scholarly journals Locoregional therapy patterns and healthcare economic burden of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the USA

2021 ◽  
pp. HEP37
Author(s):  
Abdalla Aly ◽  
Melissa Lingohr-Smith ◽  
Jay Lin ◽  
Brian Seal

Aim: To examine the locoregional therapy (LRT) patterns and the healthcare economic burden of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the USA. Patients & methods: Patients with newly diagnosed HCC were identified from the MarketScan® databases (1 July 2015–31 May 2018). The LRTs received and all-cause and HCC-related healthcare costs were measured. Results: Among 2101 patients with HCC, most received embolization therapy as their first LRT treatment (57.8%, n = 1215); 17.1% (n = 360) received ablative therapy and 8.7% (n = 182) radiation therapy; 16.4% (n = 344) received multiple LRTs. After patients received their first LRT treatment, total all-cause healthcare costs averaged $20,316 per patient per month; 70.7% ($14,359) were HCC related. Conclusion: Among newly diagnosed HCC patients treated with LRT in the USA, the economic burden is high.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 286-286
Author(s):  
Brian Seal ◽  
Abdulla M. Abdulhalim ◽  
Melissa Lingohr-Smith ◽  
Jay Lin

286 Background: Hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC) is one of the fastest growing causes of cancer-related deaths in the US. The objectives of this study were to examine the lines of loco-regional therapies received and the healthcare economic burden of patients newly diagnosed with HCC in the US. Methods: Patients (≥18 years of age) diagnosed with HCC who received ≥1 loco-regional therapy (index date) after diagnosis were identified from the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (July 1, 2013-May 31, 2018). Patients were required to have ≥6 months of continuous insurance enrollment before the index date and ≥1 month after (follow-up period). The follow-up period was censored when patients received any systemic therapy. During the follow-up periods, the number of patients who received radiation therapy, ablative therapy, and embolization procedures (transarterial embolization/chemoembolization [TAE] and radioembolization [TARE]) were examined. All-cause and HCC-related healthcare costs (total and patient out-of-pocket [OOP] payments per patient per month [PPPM]) were also measured. Results: Among the 2,101 patients newly diagnosed with HCC who received ≥1 loco-regional therapy, median age was 64 years and 75.0% were male; the mean follow-up duration was 11.5 months. During the follow-up periods, 28.1% (n = 590) received radiation therapy, 27.3% (n = 574) ablative therapy, and 77.3% (n = 1,623) embolization therapy (TAE: 68.7% [n = 1,443]; TARE: 20.7% [n = 434]); 30.9% of patients received multiple loco-regional therapies. During the follow-up periods, total all-cause healthcare costs were a mean of $20,316 (OOP: $378) PPPM, of which 70.7% ($14,359; OOP: $227 PPPM) were HCC-related. The breakdown of healthcare costs is shown in the table. Conclusions: According to the findings of this large-scale real-world analysis of patients newly diagnosed with HCC in the US, a vast majority received at least one embolization procedure. The monthly healthcare economic burden of patients with HCC treated with local-regional therapies is relatively high. [Table: see text]


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. HEP27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdalla Aly ◽  
Sarah Ronnebaum ◽  
Dipen Patel ◽  
Yunes Doleh ◽  
Fernando Benavente

Aim: To describe the epidemiologic, humanistic and economic burdens of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the USA. Materials & methods: Studies describing the epidemiology and economic burden from national cohorts, any economic models, or any humanistic burden studies published 2008–2018 were systematically searched. Results: HCC incidence was 9.5 per 100,000 person-years in most recent data, but was ∼100-times higher among patients with hepatitis/cirrhosis. Approximately a third of patients were diagnosed with advanced disease. Patients with HCC experienced poor quality of life. Direct costs were substantial and varied based on underlying demographics, disease stage and treatment received. Between 25–77% of patients did not receive surgical, locoregional or systemic treatment. Conclusion: Better treatments are needed to extend survival and improve quality of life for patients with HCC.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 532-532
Author(s):  
Hyun-Cheol Kang ◽  
Jin Ho Kim ◽  
Eui Kyu Chie

532 Background: Hypofractionated RT has shown encouraging results in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. However, HCC adjacent to the gastrointestnal (GI) tract should be carefully treated using the high-precision irradiation technique due to risk of radiation damage. We evaluated the feasibility of a respiratory-gated magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (RgMRg-RT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: Thirty-three patients with HCC underwent RgMRg-RT in our hospital from 2015 to February 2019, including patients with Child-Pugh A/B7 cirrhosis and unresectable tumors near the gastrointestinal tract. The median radiation dose was 50 Gy (range, 25–60) and median fraction number was 5 (range, 4–15). Gating was performed based on real-time magnetic resonance image without an external surrogate. Results: The median follow-up period was 11.7 months (range, 3.6–37.9 months). The rates of local control of the target tumor at 6 months and 1 year were 90.2 and 86.9%, respectively. The overall survival rates at 6 months, 1, and 2 years were 84.3, 76.3, and 61%, respectively. The median distances from gross tumor to the esophagus, stomach, duodenum and colon were 6.1 (range, 1.9-14.3), 6.4 (0-13.4), 3.8 (0-13.5) and 4cm (0.3-13), respectively. A total of 15 tumors (45.5%) were located within 2 cm of the gastrointestinal tract and 9 tumors (27.3%) within 1cm. Grades 3 treatment‐related bleeding was observed in one patient and one patient had radiation‐induced liver disease. Conclusions: Hypofractionated RgMRg-RT was a safe and potentially ablative therapy for HCC. RgMRg-RT is a good alternative treatment for patients with HCCs that are unsuitable for surgical resection or local ablative therapy.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2184-2184
Author(s):  
Derek Tang ◽  
Ankush Taneja ◽  
Preety Rajora ◽  
Renu Patel

Introduction: Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare bone marrow cancer classified as a myeloproliferative neoplasm in which bone marrow is replaced by fibrous (scar) tissue, impairing the production of normal blood cells. MF has a global incidence of approximately 0.58 new cases per 100,000 person-years, with many patients experiencing short survival (approximately 6 years). Most patients with MF are found to have either intermediate-2 or high-risk MF, as per their prognostic score (International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS] or Dynamic IPSS). The economic impact of MF has been studied in individual real-world settings, each of which may have limited generalizability; however, the holistic economic burden of MF is not well understood. The objective of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to describe economic evidence for patients with MF including cost and resource use data. Methods: A SLR was conducted in Embase®, MEDLINE®, the National Health Service Economic Evaluation Database (NHS EED), and the American Economic Association (AEA) EconLit® to identify evidence published from database inception to July 2018. Conference proceedings and bibliographies were also searched. Studies were included if they were published in the English language and reported economic burden associated with adult patients with MF. The evidence was not restricted by any country or time limits. Two reviewers assessed each citation against predefined eligibility criteria, with discrepancies reconciled by a third independent reviewer. All the extracted data were quality checked by a second independent reviewer. A descriptive qualitative analysis was conducted to identify the patterns of economic burden in MF across different countries. Results: A total of 771 potentially relevant abstracts were identified and screened, of which 23 studies were included in the final analysis. Eleven studies reported cost data only, 10 studies reported both cost and resource use data, and 2 studies reported on the budget impact of treatment for MF. Eight of the included studies were conducted in the USA, 2 each in the UK, Canada, and Ireland, and the remaining 9 reported data from other countries. Eight of the included studies reported total MF costs, 4 studies reported productivity losses related to employment, and 3 studies reported indirect costs related to productivity and informal care. The remaining studies reported cost-effectiveness data for the treatment of MF. Of the 5 studies that reported categorical costs, 3 reported that outpatient costs were the major driver of costs, followed by inpatient costs. Among the studies conducted in the USA, total medical healthcare costs associated with MF ranged from USD 21,000 to USD 66,000 per patient. Three European studies reported that the annual productivity losses per patient ranged from EUR 7,774 to EUR 11,000, with total annual productivity losses as high as EUR 217,975. Two US studies compared the total MF-related healthcare costs with age- and sex-matched controls; costs were significantly higher in the MF cohort compared with matched controls (P < 0.05), especially for inpatient costs, outpatient costs, and pharmacy costs (Figure). Four studies, with a majority of the MF patients aged > 50 years, reported that 20-60% of the patients were absent from work, with a mean of 6.2 hours of work missed in the past 7 days. Among the hospitalized patients, 3 studies reported that the median length of stay for patients with MF ranged from 2.5 to 6.6 days, with 46% of patients utilizing emergency room visits and services. Conclusions: MF is associated with significant economic burden and work productivity loss to the health system, patients, and their families. Sustained efforts to develop more effective treatments are required in order to reduce the economic burden associated with MF and help patients and physicians improve disease management. Disclosures Tang: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Taneja:BresMed Health Solutions Ltd: Employment. Rajora:BresMed Health Solutions Ltd: Employment. Patel:BresMed: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4516-4516
Author(s):  
Dorothy Romanus ◽  
Brian Seal ◽  
Mehul Jhaveri ◽  
Richard Labotka ◽  
Henry Henk

Abstract Background Few studies have assessed HRU and costs in RRMM. A prior study reported 1-yr total healthcare costs of $113,000 (2013 US $) among non-transplant patients with newly diagnosed MM (DaCosta Byfield ASCO 2015). Real-world data on economic burden in the era of new MM therapeutic options could provide insight for directing efficient resource utilization. We examined HRU and costs associated with second-line therapy (SLT) in RRMM. Methods We identified adult pts with MM between Jan 2008 and Feb 2014 in a large, national, healthcare claims database of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Newly diagnosed pts were followed from first claim for MM (+12-mo wash out period). Pts with continuous enrollment from 12 mos pre-diagnosis through 12 mos post-initiation of SLT for RRMM were included (including pts who died within 12 mos post SLT start). Those with a claim for transplants were excluded. Front-line therapy (FLT) began with the first claim for MM-directed systemic cancer therapy. Unique agents administered within 90 d of FLT initiation constituted a regimen. Continuation of FLT regimen (or part thereof) or monotherapy within 3 mos of the end of the initial regimen was considered part of FLT. SLT after first relapse for RRMM was identified accordingly: 1) a treatment gap >6 mos between end of FLT and start of a 2nd regimen (retreatment or switch), 2) start of a follow-up regimen (retreatment) with treatment gap >3 and ≤6 mos after end of FLT, or 3) a switch to another drug combination after FLT. The first claim for SLT was the index date. Healthcare costs and HRU were determined for the 1-yr period following SLT start. Healthcare costs were calculated as total reimbursed amount to the provider paid by the health plan, the pt, and other payers, including treatment with subsequent lines of therapy if falling within the 1-yr period. Drug and drug-administration costs were captured from a) all pharmacy claims for MM-directed systemic therapy, and b) medical claims with CPT codes indicating chemotherapy drug administration if, on the same date of service, there was a claim with a HCPCS for any drug of interest. Results We identified 160 of 249 pts receiving SLT. The majority (55%) were female, 72% were aged ≥65 yrs, 10% received triplet SLT, and 53% were enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. Most common SLT regimens were bortezomib- (39%) or lenalidomide-based (38%) (Table 1). RRMM pts averaged 58 ambulatory visits and 1.2 hospitalizations in the yr following start of SLT, with 5.1 ICU and 7.9 non-ICU days. Mean 1-yr healthcare costs were $123,922 with 59% of total costs attributable to non-drug costs (mean: $72,718; Table 2). Conclusions The healthcare and economic burden of illness among pts with RRMM receiving SLT is substantial. The main cost driver in RRMM was non-drug related. While this research did not examine indirect costs, rates of ambulatory visits and hospitalization days occurring within 1 yr of the start of SLT were high and likely correlated with indirect costs to both the pt and caregiver. New treatment options with a more favorable side-effect and efficacy profile may mitigate this burden. At study completion, a statistical analysis will be conducted to assess the determinants and drivers of economic burden in RRMM. Table 1. RRMM pt Characteristics and SLT patterns Total (N=160)n (%)* Died during 1-yr following start of SLT 36 (22.5) Age, yrs <65 45 (28.1) 65-74 45 (28.1) ≥75 70 (43.8) Male 72 (45) Insurance type Commercial 76 (47.5) Medicare Advantage 84 (52.5) SLT regimens Bortezomib-based 62 (38.8) IMiD-based 60 (37.5) Bortezomib + IMiD 3 (1.9) Other† 35 (21.9) Start of a new regimen within 1 yr (3rd line) 68 (42.5) *unless otherwise noted †including cyclophosphamide, melphalan, vincristine, doxorubicin, interferon-alpha, pomalidomide, thalidomide, carfilzomib, dexamethasone, prednisone ‡among non-censored pts Table 2. Healthcare costs and encounters among pts with RRMM after initiation of SLT 1-yr healthcare costs (2014 US$) Mean (SD)(N=160) Total 123,922 (114,052) Drug 51,204 (40,997) Non-drug 72,718 (102,169) Total 123,922 (114,052) During SLT 81,590 (90,151) After 3rd Line initiation* 33,573 (64,832) SLT end to start of 3rd Line 8,759 (28,046) Healthcare encounters per pt Ambulatory visits 58.5 (32.6) ER visits 1.7 (2.2) Hospitalizations 1.2 (1.7) Inpatient length of stay, days 13.0 (26.6) Non-ICU 7.9 (21) ICU 5.1 (12.7) *censored at 12 mos after SLT initiation Disclosures Romanus: Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Seal:Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Jhaveri:Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Equity Ownership; Sanofi: Equity Ownership. Labotka:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, a wholly owned subsidiary of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Employment. Henk:Optum (a consulting firm retained by Takeda to conduct the reasearch pertaining to this abstract): Employment.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 5940-5940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole Princic ◽  
Xue Song ◽  
Vincent Lin ◽  
Ze Cong

Abstract Background: Ph- ALL in adults is a very rare disease with poor prognosis. Literature on the economic burden of Ph- ALL in adults is sparse. This study quantifies the economic burden by estimating the total healthcare costs of Ph- ALL in adults from initial diagnosis until relapse and from relapse until death from US payer's perspective. Methods: This is a retrospective, observational study using the MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters (Commercial) database, which contains information on approximately 40 million employees and their dependents. Patients were included if they are newly diagnosed with ALL, defined by absence of ALL ICD-9-CM diagnosis (204.0x) 90 days prior the first ALL diagnosis, and have at least one inpatient claim with ALL diagnosis (204.0x) as the primary discharge diagnosis during the study period (4/1/2009-12/31/2014). Patients with less than 6 months of continuous enrollment prior to the index date were excluded. Patient with Ph+ disease (defined by the use of any prescriptions for tyrosine kinase inhibitors) were also excluded. Relapse ALL cases were defined by patients with records of relapse code (204.02). The admission date of the hospitalization with ALL primary discharge diagnosis was the index date. Patients were followed from the index date until death, loss of follow up, or end of the study period, whichever came first. Direct medical and pharmacy costs (plan reimbursed amounts) were the primary outcomes in this analysis. All costs were inflated to 2014 dollars based on the Medical Care component of the Consumer Price Index. Costs were evaluated monthly and cumulatively. To account for censoring in cost data, the Kaplan Meier Survival Estimator (KMSE) method (Lin et al Biometrics 1997;53:419-434) was employed to adjust the monthly costs by the Kaplan Meier curves. The total per patient cost from ALL diagnosis to death was calculated by adding the 12-month KMSE adjusted cumulative costs from ALL diagnosis to relapse and from relapse to death. Results: A total of 362 newly diagnosed patients with Ph- ALL met all the study criteria. The average age was 41.2 (SD 15.1). Mean duration of follow-up was 409.5 days (SD 371.6) and 19% (n=69) of patients relapsed during follow-up. Mean monthly costs were the greatest during the first month following initial ALL diagnosis ($150,969) and during the first month following the relapse diagnosis ($155,321). The KMSE adjusted cumulative costs from initial ALL diagnosis until relapse per patient were estimated to be $412,231 at 6 months, and $595,509 at 12 months. The KMSE adjusted cumulative costs per patient from relapse to death were estimated to be $414,787 at 6 months, and $501,084 at 12 months. When combined, the calculated total cost per patient from newly diagnosed to relapse and from relapse until death was $1,096,593. Conclusions and Limitations: Ph- ALL in adults is associated with significant economic burden in the US. For an average patient, the total healthcare cost from ALL diagnosis until death is more than $1 million with almost half of the expense incurred after relapse. The primary limitation for this analysis is the small sample size for the relapse ALL patients. However, it is expected given the rarity of the disease. Disclosures Princic: Truven Health Analytics: Employment. Song:Truven Health Analytics: Employment; Amgen: Other: This study was funded by Amgen.. Lin:Amgen: Employment. Cong:Amgen: Employment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document