scholarly journals ANATOMICAL MEASUREMENTS OF GREAT SAPHENOUS VEIN AND SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL VEIN BY COLORED DUPLEX ULTRASOUND.

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 1012-1020
Author(s):  
IbrahimA Maher ◽  
◽  
HosamA Tawfik ◽  
IbrahimHEl Azzony ◽  
NearmeenM Rashad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Femoral Vein ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Superficial Femoral Vein

Morphometric characteristics of competent proximal valves of the great saphenous vein and superficial femoral vein in vivo according to ultrasound angioscanning data

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 16-22
Author(s):  
E. K. Gavrilov ◽  
H. L. Bolotokov ◽  
E. A. Babinets
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Femoral Vein ◽  
Lower Boundary ◽  
Average Diameter ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Functional Test ◽  
Natural Form ◽  
Superficial Femoral Vein ◽  
Venous Diameter

Introduction. It seems relevant to study the ultrasound anatomy and physiology of the proximal valve segments of the superficial femoral vein (SFV) and the great saphenous vein (GSV) to develop effective reconstructive surgical interventions on venous valves in chronic vein diseases.The aim of the survey was to study the ultrasound anatomy of the venous wall, the size and shape of the proximal SFV and GSV valves are normal at rest and during the functional test Valsalva.Material and methods. Proximal valve SFV studies were performed in 144 lower limbs in 115 people (mean age 51.1 ± 14.4 years, 60 women and 55 men), proximal GSV valves studies - in 82 lower limbs in 67 persons (average age 45, 1 ± 13.3 years, 33 women, 34 men). A longitudinal and transverse ultrasound scanning of the femoral vein bifurcation and safenofemoral junction areas were performed, the structures of the proximal SFV and GSV valves were visualized, the valve shape was measured and the diameter of the veins was measured at the level valves at the base of the valves (inlet diameter), at the point of maximum ectasia (diameter of ectasia), at the upper border of the valve (diameter of the outlet), as well as measuring the length of the valve a (length to ectasia, the total length of the valve). The degree of ectasia over the valve was judged by calculating the relative venous diameter change (RVDC).Results. the average diameter of the SFV at the level of the lower boundary of its first valve was 10.01 ± 1.44 mm. The average diameter of the SFV at the level of the maximum ectasia of its first valve was 13,1±2 mm. The average value of the index of RVDC for SFV was 31%±10,4%. An increase in the diameter of the vein in the zone of supravalvular ectasia up to 20% corresponded to the spindle-shaped valve, more than 20% - to the clavate form, which was noted in the majority of the examined. The change in the relative venous diameter of the SFV on the Valsalva test was 38,2%±12,4%. The average diameter of the GSV at the base of the first valves was 6,07±1,25 mm. The average diameter of the GSV at the level of the maximum ectasia of the osteal valve was 9,44±1,69 mm. The average RVDC for GSV was 58%±24%.Conclusion. the natural form of proximal SFV and GSV valves is clavate with presence of the significant supravalvular ectasia, which was noted in the majority of the subjects alone and in all during the performance of the Valsalva functional test.

Measuring diameters of great saphenous vein and common femoral vein using duplex ultrasound

Phlebologie ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (05) ◽  
pp. 263-267
Author(s):  
E. Mendoza
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Femoral Vein ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Standing Position ◽  
Common Femoral Vein ◽  
Venous Diameter ◽  
The Common ◽  
Proximal Thigh ◽  
Transverse View

SummaryFor years, measurement of the diameter of the great saphenous vein and, occasionally, the common femoral vein has been a component of many clinical studies on varicose vein treatment. There is consensus that the measurements should be conducted with the patient in the standing position and with a transverse view through the vein, but no standardised site of measurement of the venous diameter has yet been established. The shape of the great saphenous vein varies greatly at the saphenofemoral junction. Due to the curvature of the great saphenous vein, it is difficult to find a point at which the transverse view measured is at right angles to the course of the vein. According to the available data, the optimal site for measuring the great saphenous vein diameter is the proximal thigh. When measuring the common femoral vein, a transverse view immediately distal to the junction of the great saphenous vein is suggested and studies have also confirmed this.

scholarly journals CLINICAL ANATOMY OF THE PERFORATING VEINS OFTHE PROXIMAL LOWER LIMBS

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-37
Author(s):  
R.E. Kalinin ◽  
◽  
I.A. Suchkov ◽  
I.N. Shanaev ◽  
A.A. Nekliudov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Femoral Vein ◽  
Physical Exertion ◽  
Superficial Femoral Vein ◽  
Perforating Veins ◽  
Great Vessels ◽  
First Time ◽  
Upper Third ◽  
Arterial Branch

Objective. To clarify the topographic and anatomical feature of the perforating veins (PVs) in the proximal part of the lower extremity. Methods. 70 amputated lower extremities from the patients with severe ischemia were subjected to sectional anatomical study; 2800 patients with varicose disease underwent lower extremity sonography. Results. PVs were primarily located on the medial surface of the thigh. In the upper third of the thigh PVs drain into superficial femoral vein. It was detected that one or two PVs occur sin the lower third of the hip draining into superficial femoral vein and originating from the great saphenous vein in 73.6% cases. All PVs were accompanied by an arterial branch from the superficial femoral artery. Anatomical sectional study revealed that a nervous branch accompanied PVs in the lower third of the thigh. Two or four PVs were detected on the lateral surface of the thigh. PVs in the popliteal fossa could be referred to as “atypical” due to their rare occurence (0.4% of cases at sonography) in combination with absent typical sapheno-popliteal junction. PVs in this area were not supported by the intermuscular septa. PVs drained laterally into popliteal vein of the lower limb in 100% cases, while small saphenous vein drained into great saphenous vein in the upper third of the leg or into the intersaphenous vein. Conclusion. Perforating veins constitute perforating bundles (PV, arterial branch, nervous branch), which are predominantly located along the intermuscular septa, which create a constant and strong orientation along the direction of the great vessels. This ensures stable hemodynamics of great vessels and perforating complexes and does not allow squeezed tham togeter during physical exertion. What this paper adds For the first time it has been proved that the perforating veins of the gluteal region pass through the fascia and the thickness of the gluteus maximus muscle and enter the superior and inferior gluteal veins, being transmuscular perforating veins. For the first time it has been established that the location of the femoral perforating veins along the intermuscular septa allows preserving the hemodynamics of the perforating complexes without any squeezed in physical exertion.

Prospective five-year study of ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in the treatment of great saphenous vein reflux

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Chapman-Smith ◽  
A Browne
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Patient Acceptance ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Clinical Recurrence ◽  
Over Time

Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the long-term efficacy, safety and rate of recurrence for varicose veins associated with great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux treated with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS). Methods A five-year prospective study was performed, recording the effect on the GSV and saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) diameters, and reflux in the superficial venous system over time. UGFS was the sole treatment modality used in all cases, and repeat UGFS was performed where indicated following serial annual ultrasound. Results No serious adverse outcomes were observed – specifically no thromboembolism, arterial injection, anaphylaxis or nerve damage. There was a 4% clinical recurrence rate after five years, with 100% patient acceptance of success. Serial annual duplex ultrasound demonstrated a significant reduction in GSV and SFJ diameters, maintained over time. There was ultrasound recurrence in 27% at 12 months, and in 64% at five years, including any incompetent trunkal or tributary reflux even 1 mm in diameter being recorded. Thirty percent had pure ultrasound recurrence, 17% new vessel reflux and 17% combined new and recurrent vessels on ultrasound. Of all, 16.5% required repeat UGFS treatment between 12 and 24 months, but less than 10% in subsequent years. The safety and clinical efficacy of UGFS for all clinical, aetiological, anatomical and pathological elements classes of GSV reflux was excellent. Conclusion The popularity of this outpatient technique with patients reflects ease of treatment, lower cost, lack of downtime and elimination of venous signs and symptoms. Patients accept that UGFS can be repeated readily if required for recurrence in this common chronic condition. The subclinical ultrasound evidence of recanalization or new vein incompetence needs to be considered in this light.

Inferior selective crossectomy for great saphenous vein incompetence: Our experience

Vascular ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 170853812094725
Author(s):  
Maurizio Pagano ◽  
Giovanna Passaro ◽  
Roberto Flore ◽  
Paolo Tondi
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Venous Disease ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Saphenofemoral Junction

Objective To describe the mid-term outcome after inferior selective crossectomy in a subset of patients with symptomatic chronic venous disease and both great saphenous vein and suprasaphenic valve incompetence. Methodsː Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was conducted. During an eight-year period, 1095 ligations of all saphenofemoral junction inferior tributaries and great saphenous vein stripping were performed in 814 Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, Pathophysiology C2–C6 patients. Duplex ultrasound follow-up examinations were performed after 30 days, 6 months, and 2 years, and saphenofemoral junction hemodynamic patterns and varicose veins recurrence rates were evaluated. Results Two hundred and twenty patients completed the two-year follow-up period. At the 30-day Duplex ultrasound evaluations, two different hemodynamic patterns were described. Type 1, with physiological drainage of saphenofemoral junction superior tributaries, was observed in 214 patients. Type 2, without flow in saphenofemoral junction superior tributaries, was observed in six patients. Overall varicose vein recurrence rates were 0, 2.3, and 2.7% at the 30-day, 6-month, and 2-year follow-up examinations, respectively. At the two-year follow-up, Type 1 patients showed 0% varicose vein recurrence, while Type 2 patients showed 100%. Conclusionsː Inferior selective crossectomy seems to be a valid and safe option in case of both suprasaphenic valve and great saphenous vein incompetence. Duplex ultrasound evaluation, according to our protocol, allows us to identify two different saphenofemoral junction hemodynamic patterns that could predict varicose vein recurrence at mid-term. An optimal stump washing after inferior selective crossectomy, warranted by patency and large caliber saphenofemoral junction superior tributaries, seems to be the key point in preventing varicose vein recurrence in this context. However, large prospective studies regarding saphenofemoral junction modifications and varicose vein recurrence are needed to confirm these preliminary observations.

scholarly journals Endovenous Ablation of Varicose Veins Experience at Tertiary Neurological Center

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-96
Author(s):  
Sandeep Raj Pandey ◽  
George Bush Jung Katwal ◽  
Sharad Hari Gajuryal
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Normal Activity ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Endovenous Thermal Ablation

Introduction: Endovascular ablation of varicose vein either by radiofrequency ablationor laser delivers sufficient thermal energy to incompetent vein segments to produce irreversible occlusion, fibrosis and ultimately disappearance of the vein.Materials and Methods: Three hundred patients with varicosities due to primary or recurrent sapheno-femoral or sapheno-popliteal junction and great or small saphenous veinreflux underwent out-patient and in-patient endovenous thermal ablation between January 2015 to December 2017.The great saphenous vein was ablated from 2-2.5 cm below sapheno-femoral junction to knee and the small saphenous vein was ablated from mid-calf to the sapheno-popliteal junction.Results: Patient returning time to normal activity was 0–1 days returning to normal daily activity were immediately after 4 hours. Duplex ultrasound follow-up (median 3-months) confirmed abolition of sapheno-femoral junction/great saphenous vein and sapheno-popliteal junction/small saphenous vein reflux in all limbs. There were no instances of skin burns or deep vein thrombosis, but, 7 patients developed transient cutaneous numbness involving sural nerve and 1 developed endovenous heat induced thrombosis 3.Conclusions: This is likely to be more effective than conventional surgery, although long-term follow up is required.  Despite being expensive in comparison to open surgery, endovenous thermal ablation is superior in terms of: minimizing pain, avoiding incision, early mobilisation and discharge. Changing the treatment distance from 2 cm to 2.5 cm peripheral to the Deep veins junction may result in a diminished incidence of endovenous heat induced thrombosis 3.

Neovascularization in Restoration of Continuity of the Rat Femoral Vein following Surgical Interruption

1987 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.M. Glass
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Femoral Vein ◽  
Histological Studies ◽  
Venous Circulation ◽  
Main Vein

Recurrence of varicose veins after surgical treatment by ligation and transection has been usually attributed to development of varicosity in veins collateral to the transected vessels. Early studies reported regeneration of the great saphenous vein at the site of previous transection. The present study in the rat was undertaken to determine whether restoration of normal venous circulation in a limb after surgical interruption of the main vein develops through enlargement of collateral veins or by restoration of continuity of the interrupted vein as a result of neovascularization at the site of ligation. Following ligation in continuity or ligation and surgical transection of the rat common iliac or femoral vein, phlebographic, surgical exploratory and histological studies showed restoration of its continuity through newly formed vessels. These findings suggest that in recurrence of varicose veins the roles of neovascularization and of collateral veins deserve further investigation.

Radiofrequency ablation of the great saphenous vein, comparing one versus two treatment cycles for the proximal vein segment

2014 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 724-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Sufian ◽  
A Arnez ◽  
N Labropoulos ◽  
K Nguyen ◽  
V Satwah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiofrequency Ablation ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Severity Scores ◽  
Vein Segment ◽  
Ceap Classification

Objective To evaluate the results of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) using one versus two 20 s energy cycle treatment in the proximal 7 cm segment of the GSV. Methods All patients who underwent RFA of the GSV from 1 May 2013 to 30 September 2013 in eight of our vein centers were included. Duplex ultrasound scans (DUSs) were performed prior to treatment on all patients and 2–3 days, and 1 month after procedure. Demographic data, GSV diameters, and other relevant data were recorded. Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathologic (CEAP) classification and Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSSs) were determined prior to ablation and one month later. Patients who developed endovenous heat induced thrombosis (EHIT) were followed till resolution. Results A total of 205 patients had one cycle treatment (group A) and 204 had two cycle treatment (group B). The two groups were comparable in their demography, CEAP classification, and VCSS scores. The rate of failure of ablation and incidence of EHIT were also not significantly different. The incidence of complications was low, <5% in both groups and all were minor. Conclusion Two cycle treatment of the proximal GSV for vein ablation does not improve the success rate of vein closure in the short term, compared to one cycle treatment. It also does not increase the risks of DVT, EHIT, major bleeding, and other complications. However, we do not know at what diameter two cycles may be superior to one cycle.

scholarly journals ClariVein® – Early results from a large single-centre series of mechanochemical endovenous ablation for varicose veins

2016 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
TY Tang ◽  
JW Kam ◽  
ME Gaunt
Keyword(s):  
Saphenous Vein ◽  
Great Saphenous Vein ◽  
Varicose Veins ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Foam Sclerotherapy ◽  
Early Results ◽  
Endovenous Ablation ◽  
The Uk

Objectives This study assessed the effectiveness and patient experience of the ClariVein® endovenous occlusion catheter for varicose veins from a large single-centre series in the UK. Methods A total of 300 patients (371 legs) underwent ClariVein® treatment for their varicose veins; 184 for great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence, 62 bilateral GSV, 23 short saphenous vein (SSV), 6 bilateral SSV and 25 combined unilateral great saphenous vein and SSV. Patients were reviewed at an interval of two months post procedure and underwent Duplex ultrasound assessment. Postoperative complications were recorded along with patient satisfaction. Results All 393 procedures were completed successfully under local anaesthetic. Complete occlusion of the treated vein was initially achieved in all the patients, but at eight weeks’ follow-up, there was only partial obliteration in 13/393 (3.3%) veins. These were all successfully treated with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy. Procedures were well tolerated with a mean pain score of 0.8 (0–10). No significant complications were reported. Conclusions ClariVein® can be used to ablate long and short saphenous varicose veins on a walk-in–walk-out basis. Bilateral procedures can be successfully performed, and these are well tolerated as can multiple veins in the same leg. Early results are promising but further evaluation and longer term follow-up are required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document