scholarly journals The impacts of managerial and institutional ownership on firm performance: The role of stock price informativeness and corporate governance

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 115-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
William Cheung ◽  
Scott Fung ◽  
Shih-Chuan Tsai

This paper provides new evidence on the relations between managerial and institutional ownerships and firm performance. These relations are found to be affected by firm’s stock price informativeness and corporate governance. Based on a sample of US firms from NYSE, AMEX, and NASDAQ between 1989 and 2006, we document three important findings. First, managerial ownership and firm future performance are non-linearly related; the positive relation is stronger for firms with less informative prices or more agency problems. This finding suggests that poor governance and uninformative price increase the importance of managerial value creation for their firms by improving internal governance. Second, institutional ownership has a significant positive impact on firm future performance, with larger impact for firms with less informative prices or good governance. However, institutional ownership, which reflects external monitoring, has a weaker positive effect compared to managerial ownership, which controls for internal governance. Third, the interaction between managerial ownership and institutional ownership has a significant positive impact on firm future performance, suggesting that there are synergistic effects of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms in improving firm value.

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 209-230
Author(s):  
Adel Almasarwah ◽  
Mohammad Almaharmeh ◽  
Ahmed M. Al Omush ◽  
Adel Sarea

Purpose This study investigates the nature of the association between profit warnings and stock price informativeness in the context of Jordan as an emerging country. Design/methodology/approach The authors used a large panel data set that related to stock price synchronicity and profit warnings percentages on the Amman Stock Exchange for the period spanning 2007–2018. Robust regression was used as a parametric test. This enabled us to obtain stronger results that fall in line with our prediction that a profit warning encourages firm investors to collect and process more firm-specific information than common market information. Findings Our findings show a significant positive effect of profit warnings on the amount of firm-specific information incorporated into stock price, which means that the greater the percentage of profit warnings the more likely that more firm-specific information will be incorporated in stock price synchronicity. In addition, corporate governance characteristics (moderating variables) significantly increase the level of the relationship between profit warnings and stock price synchronicity. Practical implications Our study results could be useful to investors, senior managers, and regulators in Jordanian firms, particularly in relation to decisions about enhancing the quality of financial statements. In addition, our results provide new evidence about the consequences of earnings announcements for information content and the informativeness of stock prices. Our methodology and evaluation of profit warnings may also demonstrate useful evidence for future researchers on profit warnings and stock price informativeness in developing economies, especially given that such evidence is scarce in developing economies. Originality/value This research is the first study of its kind on emerging markets, particularly in the Middle East. Moreover, entering the corporate governance variables as moderating variables to the robust regression was found to be more powerful than other regressions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 388
Author(s):  
Gede Marco Pradana Dika Putra ◽  
Ni Gusti Putu Wirawati

A firm not only aims to get profits but also maximize its value  which can be reflected in stock price. Research aims to examine the effect of good corporate governance on firm value with financial performance as a mediating variable. The study conducted on LQ45 companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2017-2018. Sample determined by purposive sampling with 32 samples. Path analysis was used. analysis showed managerial ownership and institutional ownership had no effect on financial performance, managerial ownership and institutional ownership had no effect on firm value, financial performance had a positive effect on firm value, and financial performance was unable to mediate the relationship between GCG and firm value. Keywords: Good Corporate Governance; Firm Value.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-36
Author(s):  
Abdul Rafay Abdul Rafay ◽  
Ramla Sadiq ◽  
Mobeen Ajmal

IAS-24 of the International Financial Reporting Standards focuses on the concept and disclosures of related party transactions (RPTs) for a reporting entity. This study examines the interrelationship between RPTs (as disclosed under IAS-24), agency theory, ownership structures and firm performance. Our sample includes nonfinancial companies indexed by the KSE-100 of the Pakistan Stock Exchange during 2006–15. To run the regression models, we determine the regression assumptions, normality, heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation and multicollinearity. We investigate the impact of different RPTs, including cash inflows and outflows, whereas other studies generally look at the impact of RPTs on firm performance in totality. The empirical analysis suggests that institutional ownership has a positive, significant impact on firm performance. Related party purchases have a significant, negative impact on performance, resulting in the expropriation of institutional ownership. RPTs that generate revenues have a significant, positive impact on performance, such that institutional ownership has a propping-up effect with respect to the related parties. In practice, institutional ownership leads to strong corporate governance and contributes to firm performance. While other studies find family ownership responsible for the expropriation effect, we argue that institutional ownership has a propping-up and expropriation effect on related parties. Our study also suggests that certain ownership structures lead to weaker corporate governance mechanisms, resulting in greater agency problems. This, in turn, badly affects company performance and leads to the exploitation of minority shareholders.


2019 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bok Baik ◽  
Sunhwa Choi ◽  
David B. Farber

ABSTRACT In this study, we investigate whether managerial ability is related to income smoothing and, if so, whether smoothing associated with managerial ability improves the informativeness of earnings and stock prices about future performance. Using a large sample of firms, we find that managerial ability is positively related to smoothing. More importantly, we show that high-ability managers incorporate more forward-looking information about cash flows into current earnings through smoothing, thereby enhancing earnings informativeness. We also find that smoothing associated with high-ability managers improves stock price informativeness about future cash flows. Our study should be of interest to researchers, practitioners, and others concerned with understanding the determinants and usefulness of smoothing.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 72-75
Author(s):  
Maheen Imtiaz ◽  
◽  
Khalid Mahmood Ahmad ◽  
Abdul Karim

Stock price crash risk is one of the most significant risks associated with the firm. Therefore, it is important to consider the factors which may influence the price crash risk. Various factors of corporate governance found to have an impact on the stock price crash risk. The ownership structure of the firm is a critical attribute of corporate governance. This study's objective is to determine the impact of two types of ownership of a company (managerial ownership and institutional ownership) on its stock price crash risk. To examine whether a firm's ownership structures have an association with stock price crash risk, the multiple linear regression model applied on the panel data of 190 companies listed on KSE for the year 2009-2018. The results of this study show that there is a significantly positive relationship between the institutional ownership and stock price crash risk. However, no association found between managerial ownership and price crash risk. These results imply that the percentage of institutional ownership should be reduced in the firm's ownership structure to reduce the firm's stock price crash risk.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 22
Author(s):  
Anh Huu Nguyen ◽  
Thu Minh Thi Vu ◽  
Quynh Truc Thi Doan

This research is conducted to investigate the impact of corporate governance on stock price synchronicity in the context of the Vietnamese market. The paper tests four hypotheses proposing the effect of four crucial components of corporate governance including board size, board independence, managerial ownership, and foreign ownership on stock price synchronicity. The study sample includes 247 non-financial listed companies on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange (HOSE) in Vietnam over a period of five years from 2014 to 2018. The fixed effects model is employed to address econometric issues and to improve the accuracy of the regression coefficients. The research results show the positive impact of board size and foreign ownership but the negative impact of managerial ownership on stock price synchronicity. This study confirms the viewpoint that stocks in the market move more together when the firms’ corporate governance gets better. In other words, the research findings suggest that low synchronicity signifies the corporate intransparency and weak information environment and vice versa. From this, the paper provides a new insight to managers on how to improve stock price synchronicity with corporate governance.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andina Nur Fathonah

ABSTRAKTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh Good Corporate Governance terhadap financial distress pada perusahaan-perusahaan sektor property, real estate dan konstruksi bangunan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada tahun 2013. Pada penelitian ini konsep good corporate governance diproksikan menggunakan indikator kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan manajerial, komposisi dewan komisaris independen dan komite audit. Sample dipilih secara purposive dan data yang diperoleh dianalisis menggunakan regresi logistik. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa komposisi dewan komisaris independen secara signifikan berpengaruh negatif terhadap financial distress. Sementara kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan manajerial dan komite audit, secara berturut-turut, berpengaruh negatif, positif dan positif terhadap financial distress, namun tidak signifikan.Kata kunci: kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan manajerial, komposisi dewan komisaris independen, komite audit, financial distress ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study is to determine the effect of good corporate governance on financial distress in the property, real estate and construction of buildings companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2013. In this research, the concept of good corporate governance is proxied using indicators of institutional ownership, managerial ownership, the composition of the independent board and audit committee. Sample selected purposively and the data were analyzed using logistic regression. The results showed that the composition of the independent board significantly have negative effect on financial distress, while institutional ownership, managerial ownership and the audit committee, respectively, have negative effect, positive and positive impact on financial distress, yet insignificant.Keywords: institutional ownership, managerial ownership, the composition of the independent board, audit committee, financial distress


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 593-605
Author(s):  
Muhammad Shahid Rasheed ◽  
Shahzad Kouser

Emerging markets usually have weaker legal and governance environment. The weaker enforcement of investor protection laws leads to a poor information environment. Using data of all the listed non-financial firms from Pakistan stock exchange (PSX), we document the relationship between corporate governance variables and stock price informativeness. The results from two-stage least squares (2SLS) reveal that controlling shareholders in the form of block holding plays an effective role in improving informativeness. Due to the presence of these block ownership, the institutional investors remain largely short term investors and act passively. This behavior of institutional investors encourages managers to extract more cash flows leading to higher synchronicity. These findings suggest market regulators develop such a corporate governance mechanism that not only ensures investor protection but also advise firms to reduce information asymmetry by better disclosure and transparency. More specifically, in the Pakistani context, traditional corporate governance mechanisms through board room regulations may not improve informativeness, and regulators need to regulate the ownership regulations, including family ownership and controlling shareholders.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document