The identification method research for the helicopter flight based on decision-tree-based support vector machine with the parameter optimization

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haiying Qi ◽  
Luyu Zhang ◽  
Shoutao Li ◽  
Yabin Fu
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Parameter Optimization ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Identification Method ◽  
Helicopter Flight

KLASIFIKASI SMS SPAM MENGGUNAKAN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-280
Author(s):  
Agus Setiyono ◽  
Hilman F Pardede
Keyword(s):  
Data Mining ◽  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Naive Bayes ◽  
Naïve Bayes ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Spam Detection ◽  
Support Vector Machine Algorithm ◽  
Data Mining Techniques ◽  
To Receive

It is now common for a cellphone to receive spam messages. Great number of received messages making it difficult for human to classify those messages to Spam or no Spam.  One way to overcome this problem is to use Data Mining for automatic classifications. In this paper, we investigate various data mining techniques, named Support Vector Machine, Multinomial Naïve Bayes and Decision Tree for automatic spam detection. Our experimental results show that Support Vector Machine algorithm is the best algorithm over three evaluated algorithms. Support Vector Machine achieves 98.33%, while Multinomial Naïve Bayes achieves 98.13% and Decision Tree is at 97.10 % accuracy.

An Accurate Packer Identification Method Using Support Vector Machine

2014 ◽  
Vol E97.A (1) ◽  
pp. 253-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryoichi ISAWA ◽  
Tao BAN ◽  
Shanqing GUO ◽  
Daisuke INOUE ◽  
Koji NAKAO
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Identification Method

scholarly journals Analysis of Decision Tree and Smooth Support Vector Machine Methods on Data Mining

2019 ◽  
Vol 1255 ◽  
pp. 012067
Author(s):  
Natalina Br Sitepu ◽  
Sawaluddin ◽  
M Zarlis ◽  
Syahril Efendi ◽  
Hanna Willa Dhany
Keyword(s):  
Data Mining ◽  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Smooth Support Vector Machine

scholarly journals Tinjauan Algoritma RoI (Region of Interest) Dengan Metode Pengambangan Otsu Dan Klasterisasi K-Mean; Hasil Dan Tantangannya

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Didit Widiyanto
Keyword(s):  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Naive Bayes ◽  
Region Of Interest ◽  
Naïve Bayes ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Gray Level

Akurasi sebuah klasifikasi citra ditentukan oleh pengklasifikasi.  Meskipun RoI (Region of Interest) tidak menentukan secara langsung akurasi, namun RoI menentukan lingkup klasifikasi citra.   Terdapat tiga algoritma yang dapat digunakan sebagai algoritma RoI yaitu; Balanced Histogram Thresholding (BHT), algoritma Otsu, dan algoritma klasterisasi K-Means.  Paper ini meninjau algoritma Otsu dan algoritma klasterisasi K-Means yang digunakan oleh lima peneliti.  Dari ke lima peneliti; tiga peneliti menerapkan algoritma Otsu dan dua peneliti menerapkan algoritma K-Means sebagai algoritma RoI. Setelah operasi RoI, ke lima peneliti menerapkan algoritma GLCM (Gray Level Co-occurance Matrix) sebagai pengekstraksi ciri tekstur.  Hasil ekstraksi ciri diklasifikasi dengan menggunakan berbagai pengklasifikasi antara lain SVM (Support Vector Machine), Naive Bayes, dan Decision Tree. Akhirnya dengan membandingkan hasil dari ke lima peneliti, akurasi tertinggi diperoleh sebesar 100% dengan pengklasifikasi SVM menggunakan algoritma Otsu sebagai algoritma RoI, dan akurasi terendah adalah sebesar52% yang menggunakan algoritma Otsu pada kanal S dari citra HSV (Hue, Saturation Value).

Logic Learning Machine and standard supervised methods for Hodgkin’s lymphoma prognosis using gene expression data and clinical variables

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Parodi ◽  
Chiara Manneschi ◽  
Damiano Verda ◽  
Enrico Ferrari ◽  
Marco Muselli
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Machine Learning ◽  
Support Vector Machine ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Clinical Variables ◽  
Learning Machine

This study evaluates the performance of a set of machine learning techniques in predicting the prognosis of Hodgkin’s lymphoma using clinical factors and gene expression data. Analysed samples from 130 Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients included a small set of clinical variables and more than 54,000 gene features. Machine learning classifiers included three black-box algorithms ( k-nearest neighbour, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine) and two methods based on intelligible rules (Decision Tree and the innovative Logic Learning Machine method). Support Vector Machine clearly outperformed any of the other methods. Among the two rule-based algorithms, Logic Learning Machine performed better and identified a set of simple intelligible rules based on a combination of clinical variables and gene expressions. Decision Tree identified a non-coding gene ( XIST) involved in the early phases of X chromosome inactivation that was overexpressed in females and in non-relapsed patients. XIST expression might be responsible for the better prognosis of female Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document