scholarly journals Comparing EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer across Asian and non-Asian patients: a plain language summary

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Kim
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Initial Treatment ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Asian People ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Tkis

This is a summary of a review article that looked at how people from different ethnic populations respond differently to treatments for a type of lung cancer called non-small cell lung cancer (also known as NSCLC). EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (often shortened to EGFR TKI treatments) are a form of treatment for NSCLC called EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. There are currently five EGFR TKI treatments available, which are categorized based on when they were developed. First-generation EGFR TKI treatments were developed first, followed by second-generation and then third-generation. As different people respond differently to treatments, this review looked at data from clinical studies to investigate how first-, second- and third-generation EGFR TKIs are used to treat people with NSCLC from different ethnicities. The results showed that second- and third-generation EGFR TKIs work better in treating people with NSCLC than first-generation TKIs in both Asian and non-Asian populations. However, it is still not clear whether second- or third-generation EGFR TKIs should be used as the initial treatment of choice for NSCLC, particularly in Asian patients. In one of the studies (called the FLAURA study), the third-generation EGFR TKI osimertinib improved overall survival (the length of time that patients survived, from first dose of treatment to death) when compared to first-generation EGFR TKIs. However, this was only seen in non-Asian people with NSCLC and not in Asian people with NSCLC. Saving osimertinib for second-line use (i.e., after the initial treatment has stopped working or becomes ineffective) may increase the duration of chemotherapy-free treatment, particularly in Asian patients.

Outcomes of first-generation versus third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases (NSCLCBM).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2031-2031
Author(s):  
Vineeth Tatineni ◽  
Patrick Joseph O'Shea ◽  
Yasmeen Rauf ◽  
Xuefei Jia ◽  
Erin Sennett Murphy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Egfr Tkis

2031 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common cause of brain metastases, with 10-30% of patients developing brain metastases. EGFR is a transmembrane glycoprotein that is mutated in up to 50% of NSCLCs. First-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), such as erlotinib and gefitinib, are limited by blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetration and exon 20 (T790M) tumor mutations. Third-generation EGFR TKIs, such as osimertinib, have shown better BBB penetration and efficacy against T790M mutations. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLCBM patients treated with first and third-generation EGFR TKIs. Methods: NSCLCBM patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 at our tertiary care center were investigated. Information regarding molecular marker status, systemic therapies, and date of progression were collected. OS was defined as the start date of systemic therapy to the date of last follow-up or death. OS and PFS were estimated by the Cox proportional model. Results: A total of 193 NSCLCBM patients with an EGFR mutation were identified. 33 EGFR mutant patients received first-generation EGFR TKIs, of which 56.7% were females, 82.1% were white, and had a median age of 63.2 years. 22 patients received third-generation EGFR TKIs, 64.1% being female, 76.9% being white, and with a median age of 71.5 years. The median OS (mOS) in patients who received first and third-generation EGFR TKIs was 59.8 months and 65.9 months respectively (p-value (p) = 0.06). The median PFS (mPFS) between the first and third-generation EGFR TKI cohorts was 44.3 months and 66.9 months respectively (p= 0.048, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.50 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.25, 0.99). Conclusions: Newer generation of targeted therapies in NSCLCBM have focused on overcoming previous efficacy hurdles, including BBB penetration and resistant mutations. We determined that there was a significant mPFS benefit in osimertinib compared to erlotinib or gefitinib, and a trend towards significant mOS benefit in osimertinib compared to erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with NSCLCBM. However, these results should be interpreted cautiously due to treatment selection bias, and further studies need to be conducted on brain metastases lesion size and response rates.[Table: see text]

Treatment in EGFR-mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: How to Block the Receptor and overcome Resistance Mechanisms

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Proto ◽  
Giuseppe Lo Russo ◽  
Giulia Corrao ◽  
Monica Ganzinelli ◽  
Francesco Facchinetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Resistance Mechanisms ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Third Generation ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Exon 20 ◽  
Egfr Mutated ◽  
Egfr Tkis

In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and the parallel development of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have radically changed the therapeutic management strategies. Currently, erlotinib, gefitinib, and afatinib are all approved as standard first-line treatment in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. However, despite the proven efficacy, some EGFR-mutated NSCLCs do not respond to EGFR TKIs, while some patients, after a favorable and prolonged response to EGFR TKIs, inevitably progress within about 10-14 months. Epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent mechanisms, activation of alternative pathways, or phenotypic transformation can cause the resistance to EGFR TKIs. The exon 20 p.Thr790Met point mutation (T790M) is responsible for about 60% of cases of resistance when progression occurs. A third-generation TKI, osimertinib, improved outcome in patients harboring T790M after first- and second-generation TKI treatment. However, resistance develops even after treatment with third-generation drugs. To date, the Cys797Ser (C797S) mutation in exon 20 of EGFR is the most well-known resistance mutation after osimertinib. Fourth-generation TKIs are already under development. Nevertheless, additional information is needed to better understand and effectively overcome resistance. The aim of this review is to report recent advances and future perspectives in the treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC, highlighting the resistance mechanisms that underlie disease progression.

ERK Inhibitor ASN007 Effectively Overcomes Acquired Resistance to EGFR Inhibitor in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Mi Ku ◽  
Jae Yeong Heo ◽  
Jinchul Kim ◽  
Jong-Mu Sun ◽  
Se-Hoon Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Erk Signaling ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Tkis

Abstract The emergence of acquired resistance limits the long-term efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Thus, development of effective strategies to overcome resistance to EGFR-TKI is urgently needed. Multiple mechanisms to reactivate ERK signaling have been successfully demonstrated in acquired resistance models. We found that in EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs was accompanied by increased activation of ERK. Increased ERK activation was also found in in vitro models of acquired EGFR-TKI resistance. ASN007 is a potent selective ERK1/2 inhibitor with promising antitumor activity in cancers with BRAF and RAS mutations. ASN007 treatment impeded tumor cell growth and the cell cycle in EGFR-TKI-resistant cells. In addition, combination treatment with ASN007 and EGFR-TKIs synergistically decreased the survival of resistant cells, enhanced induction of apoptosis, and effectively inhibited the growth of erlotinib-resistant xenografts, providing the preclinical rationale for testing combinations of ASN007 and EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. This study emphasizes the importance of targeting ERK signaling in maintaining the long-term benefits of EGFR-TKIs by overcoming acquired resistance.

scholarly journals Concurrent Genetic Alterations and Other Biomarkers Predict Treatment Efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yijia Guo ◽  
Jun Song ◽  
Yanru Wang ◽  
Letian Huang ◽  
Li Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Treatment Efficacy ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Egfr Mutations ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Egfr Mutant ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Tkis ◽  
Gene Alterations

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) greatly improve the survival and quality of life of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations. However, many patients exhibit de novo or primary/early resistance. In addition, patients who initially respond to EGFR-TKIs exhibit marked diversity in clinical outcomes. With the development of comprehensive genomic profiling, various mutations and concurrent (i.e., coexisting) genetic alterations have been discovered. Many studies have revealed that concurrent genetic alterations play an important role in the response and resistance of EGFR-mutant NSCLC to EGFR-TKIs. To optimize clinical outcomes, a better understanding of specific concurrent gene alterations and their impact on EGFR-TKI treatment efficacy is necessary. Further exploration of other biomarkers that can predict EGFR-TKI efficacy will help clinicians identify patients who may not respond to TKIs and allow them to choose appropriate treatment strategies. Here, we review the literature on specific gene alterations that coexist with EGFR mutations, including common alterations (intra-EGFR [on target] co-mutation, TP53, PIK3CA, and PTEN) and driver gene alterations (ALK, KRAS, ROS1, and MET). We also summarize data for other biomarkers (e.g., PD-L1 expression and BIM polymorphisms) associated with EGFR-TKI efficacy.

A practical decision-making strategy based on clinical triple features for EGFR-TKIs to treat advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with unknown EGFR mutation status.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19082-e19082
Author(s):  
Di Zheng ◽  
Jiying Wang ◽  
Bing Lu
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Egfr Tki ◽  
Egfr Tkis

e19082 Background: EGFR mutated lung cancers are strongly associated with clinical characteristics of never- smoking history and adenocarcinoma histology type, and tended to develop multiple pulmonary metastases.Whether multiple pulmonary metastatic lung adenocarcinomas with never-smoking history would respond to EGFR-TKIs as those harboring EGFR active mutation remains unclear. Methods: 223 consecutive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with unknown EGFR status who received EGFR-TKIs as salvage therapy after failure of previous platinum-based chemotherapy in Shanghai Pulmonary hospital between 2009 and 2011 were included to the study. Available CT scans, routinely performed at baseline and one month after the start of EGFR-TKIs therapy, were reviewed independently by two investigators. For the purposes of this study, diffuse pulmonary metastatic nodules were defined as multiple nodules distributed diffusely throughout the whole lung with at least 20 nodules within the unilateral lung field. Paraffin embedded tissues were available for 45 of 223 patients for EGFR gene mutation test. Results: Of 134 never-smokers with lung adenocarcinoma,70 patients responded to EGFR-TKIs with an objective response rate (ORR) of 52.2% (70/134), and the ORR for the 62 patients with diffuse pulmonary metastatic nodules was 79% (49/62). Among the 20 patients with confirmed EGFR mutation (based on the available 45 archived specimen), the ORR was 75% (15/20). The multivariate analyses showed that the presence of diffused multiple pulmonary metastatic nodules, activating EGFR mutation and female are independent predictive factors of the response to EGFR-TKIs. Conclusions: Patient selection based on specific clinical features to recieve EGFR-TKI treatment yield high response rate comparable to that selected by EGFR mutation status. It is practical to consider EGFR-TKI as salvage therapy in non-smoking patients with lung adenocarcinoma characterized by diffuse pulmonary nodules when EGFR mutation testing is a challenge.

scholarly journals Optimal sequencing strategies in the treatment of EGFR mutation–positive non–small cell lung cancer: Clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness

2020 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 1466-1476
Author(s):  
Vera Hirsh ◽  
Jaspal Singh
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
First Generation ◽  
Egfr Mutation ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Optimal Sequencing ◽  
Egfr Tkis

Abstract Purpose To summarize current understanding of the efficacy, role, and cost-effectiveness of the available epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and to evaluate sequencing strategies based on the available evidence. Summary. EGFR TKIs are the current standard of care for patients with EGFR mutation–positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Five EGFR TKIs are currently approved in the United States for use in a first-line setting; these TKIs differ in mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, and cost. Most patients develop resistance to first-line EGFR TKIs and require subsequent therapy with additional EGFR TKIs, chemotherapy, and/or other targeted agents. A major consideration when selecting EGFR TKIs, both as first-line or subsequent treatment options, is cost-effectiveness. Although clinical trials have shown that the second- and third-generation EGFR TKIs are superior in efficacy to the first-generation agents, pharmacoeconomic studies suggest that the first-generation agents are the most cost-effective, with the second-generation TKI afatinib also considered cost-effective in some studies. Despite its impressive efficacy, osimertinib appears to be less cost-effective due to substantially higher acquisition costs. Conclusion Preliminary data suggest that first-line afatinib followed by osimertinib may offer promising survival outcomes and, on the basis of efficacy alone, may represent an optimal sequencing strategy in the majority of patients with EGFR mutation–positive NSCLC, in particular Asian patients and those with Del19-positive tumors. However, considerably more research into outcomes and costs associated with consecutive sequencing of EGFR TKIs is needed before any conclusions can be reached.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document