scholarly journals FAKTOR DETERMINAN FINANCIAL DISTRESS UNTUK PERUSAHAAN PERTAMBANGAN DI INDONESIA DAN MALAYSIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 168-187
Author(s):  
Arief Bagas Prasetyo ◽  
Farida Titik Kristanti
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Descriptive Research ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Operating Capacity ◽  
Processing Techniques ◽  
The Impact

Abstrak: Faktor determinan Financial Distress Untuk Perusahaan Pertambangan Di Indonesia dan Malaysia. Studi ini bermaksud untuk mengetahui dampak likuiditas, leverage, operating capacity, instittutional ownership, managerial ownership, sertakomisaris independen padaFinancial Distress. Penelitian ini memakai penelitian deskriptif. Populasi serta sampel pada studi ialah perseroan sektor pertambangan yang tercatat di BursaEfek Indonesia dan Bursa Malaysia 2014-2018. Studi ini memakai purposive sampling serta diperoleh 12 perseoran di Indonesia dan 22 perseroan di Malaysia. Olah data yang dipakai studi ini memakai logistic regression. Studi menunjukkan pada perseroan pertambangan di Indonesia bahwa operatingcapacity scara parsial mempunyai pengaruh signifikan negatif pada financial distress. Sedangkan liquidity ,leverage, institutional ownership, managerial ownership, dan independent comissioner secara parsial tidak mempunyai pengaruh pada financial distress. Kemudian pada perseroan pertambangan di Malaysia menunjukkan bahwa liquidity, Managerial Ownership, dan Independent Commissioner secara parsial mempunyai pengaruh signifikan negatif pada financial distress. Sedangkan operating capacity,leverage, dan  Institutional Ownership secara parsial tidak mempunyai pengaruh pada financial distress.Kata kunci: Liquidity, Leverage, OperatingCapacity, Institutional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, Independent Commissioner, Financial DistressAbstract: Determinants ofFinancial Distressfor Mining Companies in Indonesia and Malaysia. Research intend todetermine the impact ofliquidity, leverage, operatingcapacity, institutional ownership, managerialownership, and independent commissioner onfinancial distress. This research uses descriptive research. Thepopulation and sample are miningsector firm registered onthe IDX and Malaysia Exchange 2014-2018. This study uses purposivesamplingmethod acquired 12 companies in Indonesia and 22 companies in Malaysia. The data processing techniques used logisticregression. Research showed mining companies in Indonesia that their operating capacityhas a negative impact on financial distress. Whereas, liquidity,leverage, institutionalownership, managerialownership, and the independentcommissioner didn’t have affects onfinancial distress. Then the mining companies in Malaysia showed that liquidity, Managerial Ownership, and Independent Commissionerhave a negative impact onfinancial distress. Meanwhile, operating capacity, leverage, and institutional ownership didn’t have affects on financial distress.Keywords: Liquidity, Leverage, OperatingCapacity, Institutional Ownership, Managerial Ownership, Independent Commissioner, Financial Distress

scholarly journals Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance and Capital Structure of Non-Financial Firms of Pakistan

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-46
Author(s):  
Hassan Ahmad ◽  
Nasreen Akhter ◽  
Tariq Siddiq ◽  
Zahid Iqbal
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Capital Structure ◽  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Board Independence ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Debt Ratio ◽  
Significant Negative Impact ◽  
The Impact

This study is undertaken with the purpose of investigating the impact of ownership structure and corporate governance on the capital structure of Pakistani listed firms from 2011-2014, feasible general least square is used to investigate the impact of ownership structure and corporate governance on capital structure of KSE 100 index firms. Explanatory variables include ownership concentration, managerial ownership, foreign ownership, institutional ownership, board size, board independence and CEO duality along with the three control variables namely firm size, firm profitability and liquidity. There is insignificant positive relationship between ownership concentration and capital structure, managerial ownership has a significant negative impact on debt ratio. Foreign ownership has also a significant negative impact on firm capital structure and institutional ownership has significant positive impact on capital structure. Board size is positively related to capital structure, board independence also positively related to firm’s debt ratio but CEO duality negatively related to the dependent variable, all these variables have significant impact on capital structure of Pakistani firms. 

scholarly journals The Influence of Corporate Governance Structures on Financial Distress: A Study of Coal Mining Companies

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuli Agustina ◽  
Choisi Elgamalia Anwar
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Coal Mining ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Ownership Structures ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
The Board Of Directors

The purpose of this research was to analyze the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on financial distress, through the measurement of board of directors, board of commissioners, independent ownership structures and managerial ownership structures. The sample consisted of coal mining companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange from 2013 to 2017 and a purposive sampling method was used. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis and multiple linear regression. The results confirmed that the size of the board of commissioners and institutional ownership had no effect on conditions of financial distress. This was possible because the board of commissioners functions as supervisor in the company, but sometimes it did not carry out its role to its full potential. Meanwhile, institutional ownership was expected to encourage more optimal supervision of management performance so that agency costs could be minimized, but this could not be proven. The size of the board of directors had a significantly positive effect on finances distress. The size of the board of directors could indicate collusion in the company and thus the possibility of experiencing financial distress was greater. Managerial ownership had a significantly negative effect on conditions of financial distress. With an increase in ownership by managers, managers could immediately feel the benefits and losses of the decisions taken. Keywords: board size, the company’s health condition, corporate governance, financial distress, the Altman Z-Score, the number of boards.

scholarly journals Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan, Kinerja Keuangan, Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Indikasi Kesulitan Keuangan

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-133
Author(s):  
Tiara Ayu Andani ◽  
Elen Puspitasari
Keyword(s):  
Financial Distress ◽  
Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Secondary Data ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Data Types ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Independent Variable ◽  
The Impact

This reserach aims to determine what can affect financial distress in mining companies and to examine and analyze the impact of the independent variable on the dependent variable. The independent variables used in this research are ownership structure, financial performance and firm size. This research is processed using secondary data types. Tests in this research used descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analysis to analyze the data. By using the sampling method with purposive sampling technique, 160 data were obtained where this research was processed using the SPSS version 25 program, and the population studied included mining companies listed on the IDX during the 2016-2019 period. This reserach shows  that: Institutional Ownership, Liquidity, Leverage, Profitability shows a significant impact on Financial Distress. It is inversely proportional to Managerial Ownership and Company Size which indicate does not have effect on Financial Distress

scholarly journals FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMITIGASI FINANCIAL DISTRESS PADA PERUSAHAAN PERTAMBANGAN

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Gita Wahyuningsih Putri ◽  
Wiwin Aminah
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Mining Sector ◽  
Mining Companies ◽  
Research Goal

Gross export growths in the mining sector have experienced negatively for the last few years. One of the negative impact is the reduce of revenue generated in the mining sector causing some companies gain negative profit that can trigger financial distress. This research goal is to know the effect of liquidity, activity, growth, board of directors, and audit committee give impact to the financial distress in the mining companies that listed on IDX in the period of 2011-2016. The research sample was collected by purposive sampling method in order to obtain 24 companies. Logistic regression analysis is also used to be the method of this research. The results showed that liquidity, activity, growth, board of directors and audit committee have simultaneous significant effect, but at the same time, liquidity and activities have partial significant effect to the condition of financial distress.

scholarly journals Corporate governance effect on financial distress: evidence from In-donesian public listed companies

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 415
Author(s):  
Rahmasari Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Sampling Method ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Significant Negative Impact

The study aims to determine the effect of corporate governance structures: managerial ownership, institutional ownership, independent commissioners, board of commissioners’ size, and board of directors’ size on financial distress. It used the sample taken from non-financial companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for period 2012-2016. This study used a purposive sampling method involving 605 observations using binary logistic regression analysis techniques. The results show that there are significant negative impact between institutional ownership, size of board of commissioners and directors on financial distress. However, the results confirm that managerial ownership and independent commissioners had no significant impact on financial distress

scholarly journals The impact of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, proportion of independent commissioner, and intellectual capital on financial distress

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 351
Author(s):  
I Kadek Widhiadnyana ◽  
Ni Made Dwi Ratnadi
Keyword(s):  
Intellectual Capital ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Multinomial Logistic Regression ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies ◽  
Financial Reports ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Impact

Financial distress is a phase of the decline in the financial condition experienced by a company before the bankruptcy or liquidation occurs. One of the causes of financial distress is the company’s operating losses, caused its operating cash flow to be negative. During 2014-2016, there was 24 percent of manufacturing companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange (BEI) that has a negative pretax profit. The purpose of this study was to obtain empirical evidence of the effect of managerial ownership, institutional ownership, the proportion of independent commissioner board, and intellectual capital on financial distress. The population of this research is all of manufacturing companies listed on Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) on 2014-2016. The sample was taken using a non-probability sampling with a saturated sample technique. The numbers of samples analyzed were 423 financial reports of manufacturing companies published on IDX during 2014-2016. The analysis technique used in this research is multinomial logistic regression. It was found that managerial ownership has a negative effect on financial distress, institutional ownership has a negative effect on financial distress, proportion of independent commissioner has a positive effect on financial distress, and intellectual capital has a negative effect on financial distress.

Pengaruh Penerapan Corporate Governance Terhadap Kondisi Kesulitan Keuangan

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-64
Author(s):  
Stephanus Andi Adityaputra
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Significant Influence ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Boards Of Directors ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Manufacturing Companies

This study examined the effect ofthe implementation of corporate governance on the condition of the financial distress of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). The implementation of corporate governance proxied with the proportion of managerial ownership, proportion of institutional ownership, number of the boards of directors, proportion of independent commissioners, and existence of the audit committee. Samples used in this study was manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) with 2012 up to 2016 as an observation period. The total study samples was 48 firms with 96 firm year are determined by the method of purposive sampling. This study used Logistic Regression to examine the effect of the implementation of corporate governance of the condition of the company's financial distress. The results of this study indicated that The number of the boards of directors and the proportion of independent commissioners variables were not proven to have significant influence on the condition of the company's financial distress. The proportion of managerial ownership, the proportion of institutional ownership, and the existence of the audit committee variables proved to have a significant influence on the condition of the company's financial distress with a positive influence. Keywords: board of directors, independent commissioners, managerial ownership, institutional ownership, audit committee, financial distress, logistic regression

How does ownership structure affect the financing and dividend decisions of firm?

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahar Tayachi ◽  
Ahmed Imran Hunjra ◽  
Kirsten Jones ◽  
Rashid Mehmood ◽  
Mamdouh Abdulaziz Saleh Al-Faryan
Keyword(s):  
Ownership Structure ◽  
Dividend Policy ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Agency Cost ◽  
Debt Financing ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Ownership structure deals with internal corporate governance mechanism, which plays important role in minimizing conflict of interests between shareholders and management Ownership structure is an important mechanism that influences the value of firm, financing and dividend decisions. This paper aims to examine the impact of the ownership structures, i.e. managerial ownership, institutional ownership on financing and dividend policy. Design/methodology/approach The authors use panel data of manufacturing firms from both developed and developing countries, and the generalized method of moments (GMM) is applied to analyze the results. The authors collect the data from DataStream for the period of 2010 to 2019. Findings The authors find that managerial ownership and ownership concentration have significant and positive effects on debt financing, but they have significant and negative effects on dividend policy. Institutional ownership shows a positive impact on financing decisions and dividend policy for sample firms. Originality/value This study fills the gap by proving the policy implications for both firms and investors, as managers prefer debt financing, but at the same time try to ignore dividend payment. Therefore, investors may not invest in firms with a higher proportion of managerial ownership and may choose to invest more in institutional ownership, which lowers the agency cost.

scholarly journals PENGARUH OPERATING CAPACITY, SALES GROWTH DAN ARUS KAS OPERASI TERHADAP FINANCIAL DISTRESS

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Annisa Livia Ramadhani ◽  
Khairun Nisa
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
Stock Exchange ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Sales Growth ◽  
Operating Capacity ◽  
Operating Cash Flows

This study aims to determine how the influence of operating capacity, sales growth and operating cash flows on financial distress. The population in this study israll agricultural sector companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) in 2013-2017. The sampling technique in this study used purposive sampling which produced 8 samples in a period of 5 years, namely as many as 40 units of data samples. The analytical method used is logistic �regression analysis which is processed. using SPSS Version 25. Based on the results of this study, it was found that simultaneous operating capacity, sales growth and operating cash flows influence the occurrence of financial distress. Then partially, operating capacity and sales growth have no effect on the occurrence of financial distress, while operating cash flows have a positive and significant effect on the occurrence of financial distress.�Keyword : Financial Distress, Operating capacity, Sales growth, Operation cash flow.

scholarly journals Determinan Manajemen Laba Perusahaan di Sektor Konsumsi

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 96
Author(s):  
Muhammad Fajri
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Earnings Management ◽  
Cash Flow ◽  
Institutional Ownership ◽  
Free Cash Flow ◽  
Earning Management ◽  
Managerial Ownership ◽  
Leverage Ratio ◽  
Good Corporate Governance ◽  
The Impact

The aim of this research is to provide empirical evidence on the impact of good corporate governance, free cash flow, and leverage ratio on earnings management. Good corporate governance is measured by audit committee’s size, the proportion of independent commissioners, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership. Discretionary accrual is the proxy of earning management. This research used 28 consumer goods companies listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2016 to 2018. Data were analyzed using panel data with random effect model. Based on the result of analysis concluded that all components of good corporate governance (audit committee’s size, the proportion of independent commissioners, institutional ownership, and managerial ownership), have no significant effect on earnings management, on other hand leverage ratio has a negative effect and no significant on earning management, and free cash flow has a positve and no significant effect on earnings management

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document