scholarly journals Combined bone scintigraphy with 99mTc-MDP and 99mTc-ciprofloxacin in differentiation of hip and knee prosthesis aseptic loosening and infection: A preliminary study

2017 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 666-671
Author(s):  
Dragan Pucar ◽  
Zoran Jankovic ◽  
Zoran Bascarevic ◽  
Srdjan Starcevic ◽  
Milica Cizmic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Bone Scintigraphy ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Bone Scan ◽  
Knee Prosthesis ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Main Question ◽  
Knee Prostheses ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Preliminary Study

Background/Aim. Although the number of new primary implantation of hip and knee prostheses every year increases, the rate of failed arthroplasty is nearly the same. The main question is whether it is an aseptic instability or instability caused by infection. The aim of this preliminary study was an attempt with combined 99mTc-ciprofloxacin and 99mTc-methylene diphosphonate (MDP) bone scintigraphy to improve diagnostic accuracy in the differentiation of hip and knee prosthesis aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection. Methods. Inclusion criteria of patients for this study were based on suspected periprosthetic joint infection: painful prosthetic joint, restricted joint movements and increased value of erythrocyte sedimentation rate or levels of C-reactive protein. We examined 20 patients with implanted 14 hip and 6 knee prosthesis. All patients also underwent plain radiography of suspected joint. In all patients, three-phase 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy was performed. Three to five days after the bone scan, we performed scintigraphy using 99mTc-ciprofloxacin with the calculation of accumulation index. Periprosthetic joint infection was confirmed on the basis of microbiological findings. Results. Periprosthetic joint infection was confirmed in fourteen of twenty observed joints, in five of them the aseptic loosening was present and in one patient?s symptoms were not related to the prosthesis (poor biomechanics of prosthetic joints caused by weaknesses of muscle). Estimated sensitivity/specificity for 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy alone were 100/17%; for 99mTc-ciprofloxacin scintigraphy were 85,7/100%. Sensitivity and specificity were 92,3% and 83,3%, respectively for results obtained with combined assessment by both methods. Our study confirmed the high negative predictive value of 99mTc-MDP bone scan. The negative result of bone scan virtually excludes the possibility of periprosthetic infection. On the other hand, positive findings of 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy cannot with certainty confirm the infection. Conclusion. Combined 99mTc-MDP scintigraphy with 99mTc-ciprofloxacin scintigraphy significantly increases the ability of differentiation of aseptic loosening from periprosthetic joint infection.

Evaluation of aseptic loosening of knee prostheses by quantitative bone scintigraphy

2008 ◽  
Vol 47 (04) ◽  
pp. 163-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Steiner ◽  
S. Laurich ◽  
R. Bauer ◽  
J. Kordelle ◽  
R. Klett
Keyword(s):  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Bone Scintigraphy ◽  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Knee Prostheses ◽  
Treatment Regimes ◽  
Golden Standard ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Asymptomatic Control

SummaryIn not infected knee prostheses bone scintigraphy is a possible method to diagnose mechanical loosening, and therefore, to affect treatment regimes in symptomatic patients. However, hitherto studies showed controversial results for the reliability of bone scintigraphy in diagnosing loosened knee prostheses by using asymptomatic control groups. Therefore, the aim of our study was to optimize the interpretation procedure and to evaluate the accuracy using results from revision surgery as standard. Methods: Retrospectively, we were able to examine the tibial component in 31 cemented prostheses. In this prostheses infection was excluded by histological or bacteriological examination during revision surgery. To quantify bone scintigraphy, we used medial and lateral tibial regions with a reference region from the contralateral femur. Results: To differentiate between loosened and intact prostheses we found a threshold of 5.0 for the maximum tibia to femur ratio of the both tibial regions and a threshold of 18% for the difference of the ratio of both tibial regions. Using these thresholds, values of 0.9, 1, 0.85, 1, and 0.94 were calculated for sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and accuracy, respectively. To get a sensitivity of 1, we found a lower threshold of 3.3 for the maximum tibia to femur ratio. Conclusion: Quantitative bone scintigraphy appears to be a reliable diagnostic tool for aseptic loosening of knee prostheses with thresholds evaluated by revision surgery results being the golden standard.

scholarly journals Do Prosthetic Joint Infections Worsen the Functional Ambulatory Outcome of Patients with Joint Replacements? A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 872
Author(s):  
Isabel Mur ◽  
Marcos Jordán ◽  
Alba Rivera ◽  
Virginia Pomar ◽  
José Carlos González ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Assistive Device ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Knee Prostheses ◽  
Matched Cohort Study ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Hip Arthroplasties

Objectives: To assess the effect on the functional ambulatory outcome of postoperative joint infection (PJI) cured at the first treatment attempt versus not developing PJI in patients with hip and knee prostheses. Methods: In a single-hospital retrospectively matched cohort study, each patient with PJI between 2007 and 2016 was matched on age, sex, type of prosthesis and year of implantation with two other patients with uninfected arthroplasties. The definition of a PJI cure included infection eradication, no further surgical procedures, no PJI-related mortality and no suppressive antibiotics. Functional ambulatory status evaluated one year after the last surgery was classified into four simple categories: able to walk without assistance, able to walk with one crutch, able to walk with two crutches, and unable to walk. Patients with total hip arthroplasties (THAs), total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and partial hip arthroplasties (PHAs) were analysed separately. Results: A total of 109 PJI patients (38 TKA, 41 THA, 30 PHA) and 218 non-PJI patients were included. In a model adjusted for clinically relevant variables, PJI was associated with a higher risk of needing an assistive device for ambulation (vs. walking without aid) among THA (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.10, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.26–7.57; p = 0.014) and TKA patients (OR 5.40, 95% CI 2.12–13.67; p < 0.001), and with requiring two crutches to walk or being unable to walk (vs. walking unaided or with one crutch) among PHA patients (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.01–9.20; p = 0.047). Conclusions: Ambulatory outcome in patients with hip and knee prostheses with postoperative PJI is worse than in patients who do not have PJI.

scholarly journals Diagnostic Criteria and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection of Total Ankle Arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 247301141984100
Author(s):  
Kempland C. Walley ◽  
Christopher B. Arena ◽  
Paul J. Juliano ◽  
Michael C. Aynardi
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Total Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Ankle Arthroplasty ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Ankle Replacement ◽  
Knee And Hip Arthroplasty

Background: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total ankle arthroplasty (TAA) is a serious complication that results in significant consequences to the patient and threatens the survival of the ankle replacement. PJI in TAA may require debridement, placement of antibiotic spacer, revision arthroplasty, conversion to arthrodesis, or potentially below the knee amputation. While the practice of TAA has gained popularity in recent years, there is some minimal data regarding wound complications in acute or chronic PJI of TAA. However, of the limited studies that describe complications of PJI of TAA, even fewer studies describe the criteria used in diagnosing PJI. This review will cover the current available literature regarding total ankle arthroplasty infection and will propose a model for treatment options for acute and chronic PJI in TAA. Methods: A review of the current literature was conducted to identify clinical investigations in which prosthetic joint infections occurred in total ankle arthroplasty with associated clinical findings, radiographic imaging, and functional outcomes. The electronic databases for all peer-reviewed published works available through January 31, 2018, of the Cochrane Library, PubMed MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were explored using the following search terms and Boolean operators: “total ankle replacement” OR “total ankle arthroplasty” AND “periprosthetic joint infection” AND “diagnosis” OR “diagnostic criteria.” An article was considered eligible for inclusion if it concerned diagnostic criteria of acute or chronic periprosthetic joint infection of total ankle arthroplasty regardless of the number of patients treated, type of TAA utilized, conclusion, or level of evidence of study. Results: No studies were found in the review of the literature describing criteria for diagnosing PJI specific to TAA. Conclusions: Literature describing the diagnosis and treatment of PJI in TAA is entirely reliant on the literature surrounding knee and hip arthroplasty. Because of the limited volume of total ankle arthroplasty in comparison to knee and hip arthroplasty, no studies to our knowledge exist describing diagnostic criteria specific to total ankle arthroplasty with associated reliability. Large multicenter trials may be required to obtain the volume necessary to accurately describe diagnostic criteria of PJI specific to TAA. Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review.

scholarly journals Conversion Knee Arthroplasty Using a Rotating Hinge as a Salvage Prosthesis Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Ligamentous Insufficiency: A Case Report

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon E. Minter
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Knee Prosthesis ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Extensor Mechanism ◽  
Physical Constraint ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Ligamentous Instability ◽  
Revision Tka

BackgroundIn the event of a complex revision TKA in which there is extensor mechanism involvement and ligamentous instability or insufficiency, non-linked levels of constraint may not be adequate for achieving restoration of patient function. Total knee arthroplasty devices that incorporate a linked level of constraint are successful alternatives to unlinked devices (PS and PS-Constrained) in this clinical context.Case PresentationWe present the case of a 62 year-old male patient that required a non-articulating knee fusion and multiple total knee arthroplasty revisions in conjunction with a ruptured and repaired extensor mechanism, ligamentous instability, bone loss and periprosthetic joint infection.  (Revision knee prosthesis that includes a increasing degree of nodularity and physical constraint).  The subsequent risk factors associated with the loss of bone and ligamentous insufficiency required performing conversion arthroplasty with a knee prosthesis that includes an increasing degree of modularity and physical constraint not commonly used in revision total knee arthroplasty.DiscussionThe authors report on a patient who underwent multiple operative procedures, we outline the step wise decision making progression that lead to the successful eradication of the PJI and reimplant device strategy based on the confounding factors presented.  We assess the use of revision TKA systems that offer extreme degrees of constraint which should be considered in complex revision knee revision procedures.

scholarly journals Proximal femoral reconstruction with modular megaprostheses in non-oncological patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Döring ◽  
Klemens Vertesich ◽  
Luca Martelanz ◽  
Kevin Staats ◽  
Christoph Böhler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Loss ◽  
Aseptic Loosening ◽  
Periprosthetic Fracture ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Revision Arthroplasty ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
One Year ◽  
Proximal Femoral Reconstruction

Abstract Introduction Multiple revision hip arthroplasties and critical trauma might cause severe bone loss that requires proximal femoral replacement (PFR). The aim of this retrospective study was to analyse complication- and revision-free survivals of patients who received modular megaprostheses in an attempt to reconstruct massive non-neoplastic bone defects of the proximal femur. Questions/purposes (1) What were general complication rates and revision-free survivals following PFR? (2) What is the incidence of complication specific survivals? (3) What were risk factors leading to a diminished PFR survival? Materials and methods Twenty-eight patients with sufficient follow-up after receiving a modular proximal femoral megaprosthesis were identified. The indications for PFR included prosthetic joint infection (PJI), periprosthetic fracture, aseptic loosening, non-union and critical femoral fracture. Complications were grouped according to the ISOLS-classification of segmental endoprosthetic failure by Henderson et al. Results Overall, the complication-free survival was 64.3% at one year, 43.2% at five years and 38.4% at ten years, with 16 patients (57%) suffering at least one complication. Complications were dislocation in eight patients (29%), PJI in 6 patients (21%), periprosthetic fracture in five patients (18%), and aseptic loosening in six patients (21%). Prosthesis stem cementation showed a lower risk for revision in a cox proportional hazard model (95% CI 0.04–0.93, HR 0.2, p = 0.04). Conclusion PFR with modular megaprostheses represents a viable last resort treatment with high complication rates for patients with severe proximal femoral bone loss due to failed arthroplasty or critical fractures. In revision arthroplasty settings, PFR cementation should be advocated in cases of impaired bone quality.

scholarly journals Chronic prosthetic joint infections with a draining sinus. Who should receive suppressive antibiotic treatment?

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 43-45
Author(s):  
Karel-Jan Lensen ◽  
Rosa Escudero-Sanchez ◽  
Javier Cobo ◽  
Alex Soriano ◽  
Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Patient Group ◽  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Sinus Tract ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections

Abstract. The benefit of suppressive antibiotic treatment in inoperable patients with a chronic periprosthetic joint infection and a sinus tract is unknown. Some physicians prefer to just let the sinus drain, while others prefer antibiotic treatment. In this viewpoint article we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of suppressive antibiotic treatment in this particular patient group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document