Comparison of rain gauge and radar data as input to an urban rainfall-runoff model

2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Quirmbach ◽  
G.A. Schultz
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Model Simulation ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Urban Hydrology ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model ◽  
Urban Rainfall Runoff

This paper presents an application of radar data (DX-product of the German Weather Service) with a high resolution in space (1° × 1 km) and time (Δt = 5 minutes) in urban hydrology. The radar data and data of rain gauges with different locations in the test catchment were compared concerning their suitability as input into an urban rainfall-runoff model. In order to evaluate the accuracy of model simulation results, five evaluation criteria have been specified which are relevant for an efficient management of sewer systems and wastewater treatment plants. The results demonstrate that radar data should be used in urban hydrology if distances > 4 km between rain gauge and catchment exist and for catchments with a density of rain gauges smaller than 1 rain gauge per 16 km2.

scholarly journals Conceptual Rainfall–Runoff Model Performance with Different Spatial Rainfall Inputs

2011 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1100-1112 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Vaze ◽  
D. A. Post ◽  
F. H. S. Chiew ◽  
J.-M. Perraud ◽  
J. Teng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Model Simulation ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Grid Cell ◽  
Rainfall Series ◽  
Data Availability ◽  
Rainfall Time Series ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

Abstract Different methods have been used to obtain the daily rainfall time series required to drive conceptual rainfall–runoff models, depending on data availability, time constraints, and modeling objectives. This paper investigates the implications of different rainfall inputs on the calibration and simulation of 4 rainfall–runoff models using data from 240 catchments across southeast Australia. The first modeling experiment compares results from using a single lumped daily rainfall series for each catchment obtained from three methods: single rainfall station, Thiessen average, and average of interpolated rainfall surface. The results indicate considerable improvements in the modeled daily runoff and mean annual runoff in the model calibration and model simulation over an independent test period with better spatial representation of rainfall. The second experiment compares modeling using a single lumped daily rainfall series and modeling in all grid cells within a catchment using different rainfall inputs for each grid cell. The results show only marginal improvement in the “distributed” application compared to the single rainfall series, and only in two of the four models for the larger catchments. Where a single lumped catchment-average daily rainfall series is used, care should be taken to obtain a rainfall series that best represents the spatial rainfall distribution across the catchment. However, there is little advantage in driving a conceptual rainfall–runoff model with different rainfall inputs from different parts of the catchment compared to using a single lumped rainfall series, where only estimates of runoff at the catchment outlet is required.

Snow-Hydrological modeling using remote sensing data in Vilcanota basin, Peru

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eber Risco ◽  
Waldo Lavado ◽  
Pedro Rau
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Modeling ◽  
Remote Sensing Data ◽  
Time Consistency ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Direct Evaluation ◽  
Daily Discharge ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model ◽  
Trmm 3B42

<p>Water resources availability in the southern Andes of Peru is being affected by glacier and snow retreat. This problem is already perceived in the Vilcanota river basin, where hydro-climatological information is scarce. In this particular mountain context, any water plan represents a great challenge. To cope with these limitations, we propose to assess the space-time consistency of 10 satellite-based precipitation products (CMORPH–CRT v.1, CMORPH–BLD v.1, CHIRP v.2, CHIRPS v.2, GSMaP v.6, GSMaP correction, MSWEP v.2.1, PERSIANN, PERSIANN–CDR, TRMM 3B42) with 25 rain gauge stations in order to select the best product that represents the variability in the Vilcanota basin. For this purpose, through a direct evaluation of sensitivity analysis via the GR4J parsimonious hydrological model over the basin. GSMap v.6, TRMM 3B42 and CHIRPS were selected to represent rainfall spatial variability according with different statistical criteria, such as correlation coefficient (CC), standard deviation (SD), percentage of bias (%B) and centered mean square error (CRMSE). To facilitate the interpretation of statistical results, Taylor's diagram was used to represent the CC statistics, normalized values of SD and CRMSE.</p><p>A distributed degree-day model was chosen to analyse the sensitivity of snow cover simulations and hydrological contribution. The GR4J rainfall-runoff model was calibrated (using global optimization) and applied to simulate the daily discharge and compared with the Distributed Hydrology and Vegetation Model with Glacier Dynamics (DHSVM-GDM) over the 2001-2018 period. Furthermore, the simulated streamflow was evaluated through comparisons with observations at the hydrological stations using Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency and Kling Gupta Efficiency (KGE). The results show that the snow-runoff have increased in recent years, so new water management and planning strategies should be developed in the basin. This research is part of the multidisciplinary collaboration between British and Peruvian scientists (Newton Fund, Newton-Paulet) through RAHU project.</p>

The effect of rainfall measurement uncertainties on rainfall–runoff processes modelling

2007 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 103-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Stransky ◽  
V. Bares ◽  
P. Fatka
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Errors ◽  
Dynamic Test ◽  
Systematic Errors ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Test Duration ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Rainfall Volume ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

Rainfall data are a crucial input for various tasks concerning the wet weather period. Nevertheless, their measurement is affected by random and systematic errors that cause an underestimation of the rainfall volume. Therefore, the general objective of the presented work was to assess the credibility of measured rainfall data and to evaluate the effect of measurement errors on urban drainage modelling tasks. Within the project, the methodology of the tipping bucket rain gauge (TBR) was defined and assessed in terms of uncertainty analysis. A set of 18 TBRs was calibrated and the results were compared to the previous calibration. This enables us to evaluate the ageing of TBRs. A propagation of calibration and other systematic errors through the rainfall–runoff model was performed on experimental catchment. It was found that the TBR calibration is important mainly for tasks connected with the assessment of peak values and high flow durations. The omission of calibration leads to up to 30% underestimation and the effect of other systematic errors can add a further 15%. The TBR calibration should be done every two years in order to catch up the ageing of TBR mechanics. Further, the authors recommend to adjust the dynamic test duration proportionally to generated rainfall intensity.

scholarly journals Investigation of the performance of a simple rainfall disaggregation scheme using semi-distributed hydrological modelling of the Lee catchment, UK

2010 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-144
Author(s):  
Marie-Laure Segond ◽  
Howard S. Wheater ◽  
Christian Onof
Keyword(s):  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Expected Performance ◽  
Hourly Data ◽  
Temporal Disaggregation ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Event Based ◽  
Spatially Varying ◽  
Runoff Model

A simple and practical spatial–temporal disaggregation scheme to convert observed daily rainfall to hourly data is presented, in which the observed sub-daily temporal profile available at one gauge is applied linearly to all sites over the catchment to reproduce the spatially varying daily totals. The performance of the methodology is evaluated using an event-based, semi-distributed, nonlinear hydrological rainfall–runoff model to test the suitability of the disaggregation scheme for UK conditions for catchment sizes of 80–1,000 km2. The joint procedure is tested on the Lee catchment, UK, for five events from a 12 year period of data from 16 rain gauges and 12 flow stations. The disaggregation scheme generally performs extremely well in reproducing the simulated flow for the natural catchments, although, as expected, performance deteriorates for localized convective rainfall. However, some reduction in performance occurs when the catchments are artificially urbanised.

scholarly journals Calculating the hydrological response of a mountain catchment using conventional and unconventional (CML) rainfall observations: the case study of Mallero catchment

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greta Cazzaniga ◽  
Carlo De Michele ◽  
Cristina Deidda ◽  
Michele D'Amico ◽  
Antonio Ghezzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Model ◽  
Hydrological Modelling ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Signal Attenuation ◽  
Large Variability ◽  
Field Reconstruction ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Weather Radars ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model

<p>Rainfall plays a critical role in the hydrological cycle, being the main downward forcing. It is well known that rainfall exhibits large variability in space and time due to the storm dynamics and its interaction with the topography. It is a difficult task to reconstruct the rainfall over an area accurately. Rainfall is usually collected through rain gauges, disdrometers, and weather radars. Rain gauges and disdrometers provide quite accurate measurements of rainfall on the ground, but at a single site, while weather radars provide an indication of rainfall field variability in space, even if their use is restricted to plain areas.</p><p>Recently, unconventional observations have been considered for the monitoring of rainfall. These consist in signal attenuation measurements induced by rain on a mesh of point-to-point commercial microwave links (CML). These data, integrated with the ones collected by a network of conventional rain gauges, can provide further information about rainfall dynamics leading to improvements in hydrological modelling, which requires accurate description of the rainfall field.</p><p>The work we are going to describe is part of MOPRAM (MOnitoring Precipitation through a Network of RAdio links at Microwaves), a scientific project funded by Fondazione Cariplo (see also the EGU abstract of Nebuloni et al., 2020). Here we use rainfall data, obtained both from a rain gauge network and from signal attenuation measurements, into a hydrological model in order to evaluate the improvement in the hydrological modelling due to a better description of the rainfall field. We consider a semi-distributed rainfall-runoff model and we apply it to the Mallero catchment (Western Rhaetian Alps, Northern Italy), with the outlet located in Sondrio. This catchment is equipped with 13 microwave links and a network of 13 rain gauges.</p><p>Firstly, we implement and test the Rain field Reconstruction Algorithm (RRA), which retrieves the 2D rainfall field from CML data through a tomographic inversion technique, developed by D’Amico et al., 2016. By RRA we generate synthetic rainfall maps from attenuation data measured by 13 links located in the Mallero basin, for a few historical events in the period 2016-2019. To improve the accuracy of rainfall field reconstruction, we also integrate the reconstructed maps with on ground data from 13 rain gauges. These maps are used as input to the hydrological rainfall-runoff model. Finally, we compare the observed discharge with the calculated one using the hydrological model and different rainfall inputs.</p>

scholarly journals Rainfall-runoff modeling using Doppler weather radar data for Adyar watershed, India

MAUSAM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56
Author(s):  
S.JOSEPHINE VANAJA ◽  
B.V. MUDGAL ◽  
S.B. THAMPI
Keyword(s):  
Weather Radar ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Doppler Weather Radar ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Cyclonic Storm ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Runoff Modeling

Precipitation is a significant input for hydrologic models; so, it needs to be quantified precisely. The measurement with rain gauges gives the rainfall at a particular location, whereas the radar obtains instantaneous snapshots of electromagnetic backscatter from rain volumes that are then converted into rainfall via algorithms. It has been proved that the radar measurement of areal rainfall can outperform rain gauge network measurements, especially in remote areas where rain gauges are sparse, and remotely sensed satellite rainfall data are too inaccurate. The research focuses on a technique to improve rainfall-runoff modeling based on radar derived rainfall data for Adyar watershed, Chennai, India. A hydrologic model called ‘Hydrologic Engineering Center-Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS)’ is used for simulating rainfall-runoff processes. CARTOSAT 30 m DEM is used for watershed delineation using HEC-GeoHMS. The Adyar watershed is within 100 km radius circle from the Doppler Weather Radar station, hence it has been chosen as the study area. The cyclonic storm Jal event from 4-8 November, 2010 period is selected for the study. The data for this period are collected from the Statistical Department, and the Cyclone Detection Radar Centre, Chennai, India. The results show that the runoff is over predicted using calibrated Doppler radar data in comparison with the point rainfall from rain gauge stations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document