scholarly journals Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Adolescent Opioid Use Disorder Treatment During a Pandemic: One Step Back, but Two Forward? (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel W Stull ◽  
Erin R McKnight ◽  
Andrea E Bonny
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Mobile Technologies ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
The Face ◽  
One Step ◽  
Clinician Perspectives ◽  
Receive Treatment

UNSTRUCTURED Opioid use disorder (OUD) is one of the most pressing public health problems in the United States and is highly prevalent among adolescents and young adults (AYAs). However, only a small percentage of AYAs with OUD ever receive treatment. Further, among those that do receive treatment, a substantial proportion of patients continue to struggle with OUD, and many prematurely drop out of treatment. These challenges have only been heightened in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, but greater utilization of telehealth and mobile technologies by OUD patients may help counter these barriers, which ultimately may improve AYA OUD treatment in the postpandemic period. This viewpoint presents the perspective of a person in OUD recovery using online and mobile technology to support his own OUD recovery combined with thoughts from two clinicians supporting AYAs with OUD. Their perspectives may provide insights to help counter COVID-19–related consequences and offer clues to improving AYA OUD treatment in the long term.

scholarly journals Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Adolescent Opioid Use Disorder Treatment During a Pandemic: One Step Back, but Two Forward?

10.2196/23463 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. e23463
Author(s):  
Samuel W Stull ◽  
Erin R McKnight ◽  
Andrea E Bonny
Keyword(s):  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Drop Out ◽  
Mobile Technologies ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
The Face ◽  
One Step ◽  
Clinician Perspectives ◽  
Receive Treatment

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is one of the most pressing public health problems in the United States and is highly prevalent among adolescents and young adults (AYAs). However, only a small percentage of AYAs with OUD ever receive treatment. Further, among those that do receive treatment, a substantial proportion of patients continue to struggle with OUD, and many prematurely drop out of treatment. These challenges have only been heightened in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, but greater utilization of telehealth and mobile technologies by OUD patients may help counter these barriers, which ultimately may improve AYA OUD treatment in the postpandemic period. This viewpoint presents the perspective of a person in OUD recovery using online and mobile technology to support his own OUD recovery combined with thoughts from two clinicians supporting AYAs with OUD. Their perspectives may provide insights to help counter COVID-19–related consequences and offer clues to improving AYA OUD treatment in the long term.

scholarly journals Disparities in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Admissions in the United States

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-93
Author(s):  
Peter Mallow ◽  
Michael Mercado ◽  
Michael Topmiller
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Wait Time ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
P Value ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Receive Treatment ◽  
To Receive

Objectives: The Cincinnati region has been at the epicenter of the nation’s unfolding opioid epidemic. The objectives of this study were twofold: (1) to compare the Cincinnati region to the United States in length of time to obtain treatment and planned medication-assisted therapy for the treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD); and (2) to assess racial disparities within the Cincinnati region in wait time and type of treatment. Methods: The 2017 Treatment Episode Data Set: Admissions (TEDS-A) from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) was used to identify a cohort of eligible individuals with a primary substance use of opioids, including opioid derivatives. Logistic regression models were performed to assess the differences for treatment wait time and type of planned treatment. Model covariates included patient demographics and socioeconomic characteristics. Three different models were performed to assess the influence of covariates of the outcomes. Results: There were 678 766 US and 3298 Cincinnati region individuals admitted for OUD treatment in 2017. The rate per 1000 for treatment admissions was 2.08 and 1.51 (P value < 0.0001) for the United States and Cincinnati, respectively. The fully saturated regression results found that the odds of Cincinnati individuals receiving planned medication-assisted therapy were 0.497 (95% CI, 0.451–0.546; P value < 0.001). The odds of waiting longer for treatment in Cincinnati were higher than in the United States as a whole: 2.33 (95% CI, 2.19–2.48; P value < 0.001). In Cincinnati, there were 3102 Caucasian, 123 African American, and 73 Other admissions. The fully saturated model results found that Caucasians and Other had an increased likelihood of receiving planned medication-assisted therapy (OR 1.89, P value 0.039; OR 7.07, P value 0.002, respectively) compared to African Americans. Within Cincinnati, there was not a statistically significant difference in the likelihood of waiting time to receive treatment by race. Conclusion: Individuals seeking treatment for OUD in Cincinnati were less likely to receive planned medication-assisted therapy and were more likely to wait longer than individuals in the United States as a whole. These results suggest that the demand for treatment is greater than the supply in Cincinnati. Within Cincinnati, there does not appear to be a racial disparity in treatment type or length of time to receive treatment for OUD.

scholarly journals Opioid use disorder in pregnancy

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 359-372
Author(s):  
Kristin Harter
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Strong Support ◽  
Retention In Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Maternal And Neonatal Outcomes ◽  
Key Aspects ◽  
In Pregnancy

Abstract The number of pregnant people affected by the opioid epidemic in the United States continues to rise. The following key aspects of opioid use disorder in pregnancy are explored through the progression of a pregnancy via a patient case: treatment options, treatment decisions, substance use screening, dosing modifications, and other aspects of peripartum care. Many factors affect opioid use disorder treatment choices during pregnancy; however, when a pregnant person is medically eligible for a therapy and multiple options are available locally, the ultimate decision regarding treatment selection should be left up to the patient and strong support services provided. This approach to treatment results in optimal maternal and neonatal outcomes and long-term maternal engagement and retention in care.

Adverse effects of regulation on buprenorphine prescribing and its impact on the treatment of opioid use disorder

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 133-139
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Strickland, MD, FACOG ◽  
John Sorboro, MD, DABPN, FASAM
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Federal Law ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
The Us ◽  
Main Driver ◽  
The Face ◽  
State Oversight ◽  
Overdose Deaths

Problem: Drug addiction and misuse is a medical and societal problem that has exacted a heavy toll on the United States, and, indeed, the world. In the United States, opioids are currently the main driver of drug overdose deaths. Despite the proven safety and efficacy of medically assisted therapy (MAT) using buprenorphine for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD), as well as the fact that its use is regulated by US Federal Law, many states have enacted separate and often burdensome regulations that restrict the prescribing of buprenorphine beyond those required by the US Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) under the provisions of the DATA 2000 Act, and unnecessarily reduce the availability of effective treatment of OUD in those states.Purpose: The purpose of this article is to review the pharmacology of both buprenorphine (and naloxone as an additive) and the risks associated with the misuse of buprenorphine products and to consider if such additional state oversight and restrictions improves or is deleterious to public safety in the face of this national epidemic.Conclusion: We conclude that the placing of unnecessary and unscientific restraints on the treatment of patients with OUD is inconsistent with the principles of harm reduction, and such restraints should be removed unless/until they can be supported by real evidence. 

scholarly journals Development of an Emergency Department-Based Intervention to Expand Access to Medications for Addiction Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in Appalachia: Protocol for Engagement and Community Collaboration (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren A. Walter ◽  
LI Y. Li ◽  
Joel Rodgers ◽  
Jennifer Hess ◽  
Rachel Skains ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Addiction Treatment ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Term Treatment ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Jefferson County ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Resource Limited ◽  
Long Term Treatment

BACKGROUND The opioid epidemic has disproportionately impacted the Appalachian region of the United States (US), a region characterized by higher poverty rates, healthcare access challenges, and higher opioid overdose death rates than other parts of the country. Jefferson County, Alabama, located in Southern Appalachia, has been especially affected, with overdose rates over two times greater than the statewide average (48.8 versus 19.9 overdoses per 10,000 persons). Emergency Departments (EDs) have been recognized as a major source of healthcare for persons with Opioid Use Disorder (OUD). A program to initiate medications for addiction treatment (MAT) for OUD in the ED has been shown to be effective. Likewise, continued patient engagement in a recovery or treatment program after ED discharge has been shown to be efficacious and impactful for long-term treatment success. OBJECTIVE This protocol outlines a framework for ED-initiated MAT for OUD in a resource-limited region of the US, made possible through community partnerships with referral resources for definitive OUD care. METHODS When a patient presents to the ED with symptoms of opioid withdrawal, non-fatal opioid overdose, or requesting opioid detoxification, clinicians will screen for OUD using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 diagnosis. All patients who screen positive for OUD will be further engaged and assessed for study eligibility. Recruited subjects will be evaluated for signs and symptoms of withdrawal, treated with buprenorphine/naloxone as appropriate, and given a prescription for take-home induction along with an intranasal naloxone kit. At the time of ED discharge, a peer navigator from a local substance use coordinating center will be engaged to facilitate patient referral to a regional substance abuse coordinating center for longitudinal addiction treatment. RESULTS This project is currently ongoing. It was funded in February, 2019, and approved by the University of Alabama at Birmingham IRB in June, 2019. Data collection began on July 7th, 2019 with projected end date February, 2022. Seventy-nine subjects have been enrolled to date. Results to be published in summer 2022. CONCLUSIONS ED recognition of OUD accompanied by buprenorphine/naloxone induction and referral for subsequent long-term treatment engagement have been shown to be one component of an effective strategy for addressing the ongoing opioid crisis. Establishing community and local partnerships, particularly in resource limited areas such as Appalachia, are crucial for the continuity of addiction care and rehabilitation outcomes.

scholarly journals Prior National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) opioid use disorder trials as background and rationale for NIDA CTN-0100 “optimizing retention, duration and discontinuation strategies for opioid use disorder pharmacotherapy (RDD)”

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matisyahu Shulman ◽  
Roger Weiss ◽  
John Rotrosen ◽  
Patricia Novo ◽  
Elizabeth Costello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Drug Abuse Treatment ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
National Drug ◽  
Retention In Treatment ◽  
Abuse Treatment

AbstractOpioid use disorder continues to be a significant problem in the United States and worldwide. Three medications—methadone, buprenorphine, and extended-release injectable naltrexone,— are efficacious for treating opioid use disorder (OUD). However, the utility of these medications is limited, in part due to poor rates of retention in treatment. In addition, minimum recovery milestones and other factors that influence when and whether individuals can safely discontinue medications are unknown. The National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network (CTN) study “Optimizing Retention, Duration, and Discontinuation Strategies for Opioid Use Disorder Pharmacotherapy” (RDD; CTN-0100) will be among the largest clinical trials on treatment of OUD yet conducted, consisting of two phases, the Retention phase, and the Duration-Discontinuation phase. The Retention phase, open to patients initiating treatment, will test different doses and formulations of buprenorphine (standard dose sublingual, high dose sublingual, or extended-release injection), and a digital therapeutic app delivering contingency management and cognitive behavioral counseling on the primary outcome of retention in treatment. The Discontinuation phase, open to patients in stable remission from OUD and choosing to discontinue medication (including participants from the Retention phase or from the population of patients treated at the clinical site, referred by an outside prescriber or self-referred) will study different tapering strategies for buprenorphine (sublingual taper vs taper with injection buprenorphine), and a digital therapeutic app which provides resources to promote recovery, on the primary outcome of relapse-free discontinuation of medication. This paper describes how the RDD trial derives from two decades of research in the CTN. Initial trials (CTN-0001; CTN-0002; CTN-0003) focused on opioid detoxification, showing buprenorphine-naloxone was effective for detoxification, but that acute detoxification did not appear to be an effective treatment strategy. Trials on comparative effectiveness of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) (CTN-0027; CTN-0030; and CTN-0051) highlighted the problem of dropout from treatment and few trials defined retention on MOUD as the primary outcome. Long-term follow-up studies on those patient samples demonstrated the importance of long-term continuation of medication for many patients to sustain remission. Overall, these trials highlight the potential of a stable research infrastructure such as CTN to advance treatment effectiveness through a programmatic succession of large clinical trials.

scholarly journals Assessing the Relationships Between COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Orders and Opioid Overdoses in the State of Pennsylvania

2021 ◽  
pp. 002204262110063
Author(s):  
Brian King ◽  
Ruchi Patel ◽  
Andrea Rishworth
Keyword(s):  
Age Groups ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Overdose ◽  
Policy Recommendations ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Fentanyl Analogs ◽  
Measure Change ◽  
Using Data ◽  
At Home

COVID-19 is compounding opioid use disorder throughout the United States. While recent commentaries provide useful policy recommendations, few studies examine the intersection of COVID-19 policy responses and patterns of opioid overdose. We examine opioid overdoses prior to and following the Pennsylvania stay-at-home order implemented on April 1, 2020. Using data from the Pennsylvania Overdose Information Network, we measure change in monthly incidents of opioid-related overdose pre- versus post-April 1, and the significance of change by gender, age, race, drug class, and naloxone doses administered. Findings demonstrate statistically significant increases in overdose incidents among both men and women, White and Black groups, and several age groups, most notably the 30–39 and 40–49 ranges, following April 1. Significant increases were observed for overdoses involving heroin, fentanyl, fentanyl analogs or other synthetic opioids, pharmaceutical opioids, and carfentanil. The study emphasizes the need for opioid use to be addressed alongside efforts to mitigate and manage COVID-19 infection.

scholarly journals “It’s way more than just writing a prescription”: A qualitative study of preferences for integrated versus non-integrated treatment models among individuals with opioid use disorder

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Saunders ◽  
Sarah K. Moore ◽  
Olivia Walsh ◽  
Stephen A. Metcalf ◽  
Alan J. Budney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Qualitative Study ◽  
The United States ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Integrated Treatment ◽  
Medical Setting ◽  
Integrated Models ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Medical Settings ◽  
Psychosocial Services ◽  
Treatment Models

Abstract Background Increasingly, treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) is offered in integrated treatment models addressing both substance use and other health conditions within the same system. This often includes offering medications for OUD in general medical settings. It remains uncertain whether integrated OUD treatment models are preferred to non-integrated models, where treatment is provided within a distinct treatment system. This study aimed to explore preferences for integrated versus non-integrated treatment models among people with OUD and examine what factors may influence preferences. Methods This qualitative study recruited participants (n = 40) through Craigslist advertisements and flyers posted in treatment programs across the United States. Participants were 18 years of age or older and scored a two or higher on the heroin or opioid pain reliever sections of the Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription Medications, and Other Substances (TAPS) Tool. Each participant completed a demographic survey and a telephone interview. The interviews were coded and content analyzed. Results While some participants preferred receiving OUD treatment from an integrated model in a general medical setting, the majority preferred non-integrated models. Some participants preferred integrated models in theory but expressed concerns about stigma and a lack of psychosocial services. Tradeoffs between integrated and non-integrated models were centered around patient values (desire for anonymity and personalization, fear of consequences), the characteristics of the provider and setting (convenience, perceived treatment effectiveness, access to services), and the patient-provider relationship (disclosure, trust, comfort, stigma). Conclusions Among this sample of primarily White adults, preferences for non-integrated versus integrated OUD treatment were mixed. Perceived benefits of integrated models included convenience, potential for treatment personalization, and opportunity to extend established relationships with medical providers. Recommendations to make integrated treatment more patient-centered include facilitating access to psychosocial services, educating patients on privacy, individualizing treatment, and prioritizing the patient-provider relationship. This sample included very few minorities and thus findings may not be fully generalizable to the larger population of persons with OUD. Nonetheless, results suggest a need for expansion of both OUD treatment in specialty and general medical settings to ensure access to preferred treatment for all.

scholarly journals Patient Experiences with the Transition to Telephone Counseling during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 663
Author(s):  
Augustine W. Kang ◽  
Mary Walton ◽  
Ariel Hoadley ◽  
Courtney DelaCuesta ◽  
Linda Hurley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Interrater Reliability ◽  
Telephone Counseling ◽  
Patient Experiences ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Therapeutic Experience ◽  
Perceived Impact

Background: To identify and document the treatment experiences among patients with opioid use disorder (OUD) in the context of the rapid move from in-person to telephone counseling due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Participants (n = 237) completed a survey with open-ended questions that included the following domains: (1) satisfaction with telephone counseling, (2) perceived convenience, (3) changes to the therapeutic relationship, (4) perceived impact on substance use recovery, and (5) general feedback. Responses were coded using thematic analysis. Codes were subsequently organized into themes and subthemes (covering 98% of responses). Interrater reliability for coding of participants’ responses ranged from 0.89 to 0.95. Results: Overall, patients reported that telephone counseling improved the therapeutic experience. Specifically, 74% of respondents were coded as providing responses consistently indicating “positive valency”. “Positive valency” responses include: (1) feeling supported, (2) greater comfort and privacy, (3) increased access to counselors, and (4) resolved transportation barriers. Conversely, “negative valency” responses include: (1) impersonal experience and (2) reduced privacy. Conclusions: Telephone counseling presents its own set of challenges that should be investigated further to improve the quality of care and long-term patient outcomes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document