scholarly journals COMPARISON OF SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF COMPOSITE RESIN TO ENAMEL SURFACE OF PRIMARY TEETH TREATED WITH ER,CR.YSGG LASER VERSUS ACID ETCHING: “AN INVITRO EVALUATION.”

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 21-30
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Primary Teeth ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Acid Etching

scholarly journals Shear bond strength of enamel surface treated with air-abrasive system

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 175-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Cristina Borsatto ◽  
Alma Blásida Elisaur Benitez Catirse ◽  
Regina Guenka Palma Dibb ◽  
Telma Nunes do Nascimento ◽  
Renata Andréa Salvitti de Sá Rocha ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Aluminum Oxide ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
Group I

The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of a composite resin to dental enamel, using three different surface treatments. Fifteen sound third molars were randomly assigned to three groups. The mesial and distal surfaces were flattened and covered using adhesive tape with a central orifice delimiting the adhesion area (7.07 mm²). Group I, the enamel surface was conditioned with 37% phosphoric acid for 15 s; group II, the surface was treated using air abrasion with aluminum oxide; group III, the enamel surface was treated using an association of air abrasion with aluminum oxide and 37% phosphoric acid. The Single Bond (3M) adhesive system was applied and a Teflon matrix was placed and filled with composite resin Z-100 (3M) and light-cured. The shear bond strength test was performed with a universal testing machine. The acid etching technique and air abrasion with aluminum oxide associated with acid etching had the highest shear bond strength values. Data were subjected to statistical analysis using ANOVA and the Tukey test, and no statistically significant difference in shear bond strength was observed between group I (12.49 ± 2.85 MPa) and group III (12.59 ± 2.68 MPa). In contrast, both groups had statistically better shear bond strengths compared to group II (0.29 ± 0.56 MPa; p<0.05). Air abrasion with aluminum oxide does not substitute acid etching. The association of these methods to obtain adequate adhesion to the substrate is necessary.

Enamel Deproteinization Before Acid Etching and its Effect on the Shear Bond Strength – An in vitro Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Harleen ◽  
Y Ramakrishna ◽  
AK Munshi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Sodium Hypochlorite ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group B

Objective: This study was undertaken to assess the effect of enamel deproteinization with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) before phosphoric acid (H3PO4) etching on the shear bond strength of Adper™ Single Bond 2 adhesive and Filtek™ Z- 350 XT composite resin . Study design: Forty human sound permanent molars which were extracted for periodontal reasons were used in the experimental protocol as under:Group-A (20 teeth):– A 5X4 mm window of the enamel surface was etched with 37% H3PO4 gel for 15 seconds,washed with distilled water and air dried. A single coat of Adper™ Single Bond 2 adhesive was applied and photo polymerized for 20 seconds and Filtek™ Z- 350 XT composite resin block of length 5mm,width 4mm and height 5mm respectively was built and photo polymerized in increments for 20 seconds each. Group-B (20 teeth):- Similarly the enamel surface was treated with 5.25% NaOCl for 60 seconds, washed with distilled water and then etched with 37% H3PO4 gel for 15 seconds, washed with distilled water and air dried. A single coat of Adper™ Single Bond 2 adhesive was applied and photo polymerized for 20 seconds and Filtek™ Z- 350 XT composite resin block of length 5mm, width 4mm and height 5mm respectively was built and photo polymerized in increments for 20 seconds each. The shear bond strength of all the samples were measured (in MPa) on Instron Mechanical Testing Machine. Results: The mean shear bond strength value for Group-A was 13.51 ± 5.726 MPa and for Group-B being 15.06 ± 6.220 MPa. No statistically significant difference in the shear bond strengths was observed between the two groups. Conclusions:No significant effect of sodium hypochlorite enamel deproteinization on the shear bond strength of Adper™ Single Bond 2 adhesive and Filtek™ Z- 350 XT composite resin before acid etching was observed in this study.

scholarly journals Etching Enamel for Orthodontics with an Erbium, Chromium:Yttrium-Scandium-Gallium-Garnet Laser System

2007 ◽  
Vol 77 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Güvenç Basaran ◽  
Törün Özer ◽  
Nükhet Berk ◽  
Orhan Hamamcı
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Laser Irradiation ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Laser System ◽  
Surface Characteristics ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Power Outputs

Abstract Objective: To test the shear bond strength, surface characteristics, and fracture mode of brackets that are bonded to enamel etched with an erbium, chromium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser operated at different power outputs: 0.5 W, 1 W, and 2 W. Materials and Methods: Human premolars that had been extracted for orthodontic purposes were used. Enamel was etched with an Er,Cr:YSGG laser system operated at one of three power outputs or with orthophosphoric acid. Results: The shear bond strength associated with the 0.5-W laser irradiation was significantly less than the strengths obtained with the other irradiations. Both the 1-W and 2-W laser irradiations were capable of etching enamel in the same manner. This finding was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy examination. The evaluation of adhesive-remnant-index scores demonstrated no statistically significant difference in bond failure site among the groups, except for the 0.5-W laser–etched group. Generally, more adhesive was left on the enamel surface with laser irradiation than with acid etching. Conclusion: The mean shear bond strength and enamel surface etching obtained with an Er,Cr: YSGG laser (operated at 1 W or 2 W for 15 seconds) is comparable to that obtained with acid etching.

The effect of caries detector dyes and a cavity cleansing agent on composite resin bonding to enamel and dentin

2001 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Azza El-Housseiny ◽  
Hana Jamjoum
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Group Iv ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Group V ◽  
Universal Testing ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference

This study was undertaken to evaluate the effect of caries detector dyes and/or cavity cleanser on composite bonding and etching patterns of enamel and dentin. One hundred and eight non-carious premolars were divided into six groups according to the enamel and dentin pretreatment investigated. The different pretreatment were as follows: Group I: teeth with prophylaxis only, Group II: Sable seek caries detector dye,Groups III: chlorhexidine cavity cleanser,Group IV: the caries detectors dye followed by prophylaxis, Group V: the cavity cleanser followed by the caries detector dye, and Group IV: Snoop caries detector dye. The shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to enamel and dentin was evaluated by the Instron Universal testing machine while, the topographic details of enamel and dentin were examined by the SEM following the different pretreatment and acid etching. Results of the shear bond strength showed no statistically significant difference among the six groups, with no substantial differences in SEM results. It is concluded that using the caries detector dyes and/or chlorhexidine cavity cleanser before acid etching does not significantly affect composite bonding to enamel and dentin.

Enamel Deproteinization using Papacarie and 10% Papain Gel on Shear Bond Strength of Orthodontic Brackets Before and After Acid Etching

2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 348-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
RM Agarwal ◽  
R Yeluri ◽  
C Singh ◽  
AK Munshi
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Orthodontic Brackets ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Adhesive Remnant Index ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Group 2

Objective: To suggest Papacarie® as a new deproteinizing agent in comparison with indigenously prepared 10% papain gel before and after acid etching that may enhance the quality of the bond between enamel surface and composite resin complex. Study design: One hundred and twenty five extracted human premolars were utilized and divided into five groups: In the group 1, enamel surface was etched and primer was applied. In group 2, treatment with papacarie® for 60 seconds followed by etching and primer application. In group 3, etching followed by treatment with papacarie® for 60 seconds and primer application. In group 4, treatment with 10% papain gel for 60 seconds followed by etching and primer application. In group 5, etching followed by treatment with 10% papain gel for 60 seconds and primer application . After bonding the brackets, the mechanical testing was performed using a Universal testing machine. The failure mode was analyzed using an adhesive remnant index. The etching patterns before and after application of papacarie® and 10% papain gel was also evaluated using SEM. The values obtained for shear bond strength were submitted to analysis of variance and Tukey test (p &lt; 0.05). Results: It was observed that group 2 and group 4 had the highest shear bond strength and was statistically significant from other groups (p=0.001). Regarding Adhesive remnant index no statistical difference was seen between the groups (p=0.538). Conclusion: Papacarie® or 10% papain gel can be used to deproteinize the enamel surface before acid etching to enhance the bond strength of orthodontic brackets.

scholarly journals Shear bond strength of orthodontic tubes bonded directly with composite resin reinforcement on the enamel surface

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (16) ◽  
pp. e195101623481
Author(s):  
Tainah Oliveira Rifane ◽  
Ítalo Hudson Tavares Maia ◽  
Andressa Silva de Oliveira ◽  
Ranyele Elis Alexandre Rodrigues ◽  
Francisbênia Alves Silvestre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Fracture Analysis ◽  
Strength Test ◽  
Enamel Surface ◽  
Tube Surface ◽  
Control Tube ◽  
And Control

To evaluate the shear bond strength and the fracture type of orthodontic tubes bonded directly with composite resin throughout the enamel surface. 30 bovine teeth were cut into 3 slices with 5 mm each and embedded in PVC pipes with acrylic resin exposing the buccal face. Subsequently, the teeth were submitted to conventional bonding techniques. Natural Ortho resin was applied for direct bonding of Edgewise Standard orthodontic tubes (Morelli®) and light-cured for 20s. A different viscosity resin was chosen and light-cured for 40s to reinforce the tube surface. The samples were divided into the following groups: Orthodontic tube with direct bonding without reinforcement (CONTROL), Tube with Natural Ortho resin + Reinforcement (NO + NO), Tube with Natural Ortho resin + Reinforcement with Flow resin (NO + FL). These were submitted to shear bond strength; immediate and 1-year aging fracture analysis after simulated through thermocycling. In the shear bond strength test, the group of orthodontic tubes that were directly bonded with Natural Ortho resin and reinforced (NO + NO) showed greater strength results after 24 hours and 1 year with values of (p=0.0225) and (p=0.0273). It was statistically differentto the NO + FL and CONTROL reinforced groups. In the fracture analysis, the NO +NO group was classified immediately as composite cohesive, and mixed failure after aging by thermocycling. The addition of a composite resin layer on the surface of the directly bonded orthodontic tube improved bond strength. The reinforcement must be carried out in regular consistency and the use of Flow resin is not indicated.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document