scholarly journals MANAGEMENT OF LOOSE SMUT DISEASE (USTILAGO TRITICI) AND DETERMINATION OF FUNGICIDES RESIDUES IN WHEAT MATRICES USING QuEChERS METHODOLOGY

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 107-118
Author(s):  
M. A. Gad ◽  
A. A.A. El- Ghanam ◽  
Dalia E. El- Hefny
Keyword(s):  
Nature ◽  
1955 ◽  
Vol 175 (4454) ◽  
pp. 467-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. C. V. BATTS
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 219
Author(s):  
Ateeq ur Rehman ◽  
Syed A.H Naqvi ◽  
Ummad U.D. Umar ◽  
Rasheed Ahmad

Fungal diseases pose a potential threat to successful cereal production in wheat particularly in Pakistan. Loose smut caused by Ustilago tritici is an important disease of wheat. During the current research various lines of wheat were screened against the deadly disease, results showed no line was resistant against the disease in the wheat genetic resources, mostly varieties showed susceptible to highly susceptible response. All the environmental variables were found conducive for the development of the disease. The disease is a serious concern for wheat production and potential breeding programs are the need of time to cater the losses due to this disease. 


Euphytica ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 169 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harpinder Singh Randhawa ◽  
Zlatko Popovic ◽  
Jim Menzies ◽  
Ron Knox ◽  
Stephen Fox

1978 ◽  
Vol 56 (21) ◽  
pp. 2712-2716 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Nielsen

The grass Agropyron tsukushiense var. transiens is native to Far East Asia, and Hordeum compressum is native to southern South America. They were found to be susceptible to all the races that they were tested to of the following: loose smut of wheat (Ustilago tritici): loose, covered, and false loose smut of barley (U. nuda, U. hordei, and U. nigra); loose and covered smut of oats (U. avenae and U. kolleri); and head smut of grasses (U. bullata). The two grasses are the first known common hosts for these smuts and will be used to study the relationships between these pathogens.


1991 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 543-546
Author(s):  
D. R. Sampson ◽  
R. G. Fulcher ◽  
W. L. Seaman ◽  
J. Fregeau-Reid

Harmil is a new soft white winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar well adapted to southwestern Ontario. It has high yield, medium height, strong straw, low grain and flour protein, and low 1000-grain weight. It is moderately susceptible to leaf and head diseases, but it is the only cultivar available for the area that is resistant to the two prevalent races of loose smut (Ustilago tritici). Key words: Triticum aestivum L., wheat (winter), soft white, cultivar description


1977 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 1033-1039 ◽  
Author(s):  
MILTON C. MEDEIROS ◽  
J. NIELSEN

The occurrence in Brazil of physiologic races of loose smut, Ustilago tritici, (Pers.) Rostr., has been demonstrated. Twelve races were identified amongst 50 field collections of loose smut. Five of the races were classified as being similar to Canadian race T 2, and two races as T 8 when the standard set of differential cultivars was used. However, further differentiation of these races was possible on three supplemental differentials. Another four races were virulent on several differential cultivars of common wheat and on Pentad, a differential cultivar of durum wheat, and thus appear to invalidate the claim that formae speciales of Ustilago tritici exist on common wheat and on durum wheat.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanwen Yan ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Dongfang Ma ◽  
Junliang Yin

Wheat loose smut caused by Ustilago tritici a seed-borne disease, is difficult to control due to the expansion of wheat planting area and difficulty of pathogen detection. In this study, real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR (qPCR) and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assays were used to rapidly amplify the DNA of U. tritici. Five pairs primers for qPCR and two series primers for LAMP were designed. Firstly, the specify of primers were carried out by using the DNAs of U. tritici, Fusarium graminearum, Blumeria graminis, Rhizoctonia cerealis, Puccinia striiformis, Bipolaris sorokiniana, and Alternaria solani as templates. Then the amplification systems are optimized. Finally, the sensitivity of qPCR and LAMP assays were quantified. The results show that using the primers pairs Y430F/R, Y307F/R, Y755F/R and Y139F/R for qPCR, primers L-139 and L-988 for LAMP assay could be used for U. tritici detection. In the sensitivity test, the detection limit of qPCR assay is 10 pg μL-1 of genomic DNA, the detection limit of LAMP assay is 100 fg μL -1 . We successfully performed qPCR and LAMP assays on two wheat loose smut wheat samples, and confirmed sequenced U. tritici infection by subsequently sequencing. This paper established two methods for U. tritici detection, which could be used for wheat loose smut diagnose in lab and field.


2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 49-59
Author(s):  
B. Karsou ◽  
R. Samara

Abstract This study investigated the role of endogenous Palestinian plant extracts in inducing wheat and barley resistance systems against loose smut disease with the aim to alternate the chemical pest control with natural fungicides. Twenty indigenous herbal plant extracts and essential oils were assessed for their biological and antifungal properties against Ustilago tritici and Ustilago nuda. Their potential role in inducing resistance pathways was studied on four different cultivars of wheat and barley. Two common enzyme indicators – guaiacol peroxidase (POX) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) – are expressed in plants only after physical or chemical induction. The antifungal activity of the plant extracts was investigated in vitro. Totally 70 % of the plant extracts showed antifungal activity against Ustilago tritici and Ustilago nuda. Coridothyme extracts ranked first (61 %) in the fungal growth inhibition, followed by varthemia, salvia, ambrosia, artemisia, and lemon thyme. Some plant extracts significantly increased the POX and PPO effect compared to control for all the wheat and barley cultivars tested. The study revealed that oregano, clove or lavender and pomegranate, common yarrow or chamomile oil effectively induced the resistance indicator enzymes in wheat and barley.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document