scholarly journals Rainfall-runoff modeling using Doppler weather radar data for Adyar watershed, India

MAUSAM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-56
Author(s):  
S.JOSEPHINE VANAJA ◽  
B.V. MUDGAL ◽  
S.B. THAMPI
Keyword(s):  
Weather Radar ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Doppler Weather Radar ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Cyclonic Storm ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Runoff Modeling

Precipitation is a significant input for hydrologic models; so, it needs to be quantified precisely. The measurement with rain gauges gives the rainfall at a particular location, whereas the radar obtains instantaneous snapshots of electromagnetic backscatter from rain volumes that are then converted into rainfall via algorithms. It has been proved that the radar measurement of areal rainfall can outperform rain gauge network measurements, especially in remote areas where rain gauges are sparse, and remotely sensed satellite rainfall data are too inaccurate. The research focuses on a technique to improve rainfall-runoff modeling based on radar derived rainfall data for Adyar watershed, Chennai, India. A hydrologic model called ‘Hydrologic Engineering Center-Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS)’ is used for simulating rainfall-runoff processes. CARTOSAT 30 m DEM is used for watershed delineation using HEC-GeoHMS. The Adyar watershed is within 100 km radius circle from the Doppler Weather Radar station, hence it has been chosen as the study area. The cyclonic storm Jal event from 4-8 November, 2010 period is selected for the study. The data for this period are collected from the Statistical Department, and the Cyclone Detection Radar Centre, Chennai, India. The results show that the runoff is over predicted using calibrated Doppler radar data in comparison with the point rainfall from rain gauge stations.

scholarly journals Improved input to distributed hydrologic model in areas with sparse subdaily rainfall data using multivariate daily rainfall disaggregation

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 784-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marija Ivković ◽  
Andrijana Todorović ◽  
Jasna Plavšić
Keyword(s):  
Daily Rainfall ◽  
Flood Forecasting ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Observation Network ◽  
Hourly Rainfall ◽  
Extreme Flood ◽  
Flood Simulations

Abstract Flood forecasting relies on good quality of observed and forecasted rainfall. In Serbia, the recording rain gauge network is sparse and rainfall data mainly come from dense non-recording rain gauges. This is not beneficial for flood forecasting in smaller catchments and short-duration events, when hydrologic models operating on subdaily scale are applied. Moreover, differences in rainfall amounts from two types of gauges can be considerable, which is common in operational hydrological practice. This paper examines the possibility of including daily rainfall data from dense observation networks in flood forecasting based on subdaily data, using the extreme flood event in the Kolubara catchment in May 2014 as a case study. Daily rainfall from a dense observation network is disaggregated to hourly scale using the MuDRain multivariate disaggregation software. The disaggregation procedure results in well-reproduced rainfall dynamics and adjusts rainfall volume to the values from the non-recording gauges. The fully distributed wflow_hbv model, which is under development as a forecasting tool for the Kolubara catchment, is used for flood simulations with two alternative hourly rainfall data. The results show an improvement when the disaggregated rainfall from denser network is used, thus indicating the significance of better representation of rainfall temporal and spatial variability for flood forecasting.

scholarly journals Statistical and neural classifiers in estimating rain rate from weather radar measurements

2007 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 111-115
Author(s):  
C. I. Christodoulou ◽  
S. C. Michaelides
Keyword(s):  
Electromagnetic Radiation ◽  
Rain Rate ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Meteorological Conditions ◽  
Swiss Alps ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Weather Radars ◽  
Radar Measurements

Abstract. Weather radars are used to measure the electromagnetic radiation backscattered by cloud raindrops. Clouds that backscatter more electromagnetic radiation consist of larger droplets of rain and therefore they produce more rain. The idea is to estimate rain rate by using weather radar as an alternative to rain-gauges measuring rainfall on the ground. In an experiment during two days in June and August 1997 over the Italian-Swiss Alps, data from weather radar and surrounding rain-gauges were collected at the same time. The statistical KNN and the neural SOM classifiers were implemented for the classification task using the radar data as input and the rain-gauge measurements as output. The proposed system managed to identify matching pattern waveforms and the rainfall rate on the ground was estimated based on the radar reflectivities with a satisfactory error rate, outperforming the traditional Z/R relationship. It is anticipated that more data, representing a variety of possible meteorological conditions, will lead to improved results. The results in this work show that an estimation of rain rate based on weather radar measurements treated with statistical and neural classifiers is possible.

Comparison of rain gauge and radar data as input to an urban rainfall-runoff model

2002 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 27-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Quirmbach ◽  
G.A. Schultz
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Model Simulation ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Urban Hydrology ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Rainfall Runoff Model ◽  
Runoff Model ◽  
Urban Rainfall Runoff

This paper presents an application of radar data (DX-product of the German Weather Service) with a high resolution in space (1° × 1 km) and time (Δt = 5 minutes) in urban hydrology. The radar data and data of rain gauges with different locations in the test catchment were compared concerning their suitability as input into an urban rainfall-runoff model. In order to evaluate the accuracy of model simulation results, five evaluation criteria have been specified which are relevant for an efficient management of sewer systems and wastewater treatment plants. The results demonstrate that radar data should be used in urban hydrology if distances > 4 km between rain gauge and catchment exist and for catchments with a density of rain gauges smaller than 1 rain gauge per 16 km2.

scholarly journals Effect of spatial and temporal variability of gauged and radar rainfall data on hydrological modelingof urban basins

RBRH ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor Costa Pontes ◽  
Carlos Ruberto Fragoso Jr. ◽  
Marllus Gustavo Ferreira Passos das Neves ◽  
Vladimir Caramori Borges de Souza
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Urban Areas ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Spatial And Temporal Variability ◽  
Peak Time ◽  
Radar Rainfall ◽  
Storm Water Management Model ◽  
Runoff Modeling

ABSTRACT In urban areas, rainfall-runoff modeling provides large uncertainties due to the difficulty in representing the spatial distribution of rainfall events. In this context, the this work aims to evaluate the effect of temporal and spatial of rainfall data (weather radar and distributed rainfall gauges network) on runoff estimation in a urban basin. The Reginaldo basin, inserted in the urban area of the Maceió city, capital of state of Alagoas (Brazil), has a reasonable availability of rainfall datal covered with a high number and spatial distribution of rain gauges and weather radar, which was used as input of a hydrological model The EPA Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) has been used with 3 analysis rainfall scenarios: (i) considering uniform rainfall distribution based on measured average rainfall, (ii) considering distributed rainfall using catchment discretization, and (iii) considering distributed rainfall using radar cell discretization. In order to evaluate the model outcomes, we analyzed four hydrological output variables: (i) the peak flow; (ii) the peak time; (iii) the volume flowed and (iv) the volume losses. Based on this criterion, it was clear that, considering he analyzed scenarios, the effect of spatial distribution of rainfall data on hydrological response in small urban basins, with high impervious coverage, was not divergent for the analyzed scenarios and that the radar data showed significantly higher data resolution than rainfall gauges.

scholarly journals Intra-Storm Pattern Recognition through Fuzzy Clustering

Hydrology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 57
Author(s):  
Konstantinos Vantas ◽  
Epaminondas Sidiropoulos
Keyword(s):  
Fuzzy Clustering ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Temporal Distribution ◽  
Distribution Patterns ◽  
Rainfall Data ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Domain Specific ◽  
Runoff Modeling ◽  
National Bank ◽  
Rainfall Patterns

The identification and recognition of temporal rainfall patterns is important and useful not only for climatological studies, but mainly for supporting rainfall–runoff modeling and water resources management. Clustering techniques applied to rainfall data provide meaningful ways for producing concise and inclusive pattern classifications. In this paper, a timeseries of rainfall data coming from the Greek National Bank of Hydrological and Meteorological Information are delineated to independent rainstorms and subjected to cluster analysis, in order to identify and extract representative patterns. The computational process is a custom-developed, domain-specific algorithm that produces temporal rainfall patterns using common characteristics from the data via fuzzy clustering in which (a) every storm may belong to more than one cluster, allowing for some equivocation in the data, (b) the number of the clusters is not assumed known a priori but is determined solely from the data and, finally, (c) intra-storm and seasonal temporal distribution patterns are produced. Traditional classification methods include prior empirical knowledge, while the proposed method is fully unsupervised, not presupposing any external elements and giving results superior to the former.

scholarly journals Application of Attenuation Correction to Quantitative Precipitation Estimation on C-Band Weather Radar in Bengkulu

2021 ◽  
Vol 893 (1) ◽  
pp. 012054
Author(s):  
M F Handoyo ◽  
M P Hadi ◽  
S Suprayogi
Keyword(s):  
Attenuation Correction ◽  
Estimation Error ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Signal Interference ◽  
Active System ◽  
Estimation Errors ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation

Abstract A weather radar is an active system remote sensing tool that observes precipitation indirectly. Weather radar has an advantage in estimating precipitation because it has a high spatial resolution (up to 0.5 km). Reflectivity generated by weather radar still has signal interference caused by attenuation factors. Attenuation causes the Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) by the C-band weather radar to underestimate. Therefore attenuation correction on C-band weather radar is needed to eliminate precipitation estimation errors. This study aims to apply attenuation correction to determine Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) on the c-band weather radar in Bengkulu in December 2018. Gate-by-gate method attenuation correction with Kraemer approach has applied to c-band weather radar data from the Indonesian Agency for Meteorology and Geophysics (BMKG) weather radar network Bengkulu. This method uses reflectivity as the only input. Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) has obtained by comparing weather radar-based rain estimates to 10 observation rain gauges over a month with the Z-R relation equation. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is used to calculate the estimation error. Weather radar data are processed using Python-based libraries Wradlib and ArcGIS 10.5. As a result, the calculation between the weather radar estimate precipitation and the observed rainfall obtained equation Z=2,65R1,3. The attenuation correction process with Kreamer's approach on the c-band weather radar has reduced error in the Qualitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE). Corrected precipitation has a smaller error value (r = 0.88; RMSE = 8.38) than the uncorrected precipitation (r = 0.83; RMSE = 11.70).

scholarly journals Impact of the Altitudinal Gradients of Precipitation on the Radar QPE Bias in the French Alps

Atmosphere ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominique Faure ◽  
Guy Delrieu ◽  
Nicolas Gaussiat
Keyword(s):  
Ground Level ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Altitudinal Gradients ◽  
French Alps ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Quantitative Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Precipitation Estimation ◽  
Radar Data Processing

In the French Alps the quality of the radar Quantitative Precipitation Estimation (QPE) is limited by the topography and the vertical structure of precipitation. A previous study realized in all the French Alps, has shown a general bias between values of the national radar QPE composite and the rain gauge measurements: a radar QPE over-estimation at low altitude (+20% at 200 m a.s.l.), and an increasing underestimation at high altitudes (until −40% at 2100 m a.s.l.). This trend has been linked to altitudinal gradients of precipitation observed at ground level. This paper analyzes relative altitudinal gradients of precipitation estimated with rain gauges measurements in 2016 for three massifs around Grenoble, and for different temporal accumulations (yearly, seasonal, monthly, daily). Comparisons of radar and rain gauge accumulations confirm the bias previously observed. The parts of the current radar data processing affecting the bias value are pointed out. The analysis shows a coherency between the relative gradient values estimated at the different temporal accumulations. Vertical profiles of precipitation detected by a research radar installed at the bottom of the valley also show how the wide horizontal variability of precipitation inside the valley can affect the gradient estimation.

scholarly journals Influence of the rain gauge network on the performance of a hydrological lumped model applied at different basin scales

RBRH ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefany Correia de Paula ◽  
Rutineia Tassi ◽  
Daniel Gustavo Allasia Piccilli ◽  
Francisco Lorenzini Neto
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Monitoring Network ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Network Density ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Rainfall Runoff ◽  
Lumped Model ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Rain Gauge Network

ABSTRACT In this study was evaluated the influence of the rainfall monitoring network density and distribution on the result of rainfall-runoff daily simulations of a lumped model (IPH II) considering basins with different drainage scales: Turvo River (1,540 km2), Ijuí River (9,462 km2), Jacuí River (38,700 km2) and Upper Uruguay (61,900 km2). For this purpose, four rain gauge coverage scenarios were developed: (I) 100%; (II) 75%; (III) 50% and (IV) 25% of the rain gauges of the basin. Additionally, a scenario considering the absence of monitoring was evaluated, in which the rainfall used in the modeling was estimated based on the TRMM satellite. Was verified that, in some situations, the modeling produced better results for scenarios with a lower rain gauges density if the available gauges presented better spatial distribution. Comparatively to the simulations performed with the rainfall estimated by the TRMM, the results obtained using rain gauges’ data were better, even in scenarios with low rain gauges density. However, when the poor spatial distribution of the rain gauges was associated with low density, the satellite’s estimation provided better results. Thus, was conclude that spatial distribution of the rain gauge network is important in the rainfall representation and that estimates obtained by the TRMM can be presented as alternatives for basins with a deficient monitoring network.

scholarly journals Quality-Based Combination of Multi-Source Precipitation Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Jurczyk ◽  
Jan Szturc ◽  
Irena Otop ◽  
Katarzyna Ośródka ◽  
Piotr Struzik
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Flash Flood ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Quality Information ◽  
Precipitation Data ◽  
Spatial Error ◽  
Rain Gauges ◽  
Precipitation Measurement ◽  
Temporal And Spatial

A quantitative precipitation estimate (QPE) provides basic information for the modelling of many kinds of hydro-meteorological processes, e.g., as input to rainfall-runoff models for flash flood forecasting. Weather radar observations are crucial in order to meet the requirements, because of their very high temporal and spatial resolution. Other sources of precipitation data, such as telemetric rain gauges and satellite observations, are also included in the QPE. All of the used data are characterized by different temporal and spatial error structures. Therefore, a combination of the data should be based on quality information quantitatively determined for each input to take advantage of a particular source of precipitation measurement. The presented work on multi-source QPE, being implemented as the RainGRS system, has been carried out in the Polish national meteorological and hydrological service for new nowcasting and hydrological platforms in Poland. For each of the three data sources, different quality algorithms have been designed: (i) rain gauge data is quality controlled and, on this basis, spatial interpolation and estimation of quality field is performed, (ii) radar data are quality controlled by RADVOL-QC software that corrects errors identified in the data and characterizes its final quality, (iii) NWC SAF (Satellite Application Facility on support to Nowcasting and Very Short Range Forecasting) products for both visible and infrared channels are combined and the relevant quality field is determined from empirical relationships that are based on analyses of the product performance. Subsequently, the quality-based QPE is generated with a 1-km spatial resolution every 10 minutes (corresponding to radar data). The basis for the combination is a conditional merging technique that is enhanced by involving detailed quality information that is assigned to individual input data. The validation of the RainGRS estimates was performed taking account of season and kind of precipitation.

scholarly journals Tropical Andes Radar Precipitation Estimates Need High Temporal and Moderate Spatial Resolution

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Guallpa ◽  
Johanna Orellana-Alvear ◽  
Jörg Bendix
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Temporal Resolution ◽  
Time Resolution ◽  
Weather Radar ◽  
Radar Data ◽  
Rain Gauge ◽  
Tropical Andes ◽  
The Andes ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Impact

Weather radar networks are an excellent tool for quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE), due to their high resolution in space and time, particularly in remote mountain areas such as the Tropical Andes. Nevertheless, reduction of the temporal and spatial resolution might severely reduce the quality of QPE. Thus, the main objective of this study was to analyze the impact of spatial and temporal resolutions of radar data on the cumulative QPE. For this, data from the world’s highest X-band weather radar (4450 m a.s.l.), located in the Andes of Ecuador (Paute River basin), and from a rain gauge network were used. Different time resolutions (1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, and 60 min) and spatial resolutions (0.5, 0.25, and 0.1 km) were evaluated. An optical flow method was validated for 11 rainfall events (with different features) and applied to enhance the temporal resolution of radar data to 1-min intervals. The results show that 1-min temporal resolution images are able to capture rain event features in detail. The radar–rain gauge correlation decreases considerably when the time resolution increases (r from 0.69 to 0.31, time resolution from 1 to 60 min). No significant difference was found in the rain total volume (3%) calculated with the three spatial resolution data. A spatial resolution of 0.5 km on radar imagery is suitable to quantify rainfall in the Andes Mountains. This study improves knowledge on rainfall spatial distribution in the Ecuadorian Andes, and it will be the basis for future hydrometeorological studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document