scholarly journals Application of ISO 15189 standard on accreditation of medical laboratories

2004 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aleksandra Postic-Grujin ◽  
Nada Majkic-Singh

Application of external quality control in clinical biochemical laboratories imposed the necessity of introduction of system quality management and accreditation in identical and different medical laboratories. ?Good laboratory practice? and the principals thereof were adopted by the appointed bodies, both international and national ones. In the beginning, ISO 9001 standard was applied to certification, and EN 45001 and ISO Guide 25 to accreditation; both were prepared for testing and calibration laboratories. ISO 17025 standard is the successor of the previous documents and presently used as reference by the listed laboratories. The Working Group of European Communities Confederation of Clinical Chemistry (EC4) set up out the additional requirements for the medical laboratories. The draft standard ISO 15189 was adopted in February of 2003 as the final version of the requirements set forth for all the medical laboratories.

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vinko Peric ◽  
Dusan Jaric ◽  
Sonja Ketin ◽  
Admira Konicanin ◽  
Rade Biocanin

In the last 20 years in medical laboratories, numerous activities regarding quality and accreditation system were taken. Approach to this problem in European countries is different, so the task of the Accreditation Work Group of the Confederation of European societies for clinical chemistry (EC 4) to help the efforts to harmonize this issue. External quality control in clinical-chemical laboratories imposed the need for the implementation of quality management system. »Good laboratory practice« and its principles were adopted by nominated bodies, both international and national. In the beginning, the standard ISO 9001 was applied for certification and for accreditation EN 45001 and ISO Guide 25, which are prepared for testing and calibration laboratories. Standard ISO 17025 is the successor of the previous documents and for now it is a reference for mentioned laboratories. Accreditation Work Group of the Confederation of European societies for clinical chemistry (EC 4) made an amendment of the requirements for medical laboratories, which this standard describes. Standard draft ISO 15189 was adopted on February 2003 as a final version with requirements for medical laboratories.


2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (02) ◽  
pp. 55-62
Author(s):  
M. Fritzer-Szekeres

SummaryDuring the 20th century understanding for quality has changed and international and national requirements for quality have been published. Therefore also medical branches started to establish quality management systems. Quality assurance has always been important for medical laboratories. Certification according to the standard ISO 9001 and accreditation according to the standard ISO 17025 have been the proof of fulfilling quality requirements. The relatively new standard ISO 15189 is the first standard for medical laboratories. This standard includes technical and management requirements for the medical laboratory. The main focus is the proof of competence within the personnel. As this standard is accepted throughout the European Union an increase in accreditations of medical laboratories is predictable.


Author(s):  
Marc H.M. Thelen ◽  
Florent J.L.A. Vanstapel ◽  
Christos Kroupis ◽  
Ines Vukasovic ◽  
Guilaime Boursier ◽  
...  

AbstractThe recent revision of ISO15189 has further strengthened its position as the standard for accreditation for medical laboratories. Both for laboratories and their customers it is important that the scope of such accreditation is clear. Therefore the European co-operation for accreditation (EA) demands that the national bodies responsible for accreditation describe the scope of every laboratory accreditation in a way that leaves no room for doubt about the range of competence of the particular laboratories. According to EA recommendations scopes may be fixed, mentioning every single test that is part of the accreditation, or flexible, mentioning all combinations of medical field, examination type and materials for which the laboratory is competent. Up to now national accreditation bodies perpetuate use of fixed scopes, partly by inertia, partly out of fear that a too flexible scope may lead to over-valuation of the competence of laboratories, most countries only use fixed scopes. The EA however promotes use of flexible scopes, since this allows for more readily innovation, which contributes to quality in laboratory medicine. In this position paper, the Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN Standards belonging to the Quality and Regulation Committee of the EFLM recommends using an approach that has led to successful introduction of the flexible scope for ISO15189 accreditation as intended in EA-4/17 in The Netherlands. The approach is risk-based, discipline and competence-based, and focuses on defining a uniform terminology transferable across the borders of scientific disciplines, laboratories and countries.


2008 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-147
Author(s):  
Ljubinka Gligić

Status of Development and Implementation of Medical Laboratories Accreditation in SerbiaThrough the release of the SRPS ISO 15189:2008 standard entitled >>Medicinske laboratorije: posebni zahtevi za kvalitet i kompetentnost<< conditions have been created for medical laboratory accreditation in Serbia. The application of the ISO 15189:2007 standard is an accepted mechanism for improvement of the quality of medical laboratory services throughout EU today. In that way, different approaches to the quality improvement of medical laboratories have been harmonized. Functional organisation of the accreditation process of medical laboratories in most European countries is mainly carried out in cooperation with national accreditation bodies, medical experts appointed by scientist associations and health departments. This type of collaboration has proven successful in the United Kingdom, Germany, Hungary, France, Finland, Croatia, etc. The experiences of the Accreditation Board of Serbia (ABS) in medical laboratory accreditation according to the SRPS ISO/IEC 17025:2006 standard (5 laboratories have been accredited) and the positive experiences of European countries in accreditation process constitute the basis for the development of the program for medical laboratory accreditation in Serbia. The first step in this direction is the set-up of the Committee consisting of experts from different medical fields, ABS experts and representatives of the competent Ministry, as well as the definition of their tasks, such as: preparation of the necessary documentation, set-up and preparation of qualification criteria and training programs for assessors, participation in the development of the external quality assessment scheme through interlaboratory testing, liaison with the European organisations for accreditation, organisation of mutual assessments with national and international assessors, participation in decision making on accreditation and accreditation maintenance.


Author(s):  
Bagnu Orhan ◽  
Derya Sonmez ◽  
Hikmet Can Cubukcu ◽  
Oguzhan Zengi ◽  
Humeyra Ozturk Emre ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesThe utilization of reliable quality indicators (QIs) proven to be suitable for monitoring and improvement tools is one of the best choices to minimize of the risk of errors in all laboratory processes called as total testing process (TTP). In 2008, a Working Group “Laboratory Errors and Patient Safety” (WG-LEPS) established by International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) developed the Model of Quality Indicators (MQI) complying with requirements of the ISO 15189:2012 standard for laboratory accreditation. They have also been dealing with harmonizing the QIs in most laboratories worldwide since then. The present study was set out to investigate the frequency of using IFCC WG-LEPS’ pre-QIs by Turkish laboratories and to assess the conformity of them, by taking into account Turkey’s conditions.MethodsA survey consisting nine questions was applied in 81 laboratories using SurveyMonkey.ResultsAccording to the survey results, most of the laboratories reported they have used pre-QIs in the quality standards of health prepared by Turkish Ministry of Health (MOH). A part of IFCC WG-LEPS’ pre-QIs were being utilized by more than 80% of the laboratories, the rest of which only used by 10% of laboratories.ConclusionsThe majority of the medical laboratories have been using the pre-QIs included in the guidelines of Quality Standards prepared by the MOH. The pre-QIs are partially compatible with IFCC WG-LEPS’ pre-QIs. The definitions of IFCC WG-LEPS’ pre-QIs may also be revised to make them more clear and understandable by IFCC WG-LEPS. The insufficiency of Health Information Management Systems (HIMS) limits the use of pre-QIs proposed by IFCC WG-LEPS. Finally, the education of relevant personnel about the use of HIMS and pre-QIs is very crucial to harmonize and to extend the use of IFCC WG-LEPS’ pre-QIs in Turkish medical biochemistry laboratories.


2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 361-367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roseri Roelofsen-de Beer ◽  
Jos Wielders ◽  
Guilaine Boursier ◽  
Tatjana Vodnik ◽  
Florent Vanstapel ◽  
...  

AbstractThis paper reflects the opinion of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group Accreditation and ISO/CEN standards (WG-A/ISO). It aims to provide guidance for drawing up local/national documents about validation and verification of laboratory methods. We demonstrate how risk evaluation can be used to optimize laboratory policies to meet intended use requirements as well as requirements of standards. This is translated in a number of recommendations on how to introduce risk evaluation in various stages of the implementation of new methods ultimately covering the whole process cycle.


Author(s):  
Wim Huisman ◽  
A. Rita Horvath ◽  
David Burnett ◽  
Victor Blaton ◽  
Rózsa Czikkely ◽  
...  

Abstract: Using a questionnaire, the EC4 (European Communities Confederation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine) has collated an inventory of the accreditation procedures for medical laboratories in the EU.: Accreditation of medical laboratories in the countries of the EU is mostly carried out in cooperation with national accreditation bodies. These national accreditation bodies work together in a regional cooperation, the European Cooperation for Accreditation (EA). Professionals are trained to become assessors and play a prominent role in the accreditation process. The extent of the training is diverse, but assessors are kept informed and up-to-date by annual meetings. The frequency of assessments and surveillance visits differs from country to country and ranges from 1 to 4 years. More harmonisation is needed in this respect, based on a frequency that can be pragmatically handled by laboratory professionals. In the majority of EA bodies, accreditation is carried out on a test-by-test basis. Many professionals would prefer accreditation of the entire service provided within the actual field of testing (i.e., haematology, immunology, etc.), with accreditation granted if the majority of tests offered within a service field fulfil the requirements of the ISO 15189 standard. The scope of accreditation is a major point of discussions between the EC4 Working Group on Accreditation and representatives of accreditation bodies in the EA Medical Laboratory Committee.Clin Chem Lab Med 2007;45:268–75.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 225-230 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Plebani ◽  
Laura Sciacovelli

SummaryAccreditation is a valuable resource for clinical laboratories and the development of an International Standard for their accreditation represented a milestone on the path towards improved quality and safety in laboratory medicine. The recent revision of the International Standard, ISO 15189, has further strengthened its value not only for improving the quality system of a clinical laboratory but also for better answering the request for competence, focus on customers’ needs and ultimate value of laboratory services. Although in some countries more general standards such as ISO 9001 for quality systems or ISO 17025 for testing laboratories are still used, there is increasing recognition of the value of ISO 15189 as the most appropriate and useful standard for the accreditation of medical laboratories. In fact, only this International Standard recognizes the importance of all steps of the total testing process, namely extra-analytical phases, the need to focus on technical competence in addition to quality systems, and the focus on customers’ needs. However, the number of accredited laboratories largely varies between European countries and also major differences affect the approaches to accreditation promoted by the national bodies. In particular, some national accreditation bodies perpetuate the use of fixed scopes, while the European co-operation for accreditation (EA) and the European Federation of Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group promote the use of flexible scopes. Major issues in clinical laboratory accreditation are the verification of examination procedures for imprecision, trueness and diagnostic accuracy and for estimating measurement uncertainty. In addition, quality indicators (QIs) are a fundamental requirement of the ISO 15189 International Standard.


2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (07) ◽  
pp. 4704
Author(s):  
Syed Riaz Mehdi* ◽  
Sharique Ahmad ◽  
Noorin Zaidi

Laboratory error is defined by ISO 22367 as “Failure of planned actions to be completed as intended or use a wrong plan to achieve an aim”. Lundeberg in 1981 outlined the concept of Total Testing Process (TTP) and Plebani elaborated it further and classified the whole testing process into five phases of Pre-Pre Analytic, Pre Analytic, Analytic, Post Analytic and Post - Post Analytic. The errors have to be identified and resolved in each phase of the process. The medical laboratories have to run Internal and External Quality Control programs and abide by the guidelines of ISO 15189 in order to be accredited by bodies like JCI, CAP or NABL. Active communication and regular interaction between the clinicians and the laboratory is recommended during Pre Analytic and Post Analytic phases of TTP in order to achieve the target of Best Laboratory Practices. 


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document