scholarly journals The Bond of Different Post Materials to a Resin Composite Cement and a Resin Composite Core Material

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. E38-E49 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Stewardson ◽  
A Shortall ◽  
P Marquis
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Chemical Interaction ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Core Material ◽  
Composite Cement ◽  
Grit Blasting ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Push Out ◽  
Resin Composite Cement

SUMMARY Purpose To investigate the bond of endodontic post materials, with and without grit blasting, to a resin composite cement and a core material using push-out bond strength tests. Materials and Methods Fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) posts containing carbon (C) or glass (A) fiber and a steel (S) post were cemented into cylinders of polymerized restorative composite without surface treatment (as controls) and after grit blasting for 8, 16, and 32 seconds. Additional steel post samples were sputter-coated with gold before cementation to prevent chemical interaction with the cement. Cylindrical composite cores were bonded to other samples. After sectioning into discs, bond strengths were determined using push-out testing. Profilometry and electron microscopy were used to assess the effect of grit blasting on surface topography. Results Mean (standard deviation) bond strength values (MPa) for untreated posts to resin cement were 8.41 (2.80) for C, 9.61(1.88) for A, and 19.90 (3.61) for S. Prolonged grit blasting increased bond strength for FRC posts but produced only a minimal increase for S. After 32 seconds, mean values were 20.65 (4.91) for C, 20.41 (2.93) for A, and 22.97 (2.87) for S. Gold-coated steel samples produced the lowest bond strength value, 7.84 (1.40). Mean bond strengths for untreated posts bonded to composite cores were 6.19 (0.95) for C, 13.22 (1.61) for A, and 8.82 (1.18) for S, and after 32 seconds of grit blasting the values were 17.30 (2.02) for C, 26.47 (3.09) for A, and 20.61 (2.67) for S. FRC materials recorded higher roughness values before and after grit blasting than S. With prolonged grit blasting, roughness increased for A and C, but not for S. Conclusions There was no evidence of significant bonding to untreated FRC posts, but significant bonding occurred between untreated steel posts and the resin cement. Increases in the roughness of FRC samples were material dependent and roughening significantly increased bond strength values (p<0.05). Surface roughening of the tested FRC posts is required for effective bonding.

scholarly journals Influence of the Resin Cement Thickness on the Push-Out Bond Strength of Glass Fiber Posts

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 592-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Regina Maria Helen-Cot Marcos ◽  
◽  
Gustavo Ross Kinder ◽  
Edson Alfredo ◽  
Tarcisio Quaranta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Distilled Water ◽  
Cement Layer ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Glass Fiber Posts ◽  
Post Space ◽  
Push Out

Abstract The objective of the present study was to evaluate the influence of resin cement thickness on the bond strength of prefabricated and customized glass fiber posts after storage in distilled water. Thirty human uniradicular roots were treated endodontically. The roots were divided into 3 groups: THIN (thin cement layer) - post space preparation with #0.5 drill and cementation of #0.5 post; THICK (thick cement layer) - post space preparation with #1 drill and cementation of #0.5 post; and CUSTOM (customized cement layer) - post space preparation with #1 drill and cementation of a customized post (#0.5 glass fiber posts customized with resin composite). All posts were luted with self-adhesive resin cement. The push-out test was carried out after storage for 24 h and 90 days in distilled water at 37 °C. The data were analyzed with three-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (a=0.05). Bond strengths were significantly higher for CUSTOM (9.37 MPa), than for THIN (7.85 MPa) and THICK (7.07 MPa), which were statistically similar. Considering the thirds, the bond strength varied in the sequence: apical (7.13 MPa) < middle (8.22 MPa) = coronal (8.94 MPa). Bond strength for 24 h storage was significantly higher (8.80 MPa) than for 90-day storage (7.40 MPa). It may be concluded that the thickness of resin cement influenced the bond strength of glass fiber posts. The customized posts presented higher bond strength. Storage in water for 90 days affected negatively the values of bond strength, especially for thick cement layers in the apical third.

scholarly journals Adhesion of Indirect MOD Resin Composite Inlays Luted With Self-adhesive and Self-etching Resin Cements

2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 474-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Inukai ◽  
T Abe ◽  
Y Ito ◽  
P Pilecki ◽  
RF Wilson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Acid Etching ◽  
Resin Cements ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Indirect Composite ◽  
Bond Strengths ◽  
Composite Inlays

SUMMARY This study investigated the effect of loading on the bond strength to dentin and microleakage of MOD indirect composite restorations bonded with self-adhesive and self-etching resin cements with or without acid etching of the proximal enamel margins. Class II MOD cavities were prepared in 48 molar teeth into dentin and divided into three groups of 16 teeth. Impressions were taken and indirect composite inlays fabricated (Estenia C & B). The enamel margins of the proximal boxes of half the specimens were phosphoric acid etched, and the inlays were cemented with one of three cements (Panavia F 2.0, SA Cement, or Rely X Unicem). After luting, eight teeth in each cement group were mechanically loaded at 2.5 cycles/s for 250,000 cycles. Unloaded teeth acted as controls. Teeth were stored in Rhodamine B solution for 24 hours, sectioned buccolingually at the proximal boxes to examine microleakage using confocal microscopy, and further sectioned for μTBS testing of the resin-dentin interface. Analysis of variance was performed to assess the effect of loading and acid etching on microleakage and bond strength. Acid etching had no effect on microleakage. No significant difference in the dentin bond strengths between the three cements existed after loading. Panavia F 2.0 exhibited a significant reduction in bond strength. With regard to microleakage at the proximal boxes, loading had no effect on dye penetration at the cavity floor. However, at the axial walls, loading had a significant deleterious effect on Panavia F 2.0. No difference in microleakage existed between the three cements at both sites before and after loading. In conclusion, the two tested self-adhesive cements exhibited similar bond strengths before and after loading to the self-etching resin cement. Loading reduced dentin bond strengths and increased microleakage at the resin-dentin interface. However, acid etching of the enamel margins had no significant effect on microleakage in the approximal regions of the bonded inlays.

The effect of ceramic primer on shear bond strength of resin composite cement to zirconia

2013 ◽  
Vol 144 (11) ◽  
pp. 1261-1271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Keul ◽  
Anja Liebermann ◽  
Malgorzata Roos ◽  
Julia Uhrenbacher ◽  
Bogna Stawarczyk
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Shear Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Composite Cement ◽  
Resin Composite Cement

Effect of Different Surface Treatments of Resin Relined Fiber Posts Cemented With Self-adhesive Resin Cement on Push-out and Microtensile Bond Strength Tests

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. E185-E195
Author(s):  
RV Machry ◽  
PE Fontana ◽  
TC Bohrer ◽  
LF Valandro ◽  
OB Kaizer
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Surface Treatment ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Air Abrasion ◽  
Microtensile Bond Strength ◽  
Adhesive Resin ◽  
Fiber Posts ◽  
Adhesive Resin Cement ◽  
Push Out

Clinical Relevance When luting relined fiber posts with self-adhesive cement, the surface treatment of the posts influences the adhesion of the fiber posts to root dentin. SUMMARY This study evaluated the effect of surface treatment and silanization of resin composite on the bond strength of relined fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement. Push-out and microtensile bond strength (MTBS) tests were performed in this study. The endodontic treatment of 80 single-rooted bovine teeth was first performed in the push- out test segment, followed by weakening the intracanal walls by diamond bur. Then, the glass fiber posts were adapted with resin composite to fill the root canals, followed by photoactivation and resin surface conditioning according to four different experimental conditions: no conditioning as control, 10% hydrofluoric acid, 35% hydrogen peroxide, or air abrasion with alumina particle (all groups were subdivided into “with silanization” or “without silanization,” thus totaling eight experimental groups). Self-adhesive resin cement was used for the post cementation. Four slices per tooth were obtained for the push-out tests. Next, 160 blocks of resin composite were first produced for the MTBS tests; their bonding surfaces were conditioned (as mentioned, ie, eight treatments), and they were cemented to each other. The 80 sets (n=10/treatment) were then cut into microbars (16/set): eight were immediately tested, while the other eight were thermocycled (12,000×) and stored (120 days) before MTBS. Failure modes and topographic analyses were performed after treatments. There was no statistically significant difference for the push-out results. In MTBS, surface treatment and silanization had a significant effect (p&lt;0.001). Aging decreased bond strength for all groups. Considering the aged groups, air abrasion promoted the highest values and silanization improved bond strength for all treatments except air abrasion. The alumina particle air abrasion of the relining resin composite promoted the highest bond strengths when luting with self-adhesive resin cement.

scholarly journals Effect of Cleaning Protocol on Bond Strength between Resin Composite Cement and Three Different CAD/CAM Materials

Materials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (18) ◽  
pp. 4150
Author(s):  
Nina Lümkemann ◽  
Lisa Marie Schönhoff ◽  
Ramona Buser ◽  
Bogna Stawarczyk
Keyword(s):  
Phosphoric Acid ◽  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Composite Cement ◽  
Fracture Patterns ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Resin Composite Cement ◽  
Cleaning Protocol

The present investigation tested the effect of the cleaning method on the tensile bond strength (TBS) between one resin composite cement (RCC) and three different computer aided design/computer aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials, namely zirconia, lithium disilicate ceramic and resin composite. Ninety specimens were prepared from each CAD/CAM material (N = 270). The specimens were pre-treated respectively, divided into five subgroups and subjected to five different cleaning protocols, namely i. 37% phosphoric acid, ii. ethanol, iii. phosphoric acid + ethanol, iv. cleaning paste, v. distilled water. After cleaning, the specimens were either conditioned using a universal primer or a universal adhesive and bonded using a dual-curing RCC. After thermo-cycling (20,000x at 5 °C/55 °C), TBS and fracture patterns were evaluated. The data was analyzed using 1- and 2-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc Scheffé and partial eta-squared (ƞP²), Kruskal–Wallis, Mann–Whitney U and Chi2 tests (p < 0.05). The CAD/CAM material showed an impact on the BS while the cleaning protocol did not affect the results. Zirconia obtained the highest BS, followed by lithium-disilicate-ceramic. Resin composite resulted in the overall lowest BS. For most fracture patterns, the cohesive type occurred. All tested cleaning protocols resulted in same BS values within one CAD/CAM material indicating that the impact of the cleaning method for the restorative material seems to play a subordinate role in obtaining durable bond strength to resin composite cement. Further, it indicates that the recommended bonding protocols are well adjusted to the respective materials and might be able to compensate the impact of not accurately performed cleaning protocols.

scholarly journals ANALYSIS OF EFFECTS OF MECHANICAL LOADS, THERMAL FLUCTUATIONS AND CHEMICAL FACTORS ON THE BOND STRENGTH OF RESIN CEMENT TO TITANIUM AND CoCrMo ALLOYS IN IMPLANT SYSTEMS – IN VITRO STUDY

2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Veselinović ◽  
Rebeka Rudolf ◽  
Aleksandra Grebenar ◽  
Aleksandra Čairović ◽  
Sanja Gnjato ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oral Cavity ◽  
Mechanical Load ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
Thermal Fluctuations ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Composite Cement ◽  
Retention Force ◽  
Group I ◽  
Resin Composite Cement

Introduction: Cements in the oral cavity are subjected to many factors affecting cement retention, the major ones being masticatory loads and thermal stress. The gold standard in cementing restorations in the contemporary implant prosthodontics are resin cements while their predisposition to the effects of oral cavity environment presents a major factor for the efficiency of dental implant treatment. Material and method: In the study, we used 40 test models made up of a combination of original components of the Nobel Biocare system (implant replica NobRplN and titanium suprastructure Easy abatement NP 0.75) and the restoration cast in CoCrMo alloy. The specimens were divided in 4 test groups with 10 specimens each. The specimens in each group were cemented with resin composite cement with or without using the metal primer. Group I – Multilink Implant, IvoclarVivadent, Liechtenstein, Group II – Multilink Implant, IvoclarVivadent, Liechtenstein + Monobond Plus, Group III G-CEM LinkAce®, Group IV - G-CEM LinkAce® + GC Metalprimer II. The specimens were stored in 100% relative humidity for 24 hours whereupon each group underwent 5 rounds of testing. The specimens were subjected to thermal and mechanical load cycling tests whose number reflected the period of simulation of the function in the oral cavity (unloaded specimens, 7 days of function, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months). The retention force was measured by the Universal testing machine. Results: The highest retention values of the resin composite cement were recorded during the initial tests, which then declined in the subsequent rounds of testing. The biggest fall was measured in the first week after the cementation, while the cross-comparison of the later rounds of testing did not show any statistically significant differences. The values of the retention force of resin composite cements 12 months after the cementation dropped by one third of the initial values. All recorded values were higher in the specimens with primer coating. Conclusion: Masticatory forces and temperature changes in the oral cavity reduced the retention values of resin cement, but its values after 12 months of function were still high and provided stability and retention of the restoration in function. The usage of metal primer had a significant effect on retention force values at all levels of testing.

scholarly journals Micro Push-Out Bond Strength of Resin Composite to Dentin in Primary Dentition Using Three Universal Adhesives with Different pH: An In Vitro Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (14) ◽  
pp. 6349
Author(s):  
Regina María Del Río Carrillo ◽  
Pedro Molinero-Mourelle ◽  
Vicente Vera ◽  
Pablo Romero Villaba ◽  
Elizabeth Casañas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Resin Composite ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Primary Dentition ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Deciduous Tooth ◽  
Universal Adhesives ◽  
Type Of Failure ◽  
Push Out

To evaluate the bond strength of different universal adhesives on deciduous tooth dentineand their relationship with the composition and potential of hydrogen (pH). Methods: An in vitromicro push-out test on 150 samples (n = 50) per group per adhesive, namely, Adhese Universal(ADH; Ivoclar Vivadent), Futurabond U (FUT; Voco GmbH) (Test), and Scotchbond Universal withpre-conditioning (SCO; 3M) (Control), to record bond strength (BS) and type of adhesive failure.Results: The results of the different adhesives (megapascals (MPa)) varied, showing no statisticalsignificance. The corresponding averages are in MPa: ADH, 13.66 2.81; FUT, 14.48 2.88; SCO,14.98 3.96. Additionally, the frequency of type of failure was as follows: mixed (60.7%), adhesive(27.3%), and cohesive (12%). Conclusions: SCO, with a pH of 2.7, showed greater resistance tofracture, while FUT, with a pH of 2.3 and no pre-conditioning, approached the same values, being aone-step adhesive. No relationship was found between failure and type of adhesive.

scholarly journals Influence of Zingiber officinale Extract on Push-Out Bond Strength of Glass-Fiber Post

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tânia Mara da Silva ◽  
Virgílio Vilas Boas Fernandes Junior ◽  
Rosemary Soares de Santana ◽  
Renata Marques de Melo Marinho ◽  
Márcia Carneiro Valera ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Glass Fiber ◽  
Zingiber Officinale ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Fiber Post ◽  
Ginger Extract ◽  
Etch And Rinse ◽  
Glass Fiber Post ◽  
Push Out

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the influence of 20% glycolic ginger extract on the bond strength of glass-fiber post cemented with etch-and-rinse or self-etching resin cement. Forty-eight bovine roots were standardized (17±0.5 mm) and randomly divided into two groups, according to irrigant used during biomechanical preparation: NaOCl: 1% sodium hypochlorite and GEN: 20% glycolic ginger extract. Root canal was prepared and randomly assigned to one of two subgroups (n=12), according to luting protocol: self-etching (RelyX U200) and etch-and-rinse (RelyX ARC). After 48 h, the roots were sectioned perpendicularly (4 in cervical third and 3 in middle third) and submitted to push-out bond strength test (50 kgf load cell, 1.0 mm/min). Failure mode was analyzed in SEM and stereomicroscopy. Data were analyzed by three-way ANOVA and Tukey tests (p<0.05). ANOVA revealed that there were no significant differences between U200 (2.01±0.17)B and ARC (1.93±0.12)B in GEN group, and at the cervical third for both irrigants, 2.69±0.16A and 2.54±0.17A, respectively. Middle third showed lower bond strength than cervical third, regardless the irrigant. Overall, the cervical third regardless the irrigant employed and the association between NaOCl and ARC, presented better adhesive performance.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Fiber Post Bonding To Root Dentin after Different Obturation Techniques and Cementation Timings: In Vitro Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
pp. 1707-1711
Author(s):  
Rami M. Atia ◽  
Nada Omar ◽  
Haidy Nabil ◽  
Yousra Aly
Keyword(s):  
Bond Strength ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Testing Machine ◽  
In Vitro Study ◽  
Resin Cement ◽  
Vitro Study ◽  
Endodontically Treated Teeth ◽  
Root Dentin ◽  
Push Out

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the effect of obturation technique and cementation timings on the bonding of fibre-reinforced posts to the root canal walls. METHODS: Twenty extracted teeth were randomly allocated to two groups according to the obturation technique and cementation timing. Central incisors with single canals were used after being decoronated. Every extracted tooth of the {vertical compaction group} (VC) group (n = 10) had been obturated using the {E & Q plus obturation system} with posts cemented in the same day; The other (CO) conventional group (n = 10) teeth were obturated using the conventional lateral compaction technique and posts cemented after one week. “SF“ Fiber posts were used after bonding and cementation using Rely X ARC resin cement with all the endodontically treated teeth. The push-out test was performed in a universal testing machine. Data were analysed by 2 way analysis of variance with Statistical significance was set to 0.05. RESULTS: Heat softened gutta percha group showed more push out the bond strength of the bonded posts than the conventional obturation group (p < 0.05). In the middle region, there was no statistical significance between the two groups while there was significance in the coronal and apical thirds. CONCLUSION: The vertical compaction technique and early cementation improved the bond strength of the resin posts in comparison to the conventional obturation technique with late cementation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document