Cognitive processes as predictors of word recognition and reading comprehension in learning-disabled and skilled readers: Revisiting the specificity hypothesis.

1997 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 128-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Lee Swanson ◽  
Joy E. Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Word Recognition ◽  
Cognitive Processes ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Skilled Readers

Effects of Illustrations on Reading Performance: Implications for Further LD Research

1980 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 60-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean R. Harber
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Word Recognition ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Beginning Readers ◽  
Disabled Children ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Research Findings ◽  
Printed Word ◽  
Low Ability

This article reviews available research findings on the influence of illustrations on the reading performance (i.e., word recognition and reading comprehension) of beginning readers in general and in specific subgroups of beginning readers (e.g., poor achievers, low-ability students). Findings suggest that the presence of illustrations interferes with poorly achieving and low-ability children's performance on word recognition tasks and that illustrations are of questionable value to such children's performance on reading comprehension tasks. The possibility that illustrations serve to distract the poor reader's attention from the printed word is discussed. The inability to filter out extraneous stimuli and focus selectively on a task frequently seen in learning disabled children is presented in terms of selective attention theory. Suggestions are offered for further research on the effect of illustrations on learning disabled youngsters' reading performance.

Effects of Error Correction on Word Recognition and Reading Comprehension

1983 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 139-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Jenkins ◽  
Kathy Larson ◽  
Lisa Fleisher
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Word Recognition ◽  
Error Correction ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Instructional Practice ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Poor Readers ◽  
Reading Process ◽  
Reading Errors ◽  
Within Subjects

Two procedures for correcting oral reading errors, Word Supply and Word Drill, were examined to determine their effects on measures of word recognition and comprehension. The two corrections were applied to 17 learning disabled, poor readers in a within-subjects design. Results indicated that the Drill correction significantly enhanced word recognition and comprehension of sentences which contained original error words. The findings are discussed in terms of “bottom-up” analyses of the reading process and their implications for instructional practice.

Does Viotin Activate Violin More Than Viocin?

2014 ◽  
Vol 61 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-29 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Perea ◽  
Victoria Panadero
Keyword(s):  
Word Recognition ◽  
Visual Word Recognition ◽  
Developmental Dyslexia ◽  
Computational Models ◽  
Error Rates ◽  
Visual Word ◽  
Base Word ◽  
Similar Response ◽  
Skilled Readers ◽  
Young Readers

The vast majority of neural and computational models of visual-word recognition assume that lexical access is achieved via the activation of abstract letter identities. Thus, a word’s overall shape should play no role in this process. In the present lexical decision experiment, we compared word-like pseudowords like viotín (same shape as its base word: violín) vs. viocín (different shape) in mature (college-aged skilled readers), immature (normally reading children), and immature/impaired (young readers with developmental dyslexia) word-recognition systems. Results revealed similar response times (and error rates) to consistent-shape and inconsistent-shape pseudowords for both adult skilled readers and normally reading children – this is consistent with current models of visual-word recognition. In contrast, young readers with developmental dyslexia made significantly more errors to viotín-like pseudowords than to viocín-like pseudowords. Thus, unlike normally reading children, young readers with developmental dyslexia are sensitive to a word’s visual cues, presumably because of poor letter representations.

scholarly journals Evidence for complementary effects of code- and knowledge-focused reading instruction

2021 ◽  
pp. 026565902110142
Author(s):  
Meghan Vollebregt ◽  
Jana Leggett ◽  
Sherry Raffalovitch ◽  
Colin King ◽  
Deanna Friesen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Word Recognition ◽  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Listening Comprehension ◽  
Nonsense Word ◽  
Dialogic Reading ◽  
Written Expression ◽  
Word Decoding ◽  
School Year ◽  
One Year

There is growing recognition of the need to end the debate regarding reading instruction in favor of an approach that provides a solid foundation in phonics and other underlying language skills to become expert readers. We advance this agenda by providing evidence of specific effects of instruction focused primarily on the written code or on developing knowledge. In a grade 1 program evaluation study, an inclusive and comprehensive program with a greater code-based focus called Reading for All (RfA) was compared to a knowledge-focused program involving Dialogic Reading. Phonological awareness, letter word recognition, nonsense word decoding, listening comprehension, reading comprehension, written expression and vocabulary were measured at the beginning and end of the school year, and one year after in one school only. Results revealed improvements in all measures except listening comprehension and vocabulary for the RfA program at the end of the first school year. These gains were maintained for all measures one year later with the exception of an improvement in written expression. The Dialogic Reading group was associated with a specific improvement in vocabulary in schools from lower socioeconomic contexts. Higher scores were observed for RfA than Dialogic Reading groups at the end of the first year on nonsense word decoding, phonological awareness and written expression, with the differences in the latter two remaining significant one year later. The results provide evidence of the need for interventions to support both word recognition and linguistic comprehension to better reading comprehension.

Factorial and Predictive Validity of First Graders' Scores on the Early Reading Screening Instrument

1997 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-210 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Perney ◽  
Darrell Morris ◽  
Stamey Carter
Keyword(s):  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Word Recognition ◽  
Predictive Validity ◽  
Reading Skills ◽  
First Graders ◽  
Early Reading ◽  
First Grade ◽  
Screening Instrument ◽  
Moderate Amount ◽  
School Year

The factorial and predictive validity of the Early Reading Screening Instrument was examined for 105 first grade students. Analysis indicated that the test is unidimensional and can predict first grade reading skills at the end of the school year with at least a moderate amount of accuracy. A previous study indicated predictive validity coefficients of .66 and .73 when the criteria were word recognition and reading comprehension. The current study yielded predictive validity coefficients of .67 and .70 for these criteria.

Dynamic Testing, Working Memory, and Reading Comprehension Growth in Children With Reading Disabilities

2011 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 358-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Lee Swanson
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Reading Comprehension ◽  
Reading Disabilities ◽  
Dynamic Testing ◽  
Verbal Iq ◽  
Only Children ◽  
Testing Conditions ◽  
Skilled Readers ◽  
Reading Measures ◽  
Significant Moderator

This longitudinal study assessed (a) whether performance changes in working memory (WM) as a function of dynamic testing were related to growth in reading comprehension and (b) whether WM performance among subgroups of children with reading disabilities (RD; children with RD only, children with both reading and arithmetic deficits, and low verbal IQ readers) varied as a function of dynamic testing. A battery of memory and reading measures was administered to 78 children (11.6 years) across three testing waves spaced 1 year apart. WM tasks were presented under initial and dynamic testing conditions (referred to as gain and maintenance testing). The important results were that (a) WM performance as a function of maintenance testing was a significant moderator of growth in reading comprehension and (b) WM performance of children with RD was statistically comparable within subgroups of RD but inferior to that of skilled readers across all testing conditions. The results support the notion that children’s WM performance under dynamic testing conditions was related to the rate of growth in reading comprehension but unrelated to subgroup differences in reading.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document