scholarly journals Azas Kebebasan Berkontrak dalam Perjanjian Keagenan

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-273
Author(s):  
Gede Agus Wiadnyana ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Desak Gde Dwi Arini

In an agency agreement in the form of a standard order, it appears that the parties are not free to jointly determine the contents of the agreement with the principle of freedom of contract. The position of the principal is economically stronger when compared to the agent. This research aims to analyze the principle of freedom of contract in agency agreements. legal protection of agents based on the principle of freedom. The research method uses normative legal research with a library research approach. The legal sources used are primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Technique of calculating or tracing legal materials in the list or grouped, and using methods of noting, recording, quoting, summarizing, and reviewing as needed and written systematically. The result of the research indicates that the principle of freedom of contract has not been fully realized in an agency agreement, considering that the agency agreement is in the form of a standard agreement. The freedom that cannot be realized is the freedom of the parties to determine the form of the agreement and the freedom of the parties to determine the conditions, as well as legal protection for agents who are in a weak position in the agency agreement. namely the law on the business activities of agents. Protection provided by the government's protection for citizens who are agents of commercial competition.

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-56
Author(s):  
Zulfikri Toguan

Legal protection for a mark of a place or origin of MSMEs can be done by first registering the mark to obtain legal force. In this case the Office/Agency/Community Organization assists by facilitating MSMEs in terms of socialization and assistance for trademark registration. Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Marks and Geographical Indications provides improvements to previous laws, especially regarding preventive protection measures, namely registration procedures and registration fees. Brands produced by Indonesian MSMEs can help increase competitiveness in the development of new products. This research is normative or library research method, namely legal research carried out by reviewing and researching library materials in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. This study concludes: First, the problems in the protection of intellectual property rights in the field of branding for MSME products are due to the understanding of MSME actors on brand rights is still low/shallow so that MSME actors do not register the brand of MSME products. Second, efforts to provide brand protection to the MSME industry are by registering MSME brands and the government makes it easy for MSME industry players to register trademarks.


Jurnal Akta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 481
Author(s):  
Arif Budi Pamungkas ◽  
Djauhari Djauhari

An auction is an activity of selling of goods in public by means of a verbal-bid to get the higher price or to get lower prices and the price quote can be done in a closed and written. This is done by the way of collecting the prospective buyers of the auction led by officials of the auction. In this case, the intended auction was the sale of goods that are held publicly. The auction, according to the regulations of security right, is when the debtor made a breach, the holder of the security rights have the right to sell the security rights’ objects over its own power through a public auction as well as taking payment of account receivable from the sale proceeds. An auction is an alternative to the sale of an undertaken asset by way of inviting prospective buyers at a particular time and place in which the last highest bidder in writing or orally is determined as the winner. The author used socio-legal research as his research method. To meet the forth standards set by the law, the auction should be widely announced to the public, either through printed file, electronic or visual. A legal certainty as a basis which concerned with propriety and justice is very closely related to the principle of auction sales in another. As the formulation of the problem of the form of identification of the problem, namely how the legal protection of the auction buyers encountered the obstacles as well as the solution.Keywords: Auction; Legal Protection; Mortgage Right


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-162
Author(s):  
Robertus Berli Puryanto ◽  
I Nyoman Putu Budiartha ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti

Labor is something that is needed by an employing company in carrying out its economic activities. This can be seen in the constitutional arrangements of the Republic of Indonesia in Article 27 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In the implementation of the working relationship between workers and the employing company, there are several rights and obligations that must be fulfilled between the two parties. Because there are provisions regarding work agreements that are differentiated based on the form of the agreement, each worker has different rights where these rights must be guaranteed by the company based on law. From this, the problems that will be examined are legal protection for workers with an unwritten work agreement at the employing company, as well as legal remedies that can be taken by workers with an unwritten agreement in the event of a violation of rights by the company. The research method used is normative legal research, namely legal research conducted by examining existing library materials. By examining problems by looking at existing regulations, and describing problems that occur in practice or in everyday life in society. From the research conducted, it was found that legal protection for workers with an unwritten work agreement at the employing company is regulated based on Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower where the basis is that the applicable work agreement is an indefinite work agreement so that the rights obtained under the provisions of the law. Then efforts that can be made if there is a violation of the law in work relations is based on Law Number 20 of 2004 concerning Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement, namely in the form of Bipartite, Tripartite (Mediation, Consoliation and Arbitration) negotiations, as well as through Trials at the Industrial Relations Court.


Author(s):  
I Wayan Juwahyudhi

ABSTRACTOne of the police authorities is a discretionary action, where the action can also be done at the time of the investigation in dealing the juvenile offenders to protect children’s right to get justice and maximum legal protection. In the Law Number 11 of 2012 on the Juvenile Criminal Justice System stipulate about the investigator authority to carry out action of diversion, but this only applies to children under sentence of less than 7 years in prison and does not apply in children who are subject to punishments of more than 7 years in prison. This is contrary to the 1945 Constitution and the Law Number 23 of 2002 which emphasizes the protection of children before the law an the efforts to avoid imprisonment of the juvenile offenders.The thesis describes the police authority and the legal mechanisms and policies by the investigator in protecting the right on the juvenile offenders that puts the principles of legal protection. In order to avoid negative effects on children, therefore the police discretion is needed to avoid restrictions on freedom of the children’s right. The method used is a normative legal research method, where the normative or library legal research method is done by examining existing library materials.The writer suggested to the government to be more serious in dealing with the problems of children, especially for the juvenile offenders so that the welfare and right of children are protected and to avoid restrictions on freedom and minimize for juvenile offenders.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 67-71
Author(s):  
I Gede Mahendra Juliana Adiputra ◽  
Ida Ayu Putu Widiati ◽  
Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti

The existence of competition causes the original brand owner to feel disadvantaged because the sales result has decreased. It is permissible for someone to use another party's mark as long as they ask permission from the trademark owner first. The owner can give trademark rights to other people as agreed in an agreement. The formulation of the problem in this research is as follows: how is the legal protection of trademark rights and how to resolve violations of trademark rights. The research method used in this research is normative legal research. The results of the discussion in this study are as follows: Legal protection of the right to a trademark has been regulated by Law Number 20 of 2016 concerning Trademarks and Geographical Indications, in the provisions of the Law it is expressly stated that if it has been registered in the law that the right to a trademark has been protected. The sanction imposed on the perpetrator of the crime of trademark rights is a fine of Rp. 20,000,000, - (twenty million rupiah) on condition that if the fine is not paid, he will be subject to imprisonment for 6 (six) months. Settlement of trademark cases can be carried out through institutions that can be used to resolve trademark disputes, including: Alternative Dispute Resolution, Arbitration and Courts. Alternative dispute resolution wants the disputing parties to resolve their own dispute with the aim of obtaining a mutual agreement, if the agreement fails, can take arbitration, namely the disputing parties to be able to resolve the dispute to the arbitration institution based on the agreement, furthermore, if the arbitration is successful the last action is through the court, namely the commercial court which has the authority to adjudicate trademark disputes.


Author(s):  
Iustika Puspita Sari ◽  
Ahyuni Yunus

This study aims to analyze the problems of the Company's Responsibility towards Fulfilling the Wages of Employees in the Bankruptcy Boedel Delivery Process; And to find out the factors that inhibit the prior rights of fulfilling the wages of workers in the process of bankruptcy in Boedel. The study used the Normative-Empirical Legal Research method. The Results of the Study Show That: First: The Responsibility of the Company for the Fulfillment of Workers' Rights in the Process of Bankruptcy Boedel Giving Based on the Emergence of Rights and Obligations Between Entrepreneurs and Workers Poured in Work Agreements as Strong Engagement for the Fulfillment of Rights and Obligations (Achievements ) Each Party. Legal Protection of Workers' Rights in the Process of Bankruptcy Boedel Giving Can Be Taken Through 3 (Three) Ways, Namely: 1. Strengthening the Position of the Priority Rights of the Workers / Laborers in the Law, Especially the Bank Law; Second: Factors that Inhibit the Priority Rights of Fulfillment of Workers' Rights in the Process of Bankruptcy Boedel Giving Is Weak Supervision, Absence of Sanction Enforcement and Lack of Transparency in the Process of Bankruptcy of Boedel Companies Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis permasalahan Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Terhadap Pemenuhan Upah Pekerja Dalam Proses Pemberesan Boedel Pailit; Serta Untuk Mengetahui Faktor Yang Menghambat Hak Mendahulu Pemenuhan Upah Pekerja Dalam Proses Pemberesan Boedel Pailit. Penelitian menggunakan metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif-Empiris. Hasil Penelitian Menunjukkan Bahwa:  Pertama: Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Terhadap Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Pekerja  dalam Proses Pemberesan Boedel Pailit Adalah Berdasar Pada Timbulnya Hak Dan Kewajiban Antara Pengusaha Dan Pekerja Yang Dituangkan Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Sebagai Perikatan Yang Kuat Untuk Pemenuhan Hak Dan Kewajiban (Prestasi) Masing-Masing Pihak. Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak-Hak Pekerja (Buruh) Dalam Proses Pemberesan Boedel Pailit Dapat Ditempuh Melalui 3 (Tiga) Cara, Yakni: 1. Mempertegas Kedudukan Hak Mendahulu Pihak Pekerja/Buruh Dalam Undang-Undang, Khususnya Undang-Undang Kepailtan; Kedua: Faktor Yang Menghambat Hak Mendahulu Pemenuhan Hak-Hak Pekerja (Buruh) Dalam Proses Pemberesan Boedel Pailit Adalah Lemahnya Pengawasan, Tidak Adanya Penegakan Sanksi Serta Kurangnya Transparansi Dalam Proses Pemberesan Boedel Perusahaan Pailit.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 73-81
Author(s):  
Yeni Nur Arifin

Taxes make a major contribution to the source of state revenue which is used to finance development in Indonesia. However, there are still many taxpayers / tax insurer who are not compliant in paying taxes. The problems in this study are why the government uses tax hostages in collecting tax debts, how hostages are used as a means of force in collecting tax debts and how hostage-taking is viewed from a juridical aspect. The research method used in this research is normative legal research method. The result of the research is that there are several factors that become the reasons for tax hostage taking. The government (fiskus) in collecting tax debt with tax hostages has been carried out in accordance with the provisions of the law. Based on the aspect of legal certainty, tax hostages in Indonesia already have a legal umbrella, namely Law no. 9 of 2000 and several other regulations. From the aspect of justice, legal protection is provided to taxpayers / tax insurer who are subject to tax hostages. From the benefit aspect, the application of tax hostages is beneficial in increasing taxpayer compliance.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 211
Author(s):  
Haingo Rabarijaona ◽  
Devina Arifani

This journal describes labor problems that arise as a result of technological advances in the modern era, one of which is due to digitalization. This results in termination of employment by employers to workers even without severance pay. The purpose of this paper is to find out how the law regulates the rights and legal protection of workers who have been laid off. The research method used is the normative legal research method. This method examines law normatively by looking at the law from an internal perspective where the object of research is to use legal norms where there is still a vagueness of norms in legal protection for workers due to layoffs due to the impact of this digitization. The final result of this research is that the rights of workers who are laid off are contained in Article 150 to Article 172 of Act No. 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. Legal protection for workers / laborers due to the impact of digitization is contained in Article 164 Paragraph (3) of the UUK with legal protection in the form of severance pay, awarding money or service fees during the work period of the worker.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Satria ◽  
Munajah Munajah ◽  
Sulistia Ningsih Rahayu ◽  
Suryadi Suryadi

The purpose of this research discusses political intervention in legislation in Indonesia to examine the problems that occur in the process of making laws. Based on the problems examined by the author, the research method used is a normative research method. Normative legal research methods or library research methods are methods or methods used in legal research conducted by examining existing library materials. Law intervention results in the form of ratification of the agenda of the intervention, and the Articles then become the basis for activities that are detrimental to the people at large and are contrary to ideology, religion for the Indonesian people. Thus, the intervention of the Law harms the nation extensively.


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Suratno Suratno

The question of Whistle blower or Justice Collaborator is a complex and interesting issue tobe discussed in a conception or legislation. The role of Whistle Blower and Justice Collaboratorin exposing such extraordinary crimes as corruption is a dilemma, because there is no adequatelegal tool to facilitate the legal guarantee to be obtained. The research approach used in thisresearch is sociological or socio-jurisdiction approach method -legal research. The results of theresearch indicate that: 1. The protection of the witness and victim’s witness law as Whistleblowerand Justice Collaborators on the disclosure of corruption has not been based on the valueof justice, it can be seen that the legal status of a whistle blower does not stop only whistleblowers, Be someone to be held accountable. 2. Legal protection barriers to the existence ofWhistleblower and Justice Collaborators on the disclosure of corruption based on the value ofjustice, known from the side of the substance of the law is the weakness of the arrangement ofJustice collaborator explicitly regulated only in Supreme Court Circular Number 4 of 2011 onthe treatment of rapporteur of acts A Whistleblower and a Justice Collaborator in a particularcriminal case, so that the SEMA does not have a binding legal force as does the Law.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document