Identificação e prevalência de bactérias causadoras de infecções urinárias em nível ambulatorial

Author(s):  
Andriéli de Souza Silva ◽  
Andréia Hartmann ◽  
Keli Jaqueline Staudt ◽  
Izabel Almeida Alves

Identification and prevalence of bacterial causes of urinary tract infections in an outpatient setting

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S528-S529
Author(s):  
Christopher Wisnik ◽  
Gabriela M Andujar Vazquez ◽  
Kirthana R Beaulac ◽  
Shira Doron

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine G Derington ◽  
Nancy Benavides ◽  
Thomas Delate ◽  
Douglas N Fish

Abstract Background Few published studies exist to describe the off-label use of multiple-dose fosfomycin for outpatient treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (UTI). The purpose of this study was to characterize the patients, infections, drug susceptibilities, and outcomes of multiple-dose fosfomycin episodes for outpatient UTI treatment. Methods This retrospective study evaluated patients who received an outpatient prescription for multiple-dose fosfomycin between July 1999 and June 2018. Multiple-dose fosfomycin prescriptions dispensed for UTI prophylaxis were excluded. The primary outcome was clinical resolution (complete resolution of signs and symptoms) of infection within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included descriptions of antibiotics and cultures before and after treatment, 30-day bacteriologic resolution (posttreatment urine culture <103 colony-forming units of the original pathogen), and 90-day healthcare utilizations for UTI or pyelonephritis. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results Of 171 multiple-dose fosfomycin treatment episodes, the most common regimen was 1 dose every 3 days, mean duration of 6.1 days. Clinical resolution occurred in 115 of 171 (67.3%) episodes, and bacteriologic resolution occurred in 37 of 76 (48.7%) episodes with posttreatment cultures. Most patients used antibiotics or had urine cultures before treatment (81.9% and 97.7%, respectively). Additional antibiotic use, urine cultures, and healthcare utilizations within 90 days posttreatment occurred in 51.5%, 66.1%, and 24.6% of patients, respectively. Conclusions For treating complicated UTI with multiple-dose fosfomycin, clinical resolution occurred in 2 of 3 treatment episodes and bacteriologic resolution occurred in one-half of treatment episodes. Future research is necessary to determine the relative efficacy and safety and optimal dosing regimen, duration, and population for UTI treatment with multiple-dose fosfomycin.


2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 5384-5393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong Sup Lee ◽  
Hyun-Sop Choe ◽  
Sung Jong Lee ◽  
Woong Jin Bae ◽  
Hyeong Jun Cho ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThis study aimed to (i) investigate the antimicrobial susceptibilities of bacteria that cause urinary tract infections (UTIs) in outpatient and inpatient settings and (ii) evaluate the risk factors for emerging antimicrobial drug resistance in UTIs in South Korea. In total, 3,023 samples without duplication were collected from females between 25 and 65 years of age who had been diagnosed with a urinary tract infection. Multicenter patient data were collected using a Web-based electronic system and then evaluated. The isolation rates ofEscherichia coli,Klebsiella pneumoniae, andEnterococcus faeciumin the outpatient setting were 78.1, 4.7, and 1.3%, respectively; in the inpatient setting, the isolation rates of these microorganisms were 37.8, 9.9, and 14.8%, respectively. The susceptibilities ofE. colito amikacin, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, piperacillin-tazobactam, and imipenem in the outpatient setting were 99.4, 79.8, 89.4, 92.8, 69.8, 96.9, and 100.0%, respectively; in the inpatient setting, the susceptibilities to these antibiotics were 97.8, 73.9, 73.7, 82.1, 53.6, 93.2, and 100.0%, respectively. The most unique and common risk factor for emerging antimicrobial-resistantE. coli,K. pneumoniae, andE. faeciumwas previous exposure to antimicrobials. On the basis of these data, the use of fluoroquinolones should be reserved until culture data are available for the treatment of UTIs in South Korea. The present study will serve as a useful reference for Far Eastern Asia.


BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e025810 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca Binda ◽  
Sébastien Fougnot ◽  
Patrice De Monchy ◽  
Anne Fagot-Campagna ◽  
Céline Pulcini ◽  
...  

IntroductionAntibiotic resistance is a serious and increasing worldwide threat to global public health. One of antibiotic stewardship programmes’ objectives are to reduce inappropriate broad-spectrum antibiotics’ prescription. Selective reporting of antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results, which consists of reporting to prescribers only few (n=5-6) antibiotics, preferring first-line and narrow-spectrum agents, is one possible strategy advised in recommendations. However, selective reporting of AST has never been evaluated using an experimental design.Methods and analysisThis study is a pragmatic, prospective, multicentre, controlled (selective reporting vs usual complete reporting of AST), before-after (year 2019 vs 2017) study. Selective reporting of AST is scheduled to be implemented from September 2018 in the ATOUTBIO group of 21 laboratories for all Escherichia coli identified in urine cultures in adult outpatients, and to be compared with the usual complete AST performed in the EVOLAB group of 20 laboratories. The main objective is to assess the impact of selective reporting of AST for E. coli-positive urine cultures in the outpatient setting on the prescription of broad-spectrum antibiotics frequently used for urinary tract infections (amoxicillin-clavulanate, third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones). The primary end point is the after (2019)–before (2017) difference in prescription rates for the previously mentioned antibiotics/classes that will be compared between the two laboratory groups, using linear regression models. Secondary objectives are to evaluate the feasibility of selective reporting of AST implementation by French laboratories and their acceptability by organising focus groups and individual semi-structured interviews with general practitioners and laboratory professionals.Ethics and disseminationThis protocol was approved by French national ethics committees (Comité d’expertise pour les recherches, les études et les évaluations dans le domaine de la santé (TPS 29064) and Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés (Décision DR-2018–141)). Findings of this study will be widely disseminated through conference presentations, reports, factsheets and academic publications and generalisation will be further discussed.Trial registration numberNTC03612297.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S801-S801
Author(s):  
Thomas Lodise ◽  
Thomas Lodise ◽  
Janna Manjelievskaia ◽  
Matthew Brouillette ◽  
Kate Sulham

Abstract Background Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) are one of the most common bacterial infections and represent substantial burden to the health care system. Here, we examine the epidemiology and treatment patterns associated with cUTI in a large US database containing longitudinal inpatient (IP) and outpatient (OP) patient-level data. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients in the IBM MarketScan® Commercial or Medicare Supplemental Databases with at least 1 IP or non-diagnostic OP claim with a diagnosis for cUTI between January 1, 2017 and June 30, 2019. Patients meeting the following criteria were included for analysis: (1) ≥18 years of age on the index date, (2) ≥6 months of continuous enrollment (CE) with medical and pharmacy benefits prior to the index date, (3) ≥12 months of CE following the index date or evidence of death, and (4) no evidence of a prior cUTI during the 6-month baseline period. Demographics and clinical characteristics were quantified. Patients were classified as IP if they were hospitalized during 30-day post index date; remaining patients were classified as OP. Antibiotics received in the OP setting in the 12-months post index date were examined. Results 95,423 patients met study criteria. Most (86.4%) patients were Commercially insured, mean (SD) age was 53.6 (18.1) and 70.4% were female. Mean baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index was 0.77. During the 30-day post index date, 22.2% were treated as IP and 77.8% were strictly treated as OP. In the 12-month OP follow-up period among index IP, 78.2% required ≥ 2 antibiotics, 38.2% required ≥4 antibiotics, and 41.6% received an IV antibiotic. In the 12-month OP follow-up period among index OP, 81.8% required ≥2 antibiotics, 38.2% required ≥4 antibiotics, and 46.8% received an IV antibiotic. For both IP and OP, fluoroquinolones were the most common oral antibiotic class (57.7%), followed by cephalosporins (39.2%), penicillins (30.3%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (29.8%), and nitrofurantoin (25.2%). Cephalosporins were the most common IV antibiotic class (38.5%). Conclusion Regardless of index treatment setting, approximately 40% of all cUTI patients required ≥4 antibiotic therapy and almost half with receive an IV antibiotic in the outpatient setting in the 12-months post index date. Disclosures Thomas Lodise, Jr., PharmD, PhD, Astra-Zeneca (Consultant)Bayer (Consultant)DoseMe (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member)ferring (Consultant)genentech (Consultant)GSK (Consultant)Melinta (Consultant)merck (Consultant, Independent Contractor)nabriva (Consultant)paratek (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)shionogi (Consultant, Advisor or Review Panel member, Speaker’s Bureau)Spero (Consultant)tetraphase (Consultant)Venatrox (Consultant) Thomas Lodise, Jr., PharmD, PhD, Melinta Therapeutics (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Merck (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant, Scientific Research Study Investigator; Paratek (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Shionogi (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant, Speakers’ bureau; Spero (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant; Tetraphase Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Individual(s) Involved: Self): Consultant Janna Manjelievskaia, PhD, MPH, IBM Watson Health (Employee)Spero Therapeutics (Consultant) Matthew Brouillette, MPH, Spero Therapeutics, Inc. (Other Financial or Material Support, I am an employee of IBM Watson Health, who received funds from Spero Therapeutics, Inc. to conduct this analysis.) Kate Sulham, MPH, Spero Therapeutics (Consultant)


Author(s):  
Melanie C. Goebel ◽  
Barbara W. Trautner ◽  
Larissa Grigoryan

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are one of the most common indications for antibiotic prescriptions in the outpatient setting. Given rising rates of antibiotic resistance among uropathogens, antibiotic stewardship is critically needed to improve outpatient antibiotic use, including in outpatient clinics (primary care and specialty clinics) and emergency departments.


Infection ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 45 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louise Rossignol ◽  
Sophie Vaux ◽  
Sylvie Maugat ◽  
Alexandre Blake ◽  
Roxane Barlier ◽  
...  

JAMA ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 312 (16) ◽  
pp. 1677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larissa Grigoryan ◽  
Barbara W. Trautner ◽  
Kalpana Gupta

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S384-S384
Author(s):  
Nina Akbar ◽  
Erica L Dobson ◽  
Michael Keefer ◽  
Sonal Munsiff ◽  
Ghinwa Dumyati

Abstract Background Surveillance data uncovers a high proportion of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms found in the outpatient setting, often in patients with recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs), underlying urologic abnormalities, and prior treatment for UTIs. We assessed prescribing practices at urology clinics to identify potential stewardship strategies for UTI management. Methods Antibiotic prescription encounters for adult patients from nine urology clinics were obtained from July to September 2018 using the EHR. We collected encounter types (visit or nonvisit), ordering medical provider types, antibiotic classes and patient demographics. A subset of 50 randomized, unique patient telephone encounters (TEs) was reviewed for documentation of a UTI diagnosis, symptoms, urinalysis and culture results, antibiotic prescriptions and duration. Results A total of 1,704 antibiotic orders were identified for 1,210 patients (48% female, median age 69 years, IQR 20). The majority (75%) of antibiotic encounters were from nonvisits: TEs (39%), orders only (25%), refills (9%), and patient email (2%). Major prescribers were advanced practice providers (APPs, 61%) followed by attending physicians (38%). Antibiotics prescribed were fluoroquinolones (FQs, 27%), nitrofurantoin (24%), first-generation cephalosporins (16%), and trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (15%). From the subset of 50 TEs, APPs wrote 76% of prescriptions and 32% of all orders were FQs. Thirty-nine patients had a clinical UTI diagnosis, yet 33% (13/39) did not have documentation of at least one urinary sign or symptom. For symptomatic patients, 15% (4/26) did not have a urine culture result within one week before or after the TE date. The distribution of antibiotics prescribed was similar to overall use and the median duration was 7 days. Conclusion Urology practices care for patients with the most complicated urinary tract pathology and appropriate antibiotic use in this population is a challenge. We found that urology providers often prescribe antibiotics to elderly patients without in-person visits, documentation of symptoms or microbiologic evidence of a UTI. Stewardship efforts should involve APPs, developing diagnostic and treatment guidelines for UTIs and improving documentation for antibiotic orders. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2015 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romney M. Humphries ◽  
Jennifer Dien Bard

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are frequent and lead to a large number of clinical encounters. A common management strategy for patients suspected of having a urinary tract infection is to test for pyuria and bacteria by urine analysis (UA) of midstream urine, with initiation of antibiotic therapy and urine culture if one or both tests are positive. Although this practice was first used in an outpatient setting with midstream urine samples, some institutions allow its use in the management of catheterized patients. The ideas behind the reflex urine culture are to limit laboratory workload by not performing culture on negative specimens and to improve antimicrobial stewardship by not giving antimicrobials to patients with negative UA results. The questions are, first, whether reflex urine culture reduces workloads significantly and, second, whether it improves antimicrobial stewardship in the era of increasing numbers of urinary tract infections due to extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Romney Humphries from UCLA supports the idea that reflex urine cultures are of value and describes what reflex parameters are most useful, while Jennifer Dien Bard of Children's Hospital Los Angeles discusses their limitations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document