Effects of Error Correction on Word Recognition and Reading Comprehension

1983 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Jenkins ◽  
Kathy Larson ◽  
Lisa Fleisher
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Word Recognition ◽  
Error Correction ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Instructional Practice ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Poor Readers ◽  
Reading Process ◽  
Reading Errors ◽  
Within Subjects

Two procedures for correcting oral reading errors, Word Supply and Word Drill, were examined to determine their effects on measures of word recognition and comprehension. The two corrections were applied to 17 learning disabled, poor readers in a within-subjects design. Results indicated that the Drill correction significantly enhanced word recognition and comprehension of sentences which contained original error words. The findings are discussed in terms of “bottom-up” analyses of the reading process and their implications for instructional practice.

The Effect of Word- and Comprehension-Emphasis Instruction on Reading Performance

1983 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa S. Fleisher ◽  
Joseph R. Jenkins
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Word Recognition ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Treatment Effects ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
The Other ◽  
The Third ◽  
Reading Errors ◽  
Instructional Procedures ◽  
Isolated Word

Three instructional procedures were compared to assess their effects on reading comprehension and word recognition. One approach emphasized comprehension, i.e., students were regularly questioned about the reading content and were not corrected when they made oral reading errors. A second approach consisted of word emphasis, whereby subjects were corrected for all reading errors and received error-word drills each day. They were not questioned about the content of their reading selection. The third approach combined aspects of the other two, including error-word corrections and drill along with comprehension questions. No differences were found among treatment effects on comprehension and oral reading; however, on an isolated word-recognition measure the approaches which included error-word drill produced higher scores.

Effects of two Error-Correction Procedures on Oral Reading

1982 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry L. Rose ◽  
Elizabeth McEntire ◽  
Carol Dowdy
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Reading Skills ◽  
Relative Effectiveness ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Alternating Treatments Design ◽  
Systematic Correction ◽  
School Learning ◽  
Error Correction Procedures

An alternating-treatments design was used to investigate the relative effectiveness of two error-correction procedures, word supply and phonic analysis, on the oral reading performance of five elementary-school learning disabled students, four boys and one girl. All subjects had deficient oral reading skills. Results indicated that (a) increased oral reading rates were related to systematic correction procedures, and (b) the word-supply procedure was relatively superior to the phonic analysis method. Possible reasons for these findings are discussed, as are suggestions for future investigations and implications for instruction.

Effects of Illustrations on Reading Performance: Implications for Further LD Research

1980 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean R. Harber
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Word Recognition ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Beginning Readers ◽  
Disabled Children ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Printed Word ◽  
Low Ability

This article reviews available research findings on the influence of illustrations on the reading performance (i.e., word recognition and reading comprehension) of beginning readers in general and in specific subgroups of beginning readers (e.g., poor achievers, low-ability students). Findings suggest that the presence of illustrations interferes with poorly achieving and low-ability children's performance on word recognition tasks and that illustrations are of questionable value to such children's performance on reading comprehension tasks. The possibility that illustrations serve to distract the poor reader's attention from the printed word is discussed. The inability to filter out extraneous stimuli and focus selectively on a task frequently seen in learning disabled children is presented in terms of selective attention theory. Suggestions are offered for further research on the effect of illustrations on learning disabled youngsters' reading performance.

Reading and Listening to Expository Text

1985 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalind Horowitz ◽  
S. Jay Samuels
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Process Model ◽  
Expository Text ◽  
Sixth Grade ◽  
Poor Readers ◽  
Good Readers ◽  
Poor Reading ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Good And Poor Readers

Poor reading comprehension may result from a general comprehension problem, a decoding problem, or a combination of these problems. Using a counterbalanced design, 38 good and poor sixth-grade readers read aloud and listened to easy and hard texts. Immediately after reading and listening, students orally retold what they had read or heard. Their recalls were scored for number of idea units produced. Results indicated no difference in listening comprehension between good and poor readers for either easy or hard texts, but a significant difference in oral reading comprehension in favor of good readers on both easy and hard texts. The finding of no difference in listening suggests that the poor readers in this sample did not have a general comprehension problem, while their poor oral reading performance indicates that they did have a decoding problem. These findings support a more complex comprehension process model of listening and reading than has typically been described in the literature.

Effects of Relative Competence on Learning Disabled Children'S Oral Reading Performance

1984 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 108-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara W. Gottlieb
Keyword(s):  
Oral Reading ◽  
Social Facilitation ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Dependent Measure ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Academic Instruction ◽  
Reading Errors ◽  
Main Effect ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Better Than

The effect of social facilitation, particularly the impact of perceived evaluation and relative competence of handicapped learners, was tested to determine its efficacy in predicting 26 learning disabled children's oral reading performance. Two conditions reflected the competence variable: low relative competence and similar relative competence. The dependent measure was number of oral reading errors. Results revealed a significant main effect, indicating that children who read with similar-ability peers performed significantly better than when they read with peers of superior ability. Results are discussed in relation to mainstreaming decisions and homogeneous groupings of students for direct academic instruction.

Reading Flexibility of Learning Disabled and Normal Students at Three Grade Levels

1982 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carol A. Dowdy ◽  
W. Donald Crump ◽  
Michael W. Welch
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Reading Rate ◽  
The Other ◽  
Poor Readers ◽  
Grade Levels ◽  
Other Hand ◽  
Two Populations

Reading flexibility refers to a person's ability to adjust both reading rate and method to the specific purpose for reading. Proficient readers exhibit reading flexibility by paying attention to the information in print that is most relevant to their purpose. Poor readers, on the other hand, do not exhibit reading flexibility and, instead, become bound to the print. Only limited research has been undertaken to investigate the degree of reading flexibility in the learning disabled population. This study compared reading flexibility among learning disabled and normal students at three grade levels. Methods included a measure of reading rate and reading comprehension under two separate conditions or purposes for reading. Results are reported in terms of differences between the two populations as well as trends across grade levels for each population.

Effects of Corrective Feedback on Comprehension Skills of Remedial Students

1981 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 131-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darlene Pany ◽  
Kathleen M. Mccoy ◽  
Ellen E. Peters
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Corrective Feedback ◽  
Skill Level ◽  
Miscue Analysis ◽  
Remedial Students ◽  
Reading Errors ◽  
Comprehension Skills ◽  
Dependent Variables ◽  
Story Retell

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of Corrective Feedback during oral reading on reading comprehension performance. A total of 34 students were classified by reading skill level into two groups: Primary (skill range 1.5–3.0) and Intermediate (skill range 3.5–5.5). Within each group half of the students were randomly assigned to either a Corrective Feedback condition or to a No Correction condition. Four dependent variables were obtained from the results of a miscue analysis, story retell, comprehension questions and oral reading errors. Few significant differences occurred between students' comprehension performance at either skill level under either condition. Overall comprehension performance was good under both conditions. The results of this study do not support the position that corrective feedback is detrimental to reading comprehension.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document