scholarly journals Considerations for Postacute Rehabilitation for Survivors of COVID-19 (Preprint)

Author(s):  
Lisa Mary Sheehy

UNSTRUCTURED Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), the infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first reported on December 31, 2019. Because it has only been studied for just over three months, our understanding of this disease is still incomplete, particularly regarding its sequelae and long-term outcomes. Moreover, very little has been written about the rehabilitation needs of patients with COVID-19 after discharge from acute care. The objective of this report is to answer the question “What rehabilitation services do survivors of COVID-19 require?” The question was asked within the context of a subacute hospital delivering geriatric inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation services. Three areas relevant to rehabilitation after COVID-19 were identified. First, details of how patients may present have been summarized, including comorbidities, complications from an intensive care unit stay with or without intubation, and the effects of the virus on multiple body systems, including those pertaining to cardiac, neurological, cognitive, and mental health. Second, I have suggested procedures regarding the design of inpatient rehabilitation units for COVID-19 survivors, staffing issues, and considerations for outpatient rehabilitation. Third, guidelines for rehabilitation (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology) following COVID-19 have been proposed with respect to recovery of the respiratory system as well as recovery of mobility and function. A thorough assessment and an individualized, progressive treatment plan which focuses on function, disability, and return to participation in society will help each patient to maximize their function and quality of life. Careful consideration of the rehabilitation environment will ensure that all patients recover as completely as possible.

10.2196/19462 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. e19462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Mary Sheehy

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19), the infection caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was first reported on December 31, 2019. Because it has only been studied for just over three months, our understanding of this disease is still incomplete, particularly regarding its sequelae and long-term outcomes. Moreover, very little has been written about the rehabilitation needs of patients with COVID-19 after discharge from acute care. The objective of this report is to answer the question “What rehabilitation services do survivors of COVID-19 require?” The question was asked within the context of a subacute hospital delivering geriatric inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation services. Three areas relevant to rehabilitation after COVID-19 were identified. First, details of how patients may present have been summarized, including comorbidities, complications from an intensive care unit stay with or without intubation, and the effects of the virus on multiple body systems, including those pertaining to cardiac, neurological, cognitive, and mental health. Second, I have suggested procedures regarding the design of inpatient rehabilitation units for COVID-19 survivors, staffing issues, and considerations for outpatient rehabilitation. Third, guidelines for rehabilitation (physiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology) following COVID-19 have been proposed with respect to recovery of the respiratory system as well as recovery of mobility and function. A thorough assessment and an individualized, progressive treatment plan which focuses on function, disability, and return to participation in society will help each patient to maximize their function and quality of life. Careful consideration of the rehabilitation environment will ensure that all patients recover as completely as possible.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Uhm ◽  
Esther Olasoji ◽  
Alexis N Simpkins ◽  
Carolyn Geis ◽  

Introduction: Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in adults, resulting in significant impairments in motor, sensory, and/ or cognitive that often requires continued rehabilitation services, which vary from intensive acute inpatient rehabilitation to outpatient rehabilitation services. Efforts to reduce disability have advanced rapidly over the past several years. Our data analysis was undertaken to assess whether recent changes in clinical practice have impacted the proportion of stroke patients receiving inpatient versus outpatient rehabilitation over time between 2014-2019 at our institution, which serves a diverse mix of rural, suburban, and urban populations. Methods: Our Institutional Review Board approved retrospective stroke database, including adult patients discharged to receive rehabilitation services data from 2014-2019, was used for analysis. Cochran-Armitage trend analysis was used to assess for differences type of rehabilitation services used over time and regression analysis was used to identify clinical factors associated with discharge type over time. Results: A total of 3467 patients were included in the analysis, 50% woman, 1% Asian, 20% Black, 75% White, 4% undetermined race, 17% intracerebral hemorrhage, 65% ischemic stroke, 11% subarachnoid hemorrhage, 3% transient ischemic attack, 3% other cerebrovascular disease. In this community population, 65% were discharged to inpatient rehab. Trend analysis demonstrated a significant increase in the proportion of patients being discharged home with rehab services, p<.0001. In comparison to those discharged home, patients discharged to rehab were older (odds ratio (OR) 1.02, confidence interval (CI) 1.02-1.03), with a higher NIHSS (OR 1.16, CI 1.14-1.18), discharged in 2014 (OR 1.72, CI 1.23-2.39) or 2016 (OR 1.46, CI 1.05-2.05) versus 2019. There was no association with race, gender, or discharge in 2015, 2017, or 2018. Discussion: Our findings demonstrate the community impact of recent changes in clinical practice guidelines for stroke. The increasing trend of home discharges is encouraging, but the significant proportion of those still not discharged home suggests there is still more work to be done to reduce stroke associated disability in adults.


Author(s):  
Melissa A. Pierce

In countries other than the United States, the study and practice of speech-language pathology is little known or nonexistent. Recognition of professionals in the field is minimal. Speech-language pathologists in countries where speech-language pathology is a widely recognized and respected profession often seek to share their expertise in places where little support is available for individuals with communication disorders. The Peace Corps offers a unique, long-term volunteer opportunity to people with a variety of backgrounds, including speech-language pathologists. Though Peace Corps programs do not specifically focus on speech-language pathology, many are easily adapted to the profession because they support populations of people with disabilities. This article describes how the needs of local children with communication disorders are readily addressed by a Special Education Peace Corps volunteer.


2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (17) ◽  
pp. 7-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy Gill ◽  
Sneha Bharadwaj ◽  
Nancy Quick ◽  
Sarah Wainscott ◽  
Paula Chance

A speech-language pathology master's program that grew out of a partnership between the University of Zambia and a U.S.-based charitable organization, Connective Link Among Special needs Programs (CLASP) International, has just been completed in Zambia. The review of this program is outlined according to the suggested principles for community-based partnerships, a framework which may help evaluate cultural relevance and sustainability in long-term volunteer efforts (Israel, Schulz, Parker, & Becker, 1998).


2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (01) ◽  
pp. 053-065
Author(s):  
Molly Holcombe ◽  
Candace van der Stelt ◽  
Christine Baron

AbstractGroup treatment is an integral part of speech-language pathology (SLP) practice. The majority of SLP literature concerns group treatment provided in outpatient settings. This article describes the goals, procedures, and benefits of providing quality SLP group therapy in the comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation (CIR) setting. Effective CIR groups must be designed with attention to type and severity of communication impairment, as well physical stamina of group members. Group leaders need to target individualized patient goals while creating a challenging, complex, and dynamic group context that supports participation by all group members. Direct patient-to-patient interaction is fostered as much as possible. Peer feedback supports goal acquisition by fellow group members. The rich, complex group context fosters improved insight, initiation, social connectedness, and generalization of communication skills. Group treatment provides a unique type of treatment not easily replicated with individual treatment. SLP group treatment in a CIR is an essential component of an intensive, high-quality program. Continued advocacy for group therapy provision and research into its efficacy and effectiveness are warranted.


2017 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 1403-1411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly T. Webster ◽  
Donna Tippett ◽  
Marissa Simpson ◽  
Rina Abrams ◽  
Kristine Pietsch ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Marion C. Leaman ◽  
Jamie H. Azios

Purpose In this article, we draw a parallel between the experience of social isolation that occurred throughout the world during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic and similar experiences occurring in everyday life for people with communication disorders living in long-term care (LTC) facilities. We propose that speech-language pathologists can use the widespread experience of social isolation as a learning catalyst in the effort to shift the LTC culture to one that more highly values a communicative environment that is accessible to all, thereby reducing risk of social isolation for those with communication disorders. Conclusions Many training paradigms for promoting an accessible communicative environment are available in the speech-language pathology literature, yet institutional barriers exist for their widespread implementation. Overcoming these barriers is a challenge that requires awareness and learning on the part of staff and administration regarding the impact of an unfriendly communicative environment on social isolation, and the resulting psychosocial consequences. Learning theory indicates that new learning in adults is motivated by connections between personal experiences and the material to be learned. Explicitly infusing established training programs with the experience of social isolation brought on by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 pandemic may be the key needed for changing the communicative environment in LTC.


Author(s):  
Robert Orlikoff ◽  
Dobrinka Georgieva

Several collaborative projects between South-West University in Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria, and 8 universities in the USA have worked well to improve the overall competence of students in speech-language pathology programs and practicing clinicians to better meet the needs of individuals with fluency and voice disorders. The US Fulbright Senior Specialist and EU Erasmus+ exchange programs serve as effective instruments that provide systemic and long-term impact supporting innovation and fostering contemporary teaching methods. These international projects prepare students and faculty succeed in a global, multicultural society, and in doing so, advance speech-language pathology as an evidence-based allied health science discipline.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claire Penn ◽  
Elizabeth Armstrong ◽  
Karen Brewer ◽  
Barbara Purves ◽  
Meaghan McAllister ◽  
...  

Indigenous peoples throughout the world, despite being known to suffer from increased risk of stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI), are marginalised in terms of access to rehabilitation services and have poorer health outcomes than non-indigenous peoples. Speech-language pathology services for indigenous people with aphasia have rarely been discussed in either clinical or research fora in this field, with few guidelines available for clinicians when working with indigenous clients, families, and communities. Exploiting the broad input gathered through the collective problem-solving of a focus group, the paper integrates the input of a group of practitioners and researchers at an international roundtable held in 2016 to generate a “declaration” of issues that need to be addressed regarding aphasia services for indigenous clients with aphasia. The paper aims to promote a transformative approach to service delivery that is driven by decolonizing attitudes and practices, and acknowledges historical, sociopolitical, linguistic, and family contexts as a framework for understanding indigenous clients with aphasia.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document