scholarly journals How Much Atrial Fibrillation is Enough to Warrant Oral Anticoagulation: Management of Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation?

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (SP1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Healey
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Continuous Monitoring ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Anticoagulation Management ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patient Groups

Stroke due to atrial fibrillation (AF) is common, the cause of significant morbidity and mortality, but is highly preventable with the appropriate use of oral anticoagulants. Recent advances in implantable and wearable electrocardiographic (ECG) technologies now allow continuous monitoring of a patient’s heart rhythm for months or years at a time.  Cohort studies have shown that using such methods, it is very common to find asymptomatic, short-lasting episodes of subclinical AF. Subclinical AF is also associated with an increased risk of stroke; however, the risk is lower than with traditional, ECG-detected AF and the absolute risk appears to depend on the overall burden of AF.  There is currently great uncertainty as to what duration of AF should trigger the use of oral anticoagulation in specific patient groups. Large randomized trials are underway to help clarify this issue; however, in the meantime, researchers and guideline committees have proposed some guidance to assist clinicians.

P4757Vitamin k antagonists are associated with higher risk of osteoporotic fractures compared to non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants among atrial fibrillation patients: a nationwide cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Binding ◽  
J B Olesen ◽  
B Abrahamsen ◽  
L Staerk ◽  
G Gislason ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Vitamin K ◽  
Lower Risk ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Osteoporosis Medication ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background/Introduction Osteoporotic fractures are associated with high mortality and reduced life quality in an elderly population. Several studies report an increased risk of fractures among patients treated with oral anticoagulants (OAC), however, only sparse research has been made to clarify the difference between treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs) regarding the risk of osteoporotic fractures. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of osteoporotic fractures among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in long-term VKA or NOAC treatment. Methods Patients with AF were identified using Danish national registries and were included when they had undergone 180 days OAC treatment, and only if they had no prior use of osteoporosis medication. The study period was from 1 January 2013 until 30 June 2017, and patients were followed for 2 years, or until death, outcome or emigration. Outcomes were hip fracture, major osteoporotic fracture, any fracture, initiation of osteoporosis medication, and a combined endpoint. G-formula was used to determine standardized absolute risk, and multiple covariate adjusted Cox regressions were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR). Results Overall, 37,350 patients with AF were included; 32.6% received VKA treatment (median age 72 years, 61.8% men) and 67.4% received NOAC treatment (median age 73 years, 55.9% men). The standardized absolute 2-year risk of any fracture was low among NOAC treated patients (3.1%; 95% CI: 2.9% to 3.3%), and among VKA treated patients (3.8%; 95% CI: 3.4% to 4.2%). NOAC was associated with a significantly lower relative risk of any fracture (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.97), of major osteoporotic fractures (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.99), and of initiating osteoporotic medication (HR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.71 to 0.95). A combined endpoint showed that patients treated with NOAC had a significantly lower risk of suffering from any fracture or initiating osteoporosis medication (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.76 to 0.93). Adjusted relative two-year risks Conclusion In a nationwide population, the absolute risk of osteoporotic fractures was low among AF patients on OAC, but NOAC was associated with a significantly lower risk of osteoporotic fractures compared to VKA. Acknowledgement/Funding Scholarship from The Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte

Prevention of Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Nadzeya Kuzniatsova ◽  
Gregory YH Lip ◽  
◽  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Individual Risk ◽  
Thromboembolic Events ◽  
Thromboembolic Complications ◽  
Esc Guidelines ◽  
European Society Of Cardiology ◽  
Substantial Morbidity

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, particularly due to thromboembolic complications. Antithrombotic therapy reduces the risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events, with the greatest benefit seen in individuals at the highest absolute risk of stroke. There is increasing recognition of the superiority of oral anticoagulation over antiplatelet therapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. Nevertheless, oral anticoagulation is underused, especially in elderly people, which may in part be explained by uncertainty in the assessment of both risk of stroke and bleeding in an individual patient. The new European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation, which have recently been updated, recommend a risk-factor-based approach to thromboprophylaxis in patients with atrial fibrillation and provide practical tools for the assessment of individual risk. In this article we summarise strategies for prevention of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation as recommended by the ESC guidelines. New oral anticoagulants are also discussed.

scholarly journals Oral Anticoagulant Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Chronic Kidney Disease

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 422
Author(s):  
Mihai Ciprian Stoica ◽  
Zsolt Gáll ◽  
Mirela Liana Gliga ◽  
Carmen Denise Căldăraru ◽  
Orsolya Székely
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Specific Patient ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Ckd Stage

Over the past few decades, a series of innovative medicines have been developed in order to optimize anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF). As a result, a number of nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) that directly target the enzymatic activity of factor II and factor Xa have been successfully licensed providing a more predictable effect and better safety profile compared to conventional anticoagulants (heparins and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)). However, comparative efficacy and safety data is limited in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (i.e., CKD stage 4/5 and end stage renal disease) because patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 were actively excluded from landmark trials, thus representing a major clinical limitation for the currently available agents. However, the renal function of AF patients can be altered over time. On the other hand, patients with CKD have an increased risk of developing AF. This review article will provide an overview of current concepts and recent evidence guiding the clinical use of NOACs in patients with CKD requiring chronic anticoagulation, and the associated risks and benefits of treatment in this specific patient population.

Reduced stroke risk without increased bleeding risk in patients with atrial fibrillation and complicated liver cirrhosis treated with oral anticoagulation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Steensig ◽  
M Pareek ◽  
A.L Krarup ◽  
P Sogaard ◽  
M Maeng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Liver Cirrhosis ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Oral Anticoagulant ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
First Time

Abstract Introduction Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have an increased risk of thromboembolic events (TE), while patients with complicated liver cirrhosis have an increased risk of both TE and bleeding. Oral anticoagulation reduces the risk of TE in the general group of patients with AF but its use in patients with liver cirrhosis is obscured by their imbalance between endogenous procoagulants and anticoagulants, as well as the lack of data from randomized controlled trials. Purpose To examine the risks of TE and bleeding in patients with AF and complicated liver cirrhosis according to whether oral anticoagulation is initiated. Methods We conducted a nationwide registry-based study of anticoagulant-naive patients with complicated liver cirrhosis and first-time AF diagnosed between 2010–2017. Complicated liver cirrhosis was defined as liver cirrhosis plus one of the following: alcoholism, esophageal varices, ascites or hepatorenal syndrome. Patients were followed for a maximum of 5 years. TE was defined as a composite of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack or systemic thromboembolism; and the bleeding endpoint was defined as gastrointestinal, cerebral or urogenital bleeding requiring hospitalization, or any hospital contact with epistaxis. TE risk was estimated by use of the CHA2DS2-VASc score, while bleeding risk was estimated by use of the HAS-BLED score. Outcomes were stratified according to whether an oral anticoagulant (vitamin K antagonists [VKA] or direct oral anticoagulants [DOAC]) was initiated. Results We identified 770 patients with complicated liver cirrhosis and first-time AF. TE events occurred in 7.0% (n=25/359) of patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≤2 versus 20.7% (n=85/411) of patients with a CHA2DS2-VASc score &gt;2. Among 411 patients with a high CHA2DS2-VASc score, 111 (27.0%) were prescribed an oral anticoagulant (OAC+; VKA, n=53 [47.7%], DOAC, n=58 [52.3%]), while 300 (73.0%) were not treated with oral anticoagulation (OAC−). These two groups had comparable baseline data, including HAS-BLED (OAC+ 3.0 [2.5–4.0] versus OAC− 3.0 [2.0–4.0]) and CHA2DS2-VASc (OAC+ 4.0 [3.0–5.0] versus OAC− 4.0 [3.0–5.0]) scores. The 5-year TE risk among patients receiving anticoagulant therapy was 14.4% (n=16/111) versus 23.0% (n=69/300) in patients not treated with anticoagulant therapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.55 [0.32–0.95]). The difference in bleeding risk was insignificant between the two groups (HR 0.67 [0.35–1.30]). Adjusting for CHA2DS2-VASc, HAS-BLED and prior bleeding requiring hospitalization did not significantly change the HR estimate, and no significant interactions were found. Conclusion TE risk was significantly lower in AF patients with complicated liver cirrhosis treated with oral anticoagulation, without a significantly increased bleeding risk. However, the majority of AF patients with complicated liver cirrhosis are not treated with anticoagulant therapy, indicating a potential for reducing the TE burden in this population. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Oral anticoagulation among atrial fibrillation patients with anaemia: an observational cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (46) ◽  
pp. 3782-3790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Nissen Bonde ◽  
Paul Blanche ◽  
Laila Staerk ◽  
Thomas Alexander Gerds ◽  
Anna Gundlund ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Absolute Risk ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Severe Anaemia ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Mild Anaemia

Abstract Aims To investigate the risk of stroke/thromboembolism (TE) and major bleeding associated with anaemia among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Also, to assess the effects of oral anticoagulation (OAC) and time in therapeutic range (TTR) with vitamin K antagonists according to level of haemoglobin (Hb). Methods and results Through administrative registry databases, we identified all Danish patients diagnosed with AF from 1997 to 2012. We included 18 734 AF patients with recent available data on Hb. Multiple Cox regression analyses were used to estimate hazard ratios and to compute standardized absolute 1-year risks of stroke/TE and major bleeding. Among included patients, 3796 (20%) had mild anaemia (Hb 6.83–7.45 mmol/L for women and Hb 6.83–8.03 mmol/L for men) and 2562 (14%) had moderate/severe anaemia (Hb &lt;6.83 mmol/L). Moderate/severe anaemia was associated with increased risk of major bleeding and 9.1% lower median TTR compared with no anaemia. Use of OAC was associated with reduced risk of stroke/TE among patients without anaemia [standardized absolute 1-year difference −2.5%, 95% confidence interval (CI) −3.8 to −1.7%] or with mild anaemia (−2.3%, 95% CI −2.8 to −1.8%), but not with moderate/severe anaemia, (0.03%, −1.8 to +2.8%, interaction P = 0.01). Oral anticoagulation was associated with a 5.3% (95% CI 2.1–8.7%) increased standardized absolute risk of major bleeding among AF patients with moderate/severe anaemia. Conclusion Anaemia was common in patients with AF and associated with major bleeding and lower TTR. Oral anticoagulation was associated with more major bleeding, but no reduction in risk of stroke/TE among AF patients with moderate/severe anaemia.

Abstract 14775: Barriers to Anticoagulation Treatment in Atrial Fibrillation: A Survey of Providers in a Large Rural Healthcare System

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Macaela N Rudeck ◽  
Catherine P Benziger
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Patient Education ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Medication Cost ◽  
Rural Healthcare ◽  
Anticoagulation Management ◽  
Increased Risk

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common and oral anticoagulants are recommended to reduce risk of thromboembolism for patients with elevated risk. Barriers to anticoagulation are not well described. Objectives: We aim to evaluate gaps in provider knowledge and barriers to anticoagulation management in AF. Methods: A REDCap survey was sent to providers at Essentia Health (N=894), a large rural healthcare system in MN, WI, and ND. Providers were grouped into 3 categories: cardiology, primary care, and other. Providers were asked how they would manage a hypothetical patient with AF: 67-year-old female with hypertension, recurrent episodes of paroxysmal AF, no other medical history. Answer options included aspirin, warfarin, or novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC). Demographic data were obtained along with answers to questions assessing barriers to anticoagulation use and patient education. Providers who reported they do not see AF patients were excluded (N=23). Results: A total of 220 providers started the survey (75.5% completion rate). Of 157 providers who completed the case study, 74.5% correctly recommended treatment with a NOAC. Providers in cardiology were more likely than those in primary care and other specialties to select NOAC (96.4% vs. 68.5% vs. 76.2%, respectively; p=0.01). Most (92%) providers stated they personally discuss the need for anticoagulation with their patients. Providers noted the primary barrier to educating patients about their increased risk of stroke was: “They have trouble understanding what I am trying to explain to them” (24%), “They think that once their symptoms are being treated, the risk of AF-related stroke goes away” (17%), and “They don't really believe their condition is serious” (13%). Providers cited the top barrier to patient compliance with anticoagulation was patients concern of cost with no difference between specialty (cardiology 40.7% vs. primary care 46.7% vs. other 34.8%; p=0.53). Conclusion: Cardiology providers are more likely to correctly recommend a NOAC, compared to primary care or other specialties, for AF. Primary barriers to patient education and compliance include inadequate patient understanding and medication cost.

Advances in anticoagulation management of patients undergoing cardioversion of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (04) ◽  
pp. 277-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Bonou ◽  
Konstantinos Toutouzas ◽  
Panagiotis Diamantopoulos ◽  
Nora Viniou ◽  
John Barbetseas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Baseline Risk ◽  
Therapeutic Approaches ◽  
Anticoagulation Management ◽  
Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Recent Onset ◽  
Increased Risk

SummaryAtrial fibrillation (AF) is a major cause of stroke. The restoration of sinus rhythm through cardioversion, either chemical or electrical is a common practice. Interestingly, there is an incremental increase from the baseline risk for embolisation in the immediate post-cardioversion period, with most events occurring within 10 days from cardioversion. Especially patients with recent onset AF show the lowest rates of antithrombotic therapy, while having a high stroke risk. Despite the increased risk for embolisation, anticoagulation in patients undergoing cardioversion of atrial fibrillation is often inadequate. Moreover, since the implementation of non-vitamin K antagonists oral anticoagulants (DOACs) there are several therapeutic approaches for pericardioversion anticoagulant therapy and not all suits to all patients. In addition, the extensive use of transesophageal echocardiography provides an alternative strategy, especially useful for patients of high haemorrhagic risk. In this review article, we aim to provide an update on the anticoagulation strategies for patients undergoing cardioversion of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the advent of the use of DOACs.

Safety of early anticoagulation in patients treated with urgent reperfusion for acute ischemic stroke related to non-valvular atrial fibrillation

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Giustozzi
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Oral Anticoagulation ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Early Recurrence ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
Hemorrhagic Event

Abstract Background The optimal timing for starting anticoagulation after an acute ischemic stroke related to non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a challenge, especially in patients treated with systemic thrombolysis or mechanical thrombectomy. Purpose We aimed to assess the rates of early recurrence and major bleeding in patients with acute ischemic stroke and AF treated with thrombolytic therapy and/or thrombectomy who received oral anticoagulants for secondary prevention. Methods We combined the dataset of the RAF and the RAF-NOACs studies, which were prospective observational studies carried out from January 2012 to March 2014 and April 2014 to June 2016, respectively. We included consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke and AF treated with either vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) or new oral anticoagulants (NOACs). Primary outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack, symptomatic systemic embolism, symptomatic cerebral bleeding, and major extracerebral bleeding within 90 days from the inclusion. Results A total of 2,159 patients were included in the RAF and RAF-NOACs trials, of which 564 patients (26%) were treated with urgent reperfusion therapy. After acute stroke, 505 (90%) patients treated with reperfusion and 1,287 out of the 1,595 (81%) patients not treated with reperfusion started oral anticoagulation. Timing of starting oral anticoagulation was similar in reperfusion-treated and untreated patients (13.5±23.3 vs 12.3±18.3 days, respectively, p=0.287). At 90 days, the composite rate of recurrence and major bleeding occurred in 37 (7%) of patients treated with reperfusion treatment and in 139 (9%) of untreated patients (p=0.127). Twenty-four (4%) reperfusion-treated patients and 82 (5%) untreated patients had early recurrence while major bleeding occurred in 13 (2%) treated and in 64 (4%) untreated patients, respectively. Seven patients in the untreated group experienced both an ischemic and hemorrhagic event. Figure 1 shows the risk of early recurrence and major bleeding over time in patients treated and not treated with reperfusion treatments. The use of NOACs was associated with a favorable rate of the primary outcome compared to VKAs (Odd ratio 0.4, 95% Confidence Interval 0.3–0.7). Conclusions Reperfusion treatment did not influence the risk of early recurrence and major bleeding in patients with AF-related acute ischemic stroke who started anticoagulant treatment. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Abstract 16732: Urinary 11-Dehydro-Thromboxane B2 is Associated With Vascular and Non-Vascular Events in Atrial Fibrillation Patients

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Pastori ◽  
Pasquale Pignatelli ◽  
Roberto Cangemi ◽  
William Hiatt ◽  
Alessio Farcomeni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Cardiovascular Death ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Thromboxane B2 ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Residual Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Anticoagulated Patients

Introduction: Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation (AF) patients show high residual cardiovascular risk despite oral anticoagulants. Urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B2 (TxB2) is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, but its predictive value in anticoagulated AF patients is unknown. Hypothesis: Aim of this was to assess whether urinary 11-dehydro-TxB2 is a predictor of cardiovascular events in anticoagulated patients with AF. Methods: Prospective single-center cohort study, including 864 consecutive AF patients. Mean time of follow-up was 30.0 months yielding 2062 person-years of observation. Urinary 11-dehydro-TxB2 was measured at baseline. The primary end-point was the composite of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiac revascularization, cardiovascular death and deaths from any cause. Results: Cardiovascular events occurred in 98 (11.3%), whilst 81 patients died (9.4%), including 55 from cardiovascular and 26 from non-cardiovascular causes. At baseline, urinary 11-dehydro-TxB2 levels were higher in patients who experienced a cardiovascular event (p<0.001). An increased rate of cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death and all-cause death was observed across tertiles of 11-dehydro-TxB2 (p<0.001). On Cox proportional hazards analysis, CHA2DS2-VASc score, second and third tertile of 11-dehydro-TxB2, compared to the first tertile, were significant predictors of vascular and non-vascular events. On a logistic regression analysis, 11-dehydro-TxB2 levels progressively increase with increasing CHA2DS2-VASc scores. Conclusions: Urinary 11-dehydro-TxB2 predicts residual risk of cardiovascular events in anticoagulated atrial fibrillation patients. Urinary 11-dehydro-TxB2 progressively increases with increasing CHA2DS2-VASc score suggesting that anticoagulated patients with high CHA2DS2-VASc score may need additional antithrombotic strategies.

Should the Presence or Extent of Coronary Artery Disease be Quantified in the CHA2DS2-VASc Score in Atrial Fibrillation? A Report from the Western Denmark Heart Registry

2018 ◽  
Vol 118 (12) ◽  
pp. 2162-2170 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kamilla Steensig ◽  
Kevin Olesen ◽  
Troels Thim ◽  
Jens Nielsen ◽  
Svend Jensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Coronary Angiography ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Independent Risk Factor ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Artery Disease

Background Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) have an increased risk of ischaemic stroke. The risk can be predicted by the CHA2DS2-VASc score, in which the vascular component refers to previous myocardial infarction, peripheral artery disease and aortic plaque, whereas coronary artery disease (CAD) is not included. Objectives This article explores whether CAD per se or extent provides independent prognostic information of future stroke among patients with AF. Materials and Methods Consecutive patients with AF and coronary angiography performed between 2004 and 2012 were included. The endpoint was a composite of ischaemic stroke, transient ischaemic attack and systemic embolism. The risk of ischaemic events was estimated according to the presence and extent of CAD. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) were calculated in reference to patients without CAD and adjusted for parameters included in the CHA2DS2-VASc score and treatment with anti-platelet agents and/or oral anticoagulants. Results Of 96,430 patients undergoing coronary angiography, 12,690 had AF. Among patients with AF, 7,533 (59.4%) had CAD. Mean follow-up was 3 years. While presence of CAD was an independent risk factor for the composite endpoint (adjusted IRR, 1.25; 1.06–1.47), extent of CAD defined as 1-, 2-, 3- or diffuse vessel disease did not add additional independent risk information. Conclusion Presence, but not extent, of CAD was an independent risk factor of the composite thromboembolic endpoint beyond the components already included in the CHA2DS2-VASc score. Consequently, we suggest that significant angiographically proven CAD should be included in the vascular disease criterion in the CHA2DS2-VASc score.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document