Knowledge of Tooth Avulsion Management Among Emergency Room Physicians in Saudi Arabia

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 219-224
Author(s):  
Abdulelah F. Andejani
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 100493
Author(s):  
Doaa Alhabib ◽  
Arwa Alumarn ◽  
Saja Alrayes

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousra Hussain AlJazairy ◽  
Hassan Suliman Halawany ◽  
Nassr AlMaflehi ◽  
Nawaf Sulaiman Alhussainan ◽  
Nimmi Biju Abraham ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (1) ◽  
pp. 003685042199730
Author(s):  
Mohammed Al Nuhait ◽  
Eshtyag Bajnaid ◽  
Abdulmalik Al Otaibi ◽  
Abdullah Al Shammari ◽  
Yousef Al Awlah

Lay abstract Real-world safety experience with immune checkpoint inhibitors in Saudi Arabia: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are rapidly growing and changing cancer care. With introduction of ICIs the landscape for cancer treatment has changed significantly. ICIs are known to induce immune-related adverse effects. This research is intended to shed light on ICIs and describe our safety experience with these agents. This study is a retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the safety of ICIs and its related adverse events at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. The study was conducted in the oncology center at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh. We identified study participants by using electronic health care system (BestCare)® to involve patients who received ICIs treatment during the study period from January 2016 up to December 2018, to include a total of 53 patients. Most of our patients were on nivolumab (37 patients) followed by atezolizumab (10 patients), and pembrolizumab (6 patients). The average number of emergency room visits after receiving treatment was three visits per patient. Renal adverse events occurred following ICIs use in nine patients, and none of the reported cases experienced a grade ≥3 event. Moreover, 13 patients experienced a hepatic adverse event, of whom only 1 patient experienced a grade ≥3 event leading to treatment discontinuation. As for diarrhea, among all patients who received ICIs, 14 patients experienced diarrhea, and 5 of them had grade ≥3 events. Also, thyroxine abnormalities occurred in seven patients. While, Pneumonitis occurred in four patients following ICIs use. In addition, we noticed other adverse events with ICIs including (skin reaction, nausea, vomiting, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and neurological adverse events). Furthermore, 17 patients required steroids to manage ICIs adverse events. And, no patients in our study required additional management with other immunosuppressive agents. Immunotherapies are rapidly growing and changing cancer care. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) have the ability to block inhibitory checkpoints and restore the functions of the immune system. ICIs are used for the treatment of several types of cancer, and nowadays, many studies are ongoing in order to get approvals for newer indications. ICIs are known to induce immune-related adverse effects. The safety of ICIs and the most common immune-related adverse events are not yet well recognized for our population since this class of medications is lately introduced in our region, where only limited studies in our population are available in the literature. This research is intended to shed light on ICIs and describe our safety experience with these agents. This study is a retrospective cohort study aimed to determine the safety of ICIs and its related adverse events at a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. The study was conducted in the oncology center at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh. Study participants were identified by using the electronic health care system (BestCare)® to include patients who were treated with ICIs during the study period from January 2016 up to December 2018. A total of 53 patients were included. Most of our patients were on nivolumab (37 patients) followed by atezolizumab (10 patients), and pembrolizumab (6 patients). The average number of emergency room visits after receiving ICIs was three visits per patient. Renal adverse events occurred following ICIs use in nine patients, and none of the reported cases experienced a grade ≥3 event. Moreover, 13 patients experienced a hepatic adverse event, of whom only 1 patient experienced a grade ≥3 event leading to treatment discontinuation. As for diarrhea, among all patients who received ICIs, 14 patients experienced diarrhea, and 5 of them had grade ≥3 events. Also, thyroxine abnormalities occurred in seven patients. While, pneumonitis occurred in four patients following ICIs use. In addition, we noticed other adverse events with ICIs, including (skin reaction, nausea, vomiting, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and neurological adverse events). Furthermore, 17 patients required steroids to manage ICIs adverse events. And, no patients in our study required additional management with other immunosuppressive agents. Patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors could have a variety of adverse drug events that might lead to treatment discontinuation and increase overall emergency room visits. This study highlights the most common adverse drug events associated with ICIs use at a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.


2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalid W. AlQuliti ◽  
Walaa A. Tajaddin ◽  
Hanan A. Habeeb ◽  
Ekhlas S. As-Saedi ◽  
Shahad A. Sheerah ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
SharatChandra Pani ◽  
RayanM Eskandrani ◽  
Khalid Al-Kadhi ◽  
Abdullah Al-Hazmi

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Al Ghobain ◽  
Turki Aldrees ◽  
Abdullah Alenezi ◽  
Saleh Alqaryan ◽  
Dana Aldabeeb ◽  
...  

Introduction. Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) outbreaks have had a considerable negative impact on health systems in Saudi Arabia. We aimed to study the psychological impact of a Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) outbreak on emergency room resident physicians (ERRPs).Methods. We assessed the MERS-related psychological impact and concerns of ERRPs using a self-report questionnaire.Results. The majority (91%) of the ERRPs agreed that their work put them at risk of infection, but most (65%) did not agree that they should not be looking after patients infected with MERS. Despite that, 54% of ERRPs reported being afraid of contracting the infection from infected patients and only 4.2% of them were willing to change their current job. The majority of the ERRPs (85%) felt that their job would expose their families to risk of infection.Conclusions. Our study demonstrated the considerable psychological impact of MERS outbreaks on ERRPs. The ERRPs’ concerns and the psychological impact of MERS outbreaks should be considered in greater detail by hospital policymakers.


Author(s):  
Mutlaq Almutlaq ◽  
Yazid Alsuliman

The care for emergency conditions is an important feature of developed the systems of                 healthcare. Emergency medicine is the medical specialty dedicated to diagnosis and treatment of unforeseen illness or injuries. Overcrowding of Emergency Room (ER) by non-urgent cases is a problem that should be raised and reasons for that need to be sought. The aim is to identify the prevalence and factors behind non-urgent cases attending to acute care in Riyadh. This is a cross-sectional study which was conducted over a one-year period. Questionnaires were distributed to parents of children ≤14 years attending pediatric emergency room (ER) in multiple hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The sample size was 383 participants recruited using convenience sampling technique. The inclusion criteria comprised of pediatrics ≤14 years attending to ER with urgent cases (level 1, 2 and 3 according to Emergency Severity Index) and minor trauma (contusion, abrasion), sore throat, upper respiratory tract infection (URTI), mild abdominal pain, vomiting alone or diarrhea alone with no sign of dehydration of (level 4 and 5 according to Emergency Severity Index). 383 questionnaires were collected. The sample consisted mostly of females 56%. Upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) was the highest reason for pediatric emergency room visits (55.1%). Only 12.2% have visited primary health care (PHC) prior to emergency room. Most of participants have sources for medical advice other than emergency physicians (80.3%). Results also show that many parents who have brought their kids to emergency lacked the knowledge that their cases could be managed in primary health care (76.2%). In Conclusion, results have shown that many parents choose ER whenever their children have any symptoms. Reasons for that varied between each participant. Many participants are ignorant of the capabilities of PHC centers, and their services. Raising awareness regarding primary health should be the objective to reduce number of non-urgent cases visiting emergency room.


2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 124 ◽  
Author(s):  
MunaK. A. Oqal ◽  
SohaA Elmorsy ◽  
AmalK Alfhmy ◽  
RehamM Alhadhrami ◽  
RawanA Ekram ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hassan Suliman Halawany ◽  
Yousra Hussain AlJazairy ◽  
Nawaf Sulaiman Alhussainan ◽  
Nassr AlMaflehi ◽  
Vimal Jacob ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document