Potential Enzymatic Targets in Alzheimer’s: A Comprehensive Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jahangir Alam ◽  
Lalit Sharma

Alzheimer’s, a degenerative cause of the brain cells, is called as a progressive neurodegenerative disease and appears to have a heterogeneous etiology with main emphasis on amyloid-cascade and hyperphosphorylated tau-cascade hypotheses, that are directly linked with macromolecules called enzymes such as β- & γ-secretases, colinesterases, transglutaminases, and glycogen synthase kinase (GSK-3), cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk-5), microtubule affinity-regulating kinase (MARK). The catalytic activity of the above enzymes is the result of cognitive deficits, memory impairment and synaptic dysfunction and loss, and ultimately neuronal death. However, some other enzymes also lead to these dysfunctional events when reduced to their normal activities and levels in the brain, such as α- secretase, protein kinase C, phosphatases etc; metabolized to neurotransmitters, enzymes like monoamine oxidase (MAO), catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) etc. or these abnormalities can occur when enzymes act by other mechanisms such as phosphodiesterase reduces brain nucleotides (cGMP and cAMP) levels, phospholipase A2: PLA2 is associated with reactive oxygen species (ROS) production etc. On therapeutic fronts, several significant clinical trials are underway by targeting different enzymes for development of new therapeutics to treat Alzheimer’s, such as inhibitors for β-secretase, GSK-3, MAO, phosphodiesterase, PLA2, cholinesterases etc, modulators of α- & γ-secretase activities and activators for protein kinase C, sirtuins etc. The last decades have perceived an increasing focus on findings and search for new putative and novel enzymatic targets for Alzheimer’s. Here, we review the functions, pathological roles, and worth of almost all the Alzheimer’s associated enzymes that address to therapeutic strategies and preventive approaches for treatment of Alzheimer’s.

1989 ◽  
Vol 568 (1 Calcium, Memb) ◽  
pp. 181-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
AKIRA KISHIMOTO ◽  
USHIO KIKKAWA ◽  
KOUJI OGITA ◽  
MARK S. SHEARMAN ◽  
YASUTOMI NISHIZUKA

2011 ◽  
Vol 497 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-63 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiao Shi ◽  
Li-Bo Fu ◽  
Long-Chuan Yu

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 155-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avraham I Jacob ◽  
Miriam Horovitz-Fried ◽  
Shlomit Aga-Mizrachi ◽  
Tamar Brutman-Barazani ◽  
Hana Okhrimenko ◽  
...  

Protein kinase C delta (PKCδ) is induced by insulin to rapidly associate with insulin receptor (IR) and upregulates insulin signaling. We utilized specific JM and CT receptor domains and chimeras of PKCα and PKCδ regulatory and catalytic domains to elucidate which components of PKCδ are responsible for positive regulatory effects of PKCδ on IR signaling. Studies were performed on L6 and L8 skeletal muscle myoblasts and myotubes. PKCδ was preferentially bound to the JM domain of IR, and insulin stimulation increased this binding. Both PKCδ/α and PKCα/δ chimeras (regulatory/catalytic) were bound preferentially to the JM but not to the CT domain of IR. Although IR–PKCδ binding was higher in cells expressing either the PKCδ/α or PKCα/δ chimera than in control cells, upregulation of IR signaling was observed only in PKCδ/α cells. Thus, in response to insulin increases in tyrosine phosphorylation of IR and insulin receptor substrate-1, downstream signaling to protein kinase B and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) and glucose uptake were greater in cells overexpressing PKCδ/α and the PKCδ/δ domains than in cells expressing the PKCα/δ domains. Basal binding of Src to PKCδ was higher in both PKCδ/α- and PKCα/δ-expressing cells compared to control. Binding of Src to IR was decreased in PKCα/δ cells but remained elevated in the PKCδ/α cells in response to insulin. Finally, insulin increased Src activity in PKCδ/α-expressing cells but decreased it in PKCα/δ-expressing cells. Thus, the regulatory domain of PKCδ via interaction with Src appears to determine the role of PKCδ as a positive regulator of IR signaling in skeletal muscle.


Blood ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 80 (4) ◽  
pp. 981-987 ◽  
Author(s):  
RD Medh ◽  
L Santell ◽  
EG Levin

Abstract Trans retinoic acid (t-RA) stimulated the production of tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) in HeLa-S3 and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (huvecs) in a dose-dependent manner with maximal release (four to five times control) at 40 nmol/L and 40 mumol/L, respectively. In endothelial cells, the stimulation of tPA production by phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) was potentiated 1.9-fold by 10 mumol/L t-RA, or 1.8 times the additive effect. In HeLa cells, total tPA secretion with 10 nmol/L PMA was increased from 43 ng/mL to 96 ng/mL by 40 nmol/L t-RA, which was two times the additive effect. Higher concentrations of t-RA (400 nmol/L) depressed tPA secretion by itself and also suppressed PMA-induced tPA production by 50%. Histamine and thrombin also synergized with t-RA. t-RA (40 nmol/L) and 10 micrograms/mL histamine or 10 U/mL thrombin combined to induce tPA production 3.4 and 1.3 times the additive effect in HeLa cells. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels were not significantly affected by 10 nmol/L to 10 mumol/L t-RA. Nor did 10 nmol/L PMA and 40 nmol/L t- RA together affect cAMP levels, suggesting that t-RA-mediated potentiation of PMA-induced tPA production occurred via a mechanism that was independent of cAMP levels. Downregulation of protein kinase C (PKC) by pretreatment of huvecs with 100 nmol/L PMA completely blocked a secondary response to PMA, but did not have a significant effect on t- RA induction. Pretreatment with 10 mumol/L t-RA, on the other hand, did not significantly affect a secondary stimulus by 100 nmol/L PMA, but completely suppressed a secondary stimulation by 10 mumol/L t-RA alone. These studies suggest that the mechanism mediating t-RA stimulation of tPA production interacts with the PKC pathway, resulting in synergism.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document