEL OF MANAGEMENT, AGENCY CONFLICT MECHANISMS, AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-62
Author(s):  
Lukas Surjaatmaja ◽  
◽  
Hendra Wijaya ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Financial Performance ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Firms ◽  
Top Management ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Female Representation ◽  
Return On Equity ◽  
Management Agency ◽  
Agency Conflict

This study analyzes the effect of female representation in top management, agency conflict mechanism on firm performance in Indonesia Manufacturing Firms. Agency conflict in this reseach consist of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, and debt. The sample of this study consist of 90 manufacturing firms over the period 2013-2017. This study measures firm performance with return on asset and return on equity. Data on this research were analyzed using multiple regression. This study found that female representation in top management and managerial ownership do not affect firm performance. This study also found that institutional ownership positively affects the firm performance and debt negatively affects the firm performance

scholarly journals Ownership structure, audit quality and firm performance moderating and direct-effect models: An empirical study

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari ◽  
Yahya Ali Al-Matari ◽  
Sulaiman Abdullah Saif Mohammed
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Audit Quality ◽  
Control Variable ◽  
Financial Sector ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Financial Firms ◽  
Relationship Of ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Two Sectors

This paper had two main objectives, with the first being to examine the direct impact of concentration and managerial ownership on firm performance (ROA) among non-financial firms in Oman for the years 2010 until 2014. Secondly, this paper aimed to examine the moderating impact of audit quality on the ownership concentration, managerial ownership-firm performance relationship of the same sample. The study made use of leverage as the control variable. Moreover, in order to test the direct relationship between independent variables and dependent variable, this study used OLS regression. Aside from this, the study focused on the non-financial sector owing to the distinction between the structure and regulations between the two sectors (financial and non-financial sector) for the years 2012-2014. More importantly, this study revealed that the ownership concentration has a positive and significant effect on ROA. In the same path, the managerial ownership has a positive but insignificant association with ROA. Moreover, the study failed to find a moderating effect of the audit quality on the relationship between ownership concentration and managerial ownership, and firm performance of Omani companies. Lastly, the study listed and discussed the study limitations and recommendations for future studies.

scholarly journals Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Kinerja Perusahaan

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hidayat
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Firm Size ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Board Members ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Board Size ◽  
Size Firm

The Purpose Of This Research Is To Analyze Determinants Of Firm Performance In Non-Financial Companies Listed On Indonesia Stock Exchange. Determinants That Are Tested In This Research Include: Board Independence, Board Size, Firm Size, Firm Age, Liquidity, Leverage, Managerial Ownership, Female Board Members. The Object In This Research Is Non-Financial Companies Listed From 2011 Until 2014. The Population Of This Research Is 378 Non-Financial Companies. Sampling Techniques That Used In This Research Is Purposive Sampling. There Are 30 Non-Financial Companies Listed From 2011 To 2014 Which Met The Criterion Used As Sample. The Data Used Is Secondary Data That Collected From Financial Statement Of The Company. Analysis Method Of This Research Is Multiple Linier Regressions. The Result Of This Research Conclude That Board Independence, Leverage, And Female Board Members Have Influence Toward Firm Performance. Other Variable Such As Board Size, Managerial Ownership, Firm Size, Liquidity, And Age Firm Don’t Have Influence To Firm Performance. 

scholarly journals MANAGERIAL OWNERSHIP AND FIRM PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE OF LISTED COMPANIES IN THE BALTICS

2017 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-283
Author(s):  
Anželika Berķe-Berga ◽  
Inna Dovladbekova ◽  
Marta Ābula
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Managerial Ownership

Managerial ownership, board independence and firm performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-220
Author(s):  
Yuan George Shan
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Simultaneous Equation ◽  
Equation Model ◽  
Decision Makers ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Corporate Governance Mechanisms ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose The extant literature reports mixed and inconclusive findings concerning the relationship between corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance. To provide incremental insight, this paper aims to investigate whether the bi-directional relationships among managerial ownership, board independence and firm performance are determined. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses a data set consisting of 9,302 firm-year observations of Australian listed companies during 2005-2015 and a three-stage least squares simultaneous equation model to test the bi-directional relationships. Findings The results indicate that both managerial ownership and board independence inversely affect firm performance and vice versa. In addition, board independence is negatively correlated with managerial ownership and vice versa. Practical implications The convergence-of-interests hypothesis can be achieved by manipulating managerial ownership through making contingent payments. Board independence, as a voluntary regime in Australia, can provide additional flexibility to corporate decision makers. Originality/value This study provides additional evidence by using the convergence-of-interests hypothesis vis-à-vis the entrenchment hypothesis to examine the relationship between managerial ownership and firm performance, and tests the association of board independence and firm performance using the explanation of agency theory vis-à-vis stewardship theory.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document