scholarly journals Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Action: Does Vietnamese Legal System Practice?

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. p98
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thi Bao Anh ◽  
Truong Kim Phung
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Medical Malpractice ◽  
Tort Law ◽  
Economic Damage ◽  
General Picture ◽  
Complex Issue ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Wrongful Life ◽  
Wrongful Birth ◽  
Exclusive Right

Wrongful birth and wrongful life is a complex issue of Tort law the world over. The vast majority of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims for medical malpractice are brought in the tort of negligence. Increasingly, parents have become more knowledgeable about the various reproductive options available, and there has evolved a body of jurisprudence that has defined and defended the exclusive right of individuals to make their own decisions about conception and childbearing. Besides, seeking damages (economic and non-economic damage) are also essential issues. By introducing and comparing the legal principles of some legal systems, the paper clarifies the general picture of wrongful birth and wrongful life action. This work seeks to answer the question, “does the Vietnamese legal system practice wrongful birth and wrongful life action?” To answer the question, the research paper applies the method of analyzing and comparing some tort law systems related to the content.

scholarly journals THE BIRTH TORTS: DAMAGES FOR WRONGFUL BIRTH AND WRONGFUL LIFE

2005 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 319 ◽  
Author(s):  
DEAN STRETTON
Keyword(s):  
Tort Law ◽  
Title Page ◽  
Medical Negligence ◽  
Legal Systems ◽  
Disabled Children ◽  
Wrongful Life ◽  
Wrongful Birth

<div class="page" title="Page 1"><div class="layoutArea"><div class="column"><p><span>[</span><span>This article examines the capacity of parents of children (whether dis- abled or not) born as a result of medical negligence to sue for the costs associated with the birth and raising of the children (‘wrongful birth’), as well as the capacity of disabled children who owe their existence to medi- cal negligence to sue for the costs associated with the disability (‘wrong- ful life’). Many legal systems have allowed the first type of claim, but very few have allowed the second type. The author argues that allowing both types of claim is consistent with ordinary principles of tort law, and that there are no policy reasons that override this conclusion. Consequently, a range of damages ought to be available in relation to both types of claim.</span><span>] </span></p></div></div></div>

scholarly journals Legal Ableism, Interrupted: Developing Tort Law & Policy Alternatives to Wrongful Birth & Wrongful Life Claims

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia X. Z. Brown
Keyword(s):  
Civil Rights ◽  
Assisted Suicide ◽  
Tort Law ◽  
Disabled People ◽  
Wrongful Life ◽  
Policy Alternatives ◽  
Alternative Means ◽  
History Of ◽  
Wrongful Birth ◽  
Policy Mechanisms

Early in 2016, the widely acclaimed film Me Before You premiered nationally to a spate of disabled-led protests against the ableism in the film's core story – that of a wealthy, physically disabled young man whose romantic and sexual relationship with a young woman hired as his caregiver (and quasi-maternal or mentoring figure) leads to his choice to kill himself to avoid living further while disabled, and to bequeath his assets to her. Protested as a "disability snuff film" by leading groups like Not Dead Yet, disabled activists lambasted the film for its glorification of assisted suicide as a brave and heroic choice because of the protagonist's disability – criticizing the writers for sending a very strong message that it is better to be dead than to live as disabled, however that might be defined or understood. U.S. law has often embodied that very same message despite the existence of civil rights protections for people with disabilities, and most particularly and glaringly in its adoption of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims as cognizable in tort. In this paper, I aim to provide brief context on the nature and history of wrongful birth and wrongful life claims, examine the myriad social harms toward disabled people that stem from their assertion, explore non-ableist purposes for which these claims might be brought, and propose potential legal and policy mechanisms as alternative means for achieving their possible legitimate purposes without reliance on them.

Energy in Public Administration - Between Human Rights and Efficient Administration

2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-241
Author(s):  
Mirko Pecaric
Keyword(s):  
Human Rights ◽  
Public Administration ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Human Dignity ◽  
Human Mind ◽  
Public Affairs ◽  
Reciprocal Relation ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Informal Practices

This paper explores recent notions in public administration, which are intertwined and addressed to the administration of public affairs. On this basis it demonstrates that content of legal system is filled through the static legal principles and rules, but they receive their real content through the informal practices and conditions of the human mind. The paper concludes that discussed notions could have only one name, because they all are the synonyms of reciprocal relation between the human dignity and efficient administration.

Adversarial Medical and Scientific Testimony and Lay Jurors: A Proposal for Medical Malpractice Reform

1995 ◽  
Vol 21 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 281-300
Author(s):  
Jody Weisberg Menon
Keyword(s):  
General Theory ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Medical Malpractice ◽  
Common Knowledge ◽  
Common Law ◽  
Expert Witnesses ◽  
Malpractice Reform ◽  
The Right ◽  
Scholarly Attention ◽  
Scientific Testimony

Pleas for reform of the legal system are common. One area of the legal system which has drawn considerable scholarly attention is the jury system. Courts often employ juries as fact-finders in civil cases according to the Seventh Amendment of the Constitution: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved … .” The general theory behind the use of juries is that they are the most capable fact-finders and the bestsuited tribunal for arriving at the most accurate and just outcomes. This idea, however, has been under attack, particularly by those who claim that cases involving certain difficult issues or types of evidence are an inappropriate province for lay jurors who typically have no special background or experience from which to make informed, fair decisions.The legal system uses expert witnesses to assist triers of fact in understanding issues which are beyond their common knowledge or difficult to comprehend.

scholarly journals Obligations, consent and contracts in Scots law: re-analysing the basis of medical malpractice liability in light of Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board

Legal Studies ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-21
Author(s):  
Jonathan Brown
Keyword(s):  
Informed Consent ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Medical Malpractice ◽  
Health Board ◽  
Medical Negligence ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Malpractice Liability ◽  
Patient Relationships ◽  
Physician Patient ◽  
Medical Regime

Abstract Professors MacQueen and Thomson have defined ‘contract’, within Scots law, as denoting ‘an agreement between two or more parties having the capacity to make it, in the form demanded by law, to perform, on one side or both, acts which are not trifling, indeterminate, impossible or illegal’. This definition reflects the fact that Scottish contracts are underpinned by consent, rather than by ‘consideration’. This, naturally, has the potential to be of great significance within the context of physician/patient relationships, particularly since the 2006 case of Dow v Tayside University Hospitals NHS Trust acknowledged that these relationships could be contractual in nature. This observation is of renewed importance since the landmark decision in Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board, which found that physicians must ensure that they obtain full and freely given ‘informed consent’ from their patients, prior to providing medical services. In light of the present medical regime which requires ‘doctor and patient [to] reach agreement on what should happen’, the basis of liability for medical negligence, in Scotland, requires reanalysis: ‘To have a contract only when the patient pays is not consistent with a legal system which has no doctrine of consideration in contract’.

Doctrinal principles of law: concept and specificity

2021 ◽  
pp. 9-21
Author(s):  
Vera A. Iliukhina
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Scientific Knowledge ◽  
Driving Force ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Social Significance ◽  
Historical Experience ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Positive Law

Based on the understanding of the doctrinal principles of law as socially significant ideas formulated by scientists, practitioners, politicians in scientific works and other texts, as well as in public speeches and have not found a normative consolidation, the peculiarities of the doctrinal principles of law are highlighted. It is proposed to delimit the doctrinal principles of law from legal axioms and normatively enshrined principles of law (principles of positive law). The similarity between the doctrinal principles of law and legal axioms is that they are ideas. It is substantiated that their differences lie in the fact that legal axioms are always ideas that are socially important and tested by historical experience, and doctrinal principles can be absolutely any, including new ones, coinciding or not coinciding with the needs of society; doctrinal principles are always not normatively fixed (this is their main specific feature), and legal axioms may or may not have normative consolidation. The main differences between doctrinal and normatively enshrined principles of law are highlighted. Three ways are established for the implementation of doctrinal ideas to the level of sectoral, inter-sectoral or general legal principles. The position is substantiated that doctrinal principles have enormous social significance and play an important role in the legal system of Russia, since are the basis for innovative changes in law, are a driving force for the development of legislation, based on the level of development of scientific knowledge and the needs of society in a specific historical period.

scholarly journals Grave Judicial Errors Within the Jordanian Legal System: Causes, Legal Provisions and Solutions

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Alaa Mohammad Alfawaer
Keyword(s):  
Legal System ◽  
Civic Responsibility ◽  
Legal Principles ◽  
Legal Provisions ◽  
Opposing Party ◽  
General Rules ◽  
Judicial Errors ◽  
Judicial Error

It is reasonably and logically conceivable that a judge commits a grave judicial error during the undertaking of his or her judicial work, whether related to legal principles, in the performance of his or her judicial duties or in his exercising of jurisdiction. This error is related to his or her civic responsibility, if it has resulted in damages to a member of the opposing party. Despite the importance and seriousness of such mistakes, and its long establishment, Jordanian legislation has not provided for it, and has left it to the general rules. There is no doubt that there are reasons which lead to such errors occurring and, conversely, that there are ways to avoid this error.

Wrongful Birth, Wrongful Life!

1983 ◽  
Vol 74 (4) ◽  
pp. 24-28
Author(s):  
Marc S. Mandell
Keyword(s):  
Wrongful Life ◽  
Wrongful Birth
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document