scholarly journals Whole Body Vibration on drivers seat and fender with fully loaded double axle tractor-trailers under different operating conditions

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 149-154
Author(s):  
MAN MOHAN DEO ◽  
ADARSH KUMAR ◽  
INDRA MANI
Keyword(s):  
Rural Areas ◽  
Health Effect ◽  
Whole Body Vibration ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Body Vibration ◽  
Indian Agriculture ◽  
Spine Degeneration ◽  
Vector Sum ◽  
On Farm

Tractors play an important role in Indian agriculture; it is used for agricultural operations and as a common means of transportation in rural areas. It exposes the drivers and workers sitting on fenders to whole body vibration. which results into back pain, spine degeneration and even spine disc problems. Keeping this in mind a study was carried out to measure the whole body vibration on driver and fender seat with fully loaded double axle tractor-trailer under different operating conditions. Vibration was measured on two terrains (Asphalt, Farm), at three speed (10, 12, 14 km/h on asphalt terrain and 4, 5, 7 km/h on farm terrain, as per ISO-5008 (1979)), in three directions (longitudinal, transverse, and vertical) using tri-axial accelerometers. Data was taken for 120 s each and analyzed using vibration meter and analyzer for three replications of each treatments. Vector sum of vibration and Health Guidance Caution Zone upper and lower limit were obtained for different operating conditions to know the health effect of vibration.

scholarly journals Assessment of whole-body vibration exposure of mining truck drivers

2020 ◽  
Vol 120 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Erdem ◽  
T. Dogan ◽  
Z. Duran
Keyword(s):  
Health Effect ◽  
Whole Body Vibration ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Dominant Frequency ◽  
Truck Drivers ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Vibration Acceleration ◽  
Body Vibration ◽  
Dump Trucks ◽  
Iso 2631

SYNOPSIS Whole-body vibration (WBV) exposure measurements taken from 105 truck drivers employed in 19 mines and other workplaces were evaluated with the criteria prescribed in EU 2002/44/EC directive, BS 6841 (1987), ISO 2631-1 (1997). and ISO 2631-5 (2004) standards. The highest vibration acceleration was measured on the vertical Z-axis. The highest WBV exposure occurred in the RETURN, HAUL, and SPOT phases while the lowest exposure took place in the LOAD and WAIT phases. Crest factors on all axes were generally greater than nine, yet strong correlation coefficients were achieved in VDV-eVDV analyses. Driver seats generally dampened the vibration along the Z-axis but exacerbated it along X and Y axes. The dominant frequency for the X and Y-axes rose up to 40 Hz while it ranged between 1 Hz and 2.5 Hz along the Z-axis. While the probability of an adverse health effect was higher with BS 6841 (1987) and ISO 2631-1 (1997) standards, it was low according to EU 2002/44/EC and ISO 2631-5 (2004). The 91 t, 100 t, and 170 t capacity trucks produced lower vibration magnitudes. Drivers were exposed to approximately equivalent levels of WBV acceleration and dose in contractor-type trucks and mining trucks. Rear-dump trucks exposed their drivers to a slightly higher level of vibration than bottom-dump trucks. Underground trucks exposed their drivers to a significantly higher level of vibration than mining trucks. Both driver age and driver experience were inversely proportional to vibration acceleration and dose. Conversely, there was a positive relationship between the truck service years and the WBV acceleration and dose to which drivers were exposed to. Loads of blocky material exposed drivers to higher vibration acceleration and dose levels than non-blocky material. Keywords: whole-body vibration, mining truck, A(8), BS 6841, EU 2002/EC/44, ISO 2631-1, ISO 2631-5, VDV(8).

Whole-Body Vibration Exposures Among Solid Waste Collecting Truck Operators

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 860-864
Author(s):  
Hyoung-gon (Frank) Ryou ◽  
Peter W Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Solid Waste ◽  
Whole Body Vibration ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Body Vibration ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Vibration Action ◽  
Regular Work ◽  
Vector Sum

A number of studies have shown an association between whole-body vibration (WBV) exposure and the onset and development of low back pain among professional vehicle operators. This study measured WBV exposures from 12 drivers who operated four different types of solid waste collecting trucks during part of their regular work shift. The daily average weighted A(8), vibration dose value VDV(8), and vector sum A(8) and VDV(8) exposures were analyzed and compared across the solid waste collecting trucks. Study result showed that the majority of A(8) and all of the VDV(8) predominant axis exposures were above International Organization for Standardization (ISO) daily vibration action limit (A(8) = 0.5 m/s2, VDV(8) = 9.1 m/s1.75). Based on the predominant axis and vector sum exposures, most of the trucks reached the daily vibration action limits before 8-hours. When compared to the predominant axis A(8) exposures, the predominant axis VDV(8) exposures reduced the acceptable solid waste collecting truck operating times on average by over 4 hours. Our study results demonstrated that these solid waste collecting truck operators were exposed to high levels of both continuous and impulsive WBV exposures, with the impulsive WBV exposures indicating that they may pose a greater risk to the driver’s health.

Investigation of Whole Body Vibration on Urban Midi Bus

2014 ◽  
Vol 592-594 ◽  
pp. 2066-2070 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Rao Jaganmohan ◽  
S.P. Sivapirakasham ◽  
K.R. Balasubramanian ◽  
K.T. Sreenath
Keyword(s):  
Resonance Effect ◽  
Whole Body Vibration ◽  
Dynamic Test ◽  
Rear Seat ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Static Test ◽  
Body Vibration ◽  
Exposure Limit ◽  
Vibration Magnitude

The objective of the study is to measure the whole body vibration (WBV) transmitted to the driver as well as the passengers during the operation of bus and to compare results with ISO 2631-1(1997) comfort chart and health guidance criteria. In this study, vibration exposure of the driver, passenger in the mid row seat and passenger in the rear row seat were measured at different operating conditions (static and dynamic). The BMI (Body Mass Index) was maintained for driver and passengers. The results of static test showed that the driver seat produced more vibrations compared to the passenger's mid row and rear row seat. This is due to the fact that driver seat was positioned close to the engine cabin. The results of dynamic test showed that, in all cases, the rear seat produced maximum vibrations. At 40 km/h speed the vibration magnitude exceeded the exposure limit at all tested seats. This high vibration magnitude might be due to the resonance effect caused between engine and chassis vibrations.

Influence of Speed in Whole Body Vibration Exposure in Heavy Equipment Mining Vehicles

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 919-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luz S. Marin ◽  
Andrés Rodriguez ◽  
Estefany Rey ◽  
Lope H. Barrero ◽  
Jack Dennerlein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Whole Body Vibration ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Daily Maximum ◽  
Vibration Exposure ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Body Vibration ◽  
Heavy Equipment ◽  
Vector Sum ◽  
Iso 2631

This study aimed to characterize and contrast the ISO 2631-1 daily average-continuous A(8) and cumulative-impulsive VDV(8) whole body vibration (WBV) exposures during the operation of mining heavy equipment vehicles (HEVs). In a cross-sectional study, WBV measurements were collected from six different types of HEVs. For each HEV, the daily A(8) and VDV(8) WBV exposures were determined for each axis (x, y and z) along with the vector sum (∑xyx).. The predominant axis of vibration exposure was related to and dependent on the type of HEV, which all have different average speeds. Most of the predominant axis WBV exposures were above the ISO daily vibration action limits and the vector sum-based WBV exposures were considerably higher. Our results indicated that mining HEV operators are exposed to high levels of both continuous and impulsive WBV exposures, with the impulsive WBV exposures being more restrictive with respect the HEVs daily maximum operation hours.

Excavator driver seat occupational comfort assessment with Lumbar Support Cushion

2021 ◽  
pp. 107754632110358
Author(s):  
Kaviraj Ramar ◽  
LA Kumaraswamidhas
Keyword(s):  
Physiological Stress ◽  
Whole Body Vibration ◽  
Postural Instability ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Stress Factors ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Lumbar Support ◽  
Body Vibration ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Operation Cycle

The operators of excavators often suffer from dreadful Whole-Body Vibration. Besides, the operators are subject to postural instability which is considered to be a serious occupational health hazard. The main objective of this study is to investigate the role of Lumbar Support Cushion in mitigation of Whole-Body Vibration and postural instability under three different operating conditions such as Front-Manipulator Motion, Swing Motion and Propel-Drive Motion. The obtained Vibration Dose Value reveals a significant difference between the operation cycle ( p < 0.001). Moreover, across the operation cycle with Lumbar Support Cushion a significant decrease in Vibration Dose Value (8) is observed on the operator seat-pan and backrest ( p < 0.05). Further, the effect of Whole-Body Vibration on physiological stress factors, a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure by 1.26%, pulse rate by 2.75% and Rate Pressure Product by 4%, is observed with the use of Lumbar Support Cushion ( p < 0.05) during the operation. The Lumbar Support Cushion helps in promoting a symmetric seating posture, and using Lumbar Support Cushion could help the excavator operator to increase in productivity during shift hour.

Exploring how anthropometric, vehicle and workplace factors influence whole-body vibration exposures during on-farm use of a quad bike

2012 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephan Milosavljevic ◽  
Ramakrishnan Mani ◽  
Daniel Cury Ribeiro ◽  
Radivoj Vasiljev ◽  
Borje Rehn
Keyword(s):  
Whole Body Vibration ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Body Vibration ◽  
Workplace Factors ◽  
On Farm

The association between whole body vibration exposure and spine degeneration on imaging: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Luciana Gazzi Macedo ◽  
Kenneth S. Noguchi ◽  
Lisandra A. de Oliveira ◽  
Nora Bakaa ◽  
Stephanie Di Pelino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Structural Damage ◽  
Whole Body Vibration ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Body Vibration ◽  
Moderate Quality ◽  
Heavy Equipment ◽  
Spine Degeneration ◽  
Quality Evidence

BACKGROUND: Low frequency vibrations from motorized vehicles and heavy equipment have been associated with musculoskeletal disorders. Spine degeneration on diagnostic imaging provides direct and objective measures of the possible effects of such exposures on the spine. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the association of exposure to whole-body vibration (WBV) with spine degeneration on imaging. METHODS: We conducted electronic searches in MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, and Web of Science to July 2021. Two reviewers independently screened search results, assessed quality, and extracted data. Studies evaluating the exposure to WBV and lumbar spine degeneration on imaging were included. RESULTS: Fifteen studies (16 manuscripts) were included. Seven studies including a meta-demonstrated moderate quality evidence of no association between WBV and disc degeneration. There was also moderate quality evidence of no association between WBV and disc height narrowing and osteophytes. Overall, there was low level evidence of no association between WBV and other degenerations findings. CONCLUSIONS: There was moderate to low quality evidence suggesting no association between WBV exposures with spine degeneration on imaging. The results of this study currently do not support assertion that motorized vehicle and WBV exposure accelerates degeneration and causes structural damage to the spine.

Development of a multiaxis active seat mount to mitigate helicopter aircrew whole-body vibration exposure

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (17) ◽  
pp. 2544-2555
Author(s):  
Yong Chen ◽  
Shao Zhang ◽  
Jiaxin Chang ◽  
Amin Fereidooni ◽  
Viresh Wickramasinghe
Keyword(s):  
Health Effect ◽  
Whole Body Vibration ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Ride Quality ◽  
Vibration Exposure ◽  
Least Mean Square ◽  
Body Vibration ◽  
Floor Vibration ◽  
Seat Frame ◽  
The Impact

This article presents the development and evaluation of a proof-of-concept multiaxis and actively controlled helicopter seat mount for aircrew whole-body vibration reduction. The multiaxis seat mount is designed to be installed between the helicopter seat floor and the seat supporting structure to minimize the impact on crashworthiness requirements of the helicopter seat. The design involves multiple miniature force actuators to counteract the vibrations of the seat frame and occupant transmitted from the helicopter floor in three orthogonal directions. The actuators are controlled by an adaptive feedforward filtered-x least mean square algorithm to cancel the helicopter floor vibration input. The prototype active seat mount design was tested in various configurations with a shaker table providing representative Bell-412 helicopter vibration inputs. Test results demonstrated that the vibrations of the seat frame and mannequin occupant body were suppressed simultaneously, and the major N/rev harmonic peaks of the occupant’s whole-body vibration were reduced by more than 20 dB. This demonstrated that the multiaxis active seat mount design can mitigate the whole-body vibration exposure of the helicopter aircrew to improve their ride quality and reduce adverse health effect.

Comparison of Whole-Body Vibration Exposures on Older and Newer Haulage Trucks at an Aggregate Stone Quarry Operation

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan G. Mayton ◽  
Christopher C. Jobes ◽  
Richard E. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Whole Body Vibration ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Body Vibration ◽  
Exposure Limit ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Vector Sum ◽  
Mean Vector ◽  
Sampling Times

Exposure to whole-body vibration (WBV) and the postural requirements of the job have been identified as important risk factors in the development of musculoskeletal disorders of the back among workers exposed to a vibratory environment. This paper focuses on preliminary results of WBV data collected for two groups of haulage trucks — four older trucks from manufacturer A (MFR-A) and two newer trucks from manufacturer B (MFR-B). All of the trucks and their respective seats were considered to be in good working order during the study. Measurement periods for the truck groups had similarities, but varied from 2 to 58 minutes. Sampling times for the older trucks included a mean of 19.5 minutes and a standard deviation (STD) of 6.5 minutes compared to a mean of 40.8 minutes and a STD of 12.1 minutes for the newer trucks. Data collection coincided with the approximate delivery and first operation of the new trucks, and occurred approximately 12 months apart under similar weather and road conditions, and with the same drivers except an additional driver was included with the older trucks. Truck routes were somewhat different in that quarry production had changed location in the time between data collection activities. Overall, the results suggest that the newer trucks may provide better overall isolation to drivers/operators from WBV exposure compared to the older trucks operating at the quarry; although, this will need to be confirmed with additional measurements. Considering the higher variability and shorter sampling times for the older trucks, the results should be viewed with caution. For two of seven trials, the older trucks showed that seats amplified vibration, i.e., a transmissibility (T) &gt;1.0. Seat T for the older trucks ranged from 0.31 to 1.17 with a mean of 0.77 and STD of 0.32. This contrasted with the newer haulage trucks where seats amplified vibration in 3 of 8 trials. In this case, T did not vary greatly and ranged from 0.87 to 1.05 with a mean of 0.97 and STD of 0.07. Regarding older trucks, in five of seven trials, the seat (output) data of weighted root-mean square (RMS) acceleration (wRMSz) for the dominant z-axis exceeded the action level of 0.5 m/s2 action level recommended by the European Union Good Practice Guide for WBV (EUGPG) and levels exceeded the recommended exposure limit of 1.15 m/s2 in two of the seven trials. The wRMSz values for the older trucks varied from 0.41 to 1.83 m/s2 with a mean of 0.99 and STD of 0.57. Similarly, newer trucks indicated a narrower range of wRMSz from 0.38 to 0.95 m/s2. The mean wRMSz was lower for the newer trucks at 0.58 m/s2 with a STD of 0.23 m/s2. Similarly, newer trucks indicated wRMSz reached or exceeded the action level in four of eight trials. None of the trials with the new trucks showed wRMSz levels that reached or exceeded the recommended 1.15 m/s2 exposure limit. As an indicator of driver/operator discomfort, overall weighted total RMS acceleration (vector sum) values seem to show a “rougher” ride for the older trucks. The vector sum values for these trucks ranged widely from 0.70 to 2.59 m/s2 and, in four of seven trials, showed levels greater than 1.40 m/s2. The mean vector sum was 1.44 m/s2 with a STD of 0.75 m/s2. Comparatively, the newer trucks exhibited less variation with a range from 0.69 to 1.59 m/s2. The mean vector sum was 1.02 m/s2 with a STD of 0.35 m/s2. Vibration dose values for the dominant z-axis (VDVz), gave a sense of vehicle jarring/jolting conditions. All trials with the older trucks were within the recommended EUGPG action level of 9.1 m/s1.75. On the other hand, in three of eight trials, both newer trucks exceeded this action level with values of 9.18, 12.58, and 13.21 m/s1.75. Neither truck group showed VDVz that exceeded the exposure limit of 21 m/s1.75. A statistical analysis was not conducted, since the differences reported between truck groups may not be statistically significant owing to the relatively small sample size. Road conditions, changes in the truck routes, and driver/operator differences (e.g., stopping and turning) are possible factors in the higher VDV for the newer trucks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document