scholarly journals Improving the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in General Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon de Lusignan ◽  
F D Richard Hobbs ◽  
Harshana Liyanage ◽  
Filipa Ferreira ◽  
Manasa Tripathy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Real World ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Sentinel Network ◽  
The Impact

BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the commonest arrhythmias observed in general practice. The thromboembolic complications of AF include transient ischemic attack, stroke, and pulmonary embolism. Early recognition of AF can lead to early intervention with managing the risks of these complications. OBJECTIVE The primary aim of this study is to investigate if patients are managed in general practice according to current national guidelines. In addition, the study will evaluate the impact of direct oral anticoagulant use with respect to AF complications in a real-world dataset. The secondary aims of the study are to develop a dashboard that will allow monitoring the management of AF in general practice and evaluate the usability of the dashboard. METHODS The study was conducted in 2 phases. The initial phase was a quantitative analysis of routinely collected primary care data from the Oxford Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Center (RCGP RSC) sentinel network database. AF cases from 2009 to 2019 were identified. The study investigated the impact of the use of anticoagulants on complications of AF over this time period. We used this dataset to examine how AF was managed in primary care during the last decade. The second phase involved development of an online dashboard for monitoring management of AF in general practice. We conducted a usability evaluation for the dashboard to identify usability issues and performed enhancements to improve usability. RESULTS We received funding for both phases in January 2019 and received approval from the RCGP RSC research committee in March 2019. We completed data extraction for phase 1 in May 2019 and completed analysis in December 2019. We completed building the AF dashboard in May 2019. We started recruiting participants for phase 1 in May 2019 and concluded data collection in July 2019. We completed data analysis for phase 2 in October 2019. The results are expected to be published in the second half of 2020. As of October 2020, the publications reporting the results are under review. CONCLUSIONS Results of this study will provide an insight into the current trends in management of AF using real-world data from the Oxford RCGP RSC database. We anticipate that the outcomes of this study will be used to guide the development and implementation of an audit-based intervention tool to assist practitioners in identifying and managing AF in primary care. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT RR1-10.2196/21259

scholarly journals Improving the Management of Atrial Fibrillation in General Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

10.2196/21259 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e21259
Author(s):  
Simon de Lusignan ◽  
F D Richard Hobbs ◽  
Harshana Liyanage ◽  
Filipa Ferreira ◽  
Manasa Tripathy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Real World ◽  
Early Recognition ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Sentinel Network ◽  
The Impact

Background Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the commonest arrhythmias observed in general practice. The thromboembolic complications of AF include transient ischemic attack, stroke, and pulmonary embolism. Early recognition of AF can lead to early intervention with managing the risks of these complications. Objective The primary aim of this study is to investigate if patients are managed in general practice according to current national guidelines. In addition, the study will evaluate the impact of direct oral anticoagulant use with respect to AF complications in a real-world dataset. The secondary aims of the study are to develop a dashboard that will allow monitoring the management of AF in general practice and evaluate the usability of the dashboard. Methods The study was conducted in 2 phases. The initial phase was a quantitative analysis of routinely collected primary care data from the Oxford Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Center (RCGP RSC) sentinel network database. AF cases from 2009 to 2019 were identified. The study investigated the impact of the use of anticoagulants on complications of AF over this time period. We used this dataset to examine how AF was managed in primary care during the last decade. The second phase involved development of an online dashboard for monitoring management of AF in general practice. We conducted a usability evaluation for the dashboard to identify usability issues and performed enhancements to improve usability. Results We received funding for both phases in January 2019 and received approval from the RCGP RSC research committee in March 2019. We completed data extraction for phase 1 in May 2019 and completed analysis in December 2019. We completed building the AF dashboard in May 2019. We started recruiting participants for phase 1 in May 2019 and concluded data collection in July 2019. We completed data analysis for phase 2 in October 2019. The results are expected to be published in the second half of 2020. As of October 2020, the publications reporting the results are under review. Conclusions Results of this study will provide an insight into the current trends in management of AF using real-world data from the Oxford RCGP RSC database. We anticipate that the outcomes of this study will be used to guide the development and implementation of an audit-based intervention tool to assist practitioners in identifying and managing AF in primary care. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/21259

scholarly journals Developing Strategies to Reduce Unnecessary Services in Primary Care: Protocol for User-Centered Design Charrettes (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandi L Klamerus ◽  
Laura J Damschroder ◽  
Jordan B Sparks ◽  
Sarah E Skurla ◽  
Eve A Kerr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
User Centered Design ◽  
The Impact ◽  
User Centered

BACKGROUND Overtreatment and overtesting expose patients to unnecessary, wasteful, and potentially harmful care. Reducing overtreatment or overtesting that has become ingrained in current clinical practices and is being delivered on a routine basis will require solutions that incorporate a deep understanding of multiple perspectives, particularly those on the front lines of clinical care: patients and their clinicians. Design approaches are a promising and innovative way to incorporate stakeholder needs, desires, and challenges to develop solutions to complex problems. OBJECTIVE This study aimed (1) to engage patients in a design process to develop high-level deintensification strategies for primary care (ie, strategies for scaling back or stopping routine medical services that more recent evidence reveals are not beneficial) and (2) to engage both patients and primary care providers in further co-design to develop and refine the broad deintensification strategies identified in phase 1. METHODS We engaged stakeholders in design charrettes—intensive workshops in which key stakeholders are brought together to develop creative solutions to a specific problem—focused on deintensification of routine overuse in primary care. We conducted the study in 2 phases: a 6.5-hour design charrette with 2 different groups of patients (phase 1) and a subsequent 4-hour charrette with clinicians and a subgroup of phase 1 patients (phase 2). Both phases included surveys and educational presentations related to deintensification. Phase 1 involved several design activities (mind mapping, business origami, and empathy mapping) to help patients gain a deeper understanding of the individuals involved in deintensification. Following that, we asked participants to review hypothetical scenarios where patients, clinicians, or the broader health system context posed a barrier to deintensification and then to brainstorm solutions. The deintensification themes identified in phase 1 were used to guide phase 2. This second phase primarily involved 1 design activity (<italic>WhoDo</italic>). In this activity, patients and clinicians worked together to develop concrete actions that specific stakeholders could take to support deintensification efforts. This activity included identifying barriers to the actions and approaches to overcoming those barriers. RESULTS A total of 35 patients participated in phase 1, and 9 patients and 7 clinicians participated in phase 2. The analysis of the deintensification strategies and survey data is currently underway. The results are expected to be submitted for publication in early 2020. CONCLUSIONS Health care interventions are frequently developed without input from the people who are most affected. The exclusion of these stakeholders in the design process often influences and limits the impact of the intervention. This study employed design charrettes, guided by a flexible user-centered design model, to bring clinicians and patients with differing backgrounds and with different expectations together to cocreate real-world solutions to the complex issue of deintensifying medical services.

scholarly journals Developing Strategies to Reduce Unnecessary Services in Primary Care: Protocol for User-Centered Design Charrettes

10.2196/15618 ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e15618 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mandi L Klamerus ◽  
Laura J Damschroder ◽  
Jordan B Sparks ◽  
Sarah E Skurla ◽  
Eve A Kerr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Design Process ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Medical Services ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
User Centered Design ◽  
The Impact ◽  
User Centered

Background Overtreatment and overtesting expose patients to unnecessary, wasteful, and potentially harmful care. Reducing overtreatment or overtesting that has become ingrained in current clinical practices and is being delivered on a routine basis will require solutions that incorporate a deep understanding of multiple perspectives, particularly those on the front lines of clinical care: patients and their clinicians. Design approaches are a promising and innovative way to incorporate stakeholder needs, desires, and challenges to develop solutions to complex problems. Objective This study aimed (1) to engage patients in a design process to develop high-level deintensification strategies for primary care (ie, strategies for scaling back or stopping routine medical services that more recent evidence reveals are not beneficial) and (2) to engage both patients and primary care providers in further co-design to develop and refine the broad deintensification strategies identified in phase 1. Methods We engaged stakeholders in design charrettes—intensive workshops in which key stakeholders are brought together to develop creative solutions to a specific problem—focused on deintensification of routine overuse in primary care. We conducted the study in 2 phases: a 6.5-hour design charrette with 2 different groups of patients (phase 1) and a subsequent 4-hour charrette with clinicians and a subgroup of phase 1 patients (phase 2). Both phases included surveys and educational presentations related to deintensification. Phase 1 involved several design activities (mind mapping, business origami, and empathy mapping) to help patients gain a deeper understanding of the individuals involved in deintensification. Following that, we asked participants to review hypothetical scenarios where patients, clinicians, or the broader health system context posed a barrier to deintensification and then to brainstorm solutions. The deintensification themes identified in phase 1 were used to guide phase 2. This second phase primarily involved 1 design activity (WhoDo). In this activity, patients and clinicians worked together to develop concrete actions that specific stakeholders could take to support deintensification efforts. This activity included identifying barriers to the actions and approaches to overcoming those barriers. Results A total of 35 patients participated in phase 1, and 9 patients and 7 clinicians participated in phase 2. The analysis of the deintensification strategies and survey data is currently underway. The results are expected to be submitted for publication in early 2020. Conclusions Health care interventions are frequently developed without input from the people who are most affected. The exclusion of these stakeholders in the design process often influences and limits the impact of the intervention. This study employed design charrettes, guided by a flexible user-centered design model, to bring clinicians and patients with differing backgrounds and with different expectations together to cocreate real-world solutions to the complex issue of deintensifying medical services. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR1-10.2196/15618

The Impact of COVID-19 on Primary Care General Practice Consultations in a Teaching Hospital in Shanghai, China

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhongqing Xu ◽  
Jingchun Fan ◽  
Jingjing Ding ◽  
Xianzhen Feng ◽  
Shunyu Tao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
The Impact

Invasive electrophysiological studies in adult congenital heart disease- evolving use and impact of specialized centre therapy on recurrence of arrhythmia: a nationwird analysis based on 2.433 cases

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A.J Fischer ◽  
D Enders ◽  
H Baumgartner ◽  
G.P Diller
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Congenital Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Real World ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Complex Disease ◽  
Annual Number ◽  
Electrophysiological Studies ◽  
Supraventricular Tachycardias ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Arrhythmias are a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in adult patients with congenital heart disease (ACHD). Advances in ablation technology have contributed to improved management and reduction of symptoms in this population. However, only limited data exist on the use and outcome of these technologies in large community-based cohorts of ACHD patients and on the impact of specialized centres on recurrence of arrhythmias. Purpose We performed a retrospective analysis based on data from one of the largest German Health Insurance Companies (approx. 9 million insured members), acquiring real-world data on frequency of invasive electrophysiological studies (EPS) in Germany between 2005 and 2018. ACHD patients were identified based on ICD codes and the spectrum of disease as well as the impact of EPS being performed at specialized ACHD centres was analysed. Results Out of 45,761 eligible ACHD patients in the database, we identified 2,433 EPS performed in 1,706 ACHD (51% female, median age 55.4 years, complexity of CHD mild, moderate and severe in 50.6%, 33.2%,16.2%, respectively). Over the study period the annual number of EPS increased by 207%. The majority of procedures were for supraventricular tachycardias (85.9%). Of these procedures atrial fibrillation accounted for 35.1%, atrial flutter for 29.4% and other supraventricular tachycardias/pre-excitation syndromes for 29.9% of cases. The majority of EPS (64.3%) was performed at non-specialized centres including 40.2% of cases in patients with complex disease. Overall, the re- intervention rate within 12 months of the primary EPS was 14.5%. Whereas in ACHD patients with simple and moderate complexity disease no obvious difference in 12-months re- intervention rate was observed between specialized and non-specialised centres (15.5% vs. 15.0%), in patients with complex disease the reintervention rate was 41.6% higher for non-specialized centres (13.6% vs. 9.6%). Conclusion Our large real- world analysis shows an increasing need for invasive electrophysiological studies in ACHD patients. The vast majority of procedures was performed for supraventricular arrhythmias including in atrial fibrillation and flutter ablation. Re-interventions were frequently required in this unique and anatomically challenging population. Alarmingly, many procedures were performed at non-specialized centres, although current guidelines recommend that interventions in complex patients should remain reserved for experienced high-volume centres. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals The Cochrane 2018 Review on Brief Interventions in Primary Care for Hazardous and Harmful Alcohol Consumption: A Distillation for Clinicians and Policy Makers

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
F R Beyer ◽  
F Campbell ◽  
N Bertholet ◽  
J B Daeppen ◽  
J B Saunders ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Alcohol Consumption ◽  
Brief Intervention ◽  
Emergency Care ◽  
Total Duration ◽  
Brief Interventions ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Harmful Alcohol ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims An updated Cochrane systematic review assessed effectiveness of screening and brief intervention to reduce hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption in general practice or emergency care settings. This paper summarises the implications of the review for clinicians. Methods Cochrane methods were followed. Reporting accords with PRISMA guidance. We searched multiple resources to September 2017, seeking randomised controlled trials of brief interventions to reduce hazardous or harmful alcohol consumption in people attending general practice, emergency care or other primary care settings for reasons other than alcohol treatment. Brief intervention was defined as a conversation comprising five or fewer sessions of brief advice or brief lifestyle counselling and a total duration of less than 60 min. Our primary outcome was alcohol consumption, measured as or convertible to grams per week. We conducted meta-analyses to assess change in consumption, and subgroup analyses to explore the impact of participant and intervention characteristics. Results We included 69 studies, of which 42 were added for this update. Most studies (88%) compared brief intervention to control. The primary meta-analysis included 34 studies and provided moderate-quality evidence that brief intervention reduced consumption compared to control after one year (mean difference −20 g/wk, 95% confidence interval −28 to −12). Subgroup analysis showed a similar effect for men and women. Conclusions Brief interventions can reduce harmful and hazardous alcohol consumption in men and women. Short, advice-based interventions may be as effective as extended, counselling-based interventions for patients with harmful levels of alcohol use who are presenting for the first time in a primary care setting.

Child Health General Practice Hubs: a service evaluation

2015 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Montgomery-Taylor ◽  
Mando Watson ◽  
Robert Klaber
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Child Health ◽  
Service Evaluation ◽  
High Patient Satisfaction ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Lower Capacity ◽  
Inside Out

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of an integrated child health system.DesignMixed methods service evaluation.Setting and patientsChildren, young people and their families registered in Child Health General Practitioner (GP) Hubs where groups of GP practices come together to form ‘hubs’.InterventionsHospital paediatricians and GPs participating in joint clinics and multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings in GP practices, a component of an ‘Inside-Out’ change known as ‘Connecting Care For Children (CC4C)’.Main outcome measuresCases seen in clinic or discussed at MDT meetings and their follow-up needs. Hospital Episode data: outpatient and inpatient activity and A&E attendance. Patient-reported experience measures and professionals’ feedback.ResultsIn one hub, 39% of new patient hospital appointments were avoided altogether and a further 42% of appointments were shifted from hospital to GP practice. In addition, there was a 19% decrease in sub-specialty referrals, a 17% reduction in admissions and a 22% decrease in A&E attenders. Smaller hubs running at lower capacity in early stages of implementation had less impact on hospital activity. Patients preferred appointments at the GP practice, gained increased confidence in taking their child to the GP and all respondents said they would recommend the service to family and friends. Professionals valued the improvement in knowledge and learning and, most significantly, the development of trust and collaboration.ConclusionsChild Health GP Hubs increase the connections between secondary and primary care, reduce secondary care usage and receive high patient satisfaction ratings while providing learning for professionals.

Sex differences in stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in French primary care. Results of the AFIGP (Atrial Fibrillation In General Practice) Database

2014 ◽  
Vol 103 (11) ◽  
pp. 887-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Sabouret ◽  
Leyla Depret-Bixio ◽  
François-Emery Cotte ◽  
Pierre Marie ◽  
Nabil Bedira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Sex Differences ◽  
Stroke Prevention
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document