Benefits of not smoking during pregnancy for non-Aboriginal women and their babies in New South Wales, Australia: a record linkage study

BackgroundSmoking rates among pregnant women in New South Wales (NSW) have plateaued at 8-9%. To inform relevant smoking reduction efforts, we aimed to quantify the benefits of not smoking during pregnancy for non-Aboriginal NSW mothers and their babies. The benefits of not smoking during pregnancy for NSW Aboriginal mothers have previously been described. These data are important inputs in modelling health and economic impacts of smoking cessation interventions. MethodsThis population-based cohort study used linked-data from routinely collected data sets. Not smoking during pregnancy was the exposure of interest among all NSW non-Aboriginal women who became mothers of singleton babies in 2012-2016. Unadjusted and adjusted relative risks (aRR) were used to examine associations between not smoking during pregnancy and adverse outcomes including severe morbidity, inter-hospital transfer, perinatal death, preterm birth and small-for-gestational age. Population attributable fractions (PAFs) were calculated to quantify adverse perinatal outcomes avoided in the population if all mothers were non-smokers. ResultsCompared with babies born to mothers who smoked during pregnancy, babies born to non-smoking mothers had a lower risk of all adverse perinatal outcomes including perinatal death (aRR}=0.68, 95%CI 0.61-0.76), preterm birth (aRR=0.58, 95%CI 0.56-0.61) and small-for-gestational age (aRR=0.48, 95%CI 0.47-0.50). PAFs(%) were 3.9% for perinatal death, 5.6% for preterm birth and 7.3% for small-for-gestational-age. Compared with women who smoked during pregnancy (n=36,518), those who did not smoke (n=413,072) had a lower risk of suffering severe maternal morbidity (aRR=0.87, 95%CI 0.81-0.93) and being transferred to another hospital (aRR=0.92, 95%CI 0.86-0.99). ConclusionsMothers who reported not smoking during pregnancy had a small reduction in their risk of morbidity and of being transferred to another hospital whilst their babies had substantially reduced risks of all adverse perinatal outcomes. Results have implications for clinician training, clinical care standards, and performance management.

Download Full-text

Benefits of not smoking during pregnancy for Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and their babies: a retrospective cohort study using linked data

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032763 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (11) ◽

pp. e032763 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Carol McInerney ◽

Ibinabo Ibiebele ◽

Jane B Ford ◽

Deborah Randall ◽

Jonathan M Morris ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Preterm Birth ◽

Gestational Age ◽

Small For Gestational Age ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Perinatal Death ◽

Perinatal Outcomes ◽

Smoking During Pregnancy ◽

Relative Risks ◽

South Wales ◽

Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

ObjectivesTo provide evidence for targeted smoking cessation policy, the aim of this study was to compare pregnancy outcomes of Aboriginal mothers who reported not smoking during pregnancy with Aboriginal mothers who reported smoking during pregnancy.DesignPopulation based retrospective cohort study using linked data.SettingNew South Wales, the most populous Australian state.Population18 154 singleton babies born to 13 477 Aboriginal mothers between 2010 and 2014 were identified from routinely collected New South Wales datasets. Aboriginality was determined from birth records and from four linked datasets through an Enhanced Reporting of Aboriginality algorithm.ExposureNot smoking at any time during pregnancy.Main outcome measuresUnadjusted and adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95% CIs from modified Poisson regression were used to examine associations between not smoking during pregnancy and maternal and perinatal outcomes including severe morbidity, inter-hospital transfer, perinatal death, preterm birth and small-for-gestational age. Population attributable fractions (PAFs) were calculated using adjusted relative risks.ResultsCompared with babies born to mothers who smoked during pregnancy, babies born to non-smoking mothers had a lower risk of all adverse perinatal outcomes including perinatal death (aRR=0.58, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.76), preterm birth (aRR=0.58, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.64) and small-for-gestational age (aRR=0.35, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.39). PAFs (%) were 27% for perinatal death, 26% for preterm birth and 48% for small-for-gestational-age. Compared with women who smoked during pregnancy (n=8919), those who did not smoke (n=9235) had a lower risk of being transferred to another hospital (aRR=0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.89).ConclusionsBabies born to women who did not smoke during pregnancy had a lower risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Rates of adverse outcomes among Aboriginal non-smokers were similar to those among the general population. These results quantify the proportion of adverse perinatal outcomes due to smoking and highlight why effective smoking cessation programme are urgently required for this population.

Download Full-text

631Benefits of not smoking during pregnancy for Aboriginal women and their babies

International Journal of Epidemiology ◽

10.1093/ije/dyab168.664 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 50 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Siranda Torvaldsen ◽

Ibinabo Ibiebele ◽

Jane Ford ◽

Deborah Randall ◽

Jonathan Morris ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Preterm Birth ◽

Gestational Age ◽

Small For Gestational Age ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Perinatal Death ◽

Perinatal Outcomes ◽

Smoking During Pregnancy ◽

Relative Risks ◽

Aboriginal Women ◽

Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

Abstract Background To provide evidence for targeted smoking cessation policy, the aim of this study was to compare pregnancy outcomes of Aboriginal mothers who reported not smoking during pregnancy with those who reported smoking. Methods This population-based retrospective cohort study used linked data from routinely collected datasets. Not smoking during pregnancy was the exposure of interest among all New South Wales Aboriginal women who became mothers of singleton babies in 2010–2014. Unadjusted and adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95%CIs from modified Poisson regression were used to examine associations between not smoking during pregnancy and maternal and perinatal outcomes including severe morbidity, inter-hospital transfer, perinatal death, preterm birth and small-for-gestational age. Population attributable fractions (PAFs) were calculated using adjusted relative risks. Results Compared with babies born to mothers who smoked during pregnancy, babies born to non-smoking mothers had a lower risk of all adverse perinatal outcomes including perinatal death (aRR=0.58, 95%CI 0.44–0.76), preterm birth (aRR=0.58, 95%CI 0.53–0.64) and small-for-gestational age (aRR=0.35, 95%CI 0.32–0.39). PAFs(%) were 27% for perinatal death, 26% for preterm birth and 48% for small-for-gestational-age. Compared with women who smoked during pregnancy (n = 8,919), those who did not smoke (n = 9,235) had a lower risk of being transferred to another hospital (aRR=0.76, 95%CI 0.66–0.89). Conclusions Babies born to women who did not smoke had much lower risks of all adverse perinatal outcomes. Key messages Between a quarter and a half of adverse perinatal outcomes in this population could potentially be prevented by an effective smoking cessation program.

Download Full-text

Perinatal Outcomes of Small for Gestational Age in Twin Pregnancies: Twin vs. Singleton Charts

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm10040643 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (4) ◽

pp. 643

Author(s):

Veronica Giorgione ◽

Corey Briffa ◽

Carolina Di Fabrizio ◽

Rohan Bhate ◽

Asma Khalil

Keyword(s):

Birth Weight ◽

Preterm Birth ◽

Gestational Age ◽

Small For Gestational Age ◽

Perinatal Death ◽

Perinatal Outcomes ◽

Adverse Outcomes ◽

Chi Square ◽

Increased Risk ◽

Twin Pregnancies

Twin pregnancies are commonly assessed using singleton growth and birth weight reference charts. This practice has led to a significant number of twins labelled as small for gestational age (SGA), causing unnecessary interventions and increased risk of iatrogenic preterm birth. However, the use of twin-specific charts remains controversial. This study aims to assess whether twin-specific estimated fetal weight (EFW) and birth weight (BW) charts are more predictive of adverse outcomes compared to singleton charts. Centiles of EFW and BW were calculated using previously published singleton and twin charts. Categorical data were compared using Chi-square or McNemar tests. The study included 1740 twin pregnancies, with the following perinatal adverse outcomes recorded: perinatal death, preterm birth <34 weeks, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) and admissions to the neonatal unit (NNU). Twin-specific charts identified prenatally and postnatally a smaller proportion of infants as SGA compared to singleton charts. However, twin charts showed a higher percentage of adverse neonatal outcomes in SGA infants than singleton charts. For example, perinatal death (SGA 7.2% vs. appropriate for gestational age (AGA) 2%, p < 0.0001), preterm birth <34 weeks (SGA 42.1% vs. AGA 16.4%, p < 0.0001), HDP (SGA 21.2% vs. AGA 13.5%, p = 0.015) and NNU admissions (SGA 69% vs. AGA 24%, p < 0.0001), when compared to singleton charts (perinatal death: SGA 2% vs. AGA 1%, p = 0.029), preterm birth <34 weeks: (SGA 20.6% vs. AGA 17.4%, p = 0.020), NNU admission: (SGA 34.5% vs. AGA 23.9%, p < 0.000). There was no significant association between HDP and SGA using the singleton charts (p = 0.696). In SGA infants, according to the twin charts, the incidence of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler was significantly more common than in SGA using the singleton chart (27.0% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, singleton charts misclassify a large number of twins as at risk of fetal growth restriction. The evidence suggests that the following twin-specific charts could reduce unnecessary medical interventions prenatally and postnatally.

Download Full-text

Adverse Perinatal Outcomes Predicted by Prenatal Maternal Stress Among U.S. Women at the COVID-19 Pandemic Onset

Annals of Behavioral Medicine ◽

10.1093/abm/kaab005 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Heidi Preis ◽

Brittain Mahaffey ◽

Susmita Pati ◽

Cassandra Heiselman ◽

Marci Lobel

Keyword(s):

Preterm Birth ◽

Pregnant Women ◽

Gestational Age ◽

Small For Gestational Age ◽

Maternal Stress ◽

High Stress ◽

Perinatal Outcomes ◽

Well Being ◽

Prenatal Maternal Stress ◽

Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

Abstract Background High stress prenatally contributes to poor maternal and infant well-being. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has created substantial stress for pregnant women. Purpose To understand whether stress experienced by women pregnant at the beginning of the pandemic was associated with a greater prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes. Methods Pregnant women across the USA aged ≥18 years old enrolled in a prospective cohort study during the pandemic onset (T1) in April–May 2020. This report focuses on the 1,367 participants who gave birth prior to July–August 2020 (T2). Hierarchical logistic regression models predicted preterm birth, small for gestational age infants, and unplanned operative delivery from T1 stress, sociodemographic, and medical factors. Results After controlling for sociodemographic and medical factors, preterm birth was predicted by high prenatal maternal stress, delivering an infant small for gestational age was predicted by interpersonal violence and by stress related to being unprepared for birth due to the pandemic, and unplanned cesarean or operative vaginal delivery was predicted by prenatal appointment alterations, experiencing a major stressful life event, and by stress related to being unprepared for birth due to the pandemic. Independent of these associations, African American women were more likely than other groups to deliver preterm. Conclusion Pregnant women who are experiencing high stress during the COVID-19 pandemic are at risk of poorer perinatal outcomes. A longitudinal investigation is critical to determine whether prenatal maternal stress and resulting outcomes have longer-term consequences for the health and well-being of children born in the midst of the current pandemic.

Download Full-text

Comparison of adverse perinatal outcomes between Asians and Caucasians: a population-based retrospective cohort study in Ontario

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth ◽

10.1186/s12884-020-03467-w ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Na Zeng ◽

Erica Erwin ◽

Wendy Wen ◽

Daniel J. Corsi ◽

Shi Wu Wen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Cohort Study ◽

Birth Weight ◽

Preterm Birth ◽

Cesarean Section ◽

Gestational Age ◽

Retrospective Cohort Study ◽

Retrospective Cohort ◽

Perinatal Outcomes ◽

Population Based ◽

Adverse Perinatal Outcomes

Abstract Background Racial disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes have been studied in other countries, but little has been done for the Canadian population. In this study, we sought to examine the disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes between Asians and Caucasians in Ontario, Canada. Methods We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study that included all Asian and Caucasian women who attended a prenatal screening and resulted in a singleton birth in an Ontario hospital (April 1st, 2015-March 31st, 2017). Generalized estimating equation models were used to estimate the independent adjusted relative risks and adjusted risk difference of adverse perinatal outcomes for Asians compared with Caucasians. Results Among 237,293 eligible women, 31% were Asian and 69% were Caucasian. Asians were at an increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus, placental previa, early preterm birth (< 32 weeks), preterm birth, emergency cesarean section, 3rd and 4th degree perineal tears, low birth weight (< 2500 g, < 1500 g), small-for-gestational-age (<10th percentile, <3rd percentile), neonatal intensive care unit admission, and hyperbilirubinemia requiring treatment, but had lower risks of preeclampsia, macrosomia (birth weight > 4000 g), large-for-gestational-age neonates, 5-min Apgar score < 7, and arterial cord pH ≤7.1, as compared with Caucasians. No difference in risk of elective cesarean section was observed between Asians and Caucasians. Conclusion There are significant differences in several adverse perinatal outcomes between Asians and Caucasians. These differences should be taken into consideration for clinical practices due to the large Asian population in Canada.

Download Full-text