Comparison of phenol-based and alternative RNA isolation methods for gene expression analyses
The widespread use of gene expression analyses has been limited by the lack of a critical evaluation of the methods used to extract nucleic acids from human tissues. For evaluating gene expression patterns in whole blood or leukocytes, the method of RNA isolation needs to be considered as a critical variable in the design of the experiment. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) is widely used for the quantification of gene expression in today?s clinical practice. Blood samples as a preferred RNA source for qPCR should be carefully handled and prepared to not inhibit gene expression analyses. The present study was designed to compare the frequently used guanidine thiocyanate-phenol-chloroformbased method (TRI Reagent?) with two alternative RNA isolation methods (6100 PrepStation and QIAamp?) from whole blood or leukocytes for the purpose of gene expression analysis in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients. Based on the results of this study, for the best combination of yield and RNA extraction purity, taking into account the necessary amount of the clinical sample and performance time, the protocol using phenol-based TRI Reagent? for RNA extraction from leukocytes is suggested as the most suitable protocol for this specific gene expression analysis.