scholarly journals Digitalizing a Brief Intervention to Reduce Intrusive Memories of Psychological Trauma for Health Care Staff Working During COVID-19: Exploratory Pilot Study With Nurses (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Singh ◽  
Marie Kanstrup ◽  
Katherine Depa ◽  
Ann-Charlotte Falk ◽  
Veronica Lindström ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the worldwide need for simple remotely delivered (digital) scalable interventions that can also be used preventatively to protect the mental health of health care staff exposed to psychologically traumatic events during their COVID-19–related work. We have developed a brief behavioral intervention that aims to reduce the number of intrusive memories of traumatic events but has only been delivered face-to-face so far. After digitalizing the intervention materials, the intervention was delivered digitally to target users (health care staff) for the first time. The adaption for staff’s working context in a hospital setting used a co-design approach. OBJECTIVE The aims of this mixed method exploratory pilot study with health care staff who experienced working in the pandemic were to pilot the intervention that we have digitalized (for remote delivery and with remote support) and adapted for this target population (health care staff working clinically during a pandemic) to explore its ability to reduce the number of intrusive memories of traumatic events and improve related symptoms (eg, posttraumatic stress) and participant’s perception of their functioning, and to explore the feasibility and acceptability of both the digitalized intervention and digitalized data collection. METHODS We worked closely with target users with lived experience of working clinically during the COVID-19 pandemic in a hospital context (registered nurses who experienced intrusive memories from traumatic events at work; N=3). We used a mixed method design and exploratory quantitative and qualitative analysis. RESULTS After completing the digitalized intervention once with remote researcher support (approximately 25 minutes) and a brief follow-up check-in, participants learned to use the intervention independently. All 3 participants reported zero intrusive memories during week 5 (primary outcome: 100% digital data capture). Prior to study inclusion, two or more intrusions in the week were reported preintervention (assessed retrospectively). There was a general pattern of symptom reduction and improvement in perceived functioning (eg, concentration) at follow-up. The digitalized intervention and data collection were perceived as feasible and rated as acceptable (eg, all 3 participants would recommend it to a colleague). Participants were positive toward the digital intervention as a useful tool that could readily be incorporated into work life and repeated in the face of ongoing or repeated trauma exposure. CONCLUSIONS The intervention when delivered remotely and adapted for this population during the pandemic was well received by participants. Since it could be tailored around work and daily life and used preventatively, the intervention may hold promise for health care staff pending future evaluations of efficacy. Limitations include the small sample size, lack of daily intrusion frequency data in the week before the intervention, and lack of a control condition. Following this co-design process in adapting and improving intervention delivery and evaluation, the next step is to investigate the efficacy of the digitalized intervention in a randomized controlled trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. S150-S151 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Røtvold ◽  
R. Wynn

IntroductionThe legal criteria for involuntary admission in Norway are that the patient has a serious psychiatric disorder (i.e. psychosis) and is in need of admission to secure needed treatment or that there is a risk of danger. While there have been some studies focusing on coercion in hospitals, less is known about the processes leading up to involuntary admission and the reasoning of referring doctors. In Norway, it is primarily general practitioners (GPs) that refer patients.AimsTo study which factors that GPs who had recently referred patients to involuntary admission thought might have made their latest referral unnecessary.MethodsSeventy-four GPs were interviewed by phone. They had all recently referred patients involuntarily to a major Norwegian university psychiatric hospital. One central question concerned how their latest involuntary referral might have been avoided.ResultsThese are the main factors that the GPs thought could have been of importance in avoiding involuntary referral of their patients:– that the patient took the prescribed medication (28%);– that they personally had the opportunity to closely follow up the patient in the following days (22%);– that other health care staff could follow up the patient closely in the patient's own home (i.e. home care nursing, etc.) (19%);– that a family member of the patient could help the patient (8%).ConclusionsThe GPs suggested that an increased availability of resources and more assistance from other parts of the health service were some of the factors that could be of importance in reducing involuntary admissions.


2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 144-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Schenström ◽  
Sten Rönnberg ◽  
Owe Bodlund

This pilot study explores feasibility and outcomes of a newly developed mindfulness-based cognitive attitude training program for health care personnel. The program was designed as an intervention to reduce the negative effects of stress on health care personnel, on both a personal and professional level, as well as to encourage personal well-being and improved management of the caregiver-patient relationship. The study group ( n = 52) consisted of individuals from various categories of caregivers within a primary care setting. The study includes pre- and postintervention assessments and a 3-month follow-up assessment of levels of mindfulness (Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale), quality of life (the WHO-5 Well-Being Questionnaire), and perceived stress (two VAS scales). As a group, course participants demonstrated significant positive changes reflected in all assessment scales after completing the course. These positive changes persisted at a 3-month follow-up assessment. The study results indicate the feasibility of this program and a need for continued research with a more powerful study design, possibly supplemented with a qualitative survey.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 65-65
Author(s):  
Sofia F. Garcia ◽  
Katy Wortman ◽  
Yanina Guevara ◽  
Elizabeth A. Hahn ◽  
Maria E. Corona ◽  
...  

65 Background: Survivorship care plans (SCPs) include treatment summaries and follow-up care recommendations intended to improve patient care and well-being after cancer treatment. Limited research has yielded mixed results regarding SCPs' impact on patient and system outcomes, but emphasized provider burden as an implementation barrier. We created a patient-centered SCP template and implemented its delivery at a safety net hospital that serves primarily racial/ethnic minority patients. Methods: In a single-arm feasibility study, oncologists and advanced practice nurses used the template to deliver SCPs to post-treatment breast cancer survivors (BCS) in consultation visits. We assessed changes in patient-reported outcomes from baseline (pre-SCP) to a 3-month follow-up, as well as provider time burden. Results: Female BCS participants (n = 75; mean age = 58.5 years) were primarily African-American (73%) and had high school/GED education or less (61%). Average time since diagnosis was 3.7 years (SD = 3.8); all received surgery; most received radiation (84%), hormone (77%), and/or chemotherapy treatment (73%). At follow-up, a majority rated their SCPs as good to excellent (92%), easy or very easy to understand (84%), a good to excellent summary of their treatment (92%) and as motivation for healthy lifestyles (88%). BCS follow-up scores improved significantly from baseline on breast cancer knowledge (p = .02), self-efficacy (p = .03), the QLQ-INFO25 (p < .01), and the FACIT TS-PS satisfaction with health care staff communication subscale (p < .01). No significant differences between baseline and follow-up scores (p < .05) were found for overall treatment satisfaction, health behaviors, and health-related quality of life. Preparing and delivering SCPs took providers considerable time (M = 54 & 22 minutes, respectively). Conclusions: This pilot study is limited by a single-arm design, but results suggest that SCPs may be related to improved survivor knowledge, information, self-efficacy and communication with health care staff. The individualized, comprehensive SCPs were well received by BCS in a safety net hospital but delivery was time-intensive. These findings will inform future research trials and clinical care initiatives.


2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (7) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
MIRIAM E. TUCKER

Author(s):  
E. Rydwik ◽  
L. Anmyr ◽  
M. Regardt ◽  
A. McAllister ◽  
R. Zarenoe ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The knowledge of the long-term consequences of covid-19 is limited. In patients, symptoms such as fatigue, decreased physical, psychological, and cognitive function, and nutritional problems have been reported. How the disease has affected next of kin, as well as staff involved in the care of patients with covid-19, is also largely unknown. The overall aim of this study is therefore three-fold: (1) to describe and evaluate predictors of patient recovery, the type of rehabilitation received and patients’ experiences of specialized rehabilitation following COVID-19 infection; (2) to study how next of kin experienced the hospital care of their relative and their experiences of the psychosocial support they received as well as their psychological wellbeing; (3) to describe experiences of caring for patients with COVID-19 and evaluate psychological wellbeing, coping mechanisms and predictors for development of psychological distress over time in health care staff. Methods This observational longitudinal study consists of three cohorts; patients, next of kin, and health care staff. The assessments for the patients consist of physical tests (lung function, muscle strength, physical capacity) and questionnaires (communication and swallowing, nutritional status, hearing, activities of daily living, physical activity, fatigue, cognition) longitudinally at 3, 6 and 12 months. Patient records auditing (care, rehabilitation) will be done retrospectively at 12 months. Patients (3, 6 and 12 months), next of kin (6 months) and health care staff (baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months) will receive questionnaires regarding, health-related quality of life, depression, anxiety, sleeping disorders, and post-traumatic stress. Staff will also answer questionnaires about burnout and coping strategies. Interviews will be conducted in all three cohorts. Discussion This study will be able to answer different research questions from a quantitative and qualitative perspective, by describing and evaluating long-term consequences and their associations with recovery, as well as exploring patients’, next of kins’ and staffs’ views and experiences of the disease and its consequences. This will form a base for a deeper and better understanding of the consequences of the disease from different perspectives as well as helping the society to better prepare for a future pandemic.


2021 ◽  
pp. 152483992110035
Author(s):  
Jennifer Utter ◽  
Sally McCray

Family meals provide a unique opportunity for families to eat well and engage positively with each other. In response to the challenges presented by the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic, a new initiative to support health care staff to share healthy meals with their families was developed. At a hospital in Queensland, Australia, dietetic staff collaborated with the on-site food service retailer to develop and offer a range of hot meals that staff could take home for their families at the end of their day. The meals were nutritious, reasonably priced, and designed to feed a family of four. The dietetic staff worked with the hospital marketing department and staff health and wellness program to promote the initiative. Over the 3 months that it has been running, nearly 300 meals have been purchased. Anecdotal comments from the food service retailer highlighted that the initiative was a good thing to do for staff to maintain a positive reputation of the business. The staff evening meal initiative is a healthy, affordable, educational, and socially engaging alternative to takeaway meals and food delivery by app, and it is mutually beneficial for health care staff and the on-site food retailer. The initiative also offers a unique opportunity for promoting nutrition and social engagement during stressful times.


2019 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 44-54
Author(s):  
Deb Mitchell ◽  
Kelly-Ann Bowles ◽  
Lisa O'Brien ◽  
Anne Bardoel ◽  
Terry Haines

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document