Historical and Philosophical Arabic Studies in Russia at the Turn of the Century (the 2nd Half of the XX - Early XXI Centuries)

2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 695-719
Author(s):  
Nur S. Kirabaev

The article presents an overview of the most significant results in Russian academic research in philosophy of the Arabic Middle East in the second half of the XX century-the beginning of XXI century. The author consistently examines the contribution of various schools and their main representatives to the field of Arabic studies, in particular, the academic research works dedicated to the Middle East philosophy and history written by the scientists from the Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Saint Petersburg State University and RUDN University. The article attempts to show the conceptual findings and results of this academic research on Arabic Islamic philosophy of the Middle Ages considering the problems of understanding and interpreting Arab and Muslim culture, which was held by a number of leading experts during the second half of the XX century, up to the early XXI century. It is equally important to understand the role and place of the historical and philosophical Arabic studies in the dialogue between different philosophical cultures - in the context of striving for responses to the challenges of the modern time. The author of the article proves the idea that overcoming false cultural, philosophical and ideological stereotypes in the unprecedented global interaction of East and West in the late XX and early XXI centuries will significantly expand academic mobility and internationalization in the fields of education and science, open new perspectives for international cooperation in various fields and promote mutual enrichment of cultures.

Author(s):  
V. I. Osipov

The paper considers the viewpoint of the author, i.e., the full member of the Russian Academy of Sciences Prof. V.I. Osipov, on the problem raised by Prof. V.T. Trofimov, the head of the Department of Engineering and ecological geology at the Moscow State University, in his article published in “Inzhenernaya geologiya” journal, about the losses in engineering geology in the last decades. Both the objective and subjective reasons of this science degradation are mentioned.


Author(s):  
E.M. Astafieva ◽  
◽  
N.P. Maletin ◽  

The paper provides an overview of the reports presented at the conference "Southeast Asia and the South Pacific region: current problems of development", which was held in the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences on December 18, 2019. In the annual inter-institute conference of Orientalists organized by the Center for Southeast Asia, Australia and Oceania studies academics, as well as applicants and post-graduates from various academic, research and educational institutions, participated.


Zootaxa ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 4227 (1) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
HOLGER H. DATHE ◽  
MAXIM YU. PROSHCHALYKIN

The type specimens of the bee genus Hylaeus Fabricius, 1793 described by Ferdinand Morawitz from Asia and deposited in the Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University and in the Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences St. Petersburg, are critically reviewed. Precise information with illustrations of types for 39 taxa is provided. New synonymy is established for Hylaeus incongruus Förster, 1871 (= H. biareolatus Morawitz, 1876, syn. nov.); H. breviceps Morawitz, 1876 (= H. bivittatus Morawitz, 1876, syn. nov.); H. punctiscapus Morawitz, 1876 (= H. citrinipes Morawitz, 1893, syn. nov.); H. dolichocephalus Morawitz, 1876 (=Prosopis heliaca Warncke, 1992, syn. nov.); H. laticeps Morawitz, 1876 (= H. nigritarsis Morawitz, 1876, syn. nov.); H. medialis Morawitz, 1890 (= H. bimaculatus Chen & Xu, 2013, syn. nov.). Lectotypes are here designated for the following six nominal taxa: Hylaeus citrinipes Morawitz, 1893, H. flavipes Morawitz, 1876, H. ibex Morawitz, 1877, H. punctiventris Morawitz, 1876, H. trisignatus Morawitz, 1876, and H. turanicus Morawitz, 1876. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 94-101
Author(s):  
Leyla G. Kaymarazova

The Institute of history, archeology and ethnography of Daghestan science center of Russian academy of sciences has its own tradition to congratulate scientist with their anniversaries. The main biographical events of Gadjikurban Ibragimovich Kakagasanov, who is a famous Daghestan scientist, historian and archivist, were overviewed in the article. Author also writes about his main achievements in science and his way from being a student of Moscow state university of history and archive to becoming a director of science subdivision of leading scientific research institute of Dagyestan science center of Russian academy of sciences. Kakagasanov’s name is well known not only in science community, but also in wide circle of readers due to his scientific and documental publications dedicated to the newest period of Daghestan history, historiographical and source studies researches that were made under his guidance and also his participation in different science events’ organization and holding and science knowledge’s popularization.


Author(s):  
Ekaterina M. Astafieva ◽  

The paper provides an overview of the reports presented at the conference "Southeast Asia and the South Pacific Region: Current Problems of Development", which was held in the Institute of Oriental Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences on December 18, 2019. The annual inter-institute conference of Orientalists organized by the Center for Southeast Asia, Australia and Oceania Studies was attended by the researchers, applicants and postgraduates from various academic, research and educational institutions.


Author(s):  
Vladimir V. Mironov ◽  
◽  
Nikolay A. Shchipkov ◽  

“Voprosy filosofii” publishes one of the last interviews of the Dean of the faculty of philosophy of Lomonosov Moscow State University, associate member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, DSc in Philosophy V.V. Mironov, which he gave to his student, lecturer of The Ilya Glazunov Russian Academy of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture N.A. Shchipkov. The conversation focuses on the post-Soviet ideological reform of the faculty of philosophy and the creation of a new social science – cultural studies – the emergence of which has affected the methodological landscape of Russian Humanities. Thirty years ago, thanks to the initiative of the rector of Moscow State University V.A. Sadovnichy, orga­nizational efforts of A.V. Panin, V.V. Mironov, V.Y. Savrei and other political and cultural figures such as R.M. Gorbacheva and D.S. Likhachev, the department of History and Theory of World culture appeared at the faculty of philosophy of Moscow University. Its field of study has always been extremely close to Vladimir Vasilyevich’s own scientific interests and it is no accident that he con­sidered “Philosophy and metamorphoses of culture” to be one of his most impor­tant works; a work devoted not only to the problem of culture itself, but also to the place of the Humanities in modern philosophical studies and education.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document