Appointment of American Delegates to the International Labor Organization

1935 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 870-871
Author(s):  
James A. Gathings
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Labor Organization ◽  
International Labor Organization ◽  
International Labor ◽  
The World ◽  
The Government ◽  
Joint Resolution

In 1934, Congress passed a joint resolution providing for American membership in the International Labor Organization which stated: “The President is hereby authorized to accept membership for the government of the United States in the International Labor Organization, which through its general conference of representatives of its members and through its International Labor Office, collects information concerning labor throughout the world and prepares conventions for the consideration of member governments with a view to improving conditions of labor.”

The Membership of the United States in the International Labor Organization

1934 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 669-684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manley O. Hudson
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Law ◽  
The United States ◽  
Labor Organization ◽  
International Labor Organization ◽  
Legal Questions ◽  
International Labor ◽  
The Government

Though representatives of the United States participated very actively in the drafting of the Constitution of the International Labor Organization in 1919, and though the first International Labor Conference was held in Washington under the presidency of the Secretary of Labor, the Government of the United States had no part in the work of the International Labor Organization during its first fifteen years. In consequence, the United States has hitherto held aloof from one of the most significant of the modern developments of international law. Fortunately, this situation has now been changed. On August 20,1934, the United States became the fifty-ninth member of the International Labor Organization. The steps by which this result has been achieved, and the problems growing out of it, present some interesting legal questions which ought not to escape attention.

scholarly journals The United States’ Withdrawal from the International Labor Organization

2005 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yves Beigbeder
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
The United States ◽  
Labor Organization ◽  
International Labor Organization ◽  
International Labor ◽  
The U.S

After a brief description of the I.L.O., this article summarizes the main events which led to the U.S. withdrawal, reviews precedents, then tries to explain the reasons for the U.S. withdrawal and lists its consequences.

Is the International Labor Organization Autonomous?

1935 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 866-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Steinbicker
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
International Cooperation ◽  
The United States ◽  
League Of Nations ◽  
Labor Organization ◽  
International Labor Organization ◽  
Full Membership ◽  
International Labor

When the United States last year became a member of the International Labor Organization, many people deplored the decision as being the first covert step toward full membership in the League of Nations. Those whose outlook was more sympathetic to international cooperation replied, in defense, that the Labor Organization is independent of the League, having its own buildings, its own separate organs, its own secretariat, and so on; that its membership is not identical with that of the League; and that therefore a state, by becoming a member of the Labor Organization assumed no connection whatever with the League.

The International Labor Organization of the League of Nations

1921 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 42-50
Author(s):  
Charles Noble Gregory
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Annual Meeting ◽  
The United States ◽  
League Of Nations ◽  
United States Government ◽  
Peace Treaty ◽  
International Labor Organization ◽  
International Labor ◽  
States Government ◽  
Joint Resolution

On October 29, 1919, the first annual meeting of the International Labor Conference opened at Washington, D. C. It convened pursuant to the invitation of the United States Government authorized by joint resolution of Congress in accordance with and under the provisions of the Versailles Peace Treaty and the League of Nations. The meeting was in some respects embarrassed by the fact that the League of Nations had not yet come into existence, but it nevertheless proceeded, doubtless on the theory that, in the present disjointed times, it is not inappropriate that the creature should precede the creator.

International Labor Organization

1955 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 546-551
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Soviet Union ◽  
The United States ◽  
Industrial Society ◽  
Director General ◽  
Main Theme ◽  
Labor Organization ◽  
International Labor Organization ◽  
Selection Committee ◽  
International Labor

International Labor ConferenceThe 38th session of the Conference of the International Labor Organization (ILOs) was held in Geneva from June 1 to 23, 1955, under the presidency of Mr. García Odini (Chile). The Conference had before it the annual report of the Director-General (Morse), the main theme of which was labor-management relations in the developing industrial society. After the selection committee had submitted its proposals on the composition of committees, a spokesman for the employers' delegations of Albania, Bulgaria, Byelorussia, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, the Ukraine, and the Soviet Union stated that the majority of the employers' group had discriminated against them and violated their rights as delegates by not including them in the lists of prospective members of committees which the employers' group had furnished the selection committee. On the request of the spokesman, a vote was taken on the lists in question; the lists were adopted by votes ranging from 124 to 139 in favor, 26 to 31 opposed, and 25 to 37 abstentions. It was later proposed by the selection committee that the eight employers' delegates who had not been chosen to sit on committees be given seats as deputy members. However, Mr. Chajn (government delegate, Poland) moved that the selection committee's proposals be amended so as to give the delegates seats as full members. Mr. McGrath (employers' delegate, United States) stated “…that no member of the United States Employers' delegation would sit on any committee with a so-called Employers' delegate or adviser from an Iron Curtain country.

International Labor Organization

1952 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 440-446
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
United Nations ◽  
Long Range ◽  
Full Employment ◽  
The United States ◽  
Labor Organization ◽  
International Labor Organization ◽  
Underdeveloped Countries ◽  
International Labor ◽  
Different Types

The sixth report of the International Labor Organization to the United Nations noted that, in the preparation of the 1953 program of ILO, the organization had found itself faced with the necessity of distinguishing between what was essential and what was desirable. “The criteria for this distinction have been the financial capacity of Governments to pay.’ Two general objectives toward which all ILO activities were directed were methods of increasing labor productivity and action to secure and maintain full employment. However, it was emphasized that these were long-range objectives which could not be measured in the “arbitrary time limit” of a single year. Shifts in emphasis in ILO's program were more apparent in different types of activity within these general fields rather than in the adoption of a different program. For example, the report continued, in 1950 when there appeared that a threat of recession in the United States and Europe existed, ILO placed particular emphasis on problems of full employment; since that time, ILO had placed increasing emphasis on problems of underemployment in underdeveloped countries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document