Heart Transplantation - Part I: General Considerations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M. Givertz

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem with significant associated morbidity and mortality. In 2001, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline committee proposed a new approach to the classification of HF that emphasized both the development and progression of disease.  Stage A and B patients are at high risk for developing HF, and include those without structural heart disease (Stage A) and those with structural heart disease, but without signs or symptoms of HF (Stage B).  Stage C and D patients have structural heart disease with prior or current symptoms of HF (Stage C) or refractory HF requiring specialized interventions (Stage D).  Rregistries suggest that between 5% and 10% of patients with HF have advanced disease, which is associated with 1-year mortality in excess of 50% and a poor quality of life. The Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) defines Stage D heart failure as “the presence of progressive and/or persistent severe signs and symptoms of heart failure despite optimized medical, surgical, and device therapy…generally accompanied by frequent hospitalization, severely limited exertional tolerance, and poor quality of life.”  In this two-part chapter, we focus on heart transplantation, which remains the standard-of-care for highly selected patients with end-stage HF and absence of contraindications to transplant.1-5 This review contains 7 figures, 8 tables, and 46 references. Key words: heart failure, cardiomyopathy, heart transplant, mechanical circulatory support, prognosis, pulmonary hypertension, diabetes, HLA sensitization, donor

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael M. Givertz

Heart failure (HF) is a major public health problem with significant associated morbidity and mortality. In 2001, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline committee proposed a new approach to the classification of HF that emphasized both the development and progression of disease.  Stage A and B patients are at high risk for developing HF, and include those without structural heart disease (Stage A) and those with structural heart disease, but without signs or symptoms of HF (Stage B).  Stage C and D patients have structural heart disease with prior or current symptoms of HF (Stage C) or refractory HF requiring specialized interventions (Stage D).  Rregistries suggest that between 5% and 10% of patients with HF have advanced disease, which is associated with 1-year mortality in excess of 50% and a poor quality of life. The Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA) defines Stage D heart failure as “the presence of progressive and/or persistent severe signs and symptoms of heart failure despite optimized medical, surgical, and device therapy…generally accompanied by frequent hospitalization, severely limited exertional tolerance, and poor quality of life.”  In this two-part chapter, we focus on heart transplantation, which remains the standard-of-care for highly selected patients with end-stage HF and absence of contraindications to transplant.1-5 This review contains 7 figures, 8 tables, and 46 references. Key words: heart failure, cardiomyopathy, heart transplant, mechanical circulatory support, prognosis, pulmonary hypertension, diabetes, HLA sensitization, donor


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 183-191
Author(s):  
O. T. Kotsoeva ◽  
A. V. Koltsov ◽  
V. V. Tyrenko ◽  
A. A. Ialovets

This review discusses a number of aspects of surgical methods for treating severe chronic heart failure: resynchronizing therapy, mechanical circulatory support systems, and heart transplantation. Surgical methods for the treatment of heart failure are a rapidly developing field of modern cardiology and cardiac surgery. The main surgical method of treatment was and remains orthotopic transplantation of a donor heart. The advent of implantable systems has affected the problem of heart transplantation. Over the past decade, the use of mechanical circulatory support systems has grown significantly. At the moment, there are 3 main directions: creating devices for auxiliary blood circulation, various modes and methods of electrical stimulation of the myocardium, creating devices that mechanically remodel the heart chambers (left ventricle). All of these directions to some extent (depending on the evidence base) have found their place in modern recommendations for the treatment of chronic heart failure. The use of mechanical left ventricular remodeling shows good results in patients suffering from symptomatic heart failure, which leads to a significant and persistent decrease in the volume of the left ventricle and improvement of its function, symptoms and quality of life. Despite the fact that at the moment the geography and prevalence of their use is small, the number of implanted devices will only grow. Thus, given the need for frequent hospitalizations and high treatment costs, it is necessary to improve modern methods of surgical treatment of severe and terminal heart failure, make them more accessible, which will affect the duration and quality of life of these patients.


Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen Grady

Approximately 5 million individuals have heart failure in the United States. The 1-year mortality rate for patients with New York Heart Association class IV heart failure is 50%. Treatment options for patients with refractory symptoms and stage D heart failure include heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support devices. Improved outcomes have been demonstrated in these advanced heart failure patients who undergo surgical therapies. Prolongation of life is relevant only if quality of life (QOL) is improved. Improvement in QOL outcomes has been demonstrated before and after heart transplantation, including improved outcomes when bridged to transplantation with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). While listed for transplantation, worse QOL is significantly related to more symptoms, psychological distress, and functional disability. Patients who are bridged to heart transplantation with an LVAD report significantly improved QOL and decreased symptoms from before to early after LVAD implantation, as well as fairly good and stable QOL outcomes through 1 year after implantation. At 1 year after transplantation, better QOL is significantly related to less psychological distress, functional disability, and symptom distress; older age; and fewer complications. At 5 to 10 years after heart transplantation, QOL is positive and stable. Improved QOL is significantly related to biopsychosocial variables, including less depression, more positive emotions, more social support, and less fatigue. Thus, for stage D heart failure patients, heart transplantation conveys significant short-and long-term QOL benefit, including in those patients who are bridged to transplantation with an LVAD.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa Silveira Faria ◽  
Ligia Neres Matos ◽  
Liana Amorim Correa Trotte ◽  
Helena Cramer Veiga Rey ◽  
Tereza Cristina Felippe Guimarães

ABSTRACT Objective: to verify the association between the prognostic scores and the quality of life of candidates for heart transplantation. Method: a descriptive cross-sectional study with a convenience sample of 32 outpatients applying to heart transplantation. The prognosis was rated by the Heart Failure Survival Score (HFSS) and the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM); and the quality of life by the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) and the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). The Pearson correlation test was applied. Results: the correlations found between general quality of life scores and prognostic scores were (HFSS/MLHFQ r = 0.21), (SHFM/MLHFQ r = 0.09), (HFSS/KCCQ r = -0.02), (SHFM/KCCQ r = -0.20). Conclusion: the weak correlation between the prognostic and quality of life scores suggests a lack of association between the measures, i.e., worse prognosis does not mean worse quality of life and the same statement is true in the opposite direction.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 40-57
Author(s):  
Gennadiy Hubulava ◽  
Kirill L. Kozlov ◽  
Andrey N. Bogomolov ◽  
Aleksey Volkov ◽  
Viktor N. Fedorets ◽  
...  

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a widespread disease associated with high rates of disability and mortality, as well as a decrease in the quality of life. Moreover, the vast majority of patients are elderly and senile. Modern surgical methods of treating heart failure are able to increase the duration and quality of life of such patients, however, the need far exceeds the volume of this care, and some highly effective methods common in Western countries are still not used in Russian clinical practice. Elderly age is a risk factor for the development of senile asthenia (frailty) and concomitant pathology. Large abdominal surgery is often contraindicated for patients with signs of senile asthenia, and the method of choice in patients with severe heart failure is the implantation of devices for long-term mechanical circulatory support (LT-MCS). After implantation of LT-MCS, a regression of signs of senile asthenia may be observed. The topic of an integrated approach to non-drug treatment of heart failure in elderly and senile patients in Russia has not been studied enough. In particular, the implantation of LT-MCS is not used in Russian clinical practice, while in many Western countries for many years it has been the main and most effective treatment for severe heart failure. Systematization of the available up-to-date information on this topic could help increase the duration and quality of life of patients with severe heart failure.


2004 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. S106
Author(s):  
Marie A. Krousel-Wood ◽  
Mandeep R. Mehra ◽  
Ann S. Jannu ◽  
Xiao Z. Jiang ◽  
Richard N. Re

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 558-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily M. Rosenberger ◽  
Kristen R. Fox ◽  
Andrea F. DiMartini ◽  
Mary Amanda Dew

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. HEP27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdalla Aly ◽  
Sarah Ronnebaum ◽  
Dipen Patel ◽  
Yunes Doleh ◽  
Fernando Benavente

Aim: To describe the epidemiologic, humanistic and economic burdens of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the USA. Materials & methods: Studies describing the epidemiology and economic burden from national cohorts, any economic models, or any humanistic burden studies published 2008–2018 were systematically searched. Results: HCC incidence was 9.5 per 100,000 person-years in most recent data, but was ∼100-times higher among patients with hepatitis/cirrhosis. Approximately a third of patients were diagnosed with advanced disease. Patients with HCC experienced poor quality of life. Direct costs were substantial and varied based on underlying demographics, disease stage and treatment received. Between 25–77% of patients did not receive surgical, locoregional or systemic treatment. Conclusion: Better treatments are needed to extend survival and improve quality of life for patients with HCC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document