Cost-Effectiveness of Risk-Stratified Endoscopic Screening for Esophageal Cancer in High-Risk Areas of China: A Modeling Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruyi Xia ◽  
He Li ◽  
Jufang Shi ◽  
Wenjun Liu ◽  
Maomao Cao ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Chen ◽  
Y Liu ◽  
G Song ◽  
B Li ◽  
D Zhao ◽  
...  

Abstract   Esophageal cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and half of all new cases occurred in China. Population-based endoscopic screening has been carried out in some high-risk areas in China since 2005, but previous evidence was based predominately on small-sample, single-center studies. We undertook a population-based, multi-center cohort study to estimate the effectiveness of endoscopic screening program in reducing the incidence and mortality of esophageal in high risks areas in China. Methods This study was conducted in six areas in China from 2005 to 2015. All permanent residents aged 40–69 yeas were identified as target subjects. We defined those who were invited and undertook endoscopic screening as the screened group, and those who refused screening as the non-screened group. The target subjects who were not invited to screening was assigned to the control group. The effectiveness of endoscopic screening and screening program were evaluated by comparing the reductions in the incidence and mortality from esophageal cancer in those screened or those invited to screening with reductions in the control group, respectively. Results Our cohort analysis included 637 500 people: 299 483 in the control group and 338 017 in the invited to screening group, 113 340 (33.53%) of whom were screened eventually. Compared with subjects in the control group, esophageal cancer incidence and mortality were reduced by 26% (relative risk(RR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval(CI), 0.69–0.79) and 60% (0.40, 0.36–0.45) respectively in those screened, and they were reduced by 15% (0.85, 0.82–0.89) and 33% (0.67, 0.63–0.71) respectively in those invited to screening. Conclusion Among individuals aged 40–69 years in high risk areas of esophageal cancer, one-time endoscopic screening program was associated with a significant decrease in esophageal cancer incidence and mortality.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 215-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yingsong Lin ◽  
Yukari Totsuka ◽  
Baoen Shan ◽  
Chaochen Wang ◽  
Wenqiang Wei ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiachen Zhou ◽  
Kexin Sun ◽  
Shaoming Wang ◽  
Ru Chen ◽  
Minjuan Li ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan LI ◽  
Lingbin Du ◽  
Youqing Wang ◽  
Yuxuan Gu ◽  
Xuemei Zhen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background : This study aimed to examine the cost-effectiveness of standard endoscopic screening with Lugol’s iodine staining for EC (esophageal cancer) screening in China. Methods : A Markov decision analysis model with eleven states was built. Individuals aged 40 to 69 years were classified into six age groups according to five-year intervals. Three different strategies were adopted for each cohort: (1) no screening; (2) endoscopic screening with Lugol’s iodine staining with annual follow-up for low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; and (3) endoscopic screening with Lugol’s iodine staining without follow-up. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) indicated the effectiveness . The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was used as the evaluating indicator. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the robustness of the model. Results : Screening with follow-up was the undominated strategy, which saved USD 10942.57 and USD 6611.73 for individuals aged 40-44 and 45-49 years, respectively, per QALY gained. For those aged 50-69 years, the nonscreening scenarios were undominated. Screening without follow-up were extended dominated strategies. Compared to screening strategies without follow-up, all the follow-up strategies were found to be cost effective, with the ICER increasing from 299.57 USD/QALY for individuals 40-44 years to 1617.72 USD/QALY for individuals 65-69 years. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis supported the results of the base case analysis. Conclusions : EC screening with follow-up targeting individuals aged 40-49 years was the most cost-effective strategy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document