Are Cost-Plus Defense Contracts (Justifiably) Out of Favor?
2013 ◽
Vol 2
(1)
◽
pp. 1-15
◽
Keyword(s):
ABSTRACT A common tenet is that the use of cost-plus contracts contributes to cost overruns in the context of Major Defense Acquisition Programs (MDAPs). Accordingly, policy-makers express a preference for fixed-price contracts as opposed to cost-plus contracts. While fixed-price contracts may be superior in certain scenarios, such scenarios are limited in the MDAP context. We document three potential unintended negative consequences of fixed-price contracts. We argue that the notion that fixed-price contracts are better than cost-plus contracts for limiting cost overruns is misleading. JEL Classifications: G38; H57; M48.
2016 ◽
Vol 2
(1)
◽
2015 ◽
Vol 1
(1)
◽
pp. 15
2015 ◽
Vol 69
(3)
◽
pp. 519-556
◽
Keyword(s):
1998 ◽
Vol 29
(3)
◽
pp. 43-51
◽
Keyword(s):
2019 ◽
Vol 7
(2)
◽
pp. 220-232
◽