Microleakage of IPS Empress 2 Inlay Restorations Luted With Self-adhesive Resin Cements

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 417-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Cal ◽  
EU Celik ◽  
M Turkun
Keyword(s):  
Control Group ◽  
Third Molars ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Class V ◽  
Diamond Blade ◽  
Relyx Unicem ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Ceramic Inlay

SUMMARY Objective To assess the microleakage of three self-adhesive and one etch-and-rinse resin cements when luting IPS Empress 2 (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein) all-ceramic inlay restorations to the prepared cavities in extracted human molars. Methods The cylindrical Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of 40 extracted human third molars using diamond burs. The IPS Empress 2 ceramic inlays were placed with Multilink Sprint (Ivoclar Vivadent), RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE, USA), G-Cem (GC, Japan), or Variolink II (Ivoclar Vivadent) as the control group. After storage in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, samples were subjected to 1000 thermal cycles between baths of 5°C and 55°C, with a dwell time of 30 seconds. The microleakage scores were examined on the occlusal and gingival margins at 30× magnification after each sample was stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin and sectioned into three parts using a thin diamond blade (Isomet, Buehler, USA) (n=40). The extent of microleakage on both occlusal and gingival margins of the restorations was scored and recorded. The microleakage data were analyzed using Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Results Statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in both margins according to the Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests (p<0.05). Microleakage scores on the occlusal margins were Variolink II < RelyX Unicem < G-Cem = Multilink Sprint. Microleakage scores on the gingival margins are Variolink II = RelyX Unicem < G-Cem < Multilink Sprint. Conclusion Self-adhesive resin cements displayed higher microleakage scores on the occlusal margins, whereas on the gingival margins RelyX Unicem showed comparable microleakage results with the control samples.

Microleakage of All-ceramic Crowns Using Self-etching Resin Luting Agents

2008 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 392-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. P. Trajtenberg ◽  
S. J. Caram ◽  
S. Kiat-amnuay
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Relevance ◽  
The Self ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Luting Agents ◽  
Relyx Unicem ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Ceramic Crowns ◽  
Die Spacer

Clinical Relevance Among the self-adhesive resin cements, Panavia F 2.0 demonstrated less microleakage than RelyX Unicem or Multilink, whether or not a die spacer technique was used.

scholarly journals Effect of Proteolytic Agents on Microleakage of Etch and Rinse Adhesive Systems

2017 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Shahin Kasraei ◽  
Ebrahim Yarmohammadi ◽  
Maryam Farhadian ◽  
Mona Malek
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Nd:Yag Laser ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Single Bond ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Class V ◽  
Dentin Surface ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: this study aimed to assess the effect of treatment of phosphoric acid etched dentin surface with 5% bromelain enzyme and Nd:YAG laser prior to the use of etch and rinse adhesive systems on microleakage margins of class V composite restorations. Materials and Methods: sixty sound premolar teeth were selected. Standard class V cavities were prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces of each teeth. Preparation in that way 1 mm of the cavity was above and 1 mm of it was below the cementoenamel junction. The teeth were then randomly divided into three groups including 20 teeth(40cavities  in each gorup). Two ethanol base etch and rinse system (Adper Single Bond and OptiBond Solo) was applied in each group. In the control group, cavities were etched with 37% phosphoric acid. Adper Single Bond was applied to 20 and OptiBond Solo was applied to the remaining 20 cavities and they were restored with Z250 composite (n=40). The same procedures were performed in bromelain and Nd:YAG laser groups with the difference that prior to the application of adhesive, aqueous 5% bromelain was applied in bromelain group while Nd:YAG laser was irradiated in laser group. All teeth were thermocycled and their apices were sealed with sticky wax. The tooth surfaces were coated with nail varnish except for 1 mm around the restoration margins, and the teeth were then immersed in fuchsine and sectioned by a diamond disc into mesial and distal halves. Marginal microleakage at both sides was determined and scored under a stereomicroscope at x40 magnification. Then data were analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney tests (α=0.05). Results: according the result of Mann Whitney test, Cervical margins showed significantly higher microleakage than the occlusal margins (P=0.000) but no significant difference was noted in microleakage of occlusal (P=0.362) or gingival (P=0.147) margins among the three groups by Kruskal Wallis test. Conclusion: in conclusion, application of proteolytic agents(5% bromelain solution and Nd:YAG laser)  on acid-etched dentin surface prior to the application of adhesive has no significant effect on marginal microleakage of class V composite restorations. 

Bond Strength and Interfacial Micromorphology of Etch-and-Rinse and Self-Adhesive Resin Cements to Dentin

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Rodrigues Vaz ◽  
Vinicius Di Hipólito ◽  
Paulo Henrique Perlatti D'Alpino ◽  
Mario Fernando de Goes
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Etch And Rinse

scholarly journals Bond Durability of Different Resin Cements to Caries-Affected Dentin Under Simulated Intrapulpal Pressure

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
MF Mohamed ◽  
HA El Deeb ◽  
IE Gomaa ◽  
EH Mobarak
Keyword(s):  
Failure Modes ◽  
Storage Conditions ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Dihydrogen Phosphate ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Machine Failure ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY Objective: To evaluate the durability of the bond of different resin cement systems to normal dentin (ND) and caries-affected dentin (CAD) with and without simulated intrapulpal pressure (IPP). Methods and Materials Molars with midcoronal caries were used. Occlusal enamel was cut to expose both dentin substrates (ND and CAD). Dentin substrates were differentiated using visual, tactile, caries-detecting dye, and dye-permeability methods. Prepared crown segments were equally divided according to the tested resin cement systems: etch-and-rinse resin cement, self-etch resin cement containing methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP), and self-adhesive resin cement. In addition to the dentin substrates and the resin cement types, the effect of application/storage conditions (with or without simulated IPP and with or without thermocycling) were tested. A microtensile bond strength test was done using a universal testing machine. Failure modes were determined using a scanning electron microscope. Results Etch-and-rinse resin cement strength values were significantly affected by the difference in the dentin substrates as well as the different application/storage conditions. Self-etch adhesive containing MDP bonded equally to ND and CAD and remained stable under all tested conditions. Self-adhesive resin cement revealed a similar bond to ND and CAD; however, its values were the lowest, especially when IPP and thermocycling were combined. Mixed failure was the predominant failure mode. Conclusions Etch-and-rinse resin cement was sensitive to dentin substrate and application/storage conditions. Resin cement with self-etch adhesive containing MDP revealed more reliable bonding to ND/CAD even when IPP and thermocycling were combined. The bonding of the self-adhesive resin cement could not compete with other resin cements.

scholarly journals Bond Strength of Overdenture Locator Posts Cemented with Seven Luting Agents

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 675-680
Author(s):  
Khalil Aleisa
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Human Teeth ◽  
Luting Agents ◽  
Relyx Unicem ◽  
Significant Difference

ABSTRACT Statement of the problem Post retention is crucial factor in restoration survival. Posts are commonly failed due to loss of retention. It is unknown which luting agents would provide the maximum bond strength for Locator overdenture posts. Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the bond retentive strengths of Locator overdenture posts cemented with 7 luting agents. Materials and methods One hundred and five single rooted human teeth were decoronated and randomly assigned to 7 groups (n = 15). Post spaces were prepared with Locator post drills to the depth of 6 mm. The Locator posts were cemented with Variolink II, RelyX ARC, Multilink N, RelyX Unicem, ParaCore, or MultiCore Flow resin luting agents. Zinc phosphate cement was served as control group. Specimens were stored in water at 37°C for 24 hours. Each specimen was loaded in tension in an Instron universal testing machine. The maximum force required to dislodge each Locator post was recorded. Means and standard deviations were calculated and data were statistically analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Results The highest mean bond strength value for Locator posts was recorded for MultiCore® Flow group (mean = 550.1 N), while the lowest mean value was for RelyX Unicem™ resin cement group (mean = 216.8 N). A statistically significant difference in mean locator overdenture post bond strength was observed between the 7 cement types (p < 0.0001). ParaCore™ and MultiCore® Flow groups had significantly higher bond strength than all other groups, but they were not differed from each other. Conclusion Bond strength of Locator overdenture posts were influenced by the type of luting agents. MultiCore Flow and ParaCore resin cements offered the greatest retention. Clinical significance The type of luting agents had a significant effect on the retention of Locator posts. The use of Core buildup resin cements as luting agent with Locator post demonstrated the greatest retention. How to cite this article Aleisa K. Bond Strength of Overdenture Locator Posts Cemented with Seven Luting Agents. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(4):675-680.

Effect of Different Adhesive Systems Used for Immediate Dentin Sealing on Bond Strength of a Self-Adhesive Resin Cement to Dentin

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 391-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
RC Ferreira-Filho ◽  
C Ely ◽  
RC Amaral ◽  
JA Rodrigues ◽  
J-F Roulet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Water Storage ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Adhesive Systems ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the immediate and three-month water storage behavior of adhesives when used for immediate dentin sealing (IDS). Methods and Materials: Four adhesive systems were used to perform IDS: a one-step self-etch (Xeno V), a two-step self-etch (Clearfil SE Bond), a two-step etch-and-rinse (XP Bond), and a three-step etch-and-rinse (Optibond FL). For the control group, IDS was not performed. The self-adhesive resin cement RelyX Unicem was used for the luting procedures. After seven days of water storage, specimens (n=6) were sectioned into beams (n=5) with an approximately 1-mm2 cross-sectional area. Half of the specimens were tested in tension after seven days of water storage at 37°C, while the other half was stored for three months prior to testing in tension using a universal testing machine (1 mm/min). The failure pattern was determined using a stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscopy. Microtensile bond strength (μTBS) data were statistically analyzed by two-way analysis of variance and Tukey post hoc test (α=0.05). Results: After seven days, the control group presented the lowest μTBS but did not differ from XP Bond and Clearfil SE Bond. After three months, there was no μTBS difference between the IDS groups and the control. Conclusions: After seven days of water storage, the groups with IDS presented higher μTBS values than the control group, although XP Bond and Clearfil SE Bond did not present significant differences. However, after three months of storage in water, IDS groups did not differ significantly from control group, which did not receive IDS.

The Effect of Dentin Treated with Calcium Phosphate Desensitizer on Shear Bond Strength with Different Resin Cement: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 232020682110502
Author(s):  
İdris Kavut ◽  
Mehmet Uğur
Keyword(s):  
Calcium Phosphate ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Third Molar ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Test Machine ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Self Etch

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of calcium phosphate based desensitizing agent on shear bond strength of self-etch/adhesive resin cements to dentin. Materials and Methods: Eighty dentin specimens were prepared from freshly extracted human third molar teeth and were classified, randomly ( n = 20). Half of groups were treated with calcium phosphate based Teethmate Desensitizer and then Panavia V5, RelyX Ultimate (containing self-etch primer), Panavia SA, and RelyX U200 self-adhesive resin cements were luted to all dentin surfaces. All specimens were stored in an incubator at 37°C for 24 h. Shear bond strength was tested by a universal test machine at a 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed. The data were analyzed with a statistical program. Two-way ANOVA was used for statistical differences ( P <.05). Dentin surfaces were examined with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) at x5000 and x10000 magnifications. Results: The higher shear bond values were observed in the groups with Teethmate Desensitizer applied and cemented with self-etch (16.05 ± 6.24 and 14.73 ± 4.75), whereas the lowest bonding values were observed in the groups with self-adhesive resin cement without Teethmate Desensitizer (3.73 ± 0.77 and 5.85 ± 4.19; P <.001). As the main effect of the treatment, the bond strength was 9.39 ± 6.04 in the control group, whereas it was 13.49 ± 5.44 in the Teethmate applied groups ( P <.05) Conclusions: Calcium phosphate desensitizer did not adversely effected shear bond strength of self-etch/adhesive resin cements to dentin. It even significantly increased the shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements.

Microleakage and Shear Bond Strength of Composite Restorations Under Cycling Conditions

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. E71-E80 ◽  
Author(s):  
RF Zanatta ◽  
M Lungova ◽  
AB Borges ◽  
CRG Torres ◽  
H-G Sydow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Thermal Cycling ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Strength Testing ◽  
Class V ◽  
Composite Restorations ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Self Etch

SUMMARY Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate microleakage and shear bond strength of composite restorations under different cycling conditions. Methods and Materials: Class V cavities were prepared in the buccal and lingual surfaces of 30 human molars (n=60). A further 60 molars were used to prepare flat enamel and dentin specimens (n=60 each). Cavities and specimens were divided into six groups and pretreated with an adhesive (self-etch/Clearfil SE Bond or etch-and-rinse/Optibond FL). Composite was inserted in the cavities or adhered to the specimens' surfaces, respectively, and submitted to cycling (control: no cycling; thermal cycling: 10,000 cycles, 5°C to 55°C; thermal/erosive cycling: thermal cycling plus storage in hydrochloric acid pH 2.1, 5 minutes, 6×/day, 8 days). Microleakage was quantified by stereomicroscopy in enamel and dentin margins after immersion in silver nitrate. Specimens were submitted to shear bond strength testing. Statistical analysis was done by two-way analysis of variance and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p&lt;0.05). Results: Microleakage in enamel margins was significantly lower in the control group compared with thermal cycling or thermal/erosive cycling. Erosive conditions increased microleakage compared with thermal cycling (significant only for Clearfil SE Bond). No significant differences were observed in dentin margins. Bond strength of enamel specimens was reduced by thermal cycling and thermal/erosive cycling when Clearfil SE Bond was used and only by thermal/erosive cycling when Optibond FL was used. No differences were observed among dentin specimens. Conclusions: Thermal/erosive cycling can adversely affect microleakage and shear bond strength of composite resin bonded to enamel.

Influence of Post-cure Time on the Microhardness of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements Inside the Root Canal

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 548-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Baena ◽  
MV Fuentes ◽  
MA Garrido ◽  
J Rodríguez ◽  
L Ceballos
Keyword(s):  
Root Canal ◽  
Acrylic Resin ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
The Self ◽  
Polymerization Reaction ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Relyx Unicem ◽  
Cure Time

SUMMARY Purpose To compare the microhardness of several dual-cure, self-adhesive resin cements used to lute fiber posts at 24 hours and seven days after cementation. Methods Bovine incisors were selected to lute 15 fiber posts that were 12 mm long (FRC Postec Plus size 3, Ivoclar-Vivadent). Five resin cements were tested: Multilink Automix (Ivoclar-Vivadent), without light-curing, and the self-adhesive resin cements Maxcem Elite (Kerr), RelyX Unicem (3M ESPE), G-Cem (GC), and Smartcem 2 (Dentsply), which were light-cured for 40 seconds (LED Bluephase, Ivoclar-Vivadent). Each root was embedded in chemically cured acrylic resin and stored at 37°C for 24 hours. The roots were transversally sectioned into nine specimens that were each 1 mm thick, with three specimens corresponding to each root third. Indentations (100g, 30 seconds) were performed on each section in the resin cement, at 24 hours and seven days after cementation, using a Vickers digital microdurometer (Buehler). Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance, Student-Newman-Keuls test, and paired t-test (p&lt;0.05). Results A significant influence was found (p&lt;0.05) for the resin cement evaluated, the root third, and their interactions on microhardness values at 24 hours and seven days after post cementation. RelyX Unicem and G-Cem exhibited the highest microhardness values, whereas Multilink Automix presented the lowest. All resin cements suffered a decrease in microhardness according to root canal depth, with the exception of G-Cem and Multilink Automix at 24 hours and Smartcem 2 after seven days. After seven days, the evaluated resin cements showed a significant increase in microhardness values, with the exception of Maxcem Elite and Smartcem 2 at the coronal third. Conclusions Microhardness of the self-adhesive resin cements when used to lute fiber posts was material-dependent and higher values were obtained in the coronal third, revealing their sensitivity to light irradiation. More information regarding the polymerization reaction of these cements is warranted. According to the current results, microhardness values were significantly higher one week after post luting.

scholarly journals Influence of Two Desensitizer Agents on the Microleakage of Adhesively Luted Ceramic Inlays

2011 ◽  
Vol 05 (01) ◽  
pp. 077-083
Author(s):  
Esra Uzer Celik ◽  
Nazli Kumbaraci ◽  
Ebru Cal ◽  
Turkun Murat
Keyword(s):  
Resin Cement ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Class V ◽  
Ceramic Inlays ◽  
Adhesive Luting ◽  
Luting Cement ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
And Control ◽  
Ceramic Inlay ◽  
Adhesive Cement

ABSTRACTObjectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of two different desensitizers (Hemaseal & Cide and Aqua Prep F) on the microleakage of ceramic inlay restorations luted with adhesive resin cement. Methods: Cylindrical Class V cavities were prepared on the buccal surfaces of thirty extracted human third molars. One of the desensitizers (either Hemaseal&Cide, Advantage Dental Products Inc. or Aqua-Prep F, Bisco) was applied to the cavities. Ten samples were used as controls. Ceramic inlays were fabricated using the heat-pressed glass ceramic technique (IPS Empress II). Inlay restorations were luted using adhesive cement (Variolink II, Ivoclar-Vivadent). The restorations were properly finished, stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 h and subjected to 1000 thermal cycles. The microleakage scores were examined using a stereomicroscope at the 30x magnification after each sample was stained with 0.5% basic fuchsin. The data were analyzed using Kruskall Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests (P=0.05). Results: Aqua-Prep F samples showed significantly higher microleakage scores at the enamel margins than did the Hemaseal & Cide and control groups (P<.05). Hemaseal & Cide application led to less microleakage than the other groups both at the enamel and dentin margins (P<.05). Conclusions: Hemaseal & Cide desensitizer decreased the microleakage process at the enamel and dentin margins of inlay restorations luted with adhesive luting cement, while Aqua-Prep F increased the leakage scores at the enamel margins. (Eur J Dent 2011;5:77-83)

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document