Further Thoughts on Mega-Accounting and the Need for Standards
This paper continues previous research (Mathews 1984, 1997b, 2000a, 2000b, 2003) into developing a proposal for a system of comprehensive<br />reporting based on a concept called megaaccounting. The ideas in mega- accounting are similar to those behind GRI (2002) and triple bottom line (TBL) reporting (Elkington 1997), but with a different underlying philosophy, a social contract approach compared to one based on organisational legitimacy or the need for management to drive sustainability and sustainable capitalism which is sometimes called ‗the<br />business case‘. The paper attempts to develop the concept of mega- accounting by identifying the purpose underlying the reports, identifying the basis of a conceptual framework and providing an indication<br />of the content that social and environmental accounting reports may include in the future. Of necessity the research perspective is normative<br />and deductive, as is much of the process of developing accounting standards, the model upon which it is argued social and environmental<br />accounting should be based. The paper concludes by reiterating that the way forward for social and environmental accounting and reporting is for a conceptual framework to be agreed and standards developed via a normative-pragmatic process that will provide the basis for comprehensive, audited, corporate reports encompassing the social, environmental and economic dimension. Furthermore, additional work is needed on the areas of macro-social accounting and externalities in order to develop a comprehensive framework.<br /><br />