scholarly journals Validasi Modul Peduli: Pelatihan Asertivitas Anti-Bullying

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Udi Rosida Hijrianti
Keyword(s):  

Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk memvalidasi modul Pelatihan Asertivitas Anti-Bullying (PEDULI). Modul PEDULI bertujuan untuk memberikan pengetahuan dan pemahaman pada remaja tentang bullying dan melatihkan cara bersikap asertif dalam kehidupan. Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk memvalidasi modul Pelatihan Asertivitas Anti-Bullying (PEDULI). Modul PEDULI bertujuan untuk memberikan pengetahuan dan pemahaman pada remaja tentang bullying dan melatihkan cara bersikap asertif dalam kehidupan sehari-hari agar menghindari perilaku bullying. Hipotesis yang diuji dalam penelitian ini ada dua, yaitu pertama, modul PEDULI memiliki validitas isi yang baik. Hasil dari evaluasi tiga expert judgment menunjukkan nilai koefisien validitas isi sebesar 86% - 93%. Hipotesis kedua yaitu, terdapat perubahan peningkatan asertivitas yang signifikan pada subjek kelompok eksperimen dibandingkan dengan subjek kelompok kontrol. Hasil uji statistik menggunakan analisis Mixed ANOVA menunjukkan skor asertivitas pada kelompok eksperimen lebih tinggi secara signifikan dibandingkan kelompok kontrol (F = 11,699 dan p = 0,002; p < 0,05) dan skor asertivitas sesudah pelatihan pada kelompok eksperimen lebih tinggi secara signifikan dibandingkan sebelum pelatihan (F = 4,182 dan p = 0,021; p < 0,05). Berdasarkan hasil tersebut dapat disimpulkan bahwa modul Pelatihan Asertivitas Anti-Bullying (PEDULI) dinyatakan valid secara isi dan valid secara empirik pada penerapan terhadap 14 siswa di kelompok eksperimen.  

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 399-408
Author(s):  
Semira Tagliabue ◽  
Maria Giulia Olivari ◽  
Elisabeth Hertfelt Wahn ◽  
Katerina Maridaki-Kassotaki ◽  
Katerina Antonopoulou ◽  
...  

Abstract. Discrepancies in perceived parenting and parental roles across European countries could be due to the use of different assessment techniques or due to mean level differences in the authoritative, authoritarian, or permissive parenting styles. The present study aimed to examine the psychometric characteristics of the Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire (PSDQ; Robinson, Mandleco, Olsen, & Hart, 1995 , 2001 ) in a sample of 225 Greek, 301 Italian, and 279 Swedish adolescents aged 16–19 years, who evaluated their father’s and mother’s parenting styles during their childhood. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), multigroup CFA, and modified version of the correlated uniqueness model were used to evaluate the structure and invariance of the scale across countries. Measurement and structural invariance was found in the 8-item authoritative scale and 6-item authoritarian scale. A mixed ANOVA (Country × Style × Role) showed that Swedish mothers scored lower than Italian or Greek mothers, and that, in the three countries, mothers were perceived as more authoritative than were fathers.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Noguera

This study was conducted to determine the effectiveness of a novel mind perception manipulation. Mind perception is currently theorized to be an essential aspect of a number of human social psychological processes. Thus, a successful manipulation would allow for the causal study of those processes. This manipulation was created in an attempt to explore the downstream impact of mind perception on the endorsement of conspiracy theories. Conspiracy theories are steadily becoming more and more prominent in social discourse. Endorsement of conspiracy theories are beginning to show real world ramifications such as a danger to human health (e.g., in the anti-vaccination movement). A sample of college students (valid N = 53) from a large rural institution in the southeastern United States participated for course credit. These participants completed a mind perception pretest, were randomly assigned to either the manipulation in question (in which participants are asked to consider the ‘mind’ of several targets and write their thoughts about them) or the control condition, and then they completed a posttest. The mixed ANOVA revealed that the interaction term between Time and Condition was not significant. Because the manipulation did not work, other analyses were aborted, in accord with the pre-registration. My Discussion focuses on the procedures and potential shortcomings of this manipulation, in an effort to lay the groundwork for a successful one.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 3208
Author(s):  
Andrea De Montis ◽  
Vittorio Serra ◽  
Giovanna Calia ◽  
Daniele Trogu ◽  
Antonio Ledda

Composite indicators (CIs), i.e., combinations of many indicators in a unique synthetizing measure, are useful for disentangling multisector phenomena. Prominent questions concern indicators’ weighting, which implies time-consuming activities and should be properly justified. Landscape fragmentation (LF), the subdivision of habitats in smaller and more isolated patches, has been studied through the composite index of landscape fragmentation (CILF). It was originally proposed by us as an unweighted combination of three LF indicators for the study of the phenomenon in Sardinia, Italy. In this paper, we aim at presenting a weighted release of the CILF and at developing the Hamletian question of whether weighting is worthwhile or not. We focus on the sensitivity of the composite to different algorithms combining three weighting patterns (equalization, extraction by principal component analysis, and expert judgment) and three indicators aggregation rules (weighted average mean, weighted geometric mean, and weighted generalized geometric mean). The exercise provides the reader with meaningful results. Higher sensitivity values signal that the effort of weighting leads to more informative composites. Otherwise, high robustness does not mean that weighting was not worthwhile. Weighting per se can be beneficial for more acceptable and viable decisional processes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 53
Author(s):  
Ricardo Lima ◽  
Henrique de Oliveira Castro ◽  
José Afonso ◽  
Gustavo De Conti Teixeira Costa ◽  
Sérgio Matos ◽  
...  

The purpose of this study was to compare the external load, internal load, and technical efficacy between the first and the second matches (M1 and M2) occurring in congested fixtures (two matches in two days) using the number of sets as a moderating factor. An observational analytic research design was adopted. Data from official volleyball matches were collected during the first competitive period of the championship, comprising 14 competitive games within 10 weeks. Ten male elite volleyball athletes (age: 21.7 ± 4.19 years of age; experience: 6.2 ± 3.8 years; body mass: 85.7 ± 8.69 kg; height: 192.4 ± 6.25 cm; BMI: 23.1 ± 1.40 kg/m2) participated in this study. Players were monitored for external load (number of jumps and height of jumps) and internal load (using the rate of perceived exertion—RPE). Additionally, notational analysis collected information about attack efficacy and receptions made during matches. The mixed ANOVA revealed no significant interaction between time (M1 vs. M2) and number of sets for number of jumps per minute (p = 0.235; ηp2 = 0.114), mean jump height (p = 0.076; ηp2 = 0.193), RPE (p = 0.261; ηp2 = 0.106), attack efficacy (p = 0.346; ηp2 = 0.085), Positive reception (p = 0.980; ηp2 = 0.002) and Perfect reception (p = 0.762; ηp2 = 0.022). In conclusion, congested fixtures do not seem to affect the performance of volleyball players negatively.


Author(s):  
Adel Mottahedi ◽  
Farhang Sereshki ◽  
Mohamad Ataei ◽  
Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou ◽  
Abbas Barabadi

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document