YANG TERSEMBUNYI DARI PIDATO POLITIK PERTAMA ANIES BASWEDAN SEBAGAI GUBERNUR DKI JAKARTA: SEBUAH ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS

Jurnal KATA ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 384
Author(s):  
Gagar Asmara Sofa
Keyword(s):  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Social Situation ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Social Situations ◽  
Social Culture ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
The Social ◽  
Unit Unit ◽  
Discourse Understanding

<p><em>van Dijk (2009) stated that we need to understand the whole context before understanding a discourse. First context is the internal aspects, which is based on what the speaker said or what was written in the text - from diction and sentence study, to the paragraph's continuity, in creating context of the discourse. Second, based on its social context, which perceived the social situations as part of the discourse. Understanding of the first political speech of the elected governor of DKI Jakarta 2017, Anies Baswedan, is one of the incomprehensive practice of discourse. In addition to causing an incomprehensive understanding, the speech also reaps a controversy driven by mass media toward Anies Baswedan for the misleading meaning of the word 'pribumi'. Therefore, the researcher would like to understand Anies Baswedan political speech using van Dijk critical discourse analysis. The frame and analytical units used in this speech will be based on analysis on the social, social-politics, and social-culture contexts. The analysis result shows that the polarized social situation post-election created a social identity among community, proponent of Anies-Sandi and the political opponent, Ahok-Djarot. Moreover, we can infer that Anies Baswedan is a prominent orator, has the faith to harmony in politics, has affiliation motives, and proper knowledge about the history and culture of Jakarta and its people</em></p><p><em><br /></em></p><p><em>Van Dijk (2009) menyatakan bahwa untuk memahami sebuah praktik wacana perlu dilihat konteks secara keseluruhan. Pertama, dilihat dari konteks internal berupa tuturan penutur wacana atau dari apa yang tertulis di dalam sebuah teks—termasuk studi kata, kalimat, hingga kesinambungan paragraf yang saling mendukung dalam pembentukan konteks suatu wacana. Kedua, konteks sosialnya</em><em> yang </em><em>menganggap bahwa situasi sosial adalah bagian dari pewacanaan. Pemahaman terhadap pidato politik pertama Gubernur terpilih DKI Jakarta 2017, Anies Baswedan, merupakan salah satu praktik wacana yang tidak menyeluruh. Selain menyebabkan pemahaman yang tidak komprehensif, pidato tersebut juga menuai banyak kontroversi. Hal itu disebabkan adanya penyempitan makna oleh media massa terkait kata ‘pribumi’ yang terdapat pada pidato Anies Baswedan. Oleh karenanya, peneliti terpicu untuk memahami pidato politik Anies Baswedan dengan menggunakan analisis wacana kritis van Dijk. Kerangka dan unit-unit analisis yang digunakan adalah analisis praktik wacana dalam konteks sosial, sosial-politik, dan sosial-budaya. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa situasi sosial yang masih terpolarisasi pascapemilukada, membentuk identitas sosial masyarakat, yaitu pendukung Anies-Sandi dan pendukung lawan politiknya, Ahok-Djarot. Selain itu, dapat diketahui bahwa Anies Baswedan memiliki keterampilan sebagai orator, memiliki keyakinan terhadap pentingnya harmoni dalam politik, memiliki motif afiliasi, serta memiliki pengetahuan sejarah dan budaya yang cukup mengenai masyarakat dan kota Jakarta. </em></p><p><em><br /></em></p>

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adib Rifqi Setiawan
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
Political Purpose

The Critical Discourse Analysis is often applied to analyze political discourse including the political speech. This article analyzes Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech, mainly in Festival 11 by Partai Solidaritas Indonesia (PSI), that is exclusively based on the perspective of Teun Adrianus van Dijk. It reveals that we can learn how to deliver our ideology to public. Moreover, we can have a better understanding of the political purpose of these speeches.

scholarly journals VARIETY OF RHETORICS IN POLITICAL SPEECH PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO AND JOKO WIDODO IN EDUCATIONAL FIELD

Humanus ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 221
Author(s):  
Noermanzah Noermanzah ◽  
Emzir Emzir ◽  
Ninuk Lustyantie
Keyword(s):  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Cultural Practices ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
The Republic ◽  
Discourse Practice ◽  
Educational Field ◽  
Dramatic Variation

The study aims to provide an understanding of the range of rhetoric in the political speech of the President of Indonesian Republic Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and Joko Widodo, especially in the field of education. The research method used is the critical discourse analysis method of Norman Fairclough model. Data collection techniques used are documentation techniques, note-taking techniques, and interviews. Data analysis techniques are operated by connecting micro, meso, and macro elements in dimensions, such as: (a) text, (b) discourse practice, and (b) socio-cultural practices. The result of the research shows the rhetoric in the political speech of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono and Joko Widodo in the field of education which are compiled by the staf of presidential documents are as followed: 54,25% of the argumentation, 31,21% of the hortatory variety, 5,32% of  the exposition, 4,25% of persuasion, 2,48% of  informative variety,  1,06 % of narrative range, 0,71% of descriptive variation, 0,35% of dramatic variation, and 0,35% of  procedural variation. The variety of rhetoric used aims to deliver educational programs that have been made, promises, and wishes or expectations to improve the quality of education in Indonesia, especially in the reform era.Keywords:  variety of rhetoric, state speech, educationRAGAM RETORIKA DALAM PIDATO KENEGARAAN PRESIDEN REPUBLIK INDONESIA SUSILO BAMBANG YUDHOYONO DAN JOKO WIDODO PADA BIDANG PENDIDIKAN AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan memberikan pemahaman tentang ragam retorika dalam pidato kenegaraan Presiden Republik Indonesia Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono dan Joko Widodo khususnya dalam bidang pendidikan. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode analisis wacana kritis model Norman Fairclough. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik dokumentasi, teknik catat, dan wawancara. Teknik analisis data dengan cara menghubungkan unsur mikro, meso, dan makro pada dimensi: (a) teks, (b) praktik wacana, dan (b) praktik sosial budaya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ragam retorika yang terdapat dalam pidato kenegaraan Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono dan Joko Widodo dalam bidang pendidikan yang disusun bersama tim kerjanya, yaitu ragam argumentasi terdapat 54,25%, ragam hortatori terdapat 31,21%, ragam eksposisi terdapat 5,32%, ragam persuasi terdapat 4,25%, ragam informatif terdapat 2,48%, ragam narasi terdapat 1,06%, ragam deskriptif terdapat 0,71%, ragam dramatik terdapat 0,35%, dan ragam prosedural terdapat 0,35%. Ragam retorika yang digunakan bertujuan untuk menyampaikan program pendidikan yang telah dilakukan, janji,  dan keinginan atau harapan untuk memperbaiki mutu pendidikan di Indonesia khususnya pada era reformasi.Kata kunci: ragam retorika, pidato kenegaraan, bidang pendidikan

scholarly journals Langue de bois, or, discourse in defense of an offshore financial center

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Weeks
Keyword(s):  
Social Sciences ◽  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Language Use ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Rationality ◽  
The Social ◽  
Financial Center ◽  
Language Strategies

Abstract This article brings together trends in Critical Discourse Analysis dating from the 1980s – which examine how language use and ideologies (re)produce social inequality – with current research in the social sciences on neoliberalism and other emerging politico-economic formations. The article addresses such a problematic with an empirical case: the language strategies, dubbed langue de bois, that people affiliated with Luxembourg’s offshore financial center employ to justify their practices. The contribution herein surveys the political rationality of the country’s financial center by analyzing the langue de bois that its representatives and boosters use. These language strategies, furthermore, enable Luxembourg’s finance elites to socialize the domestic public’s understanding of their activities.

scholarly journals „Klatka bez drzwi i bez klucza”. Analiza aspektów poznawczych i etycznych wybranych przedstawień artystycznych niepełnosprawności i osób z niepełnosprawnościami

2018 ◽  
pp. 143-162
Author(s):  
Eva Zamojska
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Social Inclusion ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
Social Situation ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Sociology Of Literature ◽  
Ethical Aspects ◽  
Ethical Problems ◽  
The Social

The aim of my paper is to analyze cognitive and ethical aspects of selected literary and film depictions of disabilities. Based on theoretical and methodological assumptions of sociology of literature and critical discourse analysis I set out to demonstrate how selected literary and film works depict situations and problems with social inclusion of people with disabilities. I concentrate on two questions: 1) How do artistic creations build non-disabled people's knowledge of the social situation and position of people with disabilities? 2) What ethical problems can such depictions involve?

A Critical Discourse Analysis of Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adib Rifqi Setiawan
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
Political Purpose

The Critical Discourse Analysis is often applied to analyze political discourse including the political speech. This article analyzes Grace Natalie Louisa’s Speech, mainly in Festival 11 by Partai Solidaritas Indonesia (PSI), that is exclusively based on the perspective of Teun Adrianus van Dijk. It reveals that we can learn how to deliver our ideology to public. Moreover, we can have a better understanding of the political purpose of these speeches.

scholarly journals WHO ARE AMERICANS? ANALYSIS OF OBAMA AND TRUMP’S POLITICAL SPEECHES ON IMMIGRATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-87
Author(s):  
Sonia Tinshe ◽  
Junaidi Junaidi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
The Political ◽  
Word Choice ◽  
The Social ◽  
Political Speeches ◽  
American Society

Immigration has been a crucial discussion in the American politics ever since the nation was still writing its constitution. Seeing how immigrants have shaped the American society, it is important to see how they are perceived, as minorities, by significant political figures, such as the president. The objective of this paper is to understand the ideology behind Obama and Trump’s political speeches about immigration, as well as its relevance to the political discourse and social context in America. Five political speeches from Obama (2009-2014), as well as two political speeches from Trump (2016-2017) are analyzed, as the primary data, using Critical Discourse Analysis, particularly Fairclough’s (1993) three-dimensional framework. The finding shows that Obama’s and Trump’s ideology on immigration is related with their idea of the immigrant’s identity in American society. It is shown through their word choice, such as pejorative adjective, and the theme related with the issue of immigration. Seen from the political discourse, the speeches are showing perceived superiority that the presidents have over immigrants. Moreover, from the social perspective, it dehumanizes and reduces the identity of immigrants.

scholarly journals ANALISIS WACANA KRITIS PADA PIDATO POLITIK MANTAN KETUA UMUM PARTAI GOLKAR ABURIZAL BAKRIE (CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS ON POLITICAL SPEECH BY THE FORMER HEAD OF GOLKAR, ABU RIZAL BAKRIE)

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 167
Author(s):  
Herlina Yuni Astuti
Keyword(s):  
Discourse Analysis ◽  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Social Contexts ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
The Political ◽  
Political Speech ◽  
Analysis Study ◽  
Descriptive Qualitative

AbstractCritical Discourse Analysis on Political Speech by The Former Head of Golkar,Abu Rizal Bakrie. Discourse is a unit of language based on words used tocommunicate in social contexts. Therefore, it cannot be denied that language isan effective tool in all aspects of life, including on the political stage. This studyaims to analyze the structure of the political speech of the former chairman of theGolkar Party, Aburizal Bakrie, entitled "Flowing But Not Drifting". The type ofthis research is descriptive qualitative with the Van Dijk's model of criticaldiscourse analysis. The results of this study indicate that the macro structure ofthe ARB speech text is "Flowing But Not Drifting". In the study of the textsuperstructure, ARB's speech was arranged in a simple way which then becamea strategy in delivering a discourse in front of the cadres. The final element ofvan Dijk's critical discourse analysis study is the micro or semantic structure.The ARB speech consists of background elements, details, presuppositions andnominalization in the semantic section. The use of pronouns, and the tenses usedare active and passive sentences, and tend to use aspects of conditionalcoherence. ARB also tends to use diction in a style that leads to the use oflanguage that is simple and easy to understand because it starts the speech bygiving greetings, thanks and also insertion of a pantun, which is understood as away to give a more positive nuance to the Golkar Party.Key words: CDA, speech, politics, Golkar, ARB AbstrakAnalisis Wacana Kritis Pada Pidato Politik Mantan Ketua Umum PartaiGolkar Aburizal Bakrie. Wacana merupakan satuan bahasa berdasarkan katayang digunakan untuk berkomunikasi dalam konteks sosial. Oleh karena itu,tidak bisa dipungkiri lagi bahwa bahasa adalah alat yang efektif dalam segalaaspek kehidupan termasuk dalam panggung politik. Penelitian ini bertujuanuntuk menganalisis struktur pidato politik mantan ketua umum Partai Golkar,Aburizal Bakrie, yang berjudul “Mengalir Tapi Tak Hanyut”. Jenis penelitian iniadalah deskriptif kualitatif dengan metode analisis wacana kritis model Van Dijk.Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa struktur makro teks pidato ARBadalah “Mengalir Tapi Tak Hanyut”. Pada kajian sisi superstruktur teks, pidatoARB tersusun secara sederhana yang kemudian menjadi sebuah strategi dalammenyampaikan suatu wacana di hadapan para kader. Elemen terakhir darikajian analisis wacana kritis oleh van Dijk adalah struktur mikro atau semantik.Pidato ARB terdiri dari elemen latar, detail, pra-anggapan dan nominalisasipada bagian semantik. Penggunaan kata ganti, dan bentuk kalimat yangdigunakan adalah kalimat aktif dan pasif, serta cenderung menggunakan aspekkoherensi kondisional. ARB juga cenderung menggunakan diksi dengan gayayang mengarah kepada penggunaan bahasa yang sederhana dan mudahdipahami karena mengawali pidato dengan memberi salam, ucapan terima kasihdan juga disisipi sebuah pantun, yang mana hal tersebut dipahami sebagai carauntuk memberikan nuansa yang lebih positif atas Partai Golkar.Kata-kata kunci:AWK, pidato, politik, Golkar, ARB

scholarly journals WHO ARE AMERICANS? ANALYSIS OF OBAMA AND TRUMP’S POLITICAL SPEECHES ON IMMIGRATION

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 73
Author(s):  
Sonia Tinshe ◽  
Junaidi Junaidi
Keyword(s):  
Critical Discourse Analysis ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Critical Discourse ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
The Political ◽  
Word Choice ◽  
The Social ◽  
Political Speeches ◽  
American Society

Immigration has been a crucial discussion in the American politics ever since the nation was still writing its constitution. Seeing how immigrants have shaped the American society, it is important to see how they are perceived, as minorities, by significant political figures, such as the president. The objective of this paper is to understand the ideology behind Obama and Trump’s political speeches about immigration, as well as its relevance to the political discourse and social context in America. Five political speeches from Obama (2009-2014), as well as two political speeches from Trump (2016-2017) are analyzed, as the primary data, using Critical Discourse Analysis, particularly Fairclough’s (1993) three-dimensional framework. The finding shows that Obama’s and Trump’s ideology on immigration is related with their idea of the immigrant’s identity in American society. It is shown through their word choice, such as pejorative adjective, and the theme related with the issue of immigration. Seen from the political discourse, the speeches are showing perceived superiority that the presidents have over immigrants. Moreover, from the social perspective, it dehumanizes and reduces the identity of immigrants.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document